Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Peer Review

Peer Reviewed

Case Report

Ulcerating Stasis Dermatitis of the Forearm Associated With Arteriovenous Graft and Central Vein Stenosis

August 2022
1044-7946
Wounds. 2022;34(8):e63–e65. doi:10.25270/wnds/20115

Abstract

Introduction. Stasis dermatitis is a pathologic condition of the skin that most commonly occurs in the lower limb, where it is caused by chronic venous insufficiency. Stasis dermatitis of the upper limb is rare. Case Report. A 45-year-old male, resident in Angola, presented to the emergency department with an ulcer encompassing the entire left forearm. Past medical history comprised arterial hypertension and end stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis. Dialysis access consisted of a left brachial-basilic AV graft obtained 4 years before. The patient also reported that a right internal jugular vein catheter was used previously during the maturation of the left brachial-basilic AV graft. Stenosis of the left brachiocephalic vein was documented at angiography. Angioplasty was performed, with complete resolution of the wound 2 months after admission. Conclusion. The differential diagnosis of extensive ulcer of the forearm must include neoplasms, cellulitis, and/or deep tissue infection with secondary ulceration, but it is also important to maintain suspicion for venous stasis syndrome as a rare but possible cause of these lesions.

Abbreviations

AV, arteriovenous; AVF, arteriovenous fistula; CVC, central venous catheter; CVS, central vein stenosis; SVC, superior vena cava.

Introduction

Stasis dermatitis is a pathologic condition of the skin that most commonly occurs in the lower limb, where it is caused by chronic venous insufficiency. Stasis dermatitis of the upper limb is rare. Clinical manifestations usually include finger and hand edema and limited mobility. Venous gangrene may be observed in advanced stages of stasis dermatitis.1–5 A case of severe ulceration of the forearm in a patient with AV graft and CVS is reported herein.

Case Report

A 45-year-old African male, resident in Angola, presented to the emergency department with an ulcer encompassing the entire left forearm (Figure 1A, 1B). The patient indicated that the ulcer appeared 7 months before. It began with a small spontaneous wound on the dorsal aspect of the left forearm that progressively increased in dimensions. Past medical history comprised arterial hypertension and chronic kidney disease, including an 8-year history of hemodialysis treatment. The patient had previously undergone treatment in a low-income country and did not present with a detailed medical history. Vascular access consisted of a left brachial-basilic AV graft constructed 4 years previously. The patient also indicated prior treatment with a right jugular internal vein catheter during maturation of the access. At Doppler ultrasound, biphasic fluxes in the radial and cubital artery were identified, with no subcutaneous abscess near the AV graft. Empiric antibiotic therapy with vancomycin and gentamicin was initiated owing to the extensive soft tissue ulceration, followed by colistin and piperacillin/tazobactam after swab culture identification of Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Central vein stenosis was suspected, and stenosis of the left brachiocephalic vein was documented at angiography. Angioplasty was performed to resolve the stenosis.

Figure 1

One month after hospital admission, ligation of the fistula and wound debridement were performed. Two weeks later, the patient underwent split-thickness skin grafting to achieve soft tissue coverage (Figure 2). The patient was discharged from the hospital 2 months after admission with good healing of the wound (Figure 3A, 3B).

Figure 2

Figure 3

Discussion

Stasis dermatitis is a manifestation of venous stasis syndrome, a skin condition that progresses from edema to ulcer development owing to venous insufficiency. The pathophysiology of stasis dermatitis in patients with an AV graft receiving hemodialysis is thought to be related to venous hypertension caused by the fistula, which eventually results in varix-like venous dilatation. Arteriovenous graft can also induce intimal thickening and turbulent flow, which sometimes cause venous thrombosis and/or stenosis distal to the fistula, most commonly at the axillary or subclavian vein. If the obstruction is located at the brachiocephalic trunk, CVS may occur. Central vein stenosis (referring to the major intrathoracic veins, including the subclavian vein, the innominate vein, and the SVC in the upper trunk and iliac veins as well as the inferior vena cava in the lower trunk) is a common complication of the CVC placement.6 It is often asymptomatic in patients who are not on dialysis, but it can result in edema of the ipsilateral extremity when challenged by increased flow from an AVF or AV graft.7 Historically, more than 90% of cases of SVC syndrome were associated with malignancy.8 Currently, however, approximately 40% of instances of SVC syndrome occur secondary to a benign etiology, with 71% of these attributed to intravascular devices.9 The most frequent signs and symptoms of SVC syndrome are swelling of the face or neck (82%) and swelling of the upper extremity (68%); an ulcer of the hand or forearm is not commonly reported.9 There is some consistent evidence linking artificial AVF with circulatory insufficiency, gangrene, thrombosis, and venous hypertension in patients receiving hemodialysis. The authors found 11 published reports associating the etiology of an upper limb ulcer with AV access, with Haimov et al reporting 4 cases.2,4,5,10–14 Only 1 study reported a forearm ulcer.2

The current case is of an atypical severe presentation of stasis dermatitis complicated by wound infection. Empiric antibiotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam plus vancomycin is a proposed treatment to be initiated in patients who present with severe soft tissue infection.15 Stasis dermatitis may be caused by venous hypertension resulting from the AV graft and CVS, whereas steal syndrome (ie, hemodialysis access-related hand ischemia) may contribute to hemodynamic imbalance. In this case, there was a strong temporal correlation between angioplasty of the central stenosis, ligation of the AVF, and dramatic improvement of the ulcer, which was completely healed 2 months after hospital admission. This case report is the second description of a forearm ulcer as a possible complication of an AV access and, to the authors’ knowledge, is the most severe case reported in the literature to date. The differential diagnosis of extensive ulcer of the forearm must include neoplasms, cellulitis, and/or deep tissue infection with secondary ulceration, but it is also important to maintain suspicion for venous stasis syndrome as a rare but possible cause of these lesions. Differential diagnosis in such cases also requires a thorough clinical history, collection of microbiologic and pathologic samples for analysis, and performance of imaging tests such as computed tomography and Doppler ultrasound evaluation.

Limitations

The patient could not provide a detailed past medical history, which contributed to a delay in the diagnosis and adequate treatment.

Conclusions

Stasis dermatitis remains a rare etiology for an ulcer on the upper limb; however, providers should still consider stasis dermatitis during the differential diagnosis of the ulcer, especially for those with risk factors for CVS--as it is with the placement of CVC.

Acknowledgments

Authors: Diogo Andrade Guimarães, MD1; Luís Mata Ribeiro, MD1; Rui Barata, MD2; Maria Manuel Mendes, MD1; Marco Mendes, MD2;
and Maria Manuel Mouzinho, MD1

Affiliations: 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal; 2Department of Nephrology, Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.

ORCID: Luís Mata Ribeiro, 0000-0002-4714-8737; Diogo Andrade Guimarães, 0000-0003-2186-9816

Disclosure: The authors disclose no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Correspondence: Diogo Andrade Guimarães, MD, Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Lisboa Central, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rua José António Serrano, Lisbon, Lisbon 1169-050 Portugal; diogoandradeguimaraes@gmail.com

How Do I Cite This?

Guimarães DA, Ribeiro LM, Barata R, Manuel Mendes M, Mendes M, Manuel Mouzinho M. Ulcerating stasis dermatitis of the forearm associated with arteriovenous graft and central vein stenosis. Wounds. 2022;34(8):e63–e65. doi:10.25270/wnds/20115

References

1. Bilen N, Apaydin R, Harova G, Anadolu RY, Doğan N, Paksoy N. Stasis dermatitis of the hand associated with an iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1998;23(5):208-210. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2230.1998.00372.x

2. Davis RP, Lipsig LJ, Connolly MM, Flinn WR. Varicose ulcer of the upper extremity. Surgery. 1985;98(3):616-618.

3. Kootstra G, Slooff MJ, Meijer S, Tegzess AM. Venous hypertension of the hand caused by subcutaneous arteriovenous fistulae established for hemodialysis. Arch Chir Neerl. 1979;31(1):43-47.

4. Haimov M, Baez A, Neff M, Slifkin R. Complications of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Arch Surg. 1975;110(6):708-712.

5. Boulenger-Vazel A, Viseux V, Schoenlaub P, Auffret M, Staroz F, Plantin P. Venous ulcer on the hand due to a treatment-related arteriovenous fistula. Article in French. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2005;132(11 Pt 1):887-890. doi:10.1016/S0151-9638(05)79508-9

6. Madan AK, Allmon JC, Harding M, Cheng SS, Slakey DP. Dialysis access-induced superior vena cava syndrome. Am Surg. 2002;68(10):904-906.

7. Mehta HJ. Central venous stenosis: What should a nephrologist know? Indian J Nephrol. 2017;27(6):427-429. doi:10.4103/0971-4065.202825

8. Chen JC, Bongard F, Klein SR. A contemporary perspective on superior vena cava syndrome. Am J Surg. 1990;160(2):207-211. doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80308-3

9. Rice TW, Rodriguez RM, Light RW. The superior vena cava syndrome: clinical characteristics and evolving etiology. Medicine (Baltimore). 2006;85(1):37-42. doi:10.1097/01.md.0000198474.99876.f0

10. Wood ML, Reilly GD, Smith GT. Ulceration of the hand secondary to a radial arteriovenous fistula: a model for varicose ulceration. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983;287(6400):1167-1168. doi:10.1136/bmj.287.6400.1167

11. Deguchi E, Imafuku S, Nakayama J. Ulcerating stasis dermatitis of the forearm due to arteriovenous fistula: a case report and review of the published work. J Dermatol. 2010;37(6):550-553. doi:10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.00857.x

12. Rahnama-Moghadam S, Motazedi T, Krejci-Manwaring J. Hemodialysis patient with finger ulcerations. J Fam Pract. 2017;66(2):107-110.

13. Pülzl P, Gschnitzer C, Tzankov A, Waldenberger P, Piza-Katzer H. Congenital arterio-venous malformations of the hand (type C): the only therapeutic option [German]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2002;34(6):403-409. doi:10.1055/s-2002-37470

14. Debus ES, Sailer M, Voit R, Franke S. “Hot ulcer” of the hand caused by retrograde flow of arterialized blood from an arteriovenous fistula: a case report. Vasc Surg. 1998;32(5):507-511. doi:10.1177/153857449803200519

15. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, et al. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: 2014 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(2):e10-e52. [Published correction appears in Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(9):1448.] doi:10.1093/cid/ciu444

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement