Was the Cytologic Method for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis discovered by Serendipity or by Design (hypothesis-based Research)? A Historical Review emphasizing the Contribution of Aurel A. Babeş and Constantin Daniel to Cervical Cancer Cytodiagnosis

Stefan E. Pambuccian

doi:10.25162/sar-2023-0004

54086 Search results

Clear filter Show 54086 results

Article Authentication required

Subscibe in publisher´s online store Share via email

Was the Cytologic Method for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis discovered by Serendipity or by Design (hypothesis-based Research)?

A Historical Review emphasizing the Contribution of Aurel A. Babeş and Constantin Daniel to Cervical Cancer Cytodiagnosis

Pambuccian, Stefan E.

From the journal Sudhoff Sudhoffs Archiv, Volume 107, December 2023, issue 1

Published by Franz Steiner Verlag

article, 13170 Words
Original language: English
Sudhoff 2023, pp 55-83
https://doi.org/10.25162/sar-2023-0004

Abstract Related content References

Abstract

This is a survey of the early publications by Aurel Babeş (alone or together with Constantin Daniel) and by George Papanicolaou on the cytologic method for cervical cancer diagnosis, against the background of the 19th and early 20th century history of the tension between histopathology and cytopathology aims to add a new dimension to a priority dispute.

Author information

Stefan E. Pambuccian

Keywords

References

1. Alonso de Ruiz / Ruiz Moreno (2014): Patricia Alonso de Ruiz, José A. Ruiz Moreno, Papanicolaou y la serendipia. Revista de enfermedades del tracto genital inferior 8 (2014), pp. 21-29.
2. Amann (1897): Josef Albert Amann, Kurzgefasstes Lehrbuch der mikroskopisch-gynäkologischen Diagnostik, Wiesbaden 1897.
3. Anonymous (1973): George Nicholas Papanicolaou (1883-1962). CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 23 (1973), 3, pp. 171-173.
4. Ayre (1947): James Ernest Ayre, Selective cytology smear for diagnosis of cancer, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 53 (1947), pp. 609-617. DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(47)90278-0
5. Ayre (1949): James Ernest Ayre, The vaginal smear. Precancer cell studies using a modified technique, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 58 (1949), pp. 1205-1219.
6. Ayre (1951): James Ernest Ayre, Cancer cytology of the uterus, New York 1951.
7. Babeş (1928): Aurel A. Babeş, Diagnostic du cancer du col utérin par les frottis, La Presse Médicale 29 (1928), pp. 451-454.
8. Babeş (1931): Aurel A. Babeş, A. Sur le cancer superficiel du col utérin, Gynécologie et Obstétrique 23 (1931), pp. 417-433.
9. Babeş (1963): Lucia M. Babeş, Les premieres communications de Daniel et Babeş, en 1927, sur le diagnostic du cancer du col utérin par les frottis. (Méthode roumaine), Gynécologie pratique 14 (1963), pp. 267-269.
10. Babeş (1967): Aurel A. Babeş, Diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix by smears, Acta Cytologica 11 (1967), pp. 217-224.
11. Bamforth / Osborn (1958): Joseph Bamforth, G. R. Osborn, Diagnosis from cells, Journal of Clinical Pathology 11 (1958), pp. 473-482. DOI 10.1136/jcp.11.6.473
12. Bavelas (1987): Janet B. Bavelas, The social psychology of citations, Canadian Psychological Review 19 (1987), pp. 158-163. DOI 10.1037/h0081472
13. Bland-Sutton (1922): John Bland-Sutton, Tumors, innocent and malignant. Their clinical characters and appropriate treatment, 7th ed., London 1922. DOI 10.1097/00000441-192207000-00019
14. Becker (1979): Volker Becker, Carl Ruge: 100 Jahre Stückchen-Diagnose, Archives of Gynecology 227 (1979), pp. 193-204. DOI 10.1007/bf02109621
15. Bennett (1849): John Hughes Bennett, On cancerous and cancroid growths, Edinburgh/London 1849.
16. Beale (1878): Lionel S. Beale, The Microscope in medicine, London 1878.
17. Besnier (1879): Ernest H. Besnier, Études nouvelles de dermatologie. Sur un cas de dégénérescence colloide du derme, affection non décrite, non dénomée, Gazette Hebdomadaire de Medecine et Chirurgie 26 (1879), pp. 645-650.
18. Bourg / Gompel / Pundel (1954): Raymond Bourg, Claude Gompel, Jean-Paul Pundel, Diagnostic cytologique du cancer genital chez la femme, Paris 1954.
19. Breathnach (1983): Caoimhghín S. Breathnach, Biographical sketches No. 29 – Papanicolaou. Irish Medical Journal 76 (1983), p. 220.
20. Broders (1932): Albert C. Broders, Carcinoma in situ contrasted with benign penetrating epithelium, Journal of the American Medical Association 99 (1932), pp. 1670-1674. DOI 10.1001/jama.1932.02740720024007
21. Brown (1995): Thomas D. Brown, Techniques for cell and tissue culture mechanostimulation. Historical and contemporary design considerations, Iowa Orthopedic Journal 15 (1995), pp. 112-117.
22. Bruch (1847): Carl W. L. Bruch, Die Diagnose der bösartigen Geschwülste. Nach eigenen Untersuchungen, Mainz 1847.
23. Bryder (2008): Linda Bryder, Debates about cervical screening. An historical overview, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 62 (2008), pp. 284-287.
24. Busch (1878): F. Busch, Ueber die Doppelfärbung des Ossificationsrandes mit Eosin und Haematoxylin, Archiv für Physiologie (1878), pp. 594 f.
25. Carmichael (1973): Daniel Erskine Carmichael, The Pap smear. Life of George N. Papanicolaou, Springfield/Illinois 1973.
26. Carmichael (1984): Daniel Erskine Carmichael, Dr. Papanicolaou and the Pap smear, Alabama Journal of Medical Sciences 21 (1984), pp. 101-104.
27. Cavers (1930): Francis Cavers, Review of the current literature. Early diagnosis of precancer and cancer of the uterus, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 37 (1930), pp. 391-393.
28. Cohen et al. (1987): Michael B. Cohen, Tristram G. Parslow, M. A. Parslow, Dóra Laky, Joseph J. Molnar, Ted R. Miller, Classics in cytology: II. The diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix in smears, Acta Cytologica 31 (1987), pp. 642 f.
29. Cullen (1900): Thomas St. Cullen, Cancer of the uterus. Its pathology, symptomatology, diagnosis, and treatment; also the pathology of diseases of the endometrium, New York 1900.
30. Dallenbach-Hellweg / Schmidt (2001): Gisela Dallenbach-Hellweg, Dietmar Schmidt, History of gynecological pathology. X. Dr. Robert Meyer, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 20 (2001), pp. 289-308. DOI 10.1097/00004347-200107000-00014
31. Dallenbach-Hellweg / Schmidt (2004): Gisela Dallenbach-Hellweg, Dietmar Schmidt, History of gynecological pathology. XV. Dr. Carl Arnold Ruge, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 23 (2004), pp. 83-90. DOI 10.1097/01.pgp.0000101151.01933.68
32. Daniel (1904): Constantin Daniel, Recherches sur la cytologie du liquide amniotique, Annales de gynécologie et d’obstétrique 2/1 (1904), pp. 466-483.
33. Daniel (1914): Constantin Daniel, L’infection puerpérale. Diagnostic, traitement, Paris 1914.
34. Daniel (1923): Constantin Daniel, Lupta contra cancerului in Romania [The fight against cancer in Romania], Ginecologie și Obstetrica (1923).
35. Daniel / Babeş (1927a): Constantin Daniel, Aurel A. Babeş, Posibilitatea diagnosticului cancerului uterin cu ajutorul frotiului, Proceedings of the Bucharest Gynecology Society, January 23 Session, Bucharest 1927, p. 55.
36. Daniel / Babeş (1927b): Constantin Daniel, Aurel A. Babeş, Diagnosticul cancerului colului uterin prin frotiu. Proceedings of the Bucharest Gynecology Society, April 5 Session, Bucharest 1927, p. 23.
37. Daniel / Mavrodin (1934): Constantin Daniel, D. Mavrodin, L’Actinomycose génitale de la femme. L’Expansion scientifique française, Paris 1934.
38. Degos (2001): Laurent Degos, John H. Bennett, Rudolph Virchow... and Alfred Donné: the first description of leukemia, The Hematology Journal. The Official Journal of the European Haematology Association 2/2 (2001), p. 1.
39. Dhom (1994): Georg Dhom, Die Krebszelle und das Bindegewebe. Ein historischer Rückblick, Der Pathologe 15 (1994), pp. 271-278. DOI 10.1007/s002920050054
40. Dhom (2001): Georg Dhom, Geschichte der Histopathologie, Berlin 2001. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-56794-0
41. Diamantis / Magiorkinis / Androutsos (2010): Aristidis Diamantis, Emmanouil Magiorkinis, George Androutsos, What’s in a name? Evidence that Papanicolaou, not Babeş, deserves credit for the Pap test, Diagnostic Cytopathology 38 (2010), pp. 473-476. DOI 10.1002/dc.21226
42. Dickinson (1869): William H. Dickinson, Portions of cancerous growth passed by urethra, Transactions of the Pathological Society of London 20 (1869), pp. 233-237.
43. Donaldson (1853): Francis Donaldson, The practical application of the microscope in the diagnosis of cancer, The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 25 (1853), pp. 43-70. DOI 10.1097/00000441-185301000-00003
44. Donné (1844): Alfred Donné, Cours de microscopie complémentaire des études médicales. Anatomie microscopique et physiologie des fluides de l’économie, Paris 1844.
45. Donné / Foucault (1845): Alfred Donné, Léon Foucault, Atlas du cours de microscopie exécuté d’apres nature au microscope-daguerréotype, Paris 1845.
46. Douglass (1967): Larry E. Douglass, A further comment on the contributions of Aurel Babeş to cytology and pathology, Acta Cytologica 11 (1967), p. 217.
47. Douglass (1970): Larry E. Douglass, Odorico Viana and his contribution to diagnostic cytology, Acta Cytolologica 14 (1970), p. 544.
48. Dreschfeld (1876): Julius Dreschfeld, Ueber eine Tinctionsflüssigkeit für histologische Zwecke, Centralblatt für die medizinischen Wissenschaften 40 (1876), pp. 705 f. DOI 10.1007/bf01356046
49. Dürck (1904): Hermann Dürck, Atlas and epitome of general pathologic histology. Translated from German, Philadelphia 1904. DOI 10.1097/00000441-190202000-00021
50. Earn / Penner (1950): A. A. Earn, D. W. Penner, Evaluation of vaginal cytologic smears in the diagnosis of uterine cancer, Canadian Medical Association Journal 62 (1950), pp. 344-348.
51. Fangerau / Hentschel (2018): Heiner Fangerau, Klaus Hentschel, Netzwerkanalysen in der Medizin- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte – Zur Einführung/Network analyses in the History of Medicine and Science – an introduction, Sudhoffs Archiv 102 (2018), 2, pp. 133-145. DOI 10.25162/sudhoff-2018-0004
52. Ferreira (1954): Clarice do Amaral Ferreira, Colpocitologia e citodiagnosticos em ginecologia, Rio de Janeiro 1954.
53. Fischer (1876): Hermann E. Fischer, Eosin als Tinctionsmittel für mikroskopische Präparate, Archiv für Mikroskopische Anatomie 12 (1876), pp. 349-352. DOI 10.1007/bf02933896
54. Fischer-Wasels (1927a): Bernhard Fischer-Wasels, Allgemeine Geschwulstlehre, in: Albrecht Bethe, Gustav von Bergmann, Gustav Georg Embden, Alexander Ellinger, Bernhard Fischer-Wasels, Ernst Küster (eds.), Handbuch der normalen und pathologischen Physiologie. Mit Berücksichtigung der Experimentellen Pharmakologie, 14. Band/Zweite Hälfte. Fortpflanzung Entwicklung und Wachstum, Berlin 1927, pp. 1341-1790. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-91038-8_3
55. Fischer-Wasels (1927b): Bernhard Fischer-Wasels, Die Entwicklung der Geschwulstzelle, Klinische Wochenschrift 6 (1927), pp. 1025-1029. DOI 10.1007/bf01742259
56. Franzén / Giertz / Zajicek (1960): Stefan Franzén, Gustav Giertz, John Zajicek, Cytological diagnosis of prostatic tumours by transrectal aspiration biopsy. A preliminary report, British Journal of Urology 32 (1960), pp. 193-196. DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1960.tb03763.x
57. Freeman (2007): Gary Freeman, Explaining the freemartin. Tandler and Keller vs. Lillie and the question of priority, Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution 308 (2007), pp. 105-112.
58. Friedländer (1883): Carl Friedländer, Microscopische Technik. Zum Gebrauch bei medicinischen und pathologisch-anatomischen Untersuchungen, Kassel/Berlin 1883.
59. Friedländer (1885): Carl Friedländer, A manual of microscopical technology for use in the investigations of medicine and pathological anatomy. Translated from German, New York/London 1885.
60. Fulton (1999): John F. Fulton, Charles Darwin (1758-1778) and the history of the early use of digitalis, Journal of Urban Health 76 (1999), pp. 533-541 (Reprinted from the Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 10 (1934), pp. 496-506). DOI 10.1007/bf02351508
61. Gal (2001): Anthony A. Gal, In search of the origins of modern surgical pathology, Advances in Anatomic Pathology 8 (2001), pp. 1-13. DOI 10.1097/00125480-200101000-00001
62. Gal (2005): Anthony A. Gal, The centennial anniversary of the frozen section technique at the Mayo Clinic, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 129 (2005), pp. 1532-1535. DOI 10.5858/2005-129-1532-tcaotf
63. Garfield (1996): Eugene Garfield, When to cite, The Library Quarterly 66 (1996), pp. 449-458. DOI 10.1086/602912
64. Gluge (1843-1850): Gottlieb Gluge, Atlas der pathologischen Anatomie; oder, Bildliche Darstellung und Erläuterung der vorzüglichsten krankhaften Veränderungen der Organe und Gewebe des menschlichen Körpers, Jena 1843-1850.
65. Goldsworthy / McFarlane (2002): Peter D. Goldsworthy, Alexander C. McFarlane, Howard Florey, Alexander Fleming and the fairy tale of penicillin, Medical Journal of Australia 176 (2002), pp. 176-178. DOI 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04349.x
66. Gompel (2007): Claude Gompel, Il y a 50 ans était fondée, a Bruxelles, l’Académie Internationale de Cytologie (AIC). Cet anniversaire permet de rappeler l’apport de notre Université dans le domaine de la cytologie clinique, Revue Médicale de Bruxelles 28 (2007), pp. 207-210.
67. Grange (1999): Robert I. Grange, National bias in citations in urology journals. Parochialism or availability? British Journal of Urology International 84 (1999), pp. 601-603. DOI 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00267.x
68. Grunze / Spriggs (1980): Heinz Grunze, Arthur I. Spriggs, History of clinical cytology. A selection of documents, Darmstadt 1980.
69. Hajdu (1977): Steven I. Hajdu, Cytology from antiquity to Papanicolaou, Acta Cytologica 21 (1977), pp. 668-676.
70. Hajdu (1998): Steven I. Hajdu, Fibrosarcoma. A historic commentary, Cancer 82 (1998), pp. 2081-2089.
71. Hajdu (2004a): Steven I. Hajdu, The first cellular pathologists, Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 34 (2004), pp. 481-483.
72. Hajdu (2004b): Steven I. Hajdu, A note from history. The first histopathologists, Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 34 (2004), pp. 113-115.
73. Hajdu (2004c): Steven I. Hajdu, A note from history. The first tumor pathologist, Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 34 (2004), pp. 355-356.
74. Hajdu (2014d): Steven I. Hajdu, The first vaginal smear, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology 3 (2014), pp. 225-226. DOI 10.1016/j.jasc.2014.05.002
75. Hajdu (2006): Steven I. Hajdu, Rediscoveries in pathology and laboratory medicine, Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 36 (2006), pp. 359-361.
76. Hajdu / Ehya (2008): Steven I. Hajdu, Hormoz Ehya, Foundation of diagnostic cytology, Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 38 (2008), pp. 296-299.
77. Hălălău / Laky (1987): Florin Hălălău, Dóra Laky, The one-hundredth birth anniversary of Aurel A. Babeş, founder of exfoliative cytology, Morphologie et Embryologie 33 (1987), pp. 155 f.
78. Hannover (1843): Adolph Hannover, Den pathologiske anatomies svar paa sporgsmaalet. Hvad er Cancer? [The response of pathological anatomy to the question: What is Cancer?], Copenhagen 1843.
79. Hannover (1852): Adolph Hannover, Das Epithelioma. Eine eigenthümliche Geschwulst, die man m allgemeinen bisher als Krebs angesehen hat, Leipzig 1852.
80. Hellwig (1932): C. Alexander Hellwig, The scientific basis of biopsy in tumors, Archives of Pathology 14 (1932), pp. 517-554.
81. Hertig / Mansell (1956): Arthur T. Hertig, H. Mansell, What is carcinoma in situ? CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 6 (1956), pp. 196-202. DOI 10.3322/canjclin.6.6.196
82. His (1870): W. His, Beschreibung eines Mikrotoms, Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie 6 (1870), pp. 229-232. DOI 10.1007/bf02955980
83. Hull (1988): David L. Hull, A mechanism and its metaphysics: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science, Biology and Philosophy 3 (1988), pp. 123-155. DOI 10.1007/bf00140989
84. Koprowska (1977): Irena Koprowska, George N. Papanicolaou – as we knew him. Acta Cytologica 21 (1977), pp. 630-638.
85. Koprowska (1984): Irena Koprowska, Remembering George N. Papanicolaou, Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association 39 (1984), pp. 200-202.
86. Koprowska (1985): Irena Koprowska, Concurrent discoveries of the value of vaginal smears for diagnosis of uterine cancer, Diagnostic Cytopathology 1 (1985), pp. 245-248. DOI 10.1002/dc.2840010315
87. Koss (1973): Leopold G. Koss, George N. Papanicolaou – some reminiscences, Acta Cytologica 17 (1973), pp. 1-2.
88. Koss (1977): Leopold G. Koss, A quarter of a century of cytology, Acta Cytologica 21 (1977), pp. 639-642.
89. Koss (1983): Leopold G. Koss, Papanicolaou’s 100th birthday, Acta Cytologica 27 (1983), pp. 217-219.
90. Koss (1989): Leopold G. Koss, The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy, Journal of the American Medical Association 261 (1989), pp. 737-743.
91. Koss (2000): Leopold G. Koss, George Papanicolaou (1883-1962). Cytopathology. Official Journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology 11 (2000), pp. 355 f.
92. Koss (2003): Leopold G. Koss, Aurel Babeş, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 22 (2003), pp. 101 f. DOI 10.1097/00004347-200301000-00020
93. Koss (2007): Leopold G. Koss, Of tissues, cells, and molecules. Reminiscences of an old pathologist, Human Pathology 38 (2007), pp. 1447-1453.
94. Koss / Melamed (2006): Leopold G. Koss, Myron R. Melamed. Koss’ diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases, 5th ed., Philadelphia 2006.
95. Krischel / Halling / Fangerau (2012): Matthis Krischel, Thorsten Halling, Heiner Fangerau, Anerkennung in den Wissenschaften sichtbar machen: Wie die Bibliometrie durch die soziale Netzwerkanalyse neue Impulse erhält, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften 23 (2012), 3, pp. 179-206.
96. Kyle / Shampo (1977): R. A. Kyle, M. A. Shampo, George Papanicolaou, Journal of the American Medical Association 238 (1977), p. 1636. DOI 10.1001/jama.238.15.1636
97. Jayle / Bender (1905): Félix Léon Jayle, X. Bender, La leucoplasie de la vulve, du vagin et de l’utérus, Revue de gynécologie et de chirurgie abdominale 9 (1905), pp. 933-1054. DOI 10.1016/0006-3002(63)91847-x
98. Labbé (1903): Marcel Labbé, Le cytodiagnostic. Les méthodes d’examen des sérosités pathologiques et du liquide céphalo-rachidien, Paris 1903.
99. Labbé (2007): Sylvain Labbé, Le point sur la cytologie en phase liquide, in: Joseph Monsonego (ed.), Traité des infections et pathologies génitales a papillomavirus, Paris 2007, pp. 87-93. DOI 10.1007/978-2-287-72066-6_11
100. Lambl (1856): Vilém Dušan Lambl, Über Harnblasenkrebs. Ein Beitrag zur mikroskopischen Diagnostik am Krankenbette, Vierteljahrschrift für die praktische Heilkunde 49 (1856), pp. 1-32.
101. Lebert (1845): Hermann Lebert, Physiologie pathologique, Tome II, Paris 1845.
102. Lipschütz (1929): Benjamin Lipschütz, Ergebnisse cytologischer Untersuchungen an Geschwülsten, Zeitschrift für Krebsforschung 28 (1929), pp. 491-532. DOI 10.1007/bf01629564
103. Lipschütz (1931): Benjamin Lipschütz, Ergebnisse cytologischer Untersuchungen an Geschwülsten. XVI. Mitteilung. Methodisches zum Nachweis und Studium der Stegosomen in Ausstrichspraparaten des Hühnersarkoms, Zeitschrift für Krebsforschung 34 (1931), pp. 646-657. DOI 10.1007/bf01792287
104. Lipschütz (1930): Benjamin Lipschütz, Über die Morphologische Spezifität der Geschwulstzelle, Klinische Wochenschrift 9 (1930), pp. 365-368. DOI 10.1007/bf01728130
105. Long / Cohen (1996): Steven R. Long, Michael B. Cohen, Classics in Cytology VII. Kun, Lebert, and early efforts at fine-needle aspiration biopsy, Diagnostic Cytopathology 14 (1996), pp. 182 f. DOI 10.1002/(sici)1097-0339(199603)14:2<182::aid-dc153.0.co;2-i
106. Löning (1999): Thomas Löning, Zur “Stückchendiagnose” in der Gynäkopathologie, Pathologe 20 (1999), pp. 6-8. DOI 10.1007/s002920050313
107. MacCarty (1928): William Carpenter MacCarty, A cytologic key to the diagnosis and prognosis of neoplasms, Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 13 (1928), pp. 354-365.
108. Malloizel (1907): Lucien Malloizel, Recherches anatomo-cliniques sur les réactions pleuro-corticales, Thesis, Paris 1907.
109. Marchetti (1969): Andrew A. Marchetti, Biographic and personal recollections of George N. Papanicolaou, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 24 (1969), pp. 680-684. DOI 10.1097/00006254-196907001-00002
110. Marshall (1983): Paul N. Marshall, Papanicolaou staining – a review, Microscopica Acta 87 (1983), pp. 233-243.
111. Martin / Ellis (1930): Hayes E. Martin, Edward B. Ellis, Biopsy by needle puncture and aspiration, Annals of Surgery 92 (1930), pp. 169-181. DOI 10.1097/00000658-193008000-00002
112. Meyers (1995): Morton A. Meyers, Glen W. Hartman Lecture. Science, creativity, and serendipity, American Journal of Roentgenology 165 (1995), pp. 755-764.
113. Meyers (2007): Morton A. Meyers, Happy accidents: serendipity in modern medical breakthroughs, New York 2007.
114. Michalas (2000): Stylianos P. Michalas, The Pap test. George N. Papanicolaou (1883-1962). A screening test for the prevention of cancer of uterine cervix, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 90 (2000), pp. 135-138.
115. Müller (1838): Johannes Müller, Ueber den feineren Bau und die Formen der krankhaften Geschwülste, Berlin 1838.
116. Naylor (1988): Bernhard Naylor, Perspectives in cytology. From Battle Creek to New Orleans, Acta Cytologica 32 (1988), pp. 613-621.
117. Naylor (2000): Bernhard Naylor, The century for cytopathology, Acta Cytologica 44 (2000), pp. 709-725. DOI 10.1159/000328553
118. Naylor et al. (2002): Bernhard Naylor, Luminita Tasca, Evangelia Bartziota, Volker Schneider, In Romania it’s the Méthode Babeş-Papanicolaou, Acta Cytologica 46 (2002), pp. 1-12.
119. Nezelof / Contesso / Guinebretiere (2001): Christian Nezelof, Genevieve Contesso, Jean-Marc Guinebretiere, Ernest Besnier (1831-1909). l’inventeur de la biopsie, Bulletin du Cancer 88 (2001), pp. 719-723.
120. Nezelof / Guinebretiere (2006): Christian Nezelof, Jean-Marc Guinebretiere, 1879. Ernest Besnier invente le mot “biopsie”, La Revue du Praticien 56 (2006), pp. 2081-2085.
121. O’Connor (2007): Dennis M. O’Connor, A brief history of lower genital tract screening, Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 11 (2007), pp. 182-188.
122. Parhon / Babes / Petrea (1957): Constantin Ion Parhon, Aurel Babeş, I. Petrea, L’hétérotransplantation du cancer humain et nouvelles perspectives dans l’oncologie, La Presse Médicale 65 (1957), pp. 1530 f.
123. Palatianos / Cintron / Narula (1992): George M. Palatianos, José R. Cintrón, Tathagat Narula, George N. Papanicolaou, M. D. Father of modern cytology. A 30-year commemorative, The Journal of the Florida Medical Association 79 (1992), pp. 837 f.
124. Papanicolaou (1925): George N. Papanicolaou, The diagnosis of early human pregnancy by the vaginal smear method, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 22 (1925), pp. 436 f. DOI 10.3181/00379727-22-207
125. Papanicolaou (1928): George N. Papanicolaou, New Cancer Diagnosis. Third Race Betterment Conference, Battle Creek, Michigan, January 2-6, 1928, Battle Creek/Michigan 1928, pp. 528-534.
126. Papanicolaou (1933): George N. Papanicolaou, The sexual cycle in the human female as revealed by vaginal smears, The American Journal of Anatomy 52 (1933), pp. 519-637. DOI 10.1002/aja.1000520402
127. Papanicolaou (1958): George N. Papanicolaou, Historical development of cytology as a tool in clinical medicine and in cancer research, Acta – Unio Internationalis Contra Cancrum 14 (1958), pp. 249-254.
128. Papanicolaou (1973): Classics in oncology: George Nicholas Papanicolaou’s new cancer diagnosis presented at the Third Race Betterment Conference, Battle Creek, Michigan, January 2-6, 1928, and published in the Proceedings of the Conference. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 23 (1973), pp. 174-179.
129. Petrea (1962): I. Petrea, Aurel A. Babeş (1886-1962), Neoplasma 9 (1962), pp. 445 f.
130. Petrea (1988): I. Petrea, Soixantieme anniversaire de la codification, par A. Babes, du cytodiagnostic du cancer du col utérin, Revue française d’endocrinologie clinique, nutrition et métabolisme 29 (1988), pp. 505-510.
131. Pickel / Reich (2006): Hellmuth Pickel, Olaf Reich, History of gynecological pathology XIX. Walther Schauenstein. An early Austrian pioneer of cervical pathology with comments on his successors, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 25 (2006), pp. 195-198. DOI 10.1097/01.pgp.0000192275.44061.7f
132. Powell (2004): John L. Powell, Biographic sketch. Powell’s Pearls: Hans Peter Hinselmann, MD (1884-1959), Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 59 (2004), pp. 693-695.
133. Prout (1990): George R. Prout Jr., Historical and modern role of cystoscopy and bladder mucosal biopsy in detecting bladder cancer in a high-risk population, Journal of Occupational Medicine 32 (1990), pp. 834-837.
134. Richardson (1871): Joseph G. Richardson, A handbook of medical microscopy, Philadelphia 1871.
135. Scheffey / Rakoff (1952): Lewis C. Scheffey, Abraham E. Rakoff, The gynecologist views cytology past, present, and future, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2 (1952), pp. 63-68. DOI 10.3322/canjclin.2.2.63
136. Schiller (1928): Walter Schiller, Zur histologischen Frühdiagnose des Portiokarzinoms, Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie 52 (1928), pp. 1562-1567.
137. Schiller (1934): Walter Schiller, Early diagnosis of carcinoma of the portio uteri, The American Journal of Surgery 26 (1934), pp. 269-280. DOI 10.1016/s0002-9610(34)90665-6
138. Schiodt (2007): Torben Schiodt, Adolph Hannover – Danmarks forste histopatolog [Adolph Hannover – the first Danish histopathologist], Ugeskrift for Lager 169 (2007), p. 2861.
139. Selden (2005): Steven Selden, Transforming better babies into fitter families: Archival resources and the history of the American Eugenics Movement, 1908-1930, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 149 (2005), 2, pp. 199-225.
140. Smith (1852): William T. Smith, A memoir on the pathology and treatment of leucorrhoea, based upon the microscopical anatomy of the os and cervix uteri, Medico-chirurgical Transactions 35 (1852), pp. 377-402. DOI 10.1177/095952875203500120
141. Spriggs (1977): Arthur I. Spriggs, History of cytodiagnosis, Journal of Clinical Pathology 30 (1977), pp. 1091-1102. DOI 10.1136/jcp.30.12.1091
142. Stockard / Papanicolaou (1916a): C. R. Stockard, George N. Papanicolaou, A further analysis of the hereditary transmission of degeneracy and deformities by the descendants of alcoholized mammals, The Amercian Naturalist 50 (1916), pp. 65-88. DOI 10.1086/279525
143. Stockard / Papanicolaou (1916b): C. R. Stockard, G. N. Papanicolaou, A further analysis of the hereditary transmission of degeneracy and deformities by the descendants of alcoholized mammals II., The Amercian Naturalist 50 (1916), pp. 144-177. DOI 10.1086/279531
144. Stockard / Papanicolaou (1917): Charles R. Stockard, G. N. Papanicolaou, The existence of a typical oestrous cycle in the guinea pig: with a study of its histological and physiological changes, The American Journal of Anatomy 22 (1917), pp. 225-283. DOI 10.1002/aja.1000220204
145. Tasca / Ostor / Babes (2002): Luminita Tasca, Andrew G. Ostor, Vincentiu Babes, XII. Aurel Babeş, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 21 (2002), pp. 198-202. DOI 10.1097/00004347-200204000-00016
146. Traut / Papanicolaou (1943): Herbert F. Traut, George N. Papanicolaou, Cancer of the uterus. The vaginal smear in its diagnosis, California and Western Medicine 59 (1943), pp. 121 f.
147. Thiersch (1865): Carl Thiersch, Der Epithelialkrebs, namentlich der Haut. Eine anatomisch-klinische Untersuchung, Leipzig 1865.
148. Tobin (2006): William Tobin, Alfred Donné and Leon Foucault. The first applications of electricity and photography to medical illustration, Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine 29 (2006), pp. 6-13.
149. Tortora (1988): Mario Tortora, In memory of G. N. Papanicolaou in the centennial of his birth, European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology 9 (1988), pp. 1-4.
150. Viana (1928): Odorico Viana, La diagnosi precoce del cancro uterino mediante lo striscio, La Clinica Ostetrica 30 (1928), pp. 781-793.
151. Vilos (1998): George A. Vilos, The history of the Papanicolaou smear and the odyssey of George and Andromache Papanicolaou, Obstetrics & Gynecology 91 (1998), pp. 479-483. DOI 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00695-9
152. Vilos (1999): George A. Vilos, Dr. George Papanicolaou and the birth of the Pap test, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 54 (1999), pp. 481-483. DOI 10.1097/00006254-199908000-00001
153. Vogel (1847): Julius Vogel, The Pathological Anatomy of the Human Body, London 1847.
154. Wedl (1854): Carl Wedl, Grundzüge der pathologischen Histologie, Wien 1854.
155. Wedl (1855): Carl Wedl, Rudiments of pathological histology, London 1855.
156. Widal / Sicard / Ravaut (1901): Fernand Widal, Jean A. Sicard, Paul Ravaut, Cytologie du liquide céphalo-rachidien au cours de quelque processus méningés chroniques (paralisie générale et tabes), Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société Médicale des Hôpitaux de Paris 3 (18 janvier) (1901), pp. 31-33.
157. Wied (1964): George L. Wied, Editorial. Pap-test or Babeş method? Acta Cytolologica 8 (1964), pp. 173 f.
158. Wissozky (1877): N. Wissozky, Ueber das Eosin als Reagenz auf Hämoglobin und die Bildung von Blutgefässen bei Säugetier- und Hühnermembranen, Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie 13 (1877), pp. 479-496. DOI 10.1007/bf02933947
159. Woronzoff-Dashkoff (1993): Kristine P. Woronzoff-Dashkoff, The Ehrlich-Chenzinsky-Plehn-Malachowski-Romanowsky-Nocht-Jenner-May-Grünwald-Leishman-Reuter-Wright-Giemsa-Lillie-Roe-Wilcox stain. The mystery unfolds, Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 13 (1993), pp. 759-771. DOI 10.1016/s0272-2712(18)30406-2
160. Wu et al. (2010): Maoxin Wu, Muhammad Idrees, Zhengbin Zhang, Eric Genden, David E. Burstein, Papanicolaou stain may not be necessary in majority of head and neck fine-needle aspirations. Evidence from a correlation study between Diff-Quik-based onsite diagnosis and final diagnosis in 287 head and neck fine-needle aspirations, Diagnostic Cytopathology 38 (2010), pp. 846-853.
161. Zachariadou-Veneti (2000): Smaragda Zachariadou-Veneti, George Papanicolaou (1883-1962), Cytopathology 11 (2000), pp. 152-157. DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00246.x
162. Zaharia et al. (1987): Maria Zaharia, Ioan Moraru, V. Luca, P. Subțirelu, Mariana Samoilescu, Rodica Bucurescu, Cervicouterine viral diseases, Morphologie et Embryologie 33 (1987), pp. 183-192.
163. Zinser / Wied (1951): Hans-Klaus Zinser, George Wied, Die Zytodiagnostik in der Gynäkologie, Jena 1951.