1. Introduction

Zika virus is a flavivirus and it was first isolated in 1947 from a febrile rhesus macaque monkey in the Zika Forest of Uganda. Subsequently it was identified in Aedes africanus mosquitoes from the same forest [1]. In 1954 the first three cases of human infection were reported in Nigeria [2] and epidemics have occurred in French Polynesia Cook Islands [3], Easter Island [4], New Caledonia [5] and latest the Americas. [6]

2.       Search Policy/Selection Criteria

We used the keywords Zika, ZIKV, ZIKAV, and Zika virus in search bar of Google and PubMed. We look over all literature published through November 30, 2016. The search comprised English and other foreign language articles, which were computer decoded.

3.       Virology and Pathogenesis

Zika virus (ZIKAV) is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus in the family Flaviviridae which includes several other mosquitos borne viruses of clinical status (e.g., DENV, WNV, and yellow fever virus [YFV]) [7]. Like other flaviviruses, ZIKAV is made up of two noncoding regions (5′ and 3′ ) that verge an open reading frame, which put into code a polyprotein smote into the capsid, precursor of membrane, envelope, and 7 nonstructural proteins [8]. A study ZIKAV’s molecular evolution, based on viral strains collected from 4 countries in West Africa during 1947–2007, identified several sites within the Zika viral genome that were under strong negative miscellany pressure. This finding proposes frequent purging of deleterious polymorphisms in functionally essential genes and the likelihood of recombination, which occurs rarely among flaviviruses [9]. After mosquito inoculation of a human host, cellular entry likely look like that of other flaviviruses, whereby the virus enters skin cells through cellular receptors, enabling migration to the lymph nodes and blood circulation. Few studies have investigated the pathogenesis of ZIKAV infection. One study showed that human skin fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and immature dendritic cells allow entry of ZIKAV. Several entry and adhesion factors (e.g., AXL receptor tyrosine kinase) enable infection, and cellular autophagy, needed for flaviviral replication, develops ZIKAV replication in skin fibroblasts [10]. After cellular entry, flaviviruses typically replicate within endoplasmic reticulum-derived vesicles. However, ZIKAV antigens were found exclusively in the nuclei of infected cells; this finding suggests a location for replication that differs from that of other flavivi¬ruses and merits further exploration [11].

4.       Transmission

Zika virus, like other flaviviruses, is pass on by mosqui¬toes, primarily of the Aedes (Stegomyia) genus. The Ae. aegypti mosquito acts to be the major vector in Asia [12]. Zika virus has been detected in wild-caught Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, which laboratory trials have shown to be capable of pass on Zika virus [13,14]. Aedes mosquitoes are widely distributed worldwide, and natural habitats of most species are warm tropical and sub-tropical regions [15-17]. Mosquito getting hold of the virus likely occurs during a blood meal; after endorsement, the virus replicates and is pass on to a reservoir animal at the next blood mealtime [18]. Isolation of the virus or of anti-Zika virus antibodies from various non-human primates and other wild and native animals suggests several animal reservoirs. Other nonvector modes of Zika virus transmission include congenital, perinatal [19], and sexual [20]. Possible transmission by blood transfusion [21,22], animal bite [23]. Intrauterine transmission is supported by the finding of Zika virus RNA by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) in amniotic fluid of 2 mothers with symptoms of Zika virus infection during pregnancy; both delivered babies with microcephaly [24]. Viral RNA, but not culturable virus, has been detected in breast milk [25], but transmission by breast-feeding has not been reported.

Two cases of possible transfusion-transmitted (TT) Zika virus were reported in Brazil [21]. Furthermore, during the French Polynesia outbreak, a study found that 42 (2.8%) of 1,505 subclinical blood donors were positive for Zika virus by RT-PCR; 11 donors pronounced a Zika fever-like syndrome 3–10 days after donation [20].

5.       Clinical Manifestations

In humans, the incubation period from mosquito bite to symptom commencement is 3–12 days. Infection is likely subclinical in 80% of cases [23,24]. Zika virus infections seem either to be subclinical (possibly in as many as 80% of infections) or to cause a trifling illness after an incubation period of 3 to 12 days. Symptoms, which last for almost two to seven days include fever, conjunctivitis, arthralgia, myalgia, and pervasive rash, which may be itchy. Headache, retro-orbital pain, peripheral oedema, and gastrointestinal fracas have also been witnessed. Only one study has examined the proportion of infections that produce symptoms. A serological survey during the Yap outbreak found that only 19% of partakers with IgM antibodies against Zika virus stated rash, joint pains, or conjunctivitis that were probably attributable to Zika virus infection. Whether the remaining infected participants experienced any other symptoms was not reported [23]. Observation of Zika viraemia in 31 French Polynesian blood donors who reported no symptoms, during or after blood donation, suggests that asymptomatic infection does occur [20]. Shock and hemorrhage occur with other flaviviruses such as dengue, but they have not been documented in Zika virus infection. Severe acute illness seems to be rare. Fewer than 10 possible Zika related deaths have been reported in adults, and an additional three deaths from Guillain-Barré syndrome have arisen in those who had symptoms of Zika infection [27,28].

6.       Diagnosis

The clinical picture of Zika virus infection is alike to that of former mosquito borne viruses such as dengue and chikungunya. Which often co-mingle in the zones, where Zika virus is endemic. The differential diagnosis of Zika virus infection is wide. Diagnosis is directed by history (travel, sexual behaviors, and interaction with other causes of infection) and consideration. Additionally to dengue and chikungunya, other diagnoses that should be considered include HIV seroconversion, measles, scarlet fever, rickettsial infection, leptospirosis, parvovirus, enterovirus, rubella, and secondary syphilis. The symptoms and clinical signs do not have adequate positive or negative prognostic value, and therefore laboratory testing is needed for dependable diagnosis.

6.1 Laboratory Testing

Conclusive diagnosis is based on recognition of Zika virus RNA in blood (serum or, ideally, EDTA treated plasma) and other body fluids by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Subsequently to the acute phase, diagnosis by antibody detection in serum samples is conceded by substantial cross reactivity with antibodies to other flaviviruses; false positive results can be comprehended with past dengue infection or previous yellow fever vaccination [29]. Details are shown in Table:

7.       Management and Prevention

There is formerly no vaccine against Zika virus, nor definite antiviral for the management of Zika virus. Treatment is suggestive, although it is not known what agents are prime for treating the fever, itch, and arthralgia. Minimization of the gamble of mosquito bites is advised by taxing long sleeves and khakis and using mosquito repellents [34].

Vector control by insecticides and removal of small pools of still water, the breeding sites for Aedes, is being instituted on a local level. Trials of the release of treated sterile mosquitoes are being deliberated by WHO.

Recommendation

1. Promote awareness campaign for prevention of Zika virus in public by eradication of Mosquito habitat.
2. Development of vaccine for the treatment of Zika virus.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

Special thanks to Dr. Jabar Zaman Khan Khattak for appreciation and guidance.

1. Fekih,M., Bourabaa, A. and Mohamed, S. ,2013, Evaluation of two methods for estimation of evaporation from Dams water in arid and semi-arid areas in Algeria, International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM), 2, 376-381, ISSN 2319 – 4847.
2. Benzaghta, M. A. , Mohammed, T. A. and Ekhmaj, A. I., 2012, Prediction of Evaporation from Algardabiya Reservoir, Libyan Agriculture Research Center Journal International ,3,120-128 , ISSN 2219-4304.
3. Dalkiliç, Y., Okkan, U. and Baykan, N., 2014, Comparison of Different Ann Approaches in Daily Pan Evaporation Prediction, Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 6, 319-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2014.64034.
4. Goyal, M. K., Bharti, B., Quilty, J. c, Adamowski, J. and Pandey, A. ,2014, Modeling of daily pan evaporation in sub tropical climates using ANN, LS-SVR, Fuzzy Logic, and ANFIS, Expert Systems with Applications, 41 , 5267–5276.
5. Behrooz Keshtegar, and Ozgur Kisi , 2016, A nonlinear modelling-based high-order response surface method for predicting monthly pan evaporations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Manuscript under review , CC-BY 3.0 License.
6. Wang, L., Kisi, O., Z.-Kermani, M., and, Gan, Y.,2016 , Comparison of six different soft computing methods in modeling  evaporation in different climates, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Manuscript under review. CC-BY 3.0 License.
7. Benzaghta, M. A. , Mohammed, T. A., Ghazali, A.H. and Soom, M. A.,2012 Prediction of evaporation in tropical climate using artificial neural network and climate based models , Scientific Research and Essays ,36, 3133-3148, ISSN 1992-2248 .
8. Alsanusi, S., Bentaher, L. ,2015, Prediction of Compressive Strength of Concrete from Early Age Test Result Using Design of Experiments (RSM)”, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9 ,1522-1526.
9. Elmazoghi, H. G., Karakale, V. and Bentaher, L., 2016, Comparison of neural networks and neuro-fuzzy computing techniques for prediction of peak breach outflow, Journal of Hydroinformatics , 18,724-740.

(Click to view)

(Click to view)