May 2007, Vol. 68, No. 5, Pages 508-516
Effects of vertebral mobilization and manipulation on kinematics of the thoracolumbar region
Kevin K. Haussler, DVM, DC, PhD; Ashley E. Hill, DVM, MPVM, PhD; Christian M. Puttlitz, PhD; C. Wayne McIlwraith, BVSc, PhD
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. (Haussler); Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523. (Hill, McIlwraith); Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523. (Puttlitz)
Dr. Haussler's present address is Gail Holmes Equine Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Supported by the Harry M. Zweig Memorial Fund for Equine Research, Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine.
The authors thank Lisa M. Mitchell; Vince Soderholm; and Drs. Amy Snyder, Elisa Salas, and Elizabeth Carothers for technical assistance.
Address correspondence to Dr. Haussler.
Objective—To measure passive spinal movements induced during dorsoventral mobilization and evaluate effects of induced pain and spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on passive vertebral mobility in standing horses.
Animals—10 healthy adult horses.
Procedures—Baseline vertical displacements, applied force, stiffness, and frequency of the oscillations were measured during dorsoventral spinal mobilization at 5 thoracolumbar intervertebral sites. As a model for back pain, fixation pins were temporarily implanted into the dorsal spinous processes of adjacent vertebrae at 2 of the intervertebral sites. Vertebral variables were recorded again after pin placement and treadmill locomotion. In a random-ized crossover study, horses were allocated to control and treatment interventions, separated by a 7-day washout period.The SMT consisted of high-velocity, low-amplitude thrusts applied to the 3 non–pin-placement sites. Control horses received no treatment.
Results—The amplitudes of vertical displacement increased from cranial to caudal in the thoracolumbar portion of the vertebral column. Pin implantation caused no immediate changes at adjacent intervertebral sites, but treadmill exercise caused reductions in most variables. The SMT induced a 15% increase in displacement and a 20% increase in applied force, compared with control measurements.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The passive vertical mobility of the trunk varied from cranial to caudal. At most sites, SMT increased the amplitudes of dorsoventral displacement and applied force, indicative of increased vertebral flexibility and increased tolerance to pressure in the thoracolumbar portion of the vertebral column.