Email this article 
The development of communication research in Indonesia in 2001-2020
Abstract
No systematic review and/or meta-analysis has attempted to map the macro and comprehensive landscape conditions, developments, and trends of communication research in Indonesia in the past few decades. Therefore, it is challenging to measure the progress that Indonesian communication scholars have achieved. This study analyzed 3108 articles distributed in reputable communication scientific publications in Indonesia, spanning two decades: January 2001 to March 2020. This study found many optimistic or skeptical justifications of Indonesian communication scholars about the development of communication epistemology in Indonesia. During the two decades, although there had been an increase in publications relying on quantitative approaches, it can be seen that the dominance of qualitative approaches was irreplaceable. The trend of increasing research using a quantitative approach was only a conversion from literature review articles widely published in the early 2000s. The Ministry of Communication and Information, Indonesia, in the second position, as the institution that contributes to the most authors of scientific articles after the Universitas Islam Bandung in the first place, and even surpassing Universitas Hasanuddin, Universitas Padjadjaran dan Universitas Diponegoro showing that the agency of state institutions is one of the active actors in communication knowledge production and reproduction in Indonesia. The increasing number of citations over the past two decades indicates that Indonesian scholars are experiencing enrichment of reference sources and interconnection with other scholars. However, based on keyword trends, Indonesian research’s deliberative and progressive vision has yet to appear dominant.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adhikarya, R. (1980). Transnational knowledge utilisation process in communication studies the north american–ASEAN connection. Media Asia, 7(3), 122–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.1980.11726003
Adiprasetio, J. (2016). Genealogi pengkajian dan ilmu komunikasi di Indonesia. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Adiprasetio, J. (2019). Perkembangan ilmu komunikasi di Indonesia: Instrumentalisasi kuasa hingga mekanisme pasar. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 6(2), 124–149. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v6i2.51583
Adiprasetio, J., Rahmawan, D., & Wibowo, K. A. (2021). A meta-analysis of hate speech in Indonesia: The yielding of an academic discourse to the discourse of authority. Pacific Journalism Review: Te Koakoa, 27(1 & 2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.24135/pjr.v27i1and2.1167
Adiprasetio, J., & Wibowo, A. K. (2020). Diskursus hate speech: ilmu pengetahuan yang tunduk pada surat edaran aparat. Remotivi.or.Id. https://remotivi.or.id/amatan/565/diskursus-hate-speech-ilmu-pengetahuan-yang-tunduk-pada-surat-edaran-aparat
Alakwe, K. O. (2017). Positivism and knowledge inquiry: from scientific method to media and communication research. Science Arena Publications: Specialty Journal of Humanities and Cultural Science, 2(3), 38–46. https://sciarena.com/storage/models/e/747QQLwqzbSpcfEro3QqIb5mls9s2ciAJA0uPF0hNZcwXhq/positivism-and-knowledge-inquiry-from-scientific-method-to-media-and-communication-researc.pdf
Bajari, A. (2011). Meta-Research dan dimensi epistemologi komunikasi konvergensi (p. 20). Disampaikan dalam Seminar Internasional di Kampus Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta, 10 Mei 2011.
Bajari, A. (2017). Trends in research on communication and media in Indonesia: The micro meta analysis on perspective, theory, and methodology. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 5(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2017.5.1.41
Boster, F. J., & Mongeau, P. (1984). Fear-arousing persuasive messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 8, 330–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1984.11678581
Chang, T.-K., & Tai, Z. (2005). Mass communication research and the invisible College Revisited: The Changing Landscape and emerging fronts in journalism-related studies. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(3), 672–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200312
Dahlan, M. A. (1987). Status dan perkembangan mutakhir ilmu komunikasi. In E. S. Ibrahim & et al. (Eds.), Perkembangan Ilmu Komunikasi di Indonesia dalam Kurun Waktu 1965-1985. Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI) dan Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (ISKI) Cabang Semarang.
Dhakidae, D. (2003). Cendekiawan dan kekuasaan dalam negara orde baru. Bandung: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Dillard, J. P., Hunter, J. E., & Burgoon, M. (1984). Sequential-request persuasive strategies: meta-analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face. Human Communication Research, 10, 461–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00028.x
Fansuri, H. (2015). Sosiologi Indonesia: Diskursus kekuasaan dan reproduksi Pengetahuan. LP3ES.
Funkhouser, Edward. T. (1996). The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journal. 1Human Communication Research, 22(4), 563–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00379.x
Gazali, E., Hidayat, D. N., & Menayang, V. (2009). Political communication in Indonesia: Media performance in Three Eras. In L. Willnat & A. Aw (Eds.), Political Communication in Asia (pp. 112–134). Routledge.
Haryanto, I. (2008). Propaganda, kuasa, dan pengetahuan: Genealogi ilmu komunikasi di Indonesia, (Suatu Penelusuran Awal). (Tidak Diterbitkan).
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664
Heryanto, A. (2006). Kiblat dan beban ideologis ilmu sosial Indonesia. In D. Dhakidae & V. R. Hadiz (Eds.), Ilmu Sosial dan Kekuasaan di Indonesia. Equinox Publishing Indonesia dan Ford Foundation.
Hutapea, E. (2019). “Seksi” porodi komunikasi peminat naik 200 Persen per Tahun, Kenapa? Kompas.Com2. https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2019/10/01/19434201/seksi-prodi-komunikasi-peminat-naik-200-persen-per-tahun-kenapa
Imamah, F. M. (2019). Tren kajian komunikasi Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 9(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2019.9.1.82-104
Johnson, B. T., Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J., Snyder, L. B., Noar, S. M., & Huedo-Medina, T. B. (2008). Contemporary approaches to eta-analysis in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Snyder (Eds.), Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research. Sage Publications.
Kamhawi, R., & Weaver, D. (2003). Mass communication research trends from 1980 to 1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(7), 7–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000102
Kearney, M. H. (1998). Ready-to-wear: Discovering grounded formal theory. Research in Nursing & Health, 21, 179–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199804)21:2<179::AID-NUR8>3.0.CO;2-G
Kiramang, K. (2017). Perkembangan penerbitan jurnal open access dalam mendukung komunikasi ilmiah dan peranan perpustakaan perguruan tinggi. Pustakaloka: Jurnal Kajian Informasi Dan Perpustakaan, 9(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.21154/pustakaloka.v9i2.1108
Krippendorff, K. (2011). Agreement and information in the reliability of coding. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(2), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.568376
Kuswarno, E. (2009). Perkembangan pendidikan tinggi ilmu komunikasi (Disampaikan Dalam Lokakarya Pengembangan Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Desain Kompetensi DIKTI-ASPIKOM, Surakarta 2-3 Desember 2009).
Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2018). Qualitative Communication research methods. Sage Publications.
Mulyana, D. (2010a). 50 Tahun Fikom-kilas balik, kekinian dan impian: Pidato pada Dies Natalis ke-50 Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Padjadjaran. Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas Padjadjaran.
Mulyana, D. (2010b). Komunikasi lintas budaya: pemikiran perjalanan dan khayalan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyana, D., & Rakhmat, J. (1990). Komunikasi antarbudaya: panduan berkomunikasi dengan orang-orang berbeda budaya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Narwaya, St. T. G. (2006). Matinya ilmu komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Resist Book.
Powell, R. R. (1999). Recent trends in research: A methodological essay. Library & Information Science Research, 21(1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(99)80007-3
Prasetyawan, Y. Y. (2017). Perkembangan open access dan kontribusinya bagi Komunikasi Ilmiah di Indonesia. ANUVA, 1(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.1.2.93-100
Pratama, B. I. (2019). Mapping Indonesian department of communication. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2019-3501-06
Rahardjo, T. (2012). Keseragaman atau keberagaman: Gagasan alternatif untuk pendidikan tinggi ilmu komunikasi di Indonesia. In S. Budi (Ed.), Communicaton Review: Catatan Tentang Pendidikan Komunikasi di Indonesia, Jerman dan Australia. Buku Litera.
Rahmawati, R., Antoni, & Prasetyo, B. D. (2019). Perkembangan kajian komunikasi pemasaran di Kota Malang: Sebuah meta analisis. Jurnal Nomosleca, 5(1), 36–43. http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/177545
Rains, S. A., Levine, T. R., & Weber, R. (2018). Sixty years of quantitative communication research summarized: Lessons from 149 Meta-Analyses. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2018.1446350
Rains, S. A., Matthes, J., & Palomares, N. A. (2020). Communication science and meta-analysis: Introduction to the special Issue. Human Communication Research, 46, 115–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa007
Saputra, K. T. (2017). Kuantitas pendidikan tinggi ilmu komunikasi harus diiringi kualitas. Tribunnews. https://sumsel.tribunnews.com/2017/09/14/kuantitas-pendidikan-tinggi-ilmu-komunikasi-harus-diiringi-kualitas
Schreiber, R., Crooks, D., & Stern, P. N. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In completing a qualitative project: details and dialogue (pp. 311–326). Sage Publications.
Sendjaja, D. S. (2006). Ilmu komunikasi di Indonesia (Makalah Disampaikan Dalam Rangka Pembukaan Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta Juli, 2006.
Sudibyo, A. (2004). Absennya pendekatan ekonomi politik untuk studi media. In N. Prajarto (Ed.), Komunikasi, Negara dan Masyarakat. FISIPOL UGM.
Tai, Z. (2009). The structure of knowledge and dynamics of scholarly communication in agenda setting research, 1996-2005. Journal of Communication, 59, 481–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01425.x
Tankard, J. W., Chang, T.-K., & Tsang, K.-J. (1984). Citation networks as indicators of journalism research activity. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 61(1), 89–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908406100112
Tirtosudarmo, R. (2007). Perkembangan ilmu-ilmu Sosial: Sebuah catatan perjalanan dalam mencari Indonesia demografi-politik pasca-soeharto. Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI) dan Yayasan Obor Indonesia (YOI).
Digital Object Identifier
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v10i1.35954Dimension Citation Metrics Badge
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Justito Adiprasetio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Justito Adiprasetio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Indexed by:
2.png){kind=small}
Editorial Office of Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi:
Faculty of Communication Science, Universitas Padjadjaran
Jl. Raya Bandung-Sumedang Km. 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
WA: +6282316731181 (Chat Only)
Telephone: +62227796954
Faxmile: +62227794122
E-mail: jurnal.kajian.komunikasi@unpad.ac.id | jurnalkajiankomunikasiunpad@gmail.com
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Supervised by:
