Economic growth and disparities: an empirical analysis for the Central and Eastern European countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i4.32Keywords:
economic growth, regional inequalities, Williamson’s hypothesis, econometric modeling, Central and Eastern EuropeAbstract
Research background: The processes of economic convergence observed in many devel-oping countries are characterized by reduction of economic differences on the cross-country level, which are accompanied by growing internal economic inequalities. This may stem from the fact that in the catching-up countries a more dynamic growth pattern is observed in the economically strongest regions, which is initially reflected in spatial polarization and increasing regional inequalities. However, just as the countries reach higher levels of devel-opment, the diffusion of growth-inducing impulses to less-developed areas should lead to the spatial equalizing of the development levels and reducing regional inequalities.
Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper is to determine the relationship be-tween the level of economic growth and observed economic inequalities in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. The theoretical framework adopted to describe and explain those relations is the so-called Williamson?s hypothesis in which the relationship between the scale of regional inequalities and economic growth is illustrated by a curve shaped like an inverted U.
Methods: The research procedure was intended to verify William-son?s hypothesis by estimating parabolic econometric models. Indicators of economic growth along with measure of regional inequalities (Williamson?s coefficient of variation) were used in the regression modeling. The research period spanned the years 1995-2014.
Findings & Value added: In the light of the study of CEE countries, it was possible to observe both convergence symptoms as well as divergence tendencies. It can be thus stated that the analyzed CEE countries followed a similar path to the one observed earlier by Wil-liamson in other developing countries. However, the analyses conducted by the authors at the national and regional levels of CEE countries were equivocal and did not fully support the theoretical assumptions of Williamson?s hypothesis.
Downloads
References
Barrios, S., & Strobl, E. (2009). The dynamics of regional inequalities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.03.008.
Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2). doi: 10.2307/2937943.
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1. doi: 10.2307/2534639.
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2). doi: 10.1086/261816.
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., Gorter, J., van der Horst, A., & Schramm, M. (2005). New economic geography. Empirics and regional policy. Hague: CBP Nether-lands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. Retrieved form http://www.eco.rug.nl/~brakman/NEG_CPB2005.pdf (15.06.2016).
Brasili, C., & Gutierrez, L. (2004). Regional convergence across European Union. EconWPA, Development and Comp Systems 0402002.
Churski, P., & Hauke, J. (2012). Polycentric development and growth areas. Studia Regionalia, 33.
Coates, B. E., Johnston, R. J., & Knox, P. L. (1979). Geography and inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dall?erba, S., & Le Gallo, J. (2008). Regional convergence and the impact of Eu-ropean structural funds over 1989?1999: A spatial econometric analysis. Pa-pers in Regional Science, 87(2). doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00184.
Davies, S., & Hallet, M. (2002). Interactions between national and regional development. Hamburgisches Welt-Wirtschafts-Archiv (HWWA) Discussion Paper 207.
European Commission (2004). The EU economy review, 2004 Review, Brussels. Retrieved form http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/ pages/publication7714_en.pdf (30.05.2016).
Forster, M., Jesuit, D., & Smeeding, T. (2005). Regional poverty and income inequality in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from the Luxembourg income study. In R. Kanbur & A. J. Venables (Eds.). Spatial inequality and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gorzelak, G. (2010). Facts and myths of regional development. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, Special Issue.
Kisiała, W., Bajerski, A., & Stępiński B. (2017). Equalising or polarising: the cen-tre?periphery model and the absorption of EU funds under regional operational programmes in Poland. Acta Oeconomica, 67(3). doi: 10.1556/032.2017.67.3.6.
Kuc, M. (2017). Is the regional divergence a price for the international conver-gence? The case of the Visegrad group. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(4). doi: 10.7441/joc.2017.04.04.
Krugman, P. (1991a). Geography and trade. Leuven ? Cambridge: Leuven University Press and The MIT Press.
Krugman, P. (1991b). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3). doi: 10.1086/261763.
Krugman, P. (1995). Development, geography, and economic theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and economic inequality. American Eco-nomic Review, 45.
Lukovics, M. (2008). Measuring regional disparities: evidence from Hungarian sub-regions. Paper presented at the ?Culture, cohesion and competitiveness: re-gional perspectives?, 48th congress of the European Regional Science Associa-tion, Liverpool.
Martin, P., & Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2001). Growth and agglomeration. International Economic Review, 42(4). doi: 10.1111/1468-2354.00141.
Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions. London: Ger-ald Duckworth & Co.
Petrakos, G., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Rovolis, A. (2003). Growth, integration and regional inequality in Europe. Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis, 81.
Piketty, T. (2015). The economics of inequality. London: Harvard University Press.
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (1999). Convergence or divergence? Types of regional re-sponses to socio-economic change in Western Europe. Tijdschrift voor Econo-mische en Sociale Geografie, 90(4). doi: 10.1111/1467-9663.00079.
Szörfi, B. (2007). Development and regional disparities ? testing the Williamson curve hypothesis in the European Union. Focus on European Economic Integration Q2/07. Retrieved form https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:93114358-b0ab-43ac-8269-ee772c2460ac/feei_2007_2_szoerfi_tcm16-79074.pdf (15.10.2015).
Wang, Z., & Ge, Z. (2004). Convergence and transition auspice of Chinese regional growth. Annals of Regional Science, 38(4). doi: 10.1007/s00168-003-0184-3.
Williamson, J. G. (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national devel-opment: a description of the patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13(4). doi: 10.1086/450136.
