The Use of Plastic Sack Fiber and Rice Husk Ash in Increasing the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value on the Girisubo Road Section Gunung Kidul Regency

Riandana Rizky Praja, Agus Riyanto

Abstract


Soil conditions in the Girisubo area, Gunung Kidul Regency, have low soil bearing capacity, so road infrastructure is bumpy and landslides. Therefore, the soil in the area needs to be stabilized and looking for bearing capacity of the soil before use for road subgrades. Clay can be improved by various soil improvement methods, including testing, by mixing plastic sack fiber and rice husk ash. These materials are used based on the high availability of plastic waste and rice husk waste, which are piling up every year. The additional material used was plastic sack fiber with variations of 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3% in rice husk ash variations of 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8% of the dry weight of the soil with the number of test objects 15 pieces. Based on the results, it found the highest CBR value change was obtained in the composition of a mixture of 0.3% plastic sack fiber and 4% rice husk ash of 18.49% and able to increase the percentage of the soil CBR value by 201.50% from the original soil value of 6,13%. Using plastic sack fiber and rice husk ash with the appropriate composition can increase the CBR value and have good quality.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


L. Afriani, “Mapping the Physical Properties of Soils and the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value for Different Soil Types: A Case Study in the Bukit Kemuning and Pugung Tampak Areas,” WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev., vol. 18, pp. 90–99, 2022, doi: 10.37394/232015.2022.18.10.

A. N. Swaminathen, “Enhancement in California Bearing Ratio values of expansive soil sub-grades using Bagasse ash and Geosynthetics,” Indian J. Environ. Prot., vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1501–1508, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85149032578

H. Daghigh, “Effect of curing time and percentage of additive materials on unconfined compressive strength and California bearing ratio in sandy silt soil,” Sadhana - Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci., vol. 47, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12046-021-01790-2.

K. Wimalasena, “Predicting California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value of a Selected Subgrade Material,” Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol. 193. pp. 547–558, 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-87379-0_41.

Y. F. Arifin, “The California Bearing Ratio and Unconfined Compressive Strength of Clay-Palm Kernel Shell Mixtures,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2578. 2022. doi: 10.1063/5.0107315.

G. Verma, “Application of multi-expression programming (MEP) in predicting the soaked California bearing ratio (CBR) value of fine-grained soil,” Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., vol. 7, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s41062-022-00858-0.

K. Othman, “The application of deep neural networks for the prediction of California Bearing Ratio of road subgrade soil,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 14, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2022.101988.

M. A. Khasawneh, “Prediction of California Bearing Ratio Using Soil Index Properties by Regression and Machine-Learning Techniques,” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol., 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42947-022-00237-z.

S. M. Kassa, “Use of Machine Learning to Predict California Bearing Ratio of Soils,” Adv. Civ. Eng., vol. 2023, 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/8198648.

C. M. Chan, “RELATING THE FIELD AND LABORATORY CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) OF STABILISED ROAD BASE,” Int. J. GEOMATE, vol. 23, no. 99, pp. 25–30, 2022, doi: 10.21660/2022.99.3520.

H. Putra, “Improvement of the California Bearing Ratio of Peat Soil Using Soybean Crude Urease Calcite Precipitation,” Civ. Eng. J., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 2411–2423, 2022, doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-11-04.

V. A. Akinbinu, “Utilization of mine wastes and bone ash for the improvement of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of soft soil,” Int. J. Min. Geo-Engineering, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 115–123, 2022, doi: 10.22059/IJMGE.2021.281748.594812.

S. Alzabeebee, “Surrogate models to predict maximum dry unit weight, optimum moisture content and California bearing ratio form grain size distribution curve,” Road Mater. Pavement Des., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2733–2750, 2022, doi: 10.1080/14680629.2021.1995471.

M. Bakri, “Prediction of California Bearing Ratio of Granular Soil by Multivariate Regression and Gene Expression Programming,” Adv. Civ. Eng., vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/7426962.

K. C. Onyelowe, “Predicting subgrade and subbase California bearing ratio (CBR) failure at Calabar-Itu highway using AI (GP, ANN, and EPR) techniques for effective maintenance,” Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Smart City Planning. pp. 159–170, 2023. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-99503-0.00020-X.

S. D. Turkane, “Optimization of fly ash geopolymer dosage for California bearing ratio using response surface method,” J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil., vol. 7, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s41024-022-00198-7.

S. A. Sarna, “Identifying Acceptable California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value for Kansas Subgrades Using Pavement Rutting Data,” Geotechnical Special Publication, vol. 2022. pp. 333–342, 2022. doi: 10.1061/9780784484067.034.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/sitekin.v20i2.22427

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 SITEKIN: Jurnal Sains, Teknologi dan Industri




Editorial Address:
FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI
UIN SULTAN SYARIF KASIM RIAU

Kampus Raja Ali Haji
Gedung Fakultas Sains & Teknologi UIN Suska Riau
Jl.H.R.Soebrantas No.155 KM 18 Simpang Baru Panam, Pekanbaru 28293
Email: sitekin@uin-suska.ac.id
© 2023 SITEKIN, ISSN 2407-0939

SITEKIN Journal Indexing:

Google Scholar | Garuda | Moraref | IndexCopernicus | SINTA


Creative Commons License
SITEKIN by http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php