ORIGINAL ARTICLE  PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE Open access

International Angiology 2023 August;42(4):327-36

DOI: 10.23736/S0392-9590.23.05064-2

Copyright © 2023 THE AUTHORS

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license which allows users to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon the manuscript, as long as this is not done for commercial purposes, the user gives appropriate credits to the original author(s) and the source (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI), provides a link to the license and indicates if changes were made.

language: English

Comparison of angiography and ultrasound for femoropopliteal angioplasty: decision-making and 12-month outcomes

Yuchi ZOU ¹, Qiang TONG ², Xuehu WANG ¹, Chuli JIANG ¹, Zheng QIN ¹, Yu ZHAO ¹, Jun CHENG ¹ ✉

¹ Department of Vascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China; ² Department of Endocrinology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Choingqing, China

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) combined with angiography during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty impacts treatment strategies and the 12-month patency of the femoropopliteal artery, compared to angiography alone.
METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study enrolled 137 patients who underwent a femoropopliteal endovascular intervention between February 2020 and May 2021. Among these interventions, 43 were guided by IVUS combined with angiography and the remaining 94 were guided by angiography only. Treatment strategies and 12-month patency were analyzed in both groups. Multivariable analysis was performed to clarify the predictors of restenosis within 12 months.
RESULTS: Primary patency at 12 months was significantly higher in the IVUS group than in the angiography group (56.4% vs. 76.7%, P=0.047). The reference diameter on IVUS images was greater than that on angiography images. Therefore, the IVUS group presented a higher balloon-to-vessel ratio [1.0 (0.97, 1.01) vs. 1.06 (1.0.1.25)]. More adjunctive stents were required in the angiography group. However, more dissections were performed in the IVUS group, with no difference in flow-limiting dissections between groups. Target disease length (odds ratio 1.02, P=0.021) and balloon-to-vessel ratio (odds ratio 0.01, P=0.021) were independent predictors of restenosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with angiography guidance alone, IVUS guidance for femoropopliteal artery-related treatment can significantly increase primary patency. This finding may be explained by the selection of larger balloons in IVUS and the resulting sufficient plaque compression and elastic membrane stretch. Moreover, IVUS was shown to detect more non-flow-limiting dissections than angiography.

KEY WORDS: Peripheral arterial disease; Ultrasonography, interventional; Angiography; Angioplasty