Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2020 June;86(6) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2020 June;86(6):601-7

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   Free accessfree

Minerva Anestesiologica 2020 June;86(6):601-7

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14173-7

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Electroencephalographic density spectral array monitoring during propofol sedation in teenagers, using the narcotrend electroencephalographic monitor

Iris J. de HEER 1 , Annejet T. WARMENHOVEN 1, 2, Frank WEBER 1

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 2 Department of Pediatrics, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands



BACKGROUND: Recently published articles address concerns about the safe use of currently available index-based depth of hypnosis monitors. Electroencephalographic Density Spectral Array monitoring facilitates the interpretation of unprocessed electroencephalogram data, providing the anesthesiologist with real-time drug-specific information on hypnotic depth. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the clinical applicability of Density Spectral Array with a commercially available monitor as the Narcotrend EEG monitor in teenagers under procedural sedation using propofol.
METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of EEG data. Unprocessed electroencephalogram data from 37 patients, aged 12-18 years, scheduled for gastrointestinal endoscopy under propofol sedation, were used for analysis. The relationship between non-steady state propofol concentrations and Density Spectral Array, represented by the four electroencephalographic frequency bands β, α, θ and δ was investigated.
RESULTS: Increasing propofol concentration caused augmentation in the amplitude of frontal δ oscillations and a decrease in the amplitude of frontal β oscillations. The expression of α oscillations showed a biphasic pattern related to increasing the propofol concentration. Spearman correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between propofol concentration and relative EEG power in β (r -0.84, P<0.0001), θ (r 0.50, P=0.004) and δ (r 0.63, P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: We were able to show that DSA displayed in real time, on a commercially available DoA monitor (the Narcotrend EEG monitor), can provide the anesthesiologist with understandable information regarding the dose-dependent EEG effects of propofol in teenagers.


KEY WORDS: Anesthesia; Electroencephalography; Pediatrics; Anesthesiologist

top of page