자기무고의 공범성립의 범위에 관한 검토

@article{ART001362913},
author={ 정혁준 },
title={자기무고의 공범성립의 범위에 관한 검토},
journal={형사판례연구},
issn={1225-6005},
year={2009},
volume={17},
pages={322-339},
doi={10.23102/kaccs.2009.17..010},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.23102/kaccs.2009.17..010}

TY - JOUR
AU - 정혁준
TI - 자기무고의 공범성립의 범위에 관한 검토
T2 - 형사판례연구
PY - 2009
VL - 17
IS -
PB - 한국형사판례연구회
SP - 322-339
SN - 1225-6005
AB - Despite of common opinion that aiding or abetting of false accusation against oneself can not establish a crime, Supreme court adjudged a person who aided false accusation against himself to be guilty recently. With the help of this judgement of conviction and a Practical need of punishing such a crime, prosecution and punishment on a person who commits a this kind of crime would increase rapidly. So in this brief report let us survey how variously this crime can be committed and to what extent it can be constituted. Also we will consider a crime of ‘interference with government official in the execution of his duty' as a substitute.
KW - 무고죄, 자기무고, 공범, 위계에 의한 공무집행방해
DO - 10.23102/kaccs.2009.17..010
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.23102/kaccs.2009.17..010
ER -

정혁준 (2009). 자기무고의 공범성립의 범위에 관한 검토. 형사판례연구, 17, 322- 339.

정혁준 . 2009, “자기무고의 공범성립의 범위에 관한 검토”, 형사판례연구, vol. 17, pp. 322-339. Available from: doi:10.23102/kaccs.2009.17..010

정혁준 “자기무고의 공범성립의 범위에 관한 검토” 형사판례연구 17 pp. 322-339 (2009): 322.

정혁준 . 자기무고의 공범성립의 범위에 관한 검토 형사판례연구 [Internet]. 2009; 17 : 322-339. Available from: doi:10.23102/kaccs.2009.17..010

정혁준 . “자기무고의 공범성립의 범위에 관한 검토” 형사판례연구 17 (2009): 322-339. doi: 10.23102/kaccs.2009.17..010

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

자기무고의 공범성립의 범위에 관한 검토

형사판례연구

약어 : KJCCS

2009, vol.17, pp.322 - 339

DOI : 10.23102/kaccs.2009.17..010

발행기관 : 한국형사판례연구회

연구분야 : 법학

정혁준¹

¹대전지방검찰청

인용한 논문 수 : 4 서지 간략 보기

초록

Despite of common opinion that aiding or abetting of false accusation against oneself can not establish a crime, Supreme court adjudged a person who aided false accusation against himself to be guilty recently. With the help of this judgement of conviction and a Practical need of punishing such a crime, prosecution and punishment on a person who commits a this kind of crime would increase rapidly. So in this brief report let us survey how variously this crime can be committed and to what extent it can be constituted. Also we will consider a crime of ‘interference with government official in the execution of his duty' as a substitute.