Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:35:12.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determining the Geological Provenance of Obsidian Artifacts from the Maya Region: A Test of the Efficacy of Visual Sourcing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Geoffrey E. Braswell ,
John E. Clark ,
Kazuo Aoyama ,
Heather I. McKillop  and
Michael D. Glascock
Geoffrey E. Braswell
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Amherst, NY 14261
John E. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, 950 SWKT, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602
Kazuo Aoyama
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities, Ibaraki University, Bunkyo 2-1- 1, Mito, Ibaraki 310-8512, Japan
Heather I. McKillop
Affiliation:
Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
Michael D. Glascock
Affiliation:
Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the last four decades, mesoamerican archaeologists regularly have employed various chemical assay techniques to determine the geological sources of obsidian artifacts. In recent years, the reliability of these analytical procedures has increased and their costs have declined, encouraging the assay of ever larger samples. Nonetheless, several constraints make it unlikely that compositional data will be used routinely to attribute entire collections to their geological sources. This report describes a test of visual sourcing, a technique that for many sites in the Maya region is only slightly less accurate than compositional assay. We also propose sampling strategies that combine visual and compositional sourcing in ways that allow large collections to be accurately sourced at low costs. Finally, we suggest ways to develop the technique for use throughout Latin America.

Resumen

Resumen

Durante las últimas décadas, arqueólogos mesoamericanos por lo general han empleado diversas técnicas químicas de análisis para determinar las fuentes geológicas de artefactos de obsidiana. En años recientes, se ha incrementado la confiabilidad de esta clase de procedimientos analíticos en tanto que su costo ha disminuido, de manera que se ha impulsado el análisis de muestras más grandes. No obstante, hay limitantes que vuelven poco probable que los datos composicionales se empleen en forma rutinaria para la atribución de colecciones completas a las fuentes geológicas de origen. En este reporte se describe una prueba del método visual de atribución, que es una técnica ligeramente menos precisa que los análsis composicionales en el caso de muchos sitios en la región maya. Además, proponemos estrategias de muestreo que combinan el método visual con los análisis composicionales, de manera que sea posible definir la fuente geológica de colecciones grandes a un bajo costo. Por último, proponemos medidas para desarrollar el uso de la técnica en toda Latinoamérica.

Type
Reports
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 269 - 282
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2000. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology

References

References Cited

Andrews, A.P., Asaro, F., Michel, H. V., Stross, F. H., and Cervera Rivero, P. 1989 The Obsidian Trade at Isla Cerritos, Yucatán, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 16:355–363.Google Scholar
Aoyama, K. 1991 Lítica. In Investigaciones arqueológicas en la región de La Entrada, vol. 2, edited by S. Nakamura, K. Aoyama, and E. Uratsuji, pp. 39–203. Servicio de Voluntarios Japoneses para la Cooperatión con el Extranjero y el Instituto Hondureño de Antropología e Historia, San Pedro Sula.Google Scholar
Aoyama, K. 1994 Socioeconomic Implications of Chipped Stone from the La Entrada Region, Western Honduras. Journal of Field Archaeology 21:133–145.Google Scholar
Aoyama, K. 1996 Exchange, Craft Specialization, and Ancient Maya State Formation: A Study of Chipped Stone Artifacts from the Southeast Maya Lowlands. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Aoyama, K. 1999 Ancient Maya State, Urbanism, Exchange, and Craft Specialization: Chipped Stone Evidence of the Copan Valley and the La Entrada Region, Honduras. Memoirs in Latin American Archaeology, No. 12. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Aoyama, K., Tashiro, T., and Glascock, M. D. 1999 A Pre-Columbian Obsidian Source in San Luis, Honduras: Implications for the Relationship between Late Classic Maya Political Boundaries and the Boundaries of Obsidian Exchange Networks. Ancient Mesoamerica 10:237–249.Google Scholar
Arnauld, M. C. 1990 El comercio clásico de obsidiana: rutas entre tierras áltas y tierras bajas en el area maya. Latin American Antiquity 1:347–367.Google Scholar
Asaro, F., Michel, H. V., Sidrys, R., and Stross, F. H. 1978 High-Precision Chemical Characterization of Maya Obsidian Sources in Guatemala. American Antiquity 43:436–443.Google Scholar
Asaro, F., Salazar, E., Michel, H. V., Burger, R. L., and Stross, F. H. 1994 Ecuadorian Obsidian Sources Used for Artifact Production and Methods for Provenience Assignments. Latin American Antiquity 5:257–277.Google Scholar
Braswell, G. E. 1996 A Maya Obsidian Source: The Geoarchaeology, Settlement History, and Ancient Economy of San Martin Jilote-peque, Guatemala. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Tulane University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Braswell, G. E. 1997a El intercambio comercial entre los pueblos prehispanicos de Mesoamérica y la Gran Nicoya. Revista de la Uni-versidad del Valle de Guatemala 6:17–29.Google Scholar
Braswell, G. E. 1997b El intercambio prehispánico en Yucatán, México. In X simposio de investigaciones arqueológicas en Guatemala, 1996, vol 2., edited by J.P. Laporte and H. Escobedo, pp. 545–556. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Braswell, G. E. 1998 Trade, Procurement, and Population: Obsidian and the Maya of the Northern Lowlands. Paper presented at the 97th Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Braswell, G. E. 1999 Los artefactos de obsidiana de Topoxté, El Petén, Guatemala. Beiträge zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Archäologie. Mainz, in press.Google Scholar
Braswell, G. E. 2000 Postclassic Mesoamerican Obsidian Exchange Spheres. In The Postclassic Mesoamerican World, edited by M. E. Smith and F. Berdan. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, in press.Google Scholar
Braswell, G. E., Andrews V, E.W., and Glascock, M. D. 1994 The Obsidian Artifacts of Quelepa, El Salvador. Ancient Mesoamerica 5:173–192.Google Scholar
Braswell, G. E., Gunn, J. D., Domínguez Carrasco, M. del R., Folan, W. J., Fletcher, L., and Glascock, M. D. 1999 Defining the Terminal Classic at Calakmul. In The Terminal Classic in the Maya Lowlands: Collapse, Transition, and Transformation, edited by D. S. Rice, P. M. Rice, and A. A. Demarest. Westview Press, Boulder. In press.Google Scholar
Braswell, G. E., Salgado González, S., and Glascock, M. D. 1995 La obsidiana guatemalteca en Centroamérica. In VII simposio de investigaciones arqueológicas en Guatemala, 1994, vol. 1, edited by J. P. Laporte and H. Escobedo, pp. 121–131. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L. 1980 Trace-Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from Pachamachay, Junin. In Prehistoric Hunters of the High Andes, by J. Rick, pp. 257–261. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L. 1981 La procedencia de artefactos de obsidiana en los sitios formativos en Ayacucho: Chupas y Wichqana. Boletin del Museo Nacional de Antropología y Arqueologia 7:9–10. Lima.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L., and Asaro, F. 1978 Obsidian Distribution and Provenience in the Central Highlands and Coast of Peru during the Preceramic Period. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 36:61–83.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L., and Asaro, F. 1993 La distributión y procedencia de artefactos de obsidiana durante el Período Inicial y Horizonte Temprano. In Emergencia de la civilizatión en los Andes: Ensayos de interpretatión, by R. L. Burger, pp. 180–231. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L., Asaro, F., and Michel, H. V. 1984 The Source of Obsidian Artifacts at Chavín de Huántar. In The Prehistoric Occupation of Chavín de Huántar, Peru, by R. L. Burger, pp. 263–270. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L., Asaro, F., Michel, H. V., Stross, F. H., and Salazar, E. 1994 An Initial Consideration of Obsidian Procurement and Exchange in Prehispanic Ecuador. Latin American Antiquity 5:228–255.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L., Asaro, F., Salas, G., and Stross, F. 1998a The Chivay Obsidian Source and the Geological Origin of Titicaca Basin Type Obsidian Artifacts. Andean Past 5:203–223.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L., Asaro, F., Trawick, P., and Stross, F. H. 1998b The Alca Obsidian Source: The Origin of Raw Material for Cuzco Type Obsidian Artifacts. Andean Past 5:185–202.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L., Schreiber, K. J., Glascock, M. D., and Ccencho, J. 1998c The Jampatilla Obsidian Source: Identifying the Geological Source of Pampas Type Obsidian Artifacts from Southern Peru. Andean Past 5: 225–239.Google Scholar
Burger, R. L., and Glascock, M. D. 2000 Locating the Quispisisa Obsidian Source in the Department of Ayacucho, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 11:258–268 (current issue).Google Scholar
Carpio Rezzio, E. H. 1993 Obsidian at Balberta. In The Balberta Project: The Terminal Formative - Early Classic Transition on the Pacific Coast of Guatemala, edited by F. J. Bove, S. Medrano B., B. Lou P., and B. Arroyo L., pp. 83–106. Memoirs in Latin American Archaeology, No. 6. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Clark, J. E. 1988 The Lithic Artifacts of La Libertad, Chiapas, Mexico. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation, No. 52. Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
Clark, J. E., Lee, T. A. Jr., and Salcedo, T. 1989 The Distribution of Obsidian. In Ancient Trade and Tribute: Economies of the Soconusco Region of Mesoamerica, edited by B. Voorhies, pp. 268–284. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Clark, J. E., and Salcedo, T. 1989 Ocós Obsidian Distribution in Chiapas, Mexico. In New Frontiers in the Archaeology of the Pacific Coast of Southern Mesoamerica, edited by F. J. Bove and L. Heller, pp. 15–24. Anthropological Research Papers, No. 39. Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1960 A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:37–46.Google Scholar
Dreiss, M. L. 1988 Obsidian at Colha, Belize: A Technological Analysis and Distributional Study Based on Trace Element Data. Papers of the Colha Project, vol. 4, Texas Archaeological Research Laboratory. University of Texas, San Antonio.Google Scholar
Dreiss, M. L., and Brown, D. O. 1989 Obsidian Exchange Patterns in Belize. In Prehistoric Maya Economies in Belize, edited by P. A. McAnany and B. L. Isaac, pp. 57–90. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement No. 4. JAI Press,Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Dreiss, M. L., and Brown, D. O. 1991 Socioeconomic Implications of the Distribution of Obsidian in the Late and Terminal Classic Periods at the Maya Site of Colha, Belize. Paper presented at the 47th International Congress of Americanists, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Glascock, M. D., Braswell, G. E., and Cobean, R. H. 1998 A Systematic Approach to Obsidian Source Characterization. In Archaeological Obsidian Studies: Method and Theory, edited by M.S. Shackley, pp. 15–65. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Glascock, M. D., Neff, H., Stryker, K. S., and Johnson, T. N. 1994 Sourcing Archaeological Obsidian by an Abbreviated NAA Procedure. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Articles 180:29–35.Google Scholar
Guderjan, T. H., Garber, J. F., Smith, H. A., Stross, F. H., Michel, H. V., and Asaro, F. 1989 Maya Maritime Trade and Sources of Obsidian at San Juan, Ambergris Cay, Belize. Journal of Field Archaeology 16:363–369.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1972 Obsidian Trade Routes in the Maya Area. Science 178:1092–1093.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1976 Maya Obsidian Trade in Southern Belize. In Maya Lithic Studies: Papers from the 1976 Belize Field Symposium, edited by T. R. Hester and N. Hammond, pp. 71–81. Special Report No. 4, Center for Archaeological Research. University of Texas, San Antonio.Google Scholar
Healan, D. M. 1993 Local versus Non-Local Obsidian Exchange at Tula and Its Implications for Post-Formative Mesoamerica. World Archaeology 24:449–464.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F., Williams, H., and Graham, J. A. 1965 Notes on Mesoamerican Obsidians and Their Significance in Archaeological Studies. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 1:94–103.Google Scholar
Heller, L., and Stark, B. L. 1998 Classic and Postclassic Obsidian Tool Production and Consumption: A Regional Perspective from the Mixtequilla, Veracruz. Mexicon 20:119–128.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. E. 1984 Obsidian Sourcing Studies in the Great Basin: Problems and Prospects. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 45:1–19.Google Scholar
Jack, R .N., and Heizer, R. F. 1968 “Finger-Printing” of Some Mesoamerican Obsidian Artifacts. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 5:81–100.Google Scholar
Lewenstein, S. M., and Glascock, M. D. 1997 Presencia del altiplano en la región de Comalcalco. Los Investigadores de la Cultura Maya 5:205–211. Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Campeche.Google Scholar
McKillop, H. I. 1987 Wild Cane Cay: An Insular Classic Period to Postclassic Period Maya Trading Station. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California-Santa Barbara. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
McKillop, H. I. 1989 Coastal Maya Trade: Obsidian Densities at Wild Cane Cay, Belize. In Prehistoric Maya Economies of Belize, edited by P. A. McAnany and B. Isaac, pp. 17–56. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement 4. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
McKillop, H. I. 1995 The Role of Northern Ambergris Caye in Maya Obsidian Trade: Evidence from Visual Sourcing and Blade Technology. In Maya Maritime Trade, Settlement, and Populations on Ambergris Caye, Belize, edited by T. H. Guderjan and J. F. Garber, pp. 163–174. Maya Research Program and Labyrinthos, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
McKillop, H. I., and Jackson, L. J. 1988 Ancient Maya Obsidian Sources and Trade Routes. In Obsidian Dates IV: A Compendium of the Obsidian Hydration Determinations Made at the UCLA Obsidian Hydration Laboratory, edited by C.W. Meighan and J. L. Scalise, pp. 130–141. Monograph No. 29, the Institute of Archaeology. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
McKillop, H. I., Jackson, L. J., Michel, H. V., Stross, F. H., and Asaro, F. 1988 Chemical Source Analysis of Maya Obsidian: New Perspectives from Wild Cane Cay, Belize. In Archaeometry ‘88: Proceedings from the 1988 International Archaeometry Conference, edited by R. M. Farquar, R. J. V. Hancock, and L. A. Pavlish, pp. 255–260. University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, H. 1999 Mexican Obsidian at Tikal, Guatemala. Latin American Antiquity 10:300–313.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, H., and Nelson, F. W. 1990 New Data on Sources of Obsidian Artifacts from Tikal, Guatemala. Ancient Mesoamerica 1:71–80.Google Scholar
Nelson, F. W. 1980 Rutas de intercambio en la península de Yucatán en las diferentes epocas arqueológicas según la evidencia de la obsidiana. In XVI Mesa Redonda, vol. 1., pp. 349–355. Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología, Saltillo, Mexico.Google Scholar
Nelson, F. W. 1985 Summary of the Results of Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from the Maya Lowlands. Scanning Electron Microscopy 11:631 –649.Google Scholar
Nelson, F. W. 1989 Rutas de intercambio de obsidiana en el norte de la penánsula de Yucatán. In La obsidiana en Mesoamérica, edited by M. Gaxiola G. and J. E. Clark, pp. 363–368. Instituto de Antropología e Historia, Mexico.Google Scholar
Pires-Ferreira, J. W. 1975 Formative Mesoamerican Exchange Networks with Special Reference to the Valley of Oaxaca. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, No. 7. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pires-Ferreira, J. W. 1976 Obsidian Exchange in Formative Mesoamerica. In The Early Mesoamerican Village, edited by K. V. Flannery, pp. 292–306. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. J. 1994 Chitak Tzak, un centro regional postclásico tardío de los mayas Kaqchikel. In VII simposio de investigaciones arqueológicas en Guatemala, 1993, edited by J. P. Laporte and H. Escobedo, pp. 175–184. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. J. 1997 Protohistoric to Colonial Settlement Transition in the Antigua Valley, Guatemala. In Approaches to the Historical Archaeology of Mexico, Central & South America, edited by J. Gasco, G. C. Smith, and P. Foumier-García, pp. 59–70. Monograph No. 38, the Institute of Archaeology. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Sánchez Polo, R. 1991 Las navajas de obsidiana de Kaminlajuyú/San Jorge: un estudio tecnológico funcional. Unpublished licenciatura thesis, Escuela de Historia, Área de Arqueología, Universidad de San Carlos Borromeo de Guatemala, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Seelenfreund, A., Rees, C.., R. Bird, G. Bailey, R. Bárcena, and V. Durán. 1996 Trace-Element Analysis of Obsidian Sources and Artifacts of Central Chile (Maule River Basin) and Western Argentina (Colorado River). Latin American Antiquity 7:7–20.Google Scholar
Sidrys, R. V. 1976a Classic Maya Obsidian Trade. American Antiquity 41:449–464.Google Scholar
Sidrys, R. V. 1976b Mesoamerica: An Archaeological Analysis of a Low-Energy Civilization. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Sidrys, R. V. 1977 Mass-Distance Measures for the Maya Obsidian Trade. In Exchange Systems in Prehistory, edited by T. K. Earle and J. E. Ericson, pp. 91–108. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Stross, F. H., Sheets, P. D., Asaro, F., and Michel, H. V. 1983 Precise Characterization of Guatemalan Obsidian Sources, and Source Determination of Artifacts from Quirigua. American Antiquity 48:323–346.Google Scholar
Stross, F. H., Weaver, J. R., Wyld, G. E. A., Heizer, R. F., and Graham, J. A. 1968 Analysis of American Obsidians by X-Ray Fluorescence and Neutron Activation Analysis. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 5:59–79.Google Scholar
Torrence, R. 1986 Production and Exchange of Stone Tools: Prehistoric Obsidian in the Aegean. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trombold, C. D., Luhr, J. F., Hasenaka, T., and Glascock, M. D. 1993 Chemical Characteristics of Obsidian from Archaeological Sites in Western Mexico and the Tequila Source Area: Implication for Regional and Pan-Regional Interaction within the Northern Mesoamerican Periphery. Ancient Mesoamerica 4:255–270.Google Scholar
Washington, H. S. 1921 Obsidian from Copán and Chichén Itzá. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 11:481–487.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. R., and Stross, F. H. 1965 Analysis by X-Ray Fluorescence of Some American Obsidians. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 1:89–93.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, R. N. 1982 Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Interregional Commodity Distribution: Political Variables and Prehistoric Obsidian Procurement in Mesoamerica. 47:260–275.Google Scholar