Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T12:49:40.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flake Tools in the American Arctic: Some Speculations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Edwin N. Wilmsen*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Abstract

Two sites, Kogruk (at the summit of Anaktuvuk Pass, Alaska) and Engigstciak (at the head of the Firth River delta, Yukon Territory, Canada), have recently yielded flake-tool assemblages which show striking resemblances to a Eurasiatic flake-blade tradition based on a Levallois-Mousterian stone-chipping technique, and to the Clovis flake-blade tradition of America which appears to be based on a similar chipping technique. It is suggested that these traditions are historically related and that the Arctic sites provide a possible link between the two. The presence of incipient fluting in Siberia and at Engigstciak may prove significant. Dating is discussed in terms of the ecology and geology of the sites and is correlated with the probable periods of availability of the Bering land bridge. An upland-foothills zone is seen to be essentially continuous from central Asia to central North America. It is suggested that this zone provided the only environmentally compatible link between the two continents, and that it was therefore the most probable route of early hunting peoples into the New World.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borden, Charles E. 1960 DjRi-3, An Early Site in the Fraser Canyon, British Columbia. Contributions to Anthropology 1957, National Museum of Canada, Bulletin 162. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Bushnell, Geoffrey and McBurney, Charles 1959 New World Origins Seen from the Old World. Antiquity, Vol. 33, No. 130, pp. 93101. Newbury.Google Scholar
Campbell, John M. 1961 The Kogruk Complex of Anaktuvuk Pass, Alaska. Anthropologics, n.s., Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 320. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Chard, Chester S. 1958 Old World Sources for Early Lithic Cultures. Adas del Congresso lnternacional de Americanistas, Vol. 1, pp. 314-20. San Jose.Google Scholar
Chard, Chester S. 1959 New World Origins: A Reappraisal. Antiquity, Vol. 33, No. 129, pp. 44-8. Newbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cressman, Luther S. 1960 Cultural Sequences at The Dalles, Oregon. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., Vol. 50, Pt. 10. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Daugherty, Richard B. 1956 Archaeology of the Lind Coulee Site, Washington. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 100, No. 3. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Giddings, J. L. 1952 Ancient Bering Sea and Population Spread. Science in Alaska, No. 1, edited by Collins, H. B., pp. 85102. Washington.Google Scholar
Giddings, J. L. 1961 Cultural Continuities of Eskimos. American Antquity, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 155-73. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenman, E. G. 1963 The Upper Paleolithic and the New World. Current Anthropology, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 4191. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Haury, Emil W., Sayles, E. B., and Wasley, William W. 1959 The Lehner Mammoth Site, Southeastern Arizona. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 230. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Hester, J. J. 1962 A Folsom Lithic Complex from the Elida Site, Roosevelt County, New Mexico. El Palacio, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 92113. Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Hopkins, David M. 1959 Cenozoic History of the Bering Land Bridge. Science, Vol. 129, No. 3362, pp. 1519-28. Washington.Google Scholar
Irving, William 1953 Evidences of Early Tundra Cultures in Northern Alaska. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska, Vol. 1, pp. 5585. College.Google Scholar
Mackay, J. R., Mathews, W. H., and Macneish, R. S. 1961 Geology of the Engigstciak Archaeological Site, Yukon Territory. Arctic, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 2552. Montreal.Google Scholar
Macneish, Richard S. 1956 The Engigstciak Site on the Yukon Arctic Coast. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 91111. College.Google Scholar
Macneish, Richard S. 1959a A Speculative Framework of Northern North American Prehistory as of April 1959. Anthropologica, n.s., Vol. 1, pp. 117. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Macneish, Richard S. 1959b Men Out of Asia: As Seen from the Northwest Yukon. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 4170. College.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul S. 1958 Pleistocene Ecology and Biogeography of North America. Zoogeography, edited by Hubbs, C. L., pp. 375420. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington.Google Scholar
Mason, Ronald J. 1958 Late Pleistocene Geochronology and the Paleo- Indian Penetration into the Lower Michigan Peninsula. Anthropological Papers, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, No. 11. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Solecki, Ralph S. 1950 Archeology and Ecology of the Arctic Slope of Alaska. Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 1950, pp. 469-95. Washington.Google Scholar
Solecki, Ralph S. 1962 New Early Man Evidence in Northeastern Alaska, 1961. Paper read before 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. Tucson.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. and Phillips, Philip 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. Phoenix Books. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Witthoft, John 1952 A Paleo-Indian Site in Eastern Pennsylvania: An Early Hunting Culture. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 464-95. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Wormington, H. M. 1962a A Survey of Early American Prehistory. American Scientist, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 230-42. Easton.Google Scholar
Wormington, H. M. 1962b The Problems of the Presence and Dating in America of Flaking Techniques Similar to the Paleolithic of the Old World. Atti del 6th Congresso Internationale della Scienze Preistoriche e Protoistoriche, Vol. 1, pp. 273-83. Rome.Google Scholar