Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:08:31.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparison of Voting for U.S. Senator and Representative in 1978

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Alan I. Abramowitz*
Affiliation:
College of William and Mary

Abstract

This article compares voting for U.S. senator and representative in 1978. Analysis of data from the Center for Political Studies 1978 Election Study reveals that incumbents were better known and more positively evaluated than challengers, but House incumbents enjoyed a much greater advantage than Senate incumbents. The invisibility of most House challengers was a serious obstacle to accountability in House elections. Senate challengers were much more visible to the electorate. In addition, ideology and party identification had a greater impact on evaluations of Senate candidates than on evaluations of House candidates. Evaluations of House incumbents appear to have been based largely on frequent positive contacts between voters and their representative. As a result, ideological voting was more prevalent in Senate elections than in House elections.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fenno, Richard F. Jr. (1975). “If as Ralph Nader Says, Congress is the ‘Broken Branch, ’ How Come We Love Our Congressmen So Much?” In Ornstein, Norman (ed.), Congress in Change. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Glantz, Stanton A., Abramowitz, Alan I., and Burkart, Michael P. (1976). “Election Outcomes: Whose Money Matters?Journal of Politics 38: 1033–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (1979). The American National Election Study, 1978. Ann Arbor, Michigan: ICPSR.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. (1978). “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.American Political Science Review 72: 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar