Abstract
Shoal grass, Halodule wrightii, exhibited different morphologies when growing in a monospecific meadow compared to plants growing under a canopy of turtle grass, Thalassia testudinum. When growing under a turtle grass canopy, shoal grass had longer internodes, less frequent branching, and lower aboveground to belowground biomass ratios than when growing in a monospecific meadow. Aquarium studies approximated the observed phenomena in the field study. Rhizome growth of sprigs of shoal grass (mm d−1) was greater for plants grown under 35% light reduction caused by blades of turtle grass than for sprigs grown under ambient light. Sprigs grown under 35% light reduction caused by neutral density screens had rhizome growth rates lower than controls. Greater rhizome growth rates of sprigs grown under turtle grass blades were due to increased internode distances, rather than increased rates of shoot formation. The environmental factor responsible for inducing morphological changes in shoal grass appears to be the ratio between red and far-red light. This ratio declines as light passes through a canopy of blades of turtle grass.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Briske, D. D. and J. L. Butler. 1989. Density-dependent regulation of ramet populations within the bunchgrass Schizachyrium scoparium: Interclonal versus intraclonal interference. Journal of Ecology 77:963–974.
Franco, M. 1986. The influence of neighbours on the growth of modular organisms with an example from trees. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 313:209–225.
Hartnett, D. C. and F. A. Bazzaz. 1985. The genet and ramet population dynamics of Solidago canadensis in an abandoned field. Journal of Ecology 73:407–413.
Holmes, M. G. 1983. Perception of shade. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 303:503–521.
Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54:187–211.
Lewis, R. R., M. J. Durako, M. D. Moffler, and R. C. Phillips. 1985. Seagrass meadows of Tampa Bay—A review, p. 210–246. In S. F. Treat, J. L. Simon, R. R. Lewis, and R. L. Whitman (eds.). Proceeding, Tampa Bay Area Scientific Information Symposium, May 1982. Florida Sea Grant Publication 65, Burgess, Minneapolis.
Noble, J. C., A. D. Bell, and J. L. Harper. 1979. The population biology of plants with clonal growth. I. The morphology and structural demography of Carex arenaria. Journal of Ecology 67:983–1008.
Rumbaugh, M. D. 1970. A clonal competition experiment with Alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. Agronomy Journal 62:51–55.
Slade, A. J. and M. J. Hutchings. 1987a. The effects of nutrient availability on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. Journal of Ecology 75:95–112.
Slade, A. J. and M. J. Hutchings. 1987b. Clonal integration and plasticity in foraging behaviour in Glechoma hederacea. Journal of Ecology 75:1023–1036.
Sutherland, W. J. and R. A. Stillman. 1988. The foraging tactics of plants. Oikos 52:239–244.
Thompson, L. and J. L. Harper. 1988. The effect of grasses on the quality of transmitted radiation and its influence on the growth of white clover Trifolium repens. Oecologia 75:343–347.
Williams, S. L. 1987. Competition between the seagrasses Thalassia testudinum and Syringodium filiforme in a Caribbean lagoon. Marine Ecology Progress Series 35:91–98.
Wilson, J. B. 1988. Shoot competition and root competition. Journal of Applied Ecology 25:279–296.
Zieman, J. C. 1982. The Ecology of the Seagrasses of South Florida: A Community Profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, Office of Biological Services, Washington, D.C. FWS/OBS-82/25. 158 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomasko, D.A. Variation in growth form of shoal grass (Halodule wrightii) due to changes in the spectral composition of light below a canopy of turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum). Estuaries 15, 214–217 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/1352694
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1352694