Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:11:47.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Myth, Environment, and the Orientation of the Templo Mayor of Tenochtitlan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

A. F. Aveni ,
E. E. Calnek  and
H. Hartung
A. F. Aveni
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY 13346
E. E. Calnek
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
H. Hartung
Affiliation:
Faculty of Architecture, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the light of the recent excavations of the Templo Mayor in downtown Mexico City, we explore the problem of the role of astronomy, calendar, and the landscape in the design and orientation of the building and of the city in general. We employ ethnohistoric data relating to the foundation myth of Tenochtitlan as a means of generating hypotheses concerning astronomical orientation that can be tested by reference to the archaeological record. We find that eastward-looking observations (implied in dismantling and reconstructing the myth) that took place around the time of the equinox may have been related to an attempt to transform a true east orientation from the natural environment into the architecture via a line that passed through the center of the Temple of Huitzilopochtli (the more southerly temple of the pair constituting the top of the Templo Mayor). It also is possible that the notch between the twin temples served a calendrical/orientational function. Evidence is presented to support the view that the mountain cult of Tlaloc, represented in the environment on the periphery of the Valley of Mexico by Mount Tlaloc, also may have directly influenced the orientation of the building and that it was part of a scheme for marking out days of the calendar by reference to the position of the rising sun at intervals of 20 days from the spring equinox. In this regard, we discuss the connection between the Templo Mayor and an enclosure containing offertory chambers atop Mount Tlaloc, which is located on a line extended to the visible horizon 44 km east of the ceremonial center. The ethnohistoric record implies that this place had been used for sacrifices to the rain god after whom the other of the twin temples of the Templo Mayor was named.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 287 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Alvarado Tezozomoc, H. 1944 Cronica Mexicana. Seleccion e introduccion por M. Mariscal. Secretana de Educacion Publica, Mexico City (reprint of 1878 edition).Google Scholar
Alvarado Tezozomoc, H. 1949 Cronica Mexicayotl. Edited by Leon, A.. Universidad Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. F., and Gibbs, S. L. 1976 On the Orientation of Pre-Columbian Buildings in Central Mexico. American Antiquity 41 : 510–517.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. F., and Hartung, H. 1982 New Observations of the Pecked Cross Petroglyph. Lateinamerika Studien 10 : 25–41.Google Scholar
Aveni, A. F., Hartung, H., and Buckingham, B. 1977 The Pecked Cross Symbol in Ancient Mesoamerica. Science 202 : 267–279.Google Scholar
Barlow, R. H. (editor) 1949 Codice Azcatitlan. Journal de la Societe des Americanistes de Paris 38 (supplement).Google Scholar
Berlin, H. 1948 Anales de Tlatelolco : Unos anales historicos de la nacion Mexicana, y Codice de Tlatelolco. Antiguo Libreria Robredo, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Broda, J. 1982a El culto Mexica de los cerros y del agua. Multidisciplina 7 : 45-56. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Broda, J. 1982b La fiesta Azteca del fuego nuevo y el culto de las Pleyadas. Lateinamerika Studien 10 : 129–157.Google Scholar
Calnek, E. E. 1974 Conjunto urbano y residencial en Tenochtitlan. In Ensayos sobre el Desarrollo Urbano de Mexico, pp. 11–65. Sep Setentas 143, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Calnek, E. E. 1976 The Internal Structure of Tenochtitlan. In The Valley of Mexico, edited by Wolf, E., pp. 287–302. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Carrasco, P. 1976 La sociedad Mexicana antes de la Conquista. In Historia General de Mexico, vol. I, edited by Martinez, B. Garcia, Lorenzo, J. L., Bernal, I., and Carrasco, P., pp. 165–288. El Colegio de Mexico, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Chimalpahin, D. 1958 Das Memorial Breve Acerca de la Fundacion de la Ciudad de Culhuacan und Weitere Ausgewdhlte Telle aus den “Diferentes Historias Originales” (Ms. Mexicain No. 74, Paris). Translated by Lehmann, W. and Kutscher, G.. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Clark, J. (editor and translator) 1938 Manuscrito Mexico conocido como coleccion de Mendoza, Bodleian Library, Oxford. Waterloo & Sons, London.Google Scholar
Cook de Leonard, C. 1971 Minor Arts of the Classic Period in Central Mexico. In Archaeology of Northern Mesoamerica, pt. I, edited by Ekholm, G. F. and Bernal, I., pp. 207–208. Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. 10, R. Wauchope, general editor. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Dibble, C. E. (editor) 1963 Historia de la nacion Mexicana : Reproduccion a todo color del Codice de 1576 (Codice Aubin). Jose Porrua Turanzas, Madrid.Google Scholar
Dow, J. W. 1967 Astronomical Orientations at Teotihuacan, a Case Study in Astroarchaeology. American Antiquity 32 : 326–334.Google Scholar
Duran, D. 1971 Historia de las indias de Nueva Espana. 2 vols., edited by Garibay, A. M.. Porrua, K., Mexico.Google Scholar
Garcia, G. (editor) 1910 The True History of the Conquest of New Spain by Bernal Diaz del Castillo, One of its Conquerers, vol. III. Hakluyt Society, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Garcia Icazbalceta, J. (editor) 1941a Historia de los Mexicanos por sus pinturas. In Nueva Coleccion de Documentos para la Historia de Mexico, vol. 3, pp. 209–240. Chavez Hayhoe, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Garcia Icazbalceta, J. (editor) 1941b Relation de Texcoco. In Nueva Coleccion de Documentos para la Historia de Mexico, vol. 3, pp. 1–64. Chavez Hayhoe, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Garcia Icazbalceta, J. (editor) 1941c Codex Franciscano. Nueva Coleccion de Documentos para la Historia de Mexico, vol. 1. Chavez Hayhoe, Mexico.Google Scholar
Graulich, M. 1982 Quecholli et Panquetzaliztli : Une nouvelle interpretation. Lateinamerika Studien 10 : 159–173.Google Scholar
Harvey, H., and Williams, B. 1980 Aztec Arithmetic : Positional Notation and Area Calculation. Science 210 : 499–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellbom, A. B. 1979 Reflejos de “sincretismo” en el Valle de Mexico. Acts XLII International Congress of Americanists VI: 73-84. Fondation Singer-Polignac, Paris.Google Scholar
Ixtlilxochitl, F. 1952 Obras historical. 2 vols. Museo National de Antropologia, Mexico. Google Scholar
Mapa de, Siguenza n.d. Mexico City. Museo Nacional de Antropologia. Codex collection 35–14.Google Scholar
Marquina, I. 1960 El Templo Mayor de Mexico. Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Matos Moctezuma, E. 1981 Una visita al Templo Mayor. Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Matos Moctezuma, E. 1984 The Great Temple of Tenochtitlan. Scientific American 251(2) : 70–79.Google Scholar
Maudslay, A. P. 1912 A Note on the Position and Extent of the Great Temple Enclosure of Tenochtitlan. Acts XVIII International Congress of Americanists, pp. 173–175. London.Google Scholar
Mengin, E. 1952 Commentaire du Codex Mexicanus No. 23-24. Journal de la Societe des Americanistes 41.Google Scholar
Millon, R. 1973 Urbanization at Teotihuacan, Mexico , vol. 1. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Motolinia, T. 1971 Memoriales o libro de las cosas de Nueva Espana y de los naturales de Ella , edited by O'Gorman, E.. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Noguez, X. (editor) 1978 Tira de Tepexpan (Tepechpan). 2 vols. Bibliografia Enciclopedica del Estado de Mexico, Mexico.Google Scholar
Nuttall, Z. (editor) 1975 [Codex Nuttall] A Picture Manuscript from Ancient Mexico. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Rickards, C. G. 1929 The ruins of Tlaloc, State of Mexico. Journal de la Societe de Americanistes 21 : 197–199.Google Scholar
Sahagun, B. 1950-1982 Florentine Codex, General History of the Things of New Spain. 12 vols, and introduction. Translated by Anderson, A. and Dibble, C.. School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Seler, E. 1904 Die Ausgrabungen am Orte des Haupttempels in Mexiko. Gesammelte Abhandlungen 11 : 767–904.Google Scholar
Siemens, A. H. 1983 Oriented Raised Fields in Central Veracruz. American Antiquity 48 : 85–102.Google Scholar
Tichy, F. 1974 Explicacion de las redes de poblaciones y terrenos como testimonio de la occupacion y planificacion del Altiplano Central en el Mexico antiguo. Comunicaciones 11 : 41–52.Google Scholar
Tichy, F. 1983 El Patron de asentamientos con sistema radial en la Meseta Central de Mexico : ^Sistemas ceques en Mesoamerica? Jahrbuch fur Geschichte Lateinamerikas 20 : 61–84.Google Scholar
Torquemada, J. 1975 Monarquia indiana. Porrua, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Townsend, R. 1979 State and Cosmos in the Art of Tenochtitlan. Dumbarton Oaks Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology No. 20. Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Umberger, E. 1981 The Structure of Aztec History. Archaeoastronomy Bulletin (IV) 4 : 10–18.Google Scholar
van Zantwijk, R. 1985 The Aztec Arrangement. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Wheatley, P. 1971 The Pivot of the Four Quarters. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wicke, C, and Horcasitas, F. 1957 Archaeological Investigations on Monte Tlaloc, Mexico. Mesoamerican Notes 5 : 83-97.Google Scholar