Skip to main content
Log in

The distribution ofJuncus roemerianus in the salt marshes of North America

  • Short Papers and Notes
  • Published:
Chesapeake Science

Abstract

Although scattered individuals ofJuncus roemerianus Scheele may be found northward in New Jersey, Long Island, New York, Connecticut and southward along the Laguna Madre in Texas, Mexico and on the Caribbean islands, the species is most prevalent along the south Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the eastern United States. Here there are approximately 3,174,333 hectares of salt marsh of which 72.9% occur on the Gulf coast and 27.1% on the Atlantic coast.Juncus roemerianus dominates 20.7% of the marsh in the south Atlantic states and 7.3% of the Gulf coast marshes, but covers more marsh area on the Gulf coast (170,067 hectares) than on the Atlantic coast (149,316 hectares). Thus, there are approximately 320,000 hectares of salt marsh dominated byJ. roemerianus in North America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Carter, J. F. [1969]. Wetlands Report, New Hampshire Water Resour. Bd. Society for Protection of New Hampshire Forests. 7 p.

  • Chabreck, R. H. 1970. Marsh zones and vegetative types in the Louisiana coastal marshes. Ph.D. Diss., La. St. Univ., Baton Rouge. 114 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesmore, A. P., and Allen Peterson, Jr. 1970. Massachusetts estuarine research and protection programs.Trans. 35th North Amer. Wildlife and Natural Res. p. 247–258.

  • Connecticut Legislative Council. 1969. Supplementary report on preservation of wetlands to the 1969 General Assembly Special Committee to Study Water Resources Problems. 14 p.

  • Crance, J. H. 1971. Description of Alabama estuarine areas—cooperative Gulf of Mexico estuarine inventory. Ala. Mar. Res. Bull 6. Ala. Mar. Res. Lab., Dauphin Island. 85 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critcher, T. S. 1967. The wildlife values of North Carolina’s estuarine lands and waters. N. C. Wildlife Res. Comm. 4p.

  • Division of Fish and Game, Rhode Island Dept. of Agriculture and Conservation. 1965. Rhode Island salt water marsh inventory. 13 p.

  • Eleuterius, L. N. 1971. Recent changes in the Louisiana marsh near Vermilion Bay.Gulf Research Reports 5(2):259–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1972. The marshes of Mississippi.Castanea 37: 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1974. The autecology ofJuncus roemerianus. Ph.D. Diss, Miss. St. Univ., Mississippi State, 221 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrigno, F. 1970. Marsh destruction. Ecology of salt marsh and coastal impoundments. State of New Jersey, Project no. W-34-R-15. 17 p.

  • Hammond, R. A. 1969. Proposed marsh bank program for coastal Georgia. Coastal Area Planning and Devel. Comm. 16 p. and App. B.

  • Harney, J. E. 1961. Wetlands preservation on Long Island.The New York State Conservationist, p. 1–3.

  • Maryland State Planning Department. 1970. Draft Report, Wetlands in Maryland. Dept. of Game and Inland Fish and the Wetlands Technical Advisory Committee. Vol. II.

  • McNulty, J. K., W. N. Lindall and J. E. Sykes. 1972. Cooperative Gulf of Mexico estuarine inventory and study Florida: Phase I, Area description. NOAA Technical Report NMFS CIRC-368. U. S. Dept. of Commerce, 127 p.

  • O’Neil, T. 1949. The muskrat in the Louisiana coastal marshes. La. Dept. of Wild Life and Fisheries. New Orleans. 152 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret, W. S., B. B. Barrett, W. R. Latapie, J. F. Pollard, W. R. Mock, G. B. Adkins, W. J. Gaidry andC. J. White. 1971. Cooperative Gulf of Mexico estuarine inventory and study, Louisiana. Phase I, Area description. Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries Commission. New Orleans. 175 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Carolina Water Resources Commission. 1970. South Carolina Tidelands Report. 178 p.

  • Spinner, G. P. 1969. The wildlife wetlands and shellfish areas of the Atlantic coastal zone.American Geographical Society. 2 p. and 12 plate map folio.

  • Turner, R. E., andJ. G. Gosselink. 1975. A note on the standing crops ofSpartina alterniflora in Texas and Florida.Contrib. Mar. Sci. 19:111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wass, M. L., and T. D. Wright. 1969. Coastal wetlands of Virginia. Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering No. 10. 154 p.

  • Williams, R. B., andM. B. Murdoch. 1972. Compartmental analysis of the production ofJuncus roemerianus in North Carolina salt marsh.Chesapeake Sci. 13(2):69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. A. 1968. Fur production on southeastern coastal marshes. Proc. Marsh and Estuary Manag. Symp., La. St. Univ., Baton Rouge. p. 149–171.

  • Wilson, K. A. 1972. North Carolina wetlands: their distribution and management. North Carolina Wildlife Res. Comm. 169 p.

  • Wallace, D. B., and R. B. Parks. [1967]. Maine legislature enacts a coastal wetlands law. [mimeograph] Maine Dept. of Sea and Shore Fisheries. 6 p.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eleuterius, L.N. The distribution ofJuncus roemerianus in the salt marshes of North America. Chesapeake Science 17, 289–292 (1976). https://doi.org/10.2307/1350516

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1350516

Keywords

Navigation