About the journal

Cobiss

Theoria, Beograd 2021 Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages: 161-172
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2101161I
Full text ( 286 KB)
Cited by


Philosophical and psychological approaches to bullshit

Ilić Sandra ORCID iD icon (Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Odeljenje za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu)
Damnjanović Kaja (Institut za filozofiju, Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Odeljenje za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu)

In this paper, we give an overview of philosophical considerations of and psychological empirical research on bullshit. While taking this concept from philosophy, in the first wave of research, psychologists implicitly changed both the content and definition of the concept, focusing on aspects of bullshit phenomena addressable by empirical tools, such as individual differences in bullshit receptivity. In the second wave, researchers, adequately, relied more on contemporary philosophical analyses and definitions of bullshit. This led to employing experimental procedures to examine the distinctive features of such statements, influence of the speaker, that is - the source of bullshit, as well as implications for public discourse. In the concluding part, shortcomings of the existing approaches addressed, social implications of use of bullshit and receptivity to them are highlighted, and suggestions on how to overcome these shortcomings are presented.

Keywords: bullshit, pseudoprofound bullshit, bullshit receptivity, psychology of bullshit