A New Interpretation of the Gongsun Longzi: The White Horse as an Analogy for Human Nature

@article{ART002440637},
author={ 정단비 },
title={A New Interpretation of the Gongsun Longzi: The White Horse as an Analogy for Human Nature},
journal={Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture},
issn={1598-267X},
year={2019},
number={31},
pages={15-37},
doi={10.22916/jcpc.2019..31.15},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.22916/jcpc.2019..31.15}

TY - JOUR
AU - 정단비
TI - A New Interpretation of the Gongsun Longzi: The White Horse as an Analogy for Human Nature
T2 - Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
PY - 2019
VL -
IS - 31
PB - 성균관대학교 유교문화연구소
SP - 15-37
SN - 1598-267X
AB - It has been the focus of much debate for scholars studying the Gongsun longzi 公孫龍子 whether his most famous sophistry, “White Horse is Not a Horse” (bai ma fei ma 白馬非馬), is a proclamation of the Chinese version of a theory of universals. This paper aims to analyze and understand the true implications of “Baimalun” 白馬論 (White Horse Dialogue), by comparing it to the terms and metaphors often used by Gongsun Long’s contemporaries and not to concepts of Western philosophy. For example, in the chapter “Zhiwulun” 指物論 (On Cognition and Things), Gongsun Long claims that zhi 指 (cognition) may have binary significance, before and after its addition to external things. This two-fold definition of key terms is found in both the Xunzi 荀子 and Mozi 墨子: a single character is used to signify human faculty, both before and after its contact with external stimulus. This pattern is repeated in the “Baimalun” chapter: the term horse may customarily refer to both a horse of undecided color or before its combination with color, and a horse of fixed color or after its combination with color. In the theories of the Hundred Schools, materials composed of undecided characteristics that turn into inflexible objects through external intervention are often used as metaphors for changes in human nature. This pattern, repeated in both “Zhiwulun” and the “Baimalun,” may indicate that the white horse, as an object of fixed characteristics, was used as an analogue for the changeability of human nature through education or social interaction, whether for good or bad. While Xunzi and Mozi stop at pointing out the dual meaning of the key terms, Gongsun Long tends to stress the difference between the two, therefore “White Horse is Not a Horse.” His inclination to emphasize the non-identity of one’s inner nature and one’s response to external intervention may provide a valuable clue to the true agenda hidden behind his sophistries.
KW - Gongsun longzi, “Baimalun”, human nature, external stimulus, theory of universals
DO - 10.22916/jcpc.2019..31.15
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.22916/jcpc.2019..31.15
ER -

정단비 (2019). A New Interpretation of the Gongsun Longzi: The White Horse as an Analogy for Human Nature. Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 31, 15- 37.

정단비 . 2019, “A New Interpretation of the Gongsun Longzi: The White Horse as an Analogy for Human Nature”, Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, no. 31, pp. 15-37. Available from: doi:10.22916/jcpc.2019..31.15

정단비 “A New Interpretation of the Gongsun Longzi: The White Horse as an Analogy for Human Nature” Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture 31 pp. 15-37 (2019): 15.

정단비 . A New Interpretation of the Gongsun Longzi: The White Horse as an Analogy for Human Nature Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture [Internet]. 2019; 31: 15-37. Available from: doi:10.22916/jcpc.2019..31.15

정단비 . “A New Interpretation of the Gongsun Longzi: The White Horse as an Analogy for Human Nature” Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture no.31 (2019): 15-37. doi: 10.22916/jcpc.2019..31.15

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

A New Interpretation of the Gongsun Longzi: The White Horse as an Analogy for Human Nature

Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture

약어 : JCPC

2019, no.31, pp.15 - 37

DOI : 10.22916/jcpc.2019..31.15

발행기관 : 성균관대학교 유교문화연구소

연구분야 : 유교학

정단비¹

¹서울대학교

인용한 논문 수 : - 서지 간략 보기

초록

It has been the focus of much debate for scholars studying the Gongsun longzi 公孫龍子 whether his most famous sophistry, “White Horse is Not a Horse” (bai ma fei ma 白馬非馬), is a proclamation of the Chinese version of a theory of universals. This paper aims to analyze and understand the true implications of “Baimalun” 白馬論 (White Horse Dialogue), by comparing it to the terms and metaphors often used by Gongsun Long’s contemporaries and not to concepts of Western philosophy. For example, in the chapter “Zhiwulun” 指物論 (On Cognition and Things), Gongsun Long claims that zhi 指 (cognition) may have binary significance, before and after its addition to external things. This two-fold definition of key terms is found in both the Xunzi 荀子 and Mozi 墨子: a single character is used to signify human faculty, both before and after its contact with external stimulus. This pattern is repeated in the “Baimalun” chapter: the term horse may customarily refer to both a horse of undecided color or before its combination with color, and a horse of fixed color or after its combination with color. In the theories of the Hundred Schools, materials composed of undecided characteristics that turn into inflexible objects through external intervention are often used as metaphors for changes in human nature. This pattern, repeated in both “Zhiwulun” and the “Baimalun,” may indicate that the white horse, as an object of fixed characteristics, was used as an analogue for the changeability of human nature through education or social interaction, whether for good or bad. While Xunzi and Mozi stop at pointing out the dual meaning of the key terms, Gongsun Long tends to stress the difference between the two, therefore “White Horse is Not a Horse.” His inclination to emphasize the non-identity of one’s inner nature and one’s response to external intervention may provide a valuable clue to the true agenda hidden behind his sophistries.

키워드

Gongsun longzi, “Baimalun”, human nature, external stimulus, theory of universals

참고문헌(18)

[학위논문] 장원태 / 2005 / 전국시대 인성론의 형성과 전개에 관한 연구 : 유가, 묵가, 법가를 중심으로
[학술지] Cheng, Chung-ying / 1983 / Kong-sun Lung : White Horse and Other Issues / Philosophy East and West 33 (4) : 341 ~ 354
[단행본] Fung, Yu-lan / 1953 / A History of Chinese Philosophy / Princeton University Press
[단행본] Graham, A. C. / 1991 / Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature / State University of New York Press
[단행본] Graham, A. C. / 2003 / Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science / Chinese University Press
[단행본] Hansen, Chad / 1983 / Language and Logic in Ancient China / University of Michigan Press
[단행본] Hu, Shi 胡適 / 2013 / Zhongguo zhexueshi dagang 中國哲學史大綱 (Outline of the History of Chinese Philosophy) / Taibei daxue chubanshe
[단행본] Johnston, Ian / 2010 / The Mozi: A Complete Translation / Columbia University Press
[학술지] 강지연 / 2012 / 『공손룡자(公孫龍子)』해석의 제문제(諸問題) 비판 / 동서철학연구 63 : 309 ~ 330
[학술지] 김철신 / 2007 / <<공손룡자>>의 세 주석에 대한타당성 고찰 / 동양철학연구 (51) : 157 ~ 182
[학술지] 김철신 / 2005 / 공손룡(公孫龍) 철학 이해의 한 방식 / 철학 (82) : 47 ~ 68
[단행본] Knoblock, John. / 1988 / Xunzi : A Translation and Study of the Complete Works / Stanford University Press
[단행본] Mou, Zongsan 牟宗三. / 1979 / Mingjia yu xunzi 名家與荀子 / Taibei xuesheng shuju
[단행본] Pang, Pu 龐樸. / 1974 / Gongsun longzi quanyi 公孫龍子全譯 / Shanghai renmin chubanshe
[단행본] Pang, Pu 龐樸. / 1985 / Gongsun longzi yanjiu 公孫龍子硏究 / Zhonghua shuju
[단행본] Wang, Xianqian 王先謙. / 1988 / Xunzi jijie 荀子集解 / Zhonghua shuju
[단행본] Xu, Fuguan 徐復觀. / 1979 / Gongsun longzi jiangshu 公孫龍子講疏 / Taibei xuesheng shuju
[단행본] Yang, Bojun 楊伯峻. / 2005 / Mengzi yizhu 孟子譯註 / Zhonghua shuju