Relationship between Rituals(禮) and Consideration(恕) in Tasan's Classical Studies ‐ Focusing on His Interpretation of Analects and Mencius

@article{ART001693687},
author={ 함윤식 },
title={Relationship between Rituals(禮) and Consideration(恕) in Tasan's Classical Studies ‐ Focusing on His Interpretation of Analects and Mencius},
journal={Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture},
issn={1598-267X},
year={2012},
number={18},
pages={1-28},
doi={10.22916/jcpc.2012..18.1},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.22916/jcpc.2012..18.1}

TY - JOUR
AU - 함윤식
TI - Relationship between Rituals(禮) and Consideration(恕) in Tasan's Classical Studies ‐ Focusing on His Interpretation of Analects and Mencius
T2 - Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
PY - 2012
VL -
IS - 18
PB - 성균관대학교 유교문화연구소
SP - 1-28
SN - 1598-267X
AB - According to Tasan, when placed in an identical situation, all people feel the same emotions and have the same desires. Therefore when the self and the other are under the same circumstances, it is possible for the self to know what the other feels and desires by extrapolating from one’s own feelings and desires. These feelings and desires correspond to the ‘human mind (人心)’ of the Theory of the Human mind and the Tao mind (人心道心說). 'Consideration (shu 恕),' or putting oneself in the other’s place, means that the self will suppress its own 'human mind' through 'Tao mind,' fulfilling the desire of the other party, which must be the same as one’s own; the greater self (or great constitution, 大體) overcomes the lesser self (or small constitution, 小體). To ‘overcome oneself (克己),’ as Confucius expresses it, appears through such an act of consideration (恕). Ultimately, in the process of fulfilling benevolence (仁), consideration (恕) and the rituals (禮), are linked through overcoming oneself (克己). If one has cultivated oneself sufficiently, to the point of becoming a saint or a sage, consideration alone is enough for one to behave in the same manner as that required by rituals. However, for ordinary people, it is difficult to define and carry out the most appropriate behavior for achieving benevolence (仁) by employing consideration alone. Rituals complement consideration, and make up for any inadequacies in employing consideration alone, by providing guidelines for ordinary people to carry out the most appropriate actions; because, rituals are that which were provided beforehand through the consideration of saints and sages. Thus, in the process of achieving benevolence, consideration and rituals are combined in a complementary relationship.
KW - Tasan (茶山), consideration (恕), rituals (禮), overcoming oneself (克己), theory of the human mind and Tao-mind (人心道心)
DO - 10.22916/jcpc.2012..18.1
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.22916/jcpc.2012..18.1
ER -

함윤식 (2012). Relationship between Rituals(禮) and Consideration(恕) in Tasan's Classical Studies ‐ Focusing on His Interpretation of Analects and Mencius. Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 18, 1- 28.

함윤식 . 2012, “Relationship between Rituals(禮) and Consideration(恕) in Tasan's Classical Studies ‐ Focusing on His Interpretation of Analects and Mencius”, Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, no. 18, pp. 1-28. Available from: doi:10.22916/jcpc.2012..18.1

함윤식 “Relationship between Rituals(禮) and Consideration(恕) in Tasan's Classical Studies ‐ Focusing on His Interpretation of Analects and Mencius” Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture 18 pp. 1-28 (2012): 1.

함윤식 . Relationship between Rituals(禮) and Consideration(恕) in Tasan's Classical Studies ‐ Focusing on His Interpretation of Analects and Mencius Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture [Internet]. 2012; 18: 1-28. Available from: doi:10.22916/jcpc.2012..18.1

함윤식 . “Relationship between Rituals(禮) and Consideration(恕) in Tasan's Classical Studies ‐ Focusing on His Interpretation of Analects and Mencius” Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture no.18 (2012): 1-28. doi: 10.22916/jcpc.2012..18.1

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

Relationship between Rituals(禮) and Consideration(恕) in Tasan's Classical Studies ‐ Focusing on His Interpretation of Analects and Mencius

Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture

약어 : JCPC

2012, no.18, pp.1 - 28

DOI : 10.22916/jcpc.2012..18.1

발행기관 : 성균관대학교 유교문화연구소

연구분야 : 유교학

함윤식¹

¹성균관대학교

인용한 논문 수 : - 서지 간략 보기

초록

According to Tasan, when placed in an identical situation, all people feel the same emotions and have the same desires. Therefore when the self and the other are under the same circumstances, it is possible for the self to know what the other feels and desires by extrapolating from one’s own feelings and desires. These feelings and desires correspond to the ‘human mind (人心)’ of the Theory of the Human mind and the Tao mind (人心道心說). 'Consideration (shu 恕),' or putting oneself in the other’s place, means that the self will suppress its own 'human mind' through 'Tao mind,' fulfilling the desire of the other party, which must be the same as one’s own; the greater self (or great constitution, 大體) overcomes the lesser self (or small constitution, 小體). To ‘overcome oneself (克己),’ as Confucius expresses it, appears through such an act of consideration (恕). Ultimately, in the process of fulfilling benevolence (仁), consideration (恕) and the rituals (禮), are linked through overcoming oneself (克己). If one has cultivated oneself sufficiently, to the point of becoming a saint or a sage, consideration alone is enough for one to behave in the same manner as that required by rituals. However, for ordinary people, it is difficult to define and carry out the most appropriate behavior for achieving benevolence (仁) by employing consideration alone. Rituals complement consideration, and make up for any inadequacies in employing consideration alone, by providing guidelines for ordinary people to carry out the most appropriate actions; because, rituals are that which were provided beforehand through the consideration of saints and sages. Thus, in the process of achieving benevolence, consideration and rituals are combined in a complementary relationship.

키워드

Tasan (茶山), consideration (恕), rituals (禮), overcoming oneself (克己), theory of the human mind and Tao-mind (人心道心)

참고문헌(15)

[학술지] 안재순 / 2007 / 실학의 인간관과 윤리적 특성 / 유교사상문화연구 29 (29) : 99 ~ 125
[단행본] Anon / 1998 / Book of Classics 經書 / Sungkyunkwan University Press
[학술지] 장승구 / 2007 / 다산 정약용의 윤리사상 연구 / 한국철학논집 21 (21) : 165 ~ 195
[학술지] Ch’oe, Yŏng‐chin. / 2001 / Tasan insŏng mulsŏngnonŭi sasangsajŏk wising (Tasan’s Theory of Nature of Humans and Things and Its Status in the History of Thoughts) / Ch’ŏrhak (Philosophy) 68
[학술지] 최영진 / 2004 / 동아시아 近世儒學에 있어 天,性,道에 대한 認識 - 王夫之伊藤仁齋丁若鏞의 中庸註釋을 中心으로 - / 南冥學硏究 18 (18) : 1 ~ 30
[단행본] Chŏng, Il‐kyun. / 2000 / Tasan sasŏ kyŏngak yŏn’gu (A Study on Tasan’s Classical Studies on the Four Books) / Ilchisa
[기타] / Chŏng Yak‐yong 丁若鏞. n.d. Yŏyudang chŏnsŏ 與猶堂全書 (The Complete Work of Yŏyudang). The following volumes are included in this book: A Summary Opinion on Mencius 孟子要義; Old and New Commentaries of Analects 論語古今註; Self‐chosen Aphorism on the Mean 中庸自箴; Addition to the Lecture on the Mean 中庸講義補; Deep Examination of the Classic of Mind 心經密驗; Review on the Book of Mae 梅氏書平; Self‐inscribed Epitaph 自撰墓誌銘; Public Opinion on the Great Learning大學公議; Four Notes on Mourning Rituals 喪禮四箋
[학위논문] Ham, Yoon‐sik. / 2011 / Chŏngyagyongŭi maengja haesŏge nat’ananŭn todŏkchŏk chaae taehan t’amgu(Investigation on Moral Self in Chŏng Yagyong’s Interpretation of Mencius)
[학술지] 임헌규 / 2010 / 다산의 『논어고금주』에서 仁과 恕 / 동방학 18 (18) : 117 ~ 146
[학술지] 임옥균 / 2006 / 孟子盡心章 “君子不謂性”, “君子不謂命” 解釋의 註釋史的考察 / 동양철학 25 (25) : 113 ~ 135
[단행본] Jiao Xun. / 1987 / Mengzi Zhengyi 孟子正義 (The Right Meaning of Mencius) / Zhonghua Publishers
[학술지] 코지마 야스노리 / 2009 / 히로세 탄소(廣瀬淡窓)와 丁茶山 -‘以心制心’ ‘以禮制心’ ‘以天制心’ / 한국실학연구 18 (18) : 515 ~ 568
[단행본] Kŭm, Chang‐ t’ae / 2005 / (Mind and Nature – Tasan’s Interpretation on the Book of Mencius) / SNU Press
[단행본] Schwartz, Benjamin / 2004 / The World of Thoughts in Ancient China / Sallim Publishers
[학술지] 신정근 / 2004 / 도덕원칙으로서의 서(恕) 요청의 필연성 / 동양철학 21 (21) : 95 ~ 118