인문학과 자연과학의 소통문법: 두 상상력의 언어성

@article{ART002096107},
author={ 정대현 },
title={인문학과 자연과학의 소통문법: 두 상상력의 언어성},
journal={탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities},
issn={2092-6081},
year={2012},
volume={5},
number={2},
pages={5-29},
doi={10.22901/trans.2012.5.2.5},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.22901/trans.2012.5.2.5}

TY - JOUR
AU - 정대현
TI - 인문학과 자연과학의 소통문법: 두 상상력의 언어성
T2 - 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities
PY - 2012
VL - 5
IS - 2
PB - 이화여자대학교 이화인문과학원
SP - 5-29
SN - 2092-6081
AB - This paper attempts to find a way for the practitioners of humanities and natural sciences to communicate to each other. Mutual interests in or knowledge of what is going on in the other disciplines are necessary but not sufficient. But if there should be a common language by which they could talk to each other, it would provide a basis by which they could have access to each other. The present paper tries to find that basis by showing (1) that imagination in the humanities is a basic power to broaden human freedom, whereas imagination in the natural sciences is a basic power to investigate natural reality; (2) that imagination in the humanities is qualitative, whereas imagination in the natural sciences is quantitative; and (3) that qualities are determined in terms of categories and numbers, eg., whether Bush is “fast” or Obama is “slow” is determined in terms of Daniel Kahneman’s category proposal and numbers of people who respond positively to the category proposal, whereas quantities are counted in a system of classifications, eg., the question how many are there in this room can neither be counted nor answered without a system where objects are classified in terms of qualities in the order of my personal or our communal interest.
KW - 질적 상상력, 양적 상상력, 범주, 분류, 체계
DO - 10.22901/trans.2012.5.2.5
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.22901/trans.2012.5.2.5
ER -

정대현 (2012). 인문학과 자연과학의 소통문법: 두 상상력의 언어성. 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities, 5( 2), 5- 29.

정대현 . 2012, “인문학과 자연과학의 소통문법: 두 상상력의 언어성”, 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 5-29. Available from: doi:10.22901/trans.2012.5.2.5

정대현 “인문학과 자연과학의 소통문법: 두 상상력의 언어성” 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities 5.2 pp. 5-29 (2012): 5.

정대현 . 인문학과 자연과학의 소통문법: 두 상상력의 언어성 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities [Internet]. 2012; 5( 2), : 5-29. Available from: doi:10.22901/trans.2012.5.2.5

정대현 . “인문학과 자연과학의 소통문법: 두 상상력의 언어성” 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities 5, no.2 (2012): 5-29. doi: 10.22901/trans.2012.5.2.5

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

인문학과 자연과학의 소통문법: 두 상상력의 언어성

탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities

약어 : -

2012, vol.5, no.2, pp.5 - 29

DOI : 10.22901/trans.2012.5.2.5

발행기관 : 이화여자대학교 이화인문과학원

연구분야 : 기타인문학

정대현¹

¹이화여자대학교

인용한 논문 수 : 1 서지 간략 보기

초록

This paper attempts to find a way for the practitioners of humanities and natural sciences to communicate to each other. Mutual interests in or knowledge of what is going on in the other disciplines are necessary but not sufficient. But if there should be a common language by which they could talk to each other, it would provide a basis by which they could have access to each other. The present paper tries to find that basis by showing (1) that imagination in the humanities is a basic power to broaden human freedom, whereas imagination in the natural sciences is a basic power to investigate natural reality; (2) that imagination in the humanities is qualitative, whereas imagination in the natural sciences is quantitative; and (3) that qualities are determined in terms of categories and numbers, eg., whether Bush is “fast” or Obama is “slow” is determined in terms of Daniel Kahneman’s category proposal and numbers of people who respond positively to the category proposal, whereas quantities are counted in a system of classifications, eg., the question how many are there in this room can neither be counted nor answered without a system where objects are classified in terms of qualities in the order of my personal or our communal interest.

키워드

질적 상상력, 양적 상상력, 범주, 분류, 체계

참고문헌(12)

[단행본] 그레고리 커리 / 2007 / 이미지와 마음 / 한울아카데미
[단행본] 김영식 / 1992 / 과학사 / 전파과학사
[단행본] 이정모 / 1989 / 認知科學 : 마음, 언어, 계산 / 민음사
[단행본] 장회익 / 2003 / 삶 반성 인문학-인문학의 인식론적 구조 / 태학사
[단행본] 정대현 / 2000 / 표현인문학 / 생각의나무
[단행본] 정재서 / 2008 / 신화적 상상력과 문화 / 이화여자대학교출판부
[단행본] C. P. 스노우 / 2001 / 두 문화: 과학과 인문학의 조화로운 만남을 위하여 / 사이언스북스
[단행본] Bee, Helen / 1981 / The Developing Child / Harper & Row
[단행본] Cavell, Stanley / 1979 / The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film / Harvard UP
[학술대회] Chalmers, David / 2008 / Extended Mind / The 22nd World Congress of Philosophy
[인터넷자료] Chung, Daihyun / Digging Slow and Deep: Chalmers and Extended Mind
[인터넷자료] Roe v. Wade / Wikipedia