Recent advances in cell-laden 3D bioprinting: materials, technologies and applications

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1 Anonymous. Organ donation depends on trust. Lancet 387(10038), 2575 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2 Ozbolat IT, Yu Y. Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(3), 691–699 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3 Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science 260(5110), 920–926 (1993).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4 Hull CW. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US 4575330 A (Google Patents) (1986).
  Google Scholar
• 5 Ferris CJ, Gilmore KG, Wallace GG et al. Biofabrication: an overview of the approaches used for printing of living cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97(10), 4243–4258 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 6 Jones N. Three dimensional printers are opening up new worlds to research. Nature 487(7405), 22–23 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 7 Anitha R, Arunachalam S, Radhakrishnan P. Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 118(1–3), 385–388 (2001).
  Google Scholar
• 8 Tay BY, Evans JRG, Edirisinghe MJ. Solid freeform fabrication of ceramics. Int. Mater. Rev. 48(6), 341–370 (2003).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 9 Hornbeck LJ. Digital light processing for high-brightness high-resolution applications. Proc. SPIE. 3013, 27–40 (1997).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Utela B, Storti D, Anderson R et al. A review of process development steps for new material systems in three dimensional printing (3DP). J. Manuf. Process. 10(2), 96–104 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 11 Mueller B, Kochan D. Laminated object manufacturing for rapid tooling and pattern making in foundry industry. Comput. Ind. 39(1), 47–53 (1999).
  Google Scholar
• 12 Singh R. Process capability study of polyjet printing for plastic components. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 25(4), 1011–1015 (2011).
  Google Scholar
• 13 Klein GT, Lu Y, Wang MY. 3D printing and neurosurgery-ready for prime time. World Neurosurg. 80(3–4), 233–235 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14 Zopf DA, Hollister SJ, Nelson ME et al. Bioresorbable airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer. N. Engl. J. Med. 368(21), 2043–2045 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15 Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 5(4), 335–341 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J et al. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 33(26), 6020–6041 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17 Kievit FM, Florczyk SJ, Leung MC et al. Proliferation and enrichment of CD133⁺ glioblastoma cancer stem cells on 3D chitosan-alginate scaffolds. Biomaterials. 35(33), 9137–9143 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Khademhosseini A, Langer R, Borenstein J et al. Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103(8), 2480–2487 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 19 Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Colangelo NW et al. Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication. 4(3), 035005 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Seyednejad H, Gawlitta D, Kuiper RV et al. In vivo biocompatibility and biodegradation of 3D-printed porous scaffolds based on a hydroxyl-functionalized poly(ε-caprolactone). Biomaterials 33(17), 4309–4318 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21 Seliktar D. Designing cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical applications. Science 336(6085), 1124–1128 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32(8), 773–785 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 23 Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24(24), 4337–4351 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24 Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP et al. 25th Anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv. Mater. 25(36), 5011–5028 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25 Murphy SV, Skardal A, Atala A. Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 101(1), 272–284 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 26 Mandrycky C, Wang ZJ, Kim K et al. 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol. Adv. 34(4), 422–434 (2016). •• Extensive review of bioprinting techniques, materials and tissues.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27 O'Connell G, Garcia J, Amir J. 3D bioprinting: new directions in articular cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00587 (2017) (Epub ahead of print).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28 Rowley JA, Madlambayan G, Mooney DJ. Alginate hydrogels as synthetic extracellular matrix materials. Biomaterials 20(1), 45–53 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29 Kuo CK, Ma PX. Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering: part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties. Biomaterials 22(6), 511–521 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Progr. Polym. Sci. 37(1), 106–126 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31 Hou JX, Li C, Guan Y et al. Enzymatically crosslinked alginate hydrogels with improved adhesion properties. Polym. Chem. 6(12), 2204–2213 (2015).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 32 Cohen DL, Lo W, Tsavaris A et al. Increased mixing improves hydrogel homogeneity and quality of three-dimensional printed constructs. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods. 17(2), 239–248 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 Ferreira AM, Gentile P, Chiono V et al. Collagen for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater. 8(9), 3191–3200 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34 Park JY, Choi JC, Shim JH et al. A comparative study on collagen type I and hyaluronic acid dependent cell behavior for osteochondral tissue bioprinting. Biofabrication 6(3), 035004 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35 Lynn AK, Yannas IV, Bonfield W. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of collagen. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Appl. Biomater. 71B(2), 343–354 (2004).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 36 Smith CM, Stone AL, Parkhill RL et al. Three-dimensional bioassembly tool for generating viable tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng. 10(9–10), 1566–1576 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37 Lee VK, Lanzi AM, Ngo H et al. Generation of multi-scale vascular network system within 3D hydrogel using 3D bio-printing technology. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 7(3), 460–472 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38 Skardal A, Mack D, Kapetanovis E et al. Bioprinted amniotic fluid-derived stem cells accelerate healing of large skin wounds. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 1(11), 792–802 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39 Gómez-Guillén MC, Gimenez B, Lopez-Caballero ME et al. Functional and bioactive properties of collagen and gelatin from alternative sources: a review. Food Hydrocolloid 25(8), 1813–1827 (2011).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 40 Bertassoni LE, Cardodo JC, Manoharan V et al. Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin hydrogels. Biofabrication 6(2), 024105 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 41 Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T et al. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials 35(1), 49–62 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42 Lee W, Lee V, Polio S et al. On-demand three-dimensional freeform fabrication of multi-layered hydrogel scaffold with fluidic channels. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105(6), 1178–1186 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43 Duan B, Hockaday LA, Kang KH et al. 3D bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 101(5), 1255–1264 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 44 Huang J, Fu H, Wang Z et al. BMSCs-laden gelatin/sodium alginate/carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel for 3D bioprinting. RSC Adv. 6(110), 108423–108430 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 45 Gruene M, Pflaum M, Hess C et al. Laser printing of three-dimensional multicellular arrays for studies of cell–cell and cell–environment interactions. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 17(10), 973–982 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 46 Mosesson MW, Siebenlist KR, Meh DA. The structure and biological features of fibrinogen and fibrin. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 936, 11–30 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47 Godal HC, Abildgaard U. Gelation of soluble fibrin in plasma by ethanol. Scand. J. Haematol. 3(5), 342–346 (1966).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 48 Kupcsik L, Alini M, Stoodart MJ. Epsilon-aminocaproic acid is a useful fibrin degradation inhibitor for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A. 15(8), 2309–2313 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 49 Collins MN, Birkinshaw C. Hyaluronic acid based scaffolds for tissue engineering – a review. Carbohyd. Polym. 92(2), 1262–1279 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50 Pescosolido L, Schuurman W, Malda J et al. Hyaluronic acid and dextran-based semi-IPN hydrogels as biomaterials for bioprinting. Biomacromolecules 12(5), 1831–1838 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 51 Kabanov AV, Batrakova EV, Alakhov VY. Pluronic (R) block copolymers as novel polymer therapeutics for drug and gene delivery. J. Control. Rel. 82(2–3), 189–212 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 52 Vadnere M, Amidon G, Lindenbaum S et al. Thermodynamic studies on the gel sol transition of some pluronic polyols. Int. J. Pharm. 22(2–3), 207–218 (1984).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 53 Wu W, DeConinck A, Lewis JA. Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks. Adv. Mater. 23(24), H178–H183 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 54 Mueller M, Becher J, Schnabelrauch M et al. Nanostructured pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 7(3), 035006 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 55 Lin C, Anseth KS. PEG hydrogels for the controlled release of biomolecules in regenerative medicine. Pharm. Res. 26(3), 631–643 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 56 Mann BK, Gobin AS, Tsai AT et al. Smooth muscle cell growth in photopolymerized hydrogels with cell adhesive and proteolytically degradable domains: Synthetic ECM analogs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 22(22), 3045–3051 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 57 Cui X, Breitenkamp K, Finn MG et al. Direct human cartilage repair using three-dimensional bioprinting technology. Tissue Eng. Part A. 18(11–12), 1304–1312 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 58 Gao G, Yonezawa T, Hubbell K et al. Inkjet-bioprinted acrylated peptides and PEG hydrogel with human mesenchymal stem cells promote robust bone and cartilage formation with minimal printhead clogging. Biotechnol. J. 10(10), 1568–1577 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 59 Zorlutuna P, Vrana NE, Khademhosseini A. The expanding world of tissue engineering: the building blocks and new applications of tissue engineered constructs. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 6, 47–62 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 60 Zamir E, Geiger B. Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell–matrix adhesions. J. Cell Sci. 114(20), 3583–3590 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 61 Gomes S, Leonor IB, Mano JF et al. Natural and genetically engineered proteins for tissue engineering. Prog. Polymer Sci. 37(1), 1–17 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 62 McAllister TN, Dusserre N, Maruszewski M et al. Cell-based therapeutics from an economic perspective: primed for a commercial success or a research sinkhole? Regen. Med. 3(6), 925–937 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 63 Sionkowska A. Current research on the blends of natural and synthetic polymers as new biomaterials: review. Prog. Polymer Sci. 36(9), 1254–1276 (2011).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 64 Patterson J, Hubbell JA. Enhanced proteolytic degradation of molecularly engineered PEG hydrogels in response to MMP-1 and MMP-2. Biomaterials 31(30), 7836–7845 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 65 Edlund U, Danmark S, Albertsson AC. A strategy for the covalent functionalization of resorbable polymers with heparin and osteoinductive growth factor. Biomacromolecules 9(3), 901–905 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 66 Ulrich TA, Jain A, Tanner K et al. Probing cellular mechanobiology in three-dimensional culture with collagen–agarose matrices. Biomaterials 31(7), 1875–1884 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 67 Köpf M, Campos DFD, Blaeser A et al. A tailored three-dimensionally printable agarose-collagen blend allows encapsulation, spreading, and attachment of human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells. Biofabrication 8(2), 025011 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 68 Frisman I, Seliktar D, Bianco-Peled H. Nanostructuring PEG–fibrinogen hydrogels to control cellular morphogenesis. Biomaterials 32(31), 7839–7846 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 69 Ehrbar M, Sala A, Lienemann P et al. Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3D cell migration and remodeling. Biophys. J. 110(2), 284–293 (2011).
  Google Scholar
• 70 Ahn S, Lee H, Bonassar LJ et al. Cells (MC3T3-E1)-laden alginate scaffolds fabricated by a modified solid-freeform fabrication process supplemented with an aerosol spraying. Biomacromolecules 13(9), 2997–3003 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 71 Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater. 26(19), 3124–3130 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 72 Selimovic S, Oh J, Bae H et al. Microscale strategies for generating cell-encapsulating hydrogels. Polymers 4(3), 1554–1579 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 73 Yang KK, Gao TT, Bao ZX et al. Preparation and characterization of a novel thermosensitive nanoparticle for drug delivery in combined hyperthermia and chemotherapy. J. Mater. Chem. B. 1(46), 6442–6448 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 74 Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK et al. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat. Biotechnol. 34(3), 312–319 (2016). • Example of fabricating stable, human-scale tissue constructs of any shape.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 75 Lee H, Han W, Kim H et al. Development of liver decellularized extracellular matrix bioink for three-dimensional cell printing-based liver tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 18(4), 1229–1237 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 76 Du MC, Chen B, Meng QY et al. 3D bioprinting of BMSC-laden methacrylamide gelatin scaffolds with CBD-BMP2-collagen microfibers. Biofabrication 7(4), 044104 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 77 Duan B, Kapetanovic E, Hockaday LA et al. Three-dimensional printed trileaflet valve conduits using biological hydrogels and human valve interstitial cells. Acta Biomater. 10(5), 1836–1846 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 78 Melhem MR, Park J, Knapp L et al. 3D printed stem-cell-laden, microchanneled hydrogel patch for the enhanced release of cell-secreting factors and treatment of myocardial infarctions. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3(9), 1980–1987 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 79 Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S et al. Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials 31(28), 7250–7256 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 80 Ouyang L, Highley CB, Sun W et al. A generalizable strategy for the 3D bioprinting of hydrogels from nonviscous photo-crosslinkable inks. Adv. Mater. 29(8), 1604983 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 81 Kang LH, Armstrong PA, Lee LJ et al. Optimizing photo-encapsulation viability of heart valve cell types in 3D printable composite hydrogels. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(2), 360–377 (2017). • Systematically test variables associated with photo-cross-linking hydrogels for their effects on encapsulated cells during laser-assisted 3D bioprinting.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 82 Dahle J, Kvam E, Stokke T. Bystander effects in UV-induced genomic instability: antioxidants inhibit delayed mutagenesis induced by ultraviolet A and B radiation. J. Carcinog. 4, 11 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 83 Melchels FP, Dhert WJ, Hutmacher DW et al. Development and characterization of a new bioink for additive tissue manufacturing. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2(16), 2282–2289 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 84 Studer K, Decker C, Beck E et al. Overcoming oxygen inhibition in UV-curing of acrylate coatings by carbon dioxide inerting, part I. Prog. Org. Coat. 48(1), 92–100 (2003).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 85 Decker C, Jenkins AD. Kinetic approach of oxygen inhibition in ultraviolet- and laser-induced polymerizations. Macromolecules 18(6), 1241–1242 (1985).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 86 Lim KS, Schon BS, Mekhileri NV et al. New visible-light photoinitiating system for improved print fidelity in gelatin-based bioinks. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2(10), 1752–1762 (2016). • Extends laser-assisted gelling method from UV light to visible light.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 87 Dai XL, Ma C, Lan Q et al. 3D bioprinted glioma stem cells for brain tumor model and applications of drug susceptibility. Biofabrication 8(4), 045005 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 88 Compaan AM, Christensen K, Huang Y. Inkjet bioprinting of 3D silk fibroin cellular constructs using sacrificial alginate. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3(8), 1519–1526 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 89 Das S, Pati F, Choi YJ et al. Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomater. 11, 233–246 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 90 Nakamura M, Iwanaga S, Henmi C et al. Biomatrices and biomaterials for future developments of bioprinting and biofabrication. Biofabrication 2(1), 014110 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 91 Nunamaker EA, Otto KJ, Kipke DR. Investigation of the material properties of alginate for the development of hydrogel repair of dura mater. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 4(1), 16–33 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 92 Shim JH, Lee JS, Kim JY et al. Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering using a multi-head tissue/organ building system. J. Micromech. Microeng. 22(8), 085014 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 93 Gaetani R, Doevendans PA, Metz CHG et al. Cardiac tissue engineering using tissue printing technology and human cardiac progenitor cells. Biomaterials 33(6), 1782–1790 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 94 Augst AD, Kong HJ, Mooney DJ. Alginate hydrogels as biomaterials. Macromol. Biosci. 6(8), 623–633 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 95 Park J, Lee SJ, Chung S et al. Cell-laden 3D bioprinting hydrogel matrix depending on different compositions for soft tissue engineering: characterization and evaluation. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 71, 678–684 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 96 Shi PJ, Laude A, Yeong WY. Investigation of cell viability and morphology in 3D bio-printed alginate constructs with tunable stiffness. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 105(4), 1009–1018 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 97 Luo YX, Lode A, Sonntag F et al. Well-ordered biphasic calcium phosphate-alginate scaffolds fabricated by multi-channel 3D plotting under mild conditions. J. Mater. Chem. B. 1(33), 4088–4098 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 98 Jia J, Richards DJ, Pollard S et al. Engineering alginate as bioink for bioprinting. Acta. Biomater. 10(10), 4323–4331 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 99 Neufurth M, Wang X, Schroder HC et al. Engineering a morphogenetically active hydrogel for bioprinting of bioartificial tissue derived from human osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells. Biomaterials 35(31), 8810–8819 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 100 Shoichet MS, Li RH, White ML et al. Stability of hydrogels used in cell encapsulation: an in vitro comparison of alginate and agarose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 50(4), 374–381 (1996).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 101 Zhang ZF, Loebus A, de Vicente G et al. Synthesis of poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels via amine-michael type addition with tunable stiffness and postgelation chemical functionality. Chem. Mater. 26(12), 3624–3630 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 102 Rodell CB, MacArthur JW, Dorsey SM et al. Shear-thinning supramolecular hydrogels with secondary autonomous covalent crosslinking to modulate viscoelastic properties in vivo. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25(4), 636–644 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 103 Su WY, Chen YC, Lin FH. Injectable oxidized hyaluronic acid/adipic acid dihydrazide hydrogel for nucleus pulposus regeneration. Acta. Biomater. 6(8), 3044–3055 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 104 Rutz AL, Hyland KE, Jakus AE et al. A multimaterial bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels. Adv Mater. 27(9), 1607–1614 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 105 Knowlton S, Onal S, Yu CH et al. Bioprinting for cancer research. Trends Biotechnol. 33(9), 504–513 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 106 Peng WJ, Datta P, Ayan B et al. 3D bioprinting for drug discovery and development in pharmaceutics. Acta Biomater. 57, 26–46 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 107 Shafiee A, Atala A. Printing technologies for medical applications. Trends. Mol. Med. 22(3), 254–255 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 108 Hsieh FY, Hsu SH. 3D bioprinting: a new insight into the therapeutic strategy of neural tissue regeneration. Organogenesis 11(4), 153–158 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 109 Richards D, Jia J, Yost M et al. 3D bioprinting for vascularized tissue fabrication. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(1), 132–147 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 110 Wang XH, Ao Q, Tian XH et al. 3D bioprinting technologies for hard tissue and organ engineering. Mater. 9(10), 802–824 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 111 Ameri K, Samurkashian R, Yeghiazarians Y. Three-dimensional bioprinting emerging technology in cardiovascular medicine. Circulation 135(14), 1281–1283 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 112 Zhang YS, Yue K, Aleman J et al. 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ fabrication. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(1), 148–163 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 113 Miller JS, Stevens KR, Yang MT et al. Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat. Mater. 11(9), 768–774 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 114 Koleskya DB, Homana KA, Skylar-Scotta MA et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113(12), 3179–3184 (2016). •• Opens new avenues for fabricating and investigating human tissues for both ex vivo and in vivo applications.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 115 Jia WT, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS et al. Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials 106, 58–68 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 116 Gao Q, Liu ZJ, Lin ZW et al. 3D bioprinting of vessel-like structures with multilevel fluidic channels. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3(3), 399–408 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 117 Li S, Liu YY, Li Y et al. A novel method for fabricating engineered structures with branched micro-channel using hollow hydrogel fibers. Biomicrofluidics 10(6), 064106 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 118 Datta P, Ayan B, Ozbolat IT. Bioprinting for vascular and vascularized tissue biofabrication. Acta Biomater. 51, 1–20 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 119 Cheung DY, Duan B, Butcher JT. Current progress in tissue engineering of heart valves: multiscale problems, multiscale solutions. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 15(8), 1–18 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 120 Gaetani R, Feyen DAM, Verhage V et al. Epicardial application of cardiac progenitor cells in a 3D-printed gelatin/hyaluronic acid patch preserves cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Biomaterials 61, 339–348 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 121 Jang J, Park HJ, Kim SW et al. 3D printed complex tissue construct using stem cell-laden decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks for cardiac repair. Biomaterials 112, 264–274 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 122 Gu Q, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Lozano R et al. Functional 3D neural mini-tissues from printed gel-based bioink and human neural stem cells. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 5(12), 1429–1438 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 123 Pourchet LJ, Thepot A, Albouy M et al. Human skin 3D bioprinting using scaffold-free approach. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 6(4), 1601101 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 124 Daly AC, Cunniffe GM, Sathy BN et al. 3D Bioprinting of developmentally inspired templates for whole bone organ engineering. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 5(18), 2353–2362 (2016). •• Describes a novel biofabrication strategy for engineering whole-bone organs.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 125 Ma XY, Qu X, Zhu W et al. Deterministically patterned biomimetic human iPSC-derived hepatic model via rapid 3D bioprinting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113(8), 2206–2211 (2016). •• Demonstrates great potential to serve as a patient-specific platform for pathophysiological studies, early drug screening and clinical translation.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 126 Kloxin AM, Benton JA, Anseth HS. In situ elasticity modulation with dynamic substrates to direct cell phenotype. Biomaterials 31(1), 1–8 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 127 Duan B. State-of-the-art review of 3D bioprinting for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45(1), 1–15 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 128 Jana S, Lerman A. Bioprinting a cardiac valve. Biotechnol. Adv. 33(8), 1503–1521 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 129 Owens CM, Marga F, Forgacs G et al. Biofabrication and testing of a fully cellular nerve graft. Biofabrication 5(4), 045007 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 130 Lozano R, Stevens L, Thompson BC et al. 3D printing of layered brain-like structures using peptide modified gellan gum substrates. Biomaterials 67, 264–273 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 131 Michael S, Sorg H, Peck C et al. Tissue engineered skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice. PLoS ONE 8(3), e57741 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 132 Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S et al. Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109(7), 1855–1863 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 133 Cubo N, Garcia M, del Cañizo JF et al. 3D bioprinting of functional human skin: production and in vivo analysis. Biofabrication 9(1), 015006 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 134 Huang S, Yao B, Xie JF et al. 3D bioprinted extracellular matrix mimics facilitate directed differentiation of epithelial progenitors for sweat gland regeneration. Acta. Biomater. 32, 170–177 (2016). •• Example of functional bioprinted organ model with demonstrable applicability.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 135 Ozbolat IT. Bioprinting scale-up tissue and organ constructs for transplantation. Trends Biotechnol. 33(7), 395–400 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 136 Abbadessa A, Mouser VHM, Blokzijl MM et al. A synthetic thermosensitive hydrogel for cartilage bioprinting and its biofunctionalization with polysaccharides. Biomacromolecules 17(6), 2137–2147 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 137 Xu T, Binder KW, Albanna MZ et al. Hybrid printing of mechanically and biologically improved constructs for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biofabrication 5(1), 015001 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 138 Narayanan LK, Huebner P, Fisher MB et al. 3D-bioprinting of polylactic acid (PLA) nanofiber-alginate hydrogel bioink containing human adipose-derived stem cells. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2(10), 1732–1742 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 139 Rhee S, Puetzer JL, Mason BN et al. 3D bioprinting of spatially heterogeneous collagen constructs for cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2(10), 1800–1805 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 140 Levato R, Visser J, Planell JA et al. Biofabrication of tissue constructs by 3D bioprinting of cell-laden microcarriers. Biofabrication 6(3), 035020 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 141 Ober TJ, Foresti D, Lewis JA. Active mixing of complex fluids at the microscale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112(40), 12293–12298 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 142 Shim JH, Jang KM, Hahn SK et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of multilayered constructs containing human mesenchymal stromal cells for osteochondral tissue regeneration in the rabbit knee joint. Biofabrication 8(1), 014102 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 143 Park SH, Jung CS, Min BH. Advances in three-dimensional bioprinting for hard tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 13(6), 622–635 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 144 Lee JW, Choi YJ, Yong WJ et al. Development of a 3D cell printed construct considering angiogenesis for liver tissue engineering. Biofabrication 8(1), 015007 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 145 Lee JS, Hong JM, Jung JW et al. 3D printing of composite tissue with complex shape applied to ear regeneration. Biofabrication 6(2), 024103 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 146 Laronda MM, Rutz AL, Xiao S et al. A bioprosthetic ovary created using 3D printed microporous scaffolds restores ovarian function in sterilized mice. Nat. Commun. 8, 15261 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 147 Demirci U, Montesano G. Single cell epitaxy by acoustic picolitre droplets. Lab on A Chip 7(9), 1139–1145 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 148 Fang Y, Frampton JP, Raghavan S et al. Rapid generation of multiplexed cell cocultures using acoustic droplet ejection followed by aqueous two-phase exclusion patterning. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 18(9), 647–657 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar