Crimes, Hegemony, and Politics: Premanism in Yogyakarta during The New Order

https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.73479

Julianto Ibrahim(1*)

(1) Departemen Sejarah Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Indonesian democracy, despite being praised as an example of democracy in Muslim majority country, has been marked with the important role of non-state actors in influencing the social, economic, and political conditions of a society that are outside the government structure. One of the actors who play an important role in influencing the condition of society is the presence of
thugs and their acts of thuggery. This pattern of politics can be traced back to the ear of New Order. This research attempts to reveal and describe the actions carried out by thugs and their impact on the lives of the people of Yogyakarta during the New Order era. The method used
is the oral history method by interviewing the actors of non-state politics in Yogyakarta, primarily prominent young paramilitary or thug groups including Joxzin, Qizruh, Pemuda Pancasila and their relations with major political parties at that time, Golkar, PDIP and PPP. This
research reveals that during the New Order era, thugs in Yogyakarta collaborated and cooperated with political forces. Political power utilizes thugs as a force that can suppress political opponents with violence and as a means of gaining votes in elections. Meanwhile, thugs
join political forces with the intention of seeking political protection for their criminal acts and as a means of pursuing a career for a better future. Golkar in Yogyakarta used the mass organization Pemuda Pancasila (PP) as an element that could be used to suppress and intimidate
political opponents. Meanwhile, PPP and PDI used their party’s laskars (paramilitary wing) in securing and dealing with the violence they faced. The main strength of the laskars in PPP and PDI actually came from the wild youth organizations, namely Joxzin and Qizruh. For the two
groups, known for their violent repertoires, this presents an alternative to express themselves and a place to find identity. When the New Order rule ended in 1988, Qizruh leaders joined PP which meant supporting Golkar, and several other leaders chose to support PDI. Meanwhile,Joxzin’s elders had many careers as the main force of the laskars in PPP.


Keywords


Criminality; Power; The new order; thuggery; violence; Yogyakarta

Full Text:

PDF


References

Abdul Arif, 2003.“Pemuda Pancasila dan Rezim Represif Orde Baru”, Skripsi S1, Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Ali Murtopo,1981.Strategi Pembangunan Nasional, Jakarta: CSIS

Boileau, Julian M.,1983. Golkar: Function Group Politics in Indonesia, Jakarta: CSIS.

Cribb, Robert, 2010. Para Jago dan Kaum Revolusioner di Jakarta, 1945-1949, Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu.

Dwi Wahyono Hadi dan Gayung Kasuma, 2012.“Propaganda Orde Baru 1966-1980” dalam Verleden Vol. 1 No. 1, Desember, hlm 41.

Geertz, Clifford, 1999. After the Fact: Dua Negeri Empat Dasawarsa, Satu Antropolog Yogyakarta: LKiS

Gottschalk, Louis,1986. Mengerti Sejarah, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Harry Tjan Silalahi,1990. Konsensus Politik Nasional Orde Baru: Ortodoksi dan Aktualisasinya, Jakarta: Central for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

Hatib Abdul Kadir.2017. “GPK: Dari Hobi Bacok, Menuju Parlemen Lokal”, etnohistory Edisi Preman, Jago, dan Negara, dalam: http://etnohistori.org/edisional/jago-preman-dan-negara

Hobsbawm, 1959. Primitive Rebels, Menchester. University of Menchester.

Hobsbawm, 1972.Bandits, Penguin Book.

Hobsbawm, 1974.“Social Banditry” dalam Henry A. Landsberger, Rural Protest, Peasant Movement and Social Change, London: Mac.Millan.

http://pemudapancasila04.blogspot.co.id/2009/01/selayang-pandang-pemuda-pancasila.html

http://stezine-a.blogspot.co.id/2011/10/sejarah-geng-legendaris-yogyakarta. html

Idi Subandi Ibrahim dan Dedi Djamaludin Malik (ed.),1997. Hegemoni Budaya, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Bentang.

Iswandi,1998. Bisnis Militer Orde Baru: Keterkaitan ABRI dalam Bidang Ekonomi dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pertumbuhan Rezim Otoriter, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Jogi Sianjuntak, (ed.),2000. Premanisme Politik, Yogyakarta: Institut Studi ARus Informasi.

Julianto Ibrahim, 2004. Bandit dan Pejuang di Simpang Beengawan: Kriminalitas dan Kekerasan Masa Revolusi di Surakarta, Surakarta: Cipta Bina Pustaka.

Julianto Ibrahim, 2002. “ABRI dan Kapitalisme Ersatz di Indonesia”, Humaniora Volume XIV no.3.

Kuntowijoyo, 1994. Metodologi Sejarah, Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana,

Lucas, Anton, 1989.Peristiwa Tiga Daerah: Revolusi dalam Revolusi , Jakarta: Grafiti Press.

Mochtar Pobotinggi,1986. “Tentang Visi, Tradisi & Hegemoni Bukan Islam: Sebuah Analisis” dalam Mochtar Pobotinggi, (ed.), Islam: Antara Visi, Tradisi dan Hegemoni Bukan Muslim, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.

Monika Dian Adelina, 2017. “Dilematis Pemberantasan Premanisme di Indonesia” http://interseksi.org/archive/blog/files/premanisme.php, diunduh 1 Maret .

Muhamad Sobari,1996.“Kebudayaan Rakyat: Dagelan dan Pasemon Punokawan?” dalam Mohamad Sobary, Kebudayaan Rakyat: Dimensi Politik dan Agama, Yogyakarta: Yayasan Bentang.

Neyla Vellayati,2017. “Psikologi Komunikasi: Premanisme Dalam Perspektif Theory Planned Behavior” dalam http://empowermentcomm.blogspot.co.id/2015/05/ psikologi-komunikasi-premanisme-dalam.html diunduh 1 Maret.

Nordholt, Henk Schulte,2002. Kriminalitas, Modernitas, dan Identitas dalam Sejarah Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar.

“Pemuda Pancasila Menebar Premanisme Sejak Orde Baru”, http://www.solidaritas.net/2015/07/pemuda-pancasila-menebar-premanisme.html diunduh 1 Maret 2017

“Penyimpangan Pada Masa Orde Baru”, dalam http://www.sejarawan.com/431-penyimpangan-pada-masa-orde-baru.html

Perekonomian Indonesia Masa Orde Baru”, dalam https://ekaodon.wordpress.com/2011/02/27/perekonomian-indonesia-masa-orde-baru/

“Prestasi Pembangunan Bidang Ekonomi” dalam http://soeharto.co/prestasi-pembangunan-bidang-ekonomiprestasi-pembangunan-bidang-ekonomi

Priyo Budi Santoso, 1997. Birokrasi Pemerinah Orde Baru (Perspektif Kultural dan Struktural), Jakarta: PT Grafindo Persada.

Ryadi Gunawan,1981. “Jagoan dalam Revolusi Kita”, Prisma, 8 Agustus.

Ryadi Gunawan,1984. “Dunia Grayak dan Revolusi Lokal”, Seminar Sejarah Lokal di Medan.

Ryter, Lren,1998. “Pemuda Pancasila: The Last Loyalist Freeman of Soeharto’s New Order?, Indonesia 66.

Sartono Kartodirdjo, 1992. Pendekatan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dalam metodologi Sejarah, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Sartono Kartodirdjo,1981.“Revolusi Indonesia dipandang dari Perspektivme Struktural”, Prisma, no.8 Agustus.

Siegel, James T., 1993. Penjahat Gaya (Orde) Baru: Eksplorasi Politik dan Kriminalitas Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2000

Suhartono Bandit-Bandit Pedesaan di Jawa: Studi Historis 1850-1942, Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.

Syamsuddin Haris dan Riza Sihbudi, ed., 1995.Menelaah Kembali Format Politik Orde Baru”, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Szimansky, Albert, 1978. The Capitalist State and the Politics of Class, Masachusetts: Wintrop Publisher.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.73479

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 350 | views : 244

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Julianto Ibrahim

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kawistara is published by the Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada.