Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 22, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 25, 2019 - Aug 16, 2019
Date Accepted: Dec 16, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Postoperative Remote Automated Monitoring and Virtual Hospital-to-Home Care System Following Cardiac and Major Vascular Surgery: User Testing Study

McGillion M, Ouellette C, Good A, Bird M, Henry S, Clyne W, Turner A, Ritvo P, Ritvo S, Dvirnik N, Lamy A, Whitlock R, Lawton C, Walsh J, Paterson K, Duquette J, Sanchez K, Elias F, Scott T, Mills J, Harrington D, Field M, Harsha P, Yang S, Peter E, Bhavnani S, Devereaux P

Postoperative Remote Automated Monitoring and Virtual Hospital-to-Home Care System Following Cardiac and Major Vascular Surgery: User Testing Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(3):e15548

DOI: 10.2196/15548

PMID: 32186521

PMCID: 7113803

Postoperative remote automated monitoring and virtual hospital to home care following cardiac and major vascular surgery: A Mixed-Methods User Testing Study

  • Michael McGillion; 
  • Carley Ouellette; 
  • Amber Good; 
  • Marissa Bird; 
  • Shaunattonie Henry; 
  • Wendy Clyne; 
  • Andrew Turner; 
  • Paul Ritvo; 
  • Sarah Ritvo; 
  • Nazari Dvirnik; 
  • Andrew Lamy; 
  • Richard Whitlock; 
  • Chris Lawton; 
  • Jake Walsh; 
  • Ken Paterson; 
  • Janine Duquette; 
  • Karla Sanchez; 
  • Fadi Elias; 
  • Ted Scott; 
  • Joseph Mills; 
  • Deborah Harrington; 
  • Mark Field; 
  • Prathiba Harsha; 
  • Stephen Yang; 
  • Elizabeth Peter; 
  • Sanjeev Bhavnani; 
  • PJ Devereaux

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cardiac and major vascular surgeries are common surgical procedures, associated with high rates of post-surgical complications and related hospital readmission. In-hospital remote automated monitoring (RAM) and virtual hospital-to-home patient care systems have major potential to improve patient outcomes following cardiac and major vascular surgery. However, the science of deploying and evaluating these systems is complex and subject to risk of implementation failure.

Objective:

As a precursor to a randomised controlled trial, the purpose of this mixed-methods user testing study was to examine user performance and acceptance of a RAM and virtual hospital-to-home care intervention, using Philip’s Guardian and Electronic Transition to Ambulatory Care (eTrAC) technologies, respectively.

Methods:

Nurses and patients participated in systems training and individual case-based user testing at two participating sites in Canada and the United Kingdom. Participants were video recorded and asked to think aloud while completing required user tasks, and while being rated on user performance. Feedback was also solicited about the user experience, including user satisfaction and acceptance, through use of the Net Promoter Score survey and debrief interviews.

Results:

Thirty-seven participants total (26 nurses, 11 patients) completed user testing. The majority of nurse and patient participants were able to complete most required tasks, independently, demonstrating comprehension and retention of required Guardian and eTrAC system workflows. Tasks which required additional prompting by the facilitator, for some, were related to the use of system features that enable continuous transmission of patient vital signs (e.g., pairing cableless sensors to the patient) and assigning remote patient monitoring protocols. Mean and overall NPS scores, as well as participant debrief interviews, indicated nurse and patient satisfaction and acceptance of the Guardian and eTrAC systems. Both user groups stressed the need for additional opportunities to practice in order to become comfortable and proficient in the use of these systems.

Conclusions:

User testing indicated a high degree of user acceptance of Philips’ Guardian and eTrAC systems among nurses and patients. Key insights were provided that informed refinement of clinical workflow training and systems implementation. These results were used to optimize workflows prior to launch of an international randomized controlled trial of in-hospital RAM and virtual hospital-to-home care, for patients undergoing cardiac and major vascular surgery.


 Citation

Please cite as:

McGillion M, Ouellette C, Good A, Bird M, Henry S, Clyne W, Turner A, Ritvo P, Ritvo S, Dvirnik N, Lamy A, Whitlock R, Lawton C, Walsh J, Paterson K, Duquette J, Sanchez K, Elias F, Scott T, Mills J, Harrington D, Field M, Harsha P, Yang S, Peter E, Bhavnani S, Devereaux P

Postoperative Remote Automated Monitoring and Virtual Hospital-to-Home Care System Following Cardiac and Major Vascular Surgery: User Testing Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(3):e15548

DOI: 10.2196/15548

PMID: 32186521

PMCID: 7113803

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.