Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 18, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 21, 2019 - May 16, 2019
Date Accepted: Feb 9, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Adoption of an Electronic Patient Record Sharing Pilot Project: Cross-Sectional Survey

Wang J, Huang J, Cheung CSK, Wong WN, Cheung NT, Wong MC

Adoption of an Electronic Patient Record Sharing Pilot Project: Cross-Sectional Survey

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(4):e13761

DOI: 10.2196/13761

PMID: 32250279

PMCID: 7171565

The Adoption of Electronic Patient Record Sharing Pilot Project: A Cross-Sectional Survey

  • Jingxuan Wang; 
  • Junjie Huang; 
  • Clement Shek Kei Cheung; 
  • Wing Nam Wong; 
  • Ngai Tseung Cheung; 
  • Martin CS Wong

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Public Private Interface-electronic Patient Record (PPI-ePR) system was implemented as a new electronic platform to facilitate collaboration between the public and private sectors in Hong Kong. However, its barriers to participate and benefits have not hitherto been comprehensively assessed.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the awareness, acceptance, perceived benefits, and obstacles to participation among private doctors and general public.

Methods:

From December 2012 to January 2013, 2,435 telephone interviews were performed by trained interviewers to survey random-selected patients who were enrolled or not enrolled in the PPI-ePR system. At the meantime, self-administered surveys were sent by post to 10,285 registered doctors in Hong Kong. The questionnaires for both patients and doctors contain questions on subjects’ awareness, acceptance and perceptions to PPI-ePR, perceived benefits and obstacles of participating in the programme, reasons for not using the system after enrolling, as well as perceived areas for service improvement of the system.

Results:

Over 53% of enrolled patients believed that the PPI-ePR system would improve healthcare quality by “reducing duplicate tests and treatments”, while over 76% of enrolled doctors emphasized “timely access to patients’ medical records” as the biggest benefit of their enrolment. Among non-enrolled patients, unawareness of the project was among the most popular obstacle of enrolling the PPI-ePR system (40%). Regarding non-enrolled doctors, the complicated registration process hinder them from participating in the programme the most (48%). Establishing of user-friendly interface (71.5%), and open rights for patients to access their own medical records (63.7%) were among the most widely underlined factors to attract non-enrollees’ participation of the programme.

Conclusions:

This study comprehensively assessed the popularity, perceived benefits and hindering factors of enrolling the PPI-ePR system in Hong Kong. Lack of awareness, as well as fear of the complex registration procedures, was the most common reason of individuals’ absence in the program, calling for more frequent and effective promotions of the program. Even for enrolled users, simplified and user-friendly interface with more functions must be developed to improve their activity.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang J, Huang J, Cheung CSK, Wong WN, Cheung NT, Wong MC

Adoption of an Electronic Patient Record Sharing Pilot Project: Cross-Sectional Survey

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(4):e13761

DOI: 10.2196/13761

PMID: 32250279

PMCID: 7171565

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement