Preferences for Facades of Historic Building: Example of Gevaş, Turkey

Berfin Taysun; Şevin Bayram; Hilmi Ekin Oktay; Hacer Mutlu Danaci

doi:10.21834/ebpj.v8i23.4545

Authors

Berfin Taysun Landscape Architecture Department, Architecture and Design Faculty, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van Turkey
Şevin Bayram Landscape Architecture Department, Architecture and Design Faculty, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van Turkey
Hilmi Ekin Oktay Landscape Architecture Department, Architecture and Design Faculty, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van Turkey
Hacer Mutlu Danaci Architecture Department, Architecture Faculty, Akdeniz University, Antalya Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v8i23.4545

Keywords:

Historic Building, Building Facades, Preferences, Factor Analysis

Abstract

In this study, research of Akdamar Church, İzzettin Şir Mosque, Halime Hatun Vault, Altınsaç Village Churches, St. Thomas Church, Garmravank Church and Deveboynu Monastery located in the Gevaş district of Van province in Turkey.Facades of historic buildings are a valuable aspect of the historic landscape aesthetics despite on that literature about the facades of this type of buildings is rare. 412 questionary has been done in online sessions. Results showed that restored building facades have more preferred than others, factor analyses yield 3 different factors based on the preference scores. Based on the preference for photos and photo ratio analyses regression analyses have shown doom and tree ratios are a significant aspect of the preference for historic landscapes. Results showed preservation is an essential aspect of the preferences of Historic buildings.

References

Akder, M., (2009). Biçim Kavram İlişkisi İçinde Mekan, Metafor, Estetik (doctoral dissertation). Yıldız Teknik University, Institute of Science, İstanbul.

Aktürk, İ., (2020). Tarihi Çevre Korumada Rekonstrüksiyon Uygulamaları: Trabzon Örneği (master’s dissertation). Karadeniz Teknik University, Institute of Science, Trabzon, Turkey.

Aladağ, H., (2010). Kültür Varlıklarının Korunmasında Koruma Yönetimi Süreci (master’s dissertation). Yıldız Teknik University, Institute of Science, İstanbul, Turkey.

Altan, İ., (2012). Psikoloji Çalışmaları, Mimarlikta Mekan Kavramı. 19 (0) , 75-88.

Altunsoy, A., (2005). Kentsel Tarihi Çevre Koruma (Kars Üzerine Bir İnceleme) (doctoral dissertation), Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Baylan, E., (2019). Kültürel Peyzaj Ve Yere Bağlılık: Van Kenti Örneği. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal Of Agricultural Sciences, 29(1), 10-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.422054

Çatalbaş, F., & KILIÇ, S. E., (2022). Tarihi Kentsel Peyzaj (Historic Urban Landscape (HUL)) Yaklaşımı Perspektifinde İ̇zmir Tarihi Liman Kentinde Planlama Ve Kültürel DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/megaron.2022.64624

Mirasın Korunmasına Yönelik Katılımcı Bir Model. Megaron, 17(3).

Ceylan, D., Korkut, A., & Kiper, T., (2014). Tarihi Çevre Yenileme Çalışmalarında Kentsel Peyzaj Planlama Anlayışı: Edirne Örneği. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi,

(1), 27-36.

Duran Akansel, Ö., (2012). Mimari Tasarımda Peyzaj Temaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma (master’s dissertation). Gazi University, Institute Of Science, Ankara, Turkey.