Skip to main content
Log in

Managing Head Lice in an Era of Increasing Resistance to Insecticides

  • Therapy in Practice
  • Published:
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Head lice are present in all age groups, however, the peak age for infestation is 7–8 years and the incidence varies throughout the year with higher incidence during the winter. Different insecticides have been used over the past 60 years to manage this condition. There is now strong evidence of insecticide resistance established in many countries to such an extent that some of these chemicals have become obsolete. Resistance to some pediculicides can vary from country to country and region to region within a country. The lack of a local monitoring system of resistance patterns means that parents and pupils are hampered in making an informed decision regarding how to treat head lice. One should no longer assume that treatment failure is due to poor treatment compliance or re-infestation. Clear treatment guidelines drawn up by healthcare professionals with an interest in head lice and taking into account regional/national resistance patterns should be implemented. These guidelines should combine chemical and non-chemical approaches to treatment and be coordinated and regularly reviewed by local public health departments. Drug companies should be made to provide up-to-date efficacy of their products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leo NP, Cambell NJ, Yang X, et al. Evidence of mitochondrial DNA that head lice and body lice of humans (Phthiraptera: Pediculidae) are conspecific. J Med Entomol 2002; 39: 662–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Araujo A, Ferreira LF, Guidon N, et al. Ten thousand years of head lice infestations [letter]. Parasitol Today 2000; 16: 269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pollack RJ, Kiszewski AE, Spielman A. Overdiagnosis and consequent mismanagement of head louse infestations in North America. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000; 19: 689–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Downs AMR, Stafford KA, Stewart GH, et al. Factors that may be influencing the prevalence of head lice in British school children. Pediatr Dermatol 2000; 17: 72–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mumcuoglu KY, Klaus S, Kaffa D, et al. Clinical observations related to head lice infestation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 25: 248–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Downs AMR, Harvey I, Kennedy CTC. The epidemiology of head lice and scabies in the UK. Epidemiol Infect 1999; 122: 471–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Connolly M, Ross Am, Fleming DM et al. Head lice infestation in the UK: is the incidence falling [abstract]? Br J Dermatol 2002; 147 Suppl. 62: 49

    Google Scholar 

  8. Downs AMR, Oxley J. Head lice infestations in different ethnic groups. Int J Dermatol 2001; 40: 1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebomoyi E. Pediculosis capitis among primary school children in urban and rural areas of Kwara state, Nigeria. J Sch Health 1988; 6: 201–3

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slonka GF, McKinley TW, McCroan JE, et al. Epidemiology of an outbreak of head lice in Georgia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1976; 25: 739–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Berges R, Mendes J. Epidemiological aspects of head lice in children attending day care centres, urban and rural schools in Uberlandia, Central Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2002; 907: 189–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Donaldson RJ. The head louse in England: prevalence among schoolchildren. The Health Education Council. London: HMSO, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  13. Downs AMR, Stafford KA, Hunt LP, et al. Widespread insecticide resistance in head lice to the over-the-counter pediculocides in England, and the emergence of carbaryl resistance. Br J Dermatol 2002; 146: 88–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Taplin D, Meinking TL, Castillero PM. Permethrin 1% crème rinse for the treatment of Pediculus humanus var capitis infestation. Pediatr Dermatol 1986; 3: 344–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mumcuoglu KY, Galan R, Ikan R. Aggregation behavior in the human body louse Pediculus humanus. Insect Sci Appl 1986; 7: 629–32

    Google Scholar 

  16. Courtiade L, Lebreze C, Fontan I, et al. Pediculosis capatis: a questionnaire in 4 schools of the Bordeaux Academy 1990–1991. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1993; 120: 363–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Burgess I. Shampoos for head lice treatment: comparative in vitro tests. Pharm J 1996; 257: 188–90

    Google Scholar 

  18. Narahashi T. Nerve membrane sodium channels as targeting of insecticides. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1992; 13: 238–41

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meinking TL, Taplin D. Infestations: pediculosis. In: Elsner P, Eichmann A, editors. Sexually transmitted diseases: advances in diagnosis and treatment. Basel: Karger, 1996: 157–63

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bowerman JG, Gomez MP, Austin RD, et al. Comparative study of permethrin 1% crème rinse and lindane shampoo for the treatment of head lice. Pediatr Infect Dis 1987; 6: 252–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chosidow O, Chastang C, Brue C, et al. Controlled study of malathion and d-phenothrin lotions for Pediculus humanus var capatis-infested schoolchildren. Lancet 1994; 344: 1724–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mumcuoglu KY, Hemingway J, Miller J, et al. Permethrin resistance in the head louse Pediculus capitis from Israel. Med Vet Entomol 1995; 9: 427–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Burgess IF, Brown CM, Peock S, et al. Head lice resistant to pyrethroid insecticides in Britain [letter]. BMJ 1995; 311 (7007): 752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rupes V, Moravek J, Chmela J, et al. A resistance of head lice (Pediculus capitis) to permethrin in the Czech Republic. Cent Eur J Public Health 1995; 3: 30–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Downs AMR, Stafford KA, Harvey I, et al. Evidence for double resistance to permethrin and malathion in head lice. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141: 508–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Downs AMR, Stafford KA, Coles GC. Head lice: prevalence in schoolchildren and insecticide resistance. Parasitol Today 1999; 15: 1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bailey AM, Prociv P. Persistent head lice following multiple treatments: evidence for insecticide resistance in Pediculus humanus capitis [letter]. Australas J Dermatol 2001; 42: 146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vinuelas J. Pediculosis resistente a permetrina. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2001; 19: 236–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Burkhart CG, Burkhart CN. Clinical evidence of lice resistance to over-the-counter products. J Cutan Med Surg 2000; 4: 199–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pollack RJ, Kiszewski A, Armstrong P, et al. Differential permethrin susceptibility of head lice sampled in the United States and Borneo. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999; 153: 969–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee SH, Yoon KS, Williamson MS, et al. Molecular analysis of kdr-like resistance in permethrin-resistant strains of head lice, Pediculus capitis. Pestic Biochem Physiol 2000; 66: 130–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hipolito RB, Mallorca FG, Zuniga-Macaraig O, et al. Head lice infestation: single drug versus combination therapy with one percent permethrin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Pediatrics 2001; 107 (3): E30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Picollo MI, Vassena CV, Mougabure Cueto GA, et al. Resistance to insecticides and effect of synergists on permethrin toxicity in Pediculus capitis (Anoplura: Pediculidae) from Buenos Aires. J Med Entomol 2000; 37: 721–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Connolly M, Stafford KA, Coles GC, et al. Double blind randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of a coconut derived emulsion shampoo as a pediculocide compared to 1% permethrin shampoo and placebo [poster abstract]. 61st Annual Meeting American Academy of Dermatology; 2003 Mar 21–26; San Franscisco

  35. Mutero A, Draalavorio M, Bridge JM, et al. Resistance-associated point mutations in insecticide-insensitive acetylcholinesterase. Pro Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91: 5922–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Downs AMR, Stafford KA, Coles GC. Monoterpenoides and tetralin as pediculocides. Acta Derm Venereol 1999; 79: 1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mathias RG, Huggins DR, Leroux SJ, et al. Comparative trial of treatment with Prioderm lotion and Kwellada shampoo in children with head lice. CMAJ 1984; 130: 407–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kyle DR. Comparison of phenothrin shampoo and malathion lotion in treatment of head louse infection. J R Soc Health 1990; 110: 62–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Roberts RJ, Casey D, Morgan DA, et al. Comparison of wet combing with malathion for treatment of head lice in the UK: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 356 (9229): 540–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Meinking TL, Serrano L, Hard B, et al. Comparative in vitro pediculocial efficacy of treatments in a resistant head lice population. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138: 220–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Maunder JW. Clinical and laboratory trial employing carbaryl against the human head-louse, Pediculus humanus capatis (de Geer). Clin Exp Dermatol 1981; 6: 605–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jolley JH, Kennedy JP, Miller AJ. A comparison of two insecticidal shampoos in the treatment of head louse infection. J R Soc Health 1991; 111: 90–1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ha YC, Heo JM, Kim HJ, et al. Infestation status of head louse and treatment with lindane shampoo in children of primary school and kindergarten in Chinju-shi, Kyongsangnam-do, Korea. Korean J Parasitol 2000; 38: 41–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Youssef MY, Sadaka HA, Eissa MM, et al. Topical application of ivermectin for human ectoparasites. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995; 53: 652–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Glaziou P, Nyguyen LN, Moulia-Pelat JP. Efficacy of ivermectin for the treatment of head lice (Pediculosis capitis). Trop Med Parasitol 1994; 45: 253–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mumcuoglu KY, Miller J, Rosen LJ, et al. Systemic activity of ivermectin on the human body louse. J Med Entomol 1990; 27: 72–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bell TA. Treatment of pediculus humanus var capitis infestation in Cowlitz county, Washington, with ivermectin and the licemeister comb. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17: 923–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Karacic I, Yawalkar SJ. A single application of crotamiton lotion in the treatment of patients with Pediculosis capitis. Int J Dermatol 1982; 21: 611–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sahu KC. Use of crotonyl-n-ethyl toluidine in pediculosis [letter]. Indian J Dermatol 1957; 2: 66

    Google Scholar 

  50. Downs AMR, Williamson MS, Stafford KA, et al. A common mechanism of resistance to pyrethroids in head lice [abstract]. Br J Dermatol 2002; 147 (S62): 49

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hemingway J, Miller J, Mumcuoglu KY. Pyrethroid resistance mechanisms in the head louse Pediculus capitis from Israel: implications for control. Med Vet Entomol 1999; 13: 89–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bingham P, Kirk S, Hill N, et al. The methodology and operation of a pilot randomised control trial of the effectiveness of the bug busting method against a single application insecticide product for head louse treatment. Public Health 2000; 114: 265–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Amevigbe MD, Ferrer A, Champorie S, et al. Isoenzymes of human lice: pediculus humanus and P. capitis. Med Vet Entomol 2000; 14: 419–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Wei SH, Clark AG, Syvannen M. Identification and cloning of a key insecticide-metabolizing glutathione-S-transferase (MdGST-6A) from a hyper insecticide resistant strain of the housefly Musca domestica. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2001; 31: 1145–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. De Maeseneer J, Blockland I, Willems S, et al. Wet combing versus traditional inspection to detect head lice in schoolchildren: observational study. BMJ 2000; 321: 1187–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fry F, Ibarra J, Smith J, et al. Wet combing to eradicate head lice. J R Soc Med 2002; 95: 630–1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Plastow L, Luthra M, Powell R, et al. Head lice infestation: bug busting vs traditional treatment. J Clin Nurs 2001; 10: 775–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Meinking TL, Clineschmidt CM, Chen C, et al. An observer-blinded study of 1% permethrin crème rinse with and without adjunctive combing in patients with head lice. J Pediatr 2002; 141: 665–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Vander Stichele RH, Gyssels L, Bracke C, et al. Wet combing for head lice: feasibility in mass screening, treatment preference and outcome. J R Soc Med 2002; 95: 348–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kelding J. Persistence of resistant populations after the relaxation of the selective pressure. World Rev Pest Contr 1967; 6: 115–30

    Google Scholar 

  61. Maunder JW, Peock S. Arena tests with piperonal, a new louse repellent [letter]. J R Soc Health 1994; 114: 108

    Google Scholar 

  62. Burkhart CN, Burkhart CG, Gunning WT. Scanning electron microscopy of adult head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis) with focus on clinical implications. J Cutan Med Surg 2000; 4: 181–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The views of this author are wholly independent. There was no funding used to assist in the preparation of this manuscript. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony M.R. Downs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Downs, A.M. Managing Head Lice in an Era of Increasing Resistance to Insecticides. Am J Clin Dermatol 5, 169–177 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200405030-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200405030-00005

Keywords

Navigation