Skip to main content
Log in

A Randomised Comparative Study of Once-Daily Ceftriaxone and 6-Hourly Flucloxacillin in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Cellulitis

Clinical Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacoeconomic Implications

  • Clinical Use
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a study comparing flucloxacillin (1g every 6 hours intravenously), as standard treatment for moderate to severe cellulitis, with ceftriaxone (1g once daily intravenously), ceftriaxone was found to be an effective alternative to flucloxacillin without the associated risk of serious cholestatic hepatitis.

Forty-seven evaluable patients, 24 in the ceftriaxone group and 23 in the flucloxacillin group, were evaluated in this prospective randomised study examining clinical efficacy, safety and duration of hospitalisation. 22 of 23 (96%) patients in the ceftriaxone group achieved clinical success (clinical cure and improvement), while 16 of 22 (70%) flucloxacillin patients were considered a clinical success (clinical cure and improvement). Baseline bacteriology was not performed in the single patient who did not respond to ceftriaxone, while 5 of the 6 patients who did not respond to flucloxacillin had a negative baseline culture. The remaining flucloxacillin failure was infected with Staphylococcus aureus, which persisted at the post-treatment evaluation. All other pathogens isolated at baseline in both treatment arms were eradicated at the post-treatment bacteriological evaluation.

No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported in either group. Because it requires only once-daily administration, ceftriaxone made it possible for some patients to be treated as outpatients, resulting in an average reduction of 3.04 hospital bed-days, while at the same time being as efficacious as flucloxacillin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turner IB, Eckstein RP, Riley JW, et al. Prolonged hepatic cholestasis after flucloxacillin therapy. Med J Aust 1989; 151: 701–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miros M, Kerlin P, Walker N, et al. Flucloxacillin induced delayed hepatic cholestasis. Aust N Z J Med 1990; 20: 251–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eckstein RP, Dowsett JF, Lunzer MR. Flucloxacillin induced liver disease: histopathological findings at biopsy and autopsy. Pathology 1993; 25: 223–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee. Fatal hepatic reactions to flucloxacillin. Aust Adv Drug React Bull 1994; 13(3): 10–1

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradsher Jr RW, Snow RM. Ceftriaxone treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in a once-daily regimen. Am J Med 1984; 77(4C): 63–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordin FM, Wofsy CB, Mills J. Once-daily ceftriaxone for skin and soft tissue infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1985; 27(4): 648–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Derby LE, Jick H, Henry DA, et al. Cholestatic hepatitis associated with flucloxacillin. Med J Aust 1993; 158(9): 596–602

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinen, J., Hudson, B., Chan, B. et al. A Randomised Comparative Study of Once-Daily Ceftriaxone and 6-Hourly Flucloxacillin in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Cellulitis. Clin. Drug Invest. 12, 221–225 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199612050-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199612050-00001

Keywords

Navigation