Skip to main content
Log in

A Data Mining Approach for Signal Detection and Analysis

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The WHO database contains over 2.5 million case reports, analysis of this data set is performed with the intention of signal detection. This paper presents an overview of the quantitative method used to highlight dependencies in this data set.

The method Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) is used to highlight dependencies in the data set. The method uses Bayesian statistics implemented in a neural network architecture to analyse all reported drug adverse reaction combinations.

This method is now in routine use for drug adverse reaction signal detection. Also this approach has been extended to highlight drug group effects and look for higher order dependencies in the WHO data.

Quantitatively unexpectedly strong relationships in the data are highlighted relative to general reporting of suspected adverse effects; these associations are then clinically assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Edwards IR, Biriell C. Harmonisation in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 1994; 10(2): 93–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsson S. The role of the WHO programme on international drug monitoring in coordinating worldwide drug safety efforts. Drug Saf 1998; 19(1): 1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bate A, Orre R, Lindquist M, et al. Explanation of data mining methods [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/322/7296/1207/DC1 [Accessed 2001 Oct 15]

  4. Bate A, Orre R, Lindquist M, et al. Pattern recognition using a recurrent neural network and its application to the WHO database [abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001; 10(S1): S163

    Google Scholar 

  5. Orre R, Lansner A, Bate A, et al. Bayesian neural networks with confidence estimations applied to data mining. Computational Statistics Data Anal 2000; 34(8): 473–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindquist M, Edwards IR, Bate A, et al. From association to alert: a revised approach to international signal analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1999; 8: S15–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 54: 315–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindquist M, Stahl M, Bate A, et al. A retrospective evaluation of a data mining approach to aid finding new adverse drug reaction signals in the WHO international database. Drug Saf 2000; 23(6): 533–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bate A, Lindquist M, Orre R, et al. Automated classification of signals as group effects or drug specific on the WHO database [abstract]. 8th Annual Meeting European Society of Pharmacovigilance; 2000 Sep; Verona; Elsevier, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. 3rd ed. Oslo: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, 2000

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Bate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bate, A., Lindquist, M., Edwards, I.R. et al. A Data Mining Approach for Signal Detection and Analysis. Drug-Safety 25, 393–397 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200225060-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200225060-00002

Keywords

Navigation