11Jun 2019

ROLE OF CT SCAN IN STAGING OF CA URINARY BLADDER WITH HPE CORRELATION.

Crossref Cited-by Linking logo
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • Cite This Article as
  • Corresponding Author

Introduction: Of every 10,000 people every 2 to 3 person will develop urinary bladder cancer. Direct examination via endoscopy remains the investigation of choice for evaluation of superficial urinary bladder lesions and the evaluation of deeper structures requires USG, CT or MRI. The goal of imaging is to define extent of tumour spread, nodal and distant metastasis. Objectives: To evaluate the role of computed tomography (CT) for staging of carcinoma urinary bladder. Methodology: 55 patients were selected for the study for which they underwent computed tomography (CT) examination after explaining the entire procedure and the risks involved. Results: In our study, urinary bladder cancer was most common in 51-60 years age with more common in males compared to females with ratio of 5.1:1. Most common HPE subtype is transitional cell carcinoma (82%) followed by squamous cell carcinoma (8%) and adenocarcinoma (6%). Most of urinary bladder carcinoma arises from lateral wall (51.4%) followed by base of urinary bladder (16.2%). On CT, 16 (29.09%) patient diagnosed as Stage II disease, 13 (23.64%) as Stage III disease and 26 (47.27%) patient diagnosed as Stage IV disease with sensitivity - 85.71%, specificity - 44.44%, PPV - 37.5% and NPV- 88.88% for stage II and Sensitivity - 83.33%, specificity - 83.33%, PPV - 38.46% and NPV- 93.75% for stage III disease respectively. HPE staging shows 12 (21.82%) as Stage I, 7(12.73%) as Stage II, 6(10.91%) as Stage III and 26 (47.27%) as Stage IV disease. Total 26 out of 55 patients showed metastatic spread from which nodal metastasis is most common (80.77%) followed by liver (26.92%), lung and bone metastasis (11.54%). Conclusion: CT plays an important complementary role to clinical examination and endoscopic biopsy in detection, localization, characterization and pre therapeutic staging of urinary bladder masses as delayed scanning allows excellent depiction of the luminal anatomy of urinary bladder and is also very sensitive to assess associated nodal disease (N staging) and systemic metastases (M staging).


1. Husband JE. Staging bladder cancer. Clin Radiol 1992; 46:153?9. 2. Husband JE, Olliff JF, Williams MP, et al. Bladder cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 173: 435?40. 3. Jeffrey RB, Palubinskas AJ, Federle MP. CT evaluation of invasive lesions of the bladder. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1981; 5: 22?6. 4. Hodson NJ, Husband JE, MacDonald JS. The role of computed tomography in the staging of bladder cancer. ClinRadiol 1979; 30: 389?95. 5. Morgan CL, Calkins RF, Cavalcanti EJ. Computed tomography in the evaluation, staging, and therapy of carcinoma of the bladder and prostate. Radiology 1981; 140: 751?61. 6. Bryan PJ, Butler HE, LiPuma JP, et al. CT and MR imaging in staging bladder neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11: 96?101. 7. Van der Werf-Messing B, Schroeder RH, Bush H. Part II. Clinical practice: bladder. In: Halnan KE, ed. Treatment of Cancer. London: Chapman and Hall, 1982: 457?74. 8. Raghavan D, Shipley WU, Garnick MB, et al. Biology and management of bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1129?38. 9. Koss JC, Arger PH, Coleman BG, et al. CT staging of bladder carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137: 359?62. 10. Husband JE. Computed tomography of the bladder. In: Jafri AJ, Amendola MA, Diokno A, eds. Genito Urinary Radiology, Diagnostic and Therapeutic. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997.

[Saumil desai. (2019); ROLE OF CT SCAN IN STAGING OF CA URINARY BLADDER WITH HPE CORRELATION. Int. J. of Adv. Res. 7 (Jun). 313-320] (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com


Dr. Saumil Desai
Associate professor department of radiology, gujarat cancer research institute

DOI:


Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/9226      
DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9226