Getting into a good headspace: A study protocol of an efficacy trial for an eating disorder prevention program in an Australian youth mental health service

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3510918/v1

Eating disorders (EDs) are serious, deadly disorders that emerge in adolescence and early adulthood. Further, reported incidences of EDs are increasing worldwide. As such, accessible, affordable, and effective early intervention and prevention efforts are critical. The Body Project is a well-established ED prevention program with demonstrated success at reducing ED symptom severity and the risk of onset of EDs in young females. However, it has not yet been formally evaluated in an Australian population, nor have the benefits of the treatment for young people of all genders been thoroughly investigated. This protocol paper outlines the design for a study which aims to investigate the outcomes and feasibility of the Body Project as a brief ED prevention program within an Australian youth mental health service: headspace Camperdown. This efficacy trial will compare outcomes between a Body Project treatment group and a Treatment-as-usual control group. Primary outcomes include body image concerns, ED symptomatology and general psychological distress, measured pre- and post-treatment, and at one-month follow-up. All young people attending headspace Camperdown for care are eligible for participation in the trial. The Body Project program is comprised of four group-based 1.5-hour sessions run over four consecutive weeks. Overall, a trial of the Body Project as an ED prevention program is warranted to investigate the outcomes of the intervention in this sample and will provide valuable information about the feasibility for widespread implementation of the treatment as part of a stepped-care approach to intervention for EDs at youth mental health service locations across Australia.

Eating disorders

early intervention

prevention

body image

clinical trial

stepped-care

The impact and prevalence of eating disorders (EDs) has increased significantly worldwide (Coffino et al., 2019; Galmiche et al., 2019; Mitchison et al., 2017). Research has indicated an increase post COVID-19 in ED symptomatology, greater concern and preoccupation with food, shape, eating and exercise, and increased associated psychological distress (Linardon et al., 2022; Sideli et al., 2021). These increases have been evidenced particularly in younger populations, who report symptoms of disordered eating, including dietary restriction, purging, and shape and weight concerns (Burton et al., 2022).

EDs are associated with increased risk for adverse physical health conditions, increased psychological distress, functional impairment, and negative impacts on interpersonal relationships (Hudson et al., 2007; Kessler et al., 2007; Mustelin et al., 2017). Due to the significant physiological and psychological impacts of EDs, EDs are associated with the highest mortality of all the psychological disorders including higher rates of suicidality compared to other conditions (Smink et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2019). Given the associated severity and mortality of these disorders, it is critical that efforts are made to reduce the incidence of these disorders, particularly in young populations shown to be at risk for onset and where prevalence is high (Hudson et al., 2007; Quick et al., 2014; Udo & Grilo, 2018). Research has indicated that the vast majority of individuals with diagnosed EDs do not receive treatment (Swanson et al., 2011) and for those who do remission rates remain modest (Grilo et al., 2012; Lock et al., 2010). As such, easily accessible, affordable, and effective early intervention and prevention efforts are critical to changing the trajectory of EDs (Allen et al., 2023). Prevention efforts involve intervening in response to detected risk factors or prodromal symptomatology, and ideally before a diagnosable disorder has been established (Allen et al., 2023). Preventative ED care has a clear clinical rationale (i.e., the ability to reduce and/or mitigate the mental health risk and burden for the individual), but also is important in its ability to reduce financial and public health burden (Allen et al., 2023).

Although several ED prevention programs have been developed, one has consistently demonstrated efficacy across a range of different settings. The Body Project is a well-established, dissonance-based ED prevention program with demonstrated success at reducing ED symptom severity and the risk of onset of EDs (Becker & Stice, 2017; Stice et al., 2019). It was developed based on evidence that has established body dissatisfaction and shape/weight concerns as key risk factors for developing clinical EDs, particularly during adolescence (Rohde et al., 2015). The program was originally designed for young women to perform a variety of tasks in order to critique a ‘thin beauty ideal’, in order to encourage the reduced pursuit of this ideal, both theoretically and behaviourally (Stice et al., 2019).

Empirical evidence in support of the Body Project has included positive outcomes from multiple research groups, including tests of the intervention theory, efficacy and effectiveness trials, and comparative trials (Stice et al., 2019). Meta-analytic data has demonstrated that dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs (i.e., the Body Project) produce significantly larger reductions across various outcomes, including body dissatisfaction, thin ideal internalization, eating disorder symptomatology and negative affect, compared to minimal-intervention control groups (Stice et al., 2019). Additionally, the efficacy of the program has been found to be further enhanced when the Body Project program takes place over four-to-six sessions, when the program is delivered to groups of approximately 10 young women, and when trained clinicians are implementing the program’s group sessions (Stice et al., 2019).

More recently the Body Project program has demonstrated cross-cultural evidence, indicating similar reductions in body image concerns, negative affect, and ED symptomatology across different racial and cultural groups in the United States (Stice et al., 2021), in young Chinese women (Luo et al., 2021), young Brazilian women (Hudson et al., 2021), and preliminary evidence for Saudi women (AlShebali et al., 2021). Other recent data has also indicated the potential for peer-led groups, when resource constraints limit clinician-led intervention (Stice et al., 2020). Additionally, there is evidence for the efficacy of virtual implementation of the program (Stice et al., 2023). A qualitative review of the existing literature has suggested that since the programs’ development, the Body Project has reached over 3.5 million young women in over 125 countries globally (Becker & Stice, 2017). Overall, this increasing body of evidence highlights the promise and potential for this brief, time-limited prevention programs under these optimised conditions, and argues for the continued and widespread dissemination of the program and the associated positive outcomes.

This program is yet to be formally implemented and evaluated in an Australian population, nor has its implementation within an existing early intervention service utilising a stepped care approach to treatment been formally assessed. Moreover, existing evidence has predominantly focussed on outcomes for female adolescents and young adults. Few trials have examined the benefits of the program for young males or those with another gender identity (e.g., non-binary, gender-queer, gender-fluid, and others). One pilot randomised control trial has provided preliminary evidence for reduced body dissatisfaction and eating pathology for men in a mixed-gender modification of the program (Kilpela et al., 2016). It is critical to continue to reduce risk of body image dissatisfaction and development of EDs for all vulnerable individuals. This also means diverging from a sole focus on thin-ideal internalisation when examining body image concerns for young females and beginning to examine more contemporary, societally relevant, and gender-neutral, or diverse-gender inclusive, body image ideals such as the muscular/toned, curvy and androgynous looks that are highly promoted on social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok.

Consequently, a trial of the Body Project as an ED prevention program is warranted to investigate the potential feasibility and outcomes for a sample of young Australians of all genders. This understanding will be valuable to future populations of young people who may then benefit from preventative intervention or early treatment. It may also be effective for those in the community suffering from subclinical or prodromal EDs, and helpful for clinicians working with young populations and subclinical ED populations.

headspace is Australia’s national youth mental health initiative, designed to provide early intevention services to young Australians aged 12–25 years, who have mild to moderate mental health symptoms (headspace, 2022). headspace aims to provide affordable, accessible, specialised and multidisciplinary mental health care to young people and utilises a stepped-care approach to treatment (McGorry et al., 2007; McGorry et al., 2014). Since 2006, it has grown to establish more than 150 centres across metropolitan, regional and rural areas of Australia, and has supported more than 770,000 young people (headspace, 2022). The headspace model has been promoted internationally, with countries including Canada, New Zealand, Singapore, and the UK exploring ways to emulate headspace-like integrated models into their own healthcare systems to better address youth mental health (Hetrick et al., 2017; Looi et al., 2021; McGorry et al., 2014). headspace remains the largest international integrated (i.e., offering multidisciplinary services at one location) primary mental healthcare initiative undertaken, and has demonstrated demand for mental health and associated services among young Australians (headspace, 2023; Rickwood et al., 2019). Recent data has revealed that 47% of young people presenting for care at a headspace centre reported significant body image concerns and over one-third reported engaging in disordered eating behaviours (Burton et al., 2022). Therefore, utilising headspace as the study setting for an initial feasibility study for the Body Project as an ED prevention program will allow for the many young Australians vulnerable to developing an ED who are currently accessing mental health care at headspace to benefit from the program.

Current Study

The current study aims to investigate the outcomes, benefits and feasibility of the Body Project as a brief evidence-based eating disorder prevention program implemented within an Australian youth mental health service. This non-randomised, efficacy trial will compare outcomes between two conditions: 1) the Body Project treatment group, and 2) a Treatment-as-usual control group, in order to examine the effectiveness of the prevention program for reducing body image concerns, eating disorder symptomatology and general psychological distress. Outcomes will be compared pre- and post-treatment and at one-month follow-up.

In accordance with the previously outlined research (Becker & Stice, 2017; Kilpela et al., 2016; Stice et al., 2019), the following study hypotheses were formed:

H1

Compared to pre-treatment, the Body Project treatment group will report reduced body image concerns, ED symptomatology and general psychological distress post-treatment and at one-month follow up.

H2

Compared to the Treatment-as-usual control group, the Body Project treatment group will report reduced body image concerns and ED symptomatology post-treatment and at one-month follow up.

H3

That an interaction effect will be observed, such that compared to the Treatment-as-usual control group, the Body Project treatment group will report greater reductions in body image concerns and ED symptomatology between pre-treatment, and both post-treatment and at one-month follow up.

H4

That the Body Project treatment intervention will result in positive outcomes (i.e., reduced body image concerns, ED symptomatology and general psychological distress) in males, non-binary and gender diverse young people, as well as in young females.

The present study protocol is reported according to the SPIRIT checklist (Chan et al., 2013). The study protocol and trial has been approved by a Human Research Ethics Review Board (HREC #X23-8405) and has been registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR Registration Number: ACTRN12623000695606p, registered 29 June 2023).

Trial Design and Setting

This study is a 2 (Treatment) x 3 (Time) non-randomised, controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the Body Project as an ED prevention program in a sample of young people presenting for care at a headspace centre. It will compare study outcomes between two treatment groups, the Body Project treatment group versus the Treatment-as-usual control group. Data will be collected at three time points; T1 (Pre), T2 (Post), and T3 (one month follow-up).

All study procedures, including recruitment, treatment, and data collection, will be conducted at headspace Camperdown. headspace Camperdown is a large, metropolitan multidisciplinary youth mental health service with a clinical team including psychologists, GPs, a psychiatry registrar, social workers and exercise physiologists. This service is located within the Brain and Mind Centre at the University of Sydney. headspace Camperdown provides approximately 6000 occasions of service to an average 1200 young people per year, half of which are new patients to the centre (headspace National, 2021). The average age of the young people who attend headspace Camperdown for care is 19.3 years (65.9% female) with 3.5% identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, 24.5% as culturally or linguistically diverse (CALD) and 37.8% as LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer, asexual and other sexually or gender diverse). A high proportion of young people present as either being sad or depressed (39.9%), or anxious (29.5%), to account for 69.4% of total presentations and comparable with national averages (headspace National, 2021).

Recruitment will include a minimum sample of 82 individuals aged 12-25 years. Treatment-as-usual will be utilised as a control condition due to the use of a study setting where individuals are already treatment seeking and maintains other benefits such as controlling for many non-specific therapy factors, and ethical advantages due to not withholding or delaying treatment or care (Kazdin, 2015). Due to external restraints on recruitment and delivery of the program, the study will not be randomised or blinded. All consenting participants will be invited to attend the treatment group and participants will voluntarily elect themselves to be a part of either study condition. See Figure 1 for a flowchart of the study design.

Participants

Participants will be young people aged 12 – 25 years presenting at headspace Camperdown, who have the ability and willingness to provide informed consent, participate and comply with the study. No restrictions will be imposed by gender or other demographic characteristics other than the age range eligibility. No additional exclusion criteria will be applied to consenting individuals beyond those already utilised at headspace Camperdown. These pre-existing exclusion criteria include individuals with a disease or psychological illness that would interfere with their ability to understand the requirements of the study and treatment or interfere with the evaluation of the patient’s safety and of the study outcome.

An a-priori power analysis was run using G*power (Faul et al., 2007). In order to adjust multiple comparisons in the testing procedure, an alpha of 0.05 was adjusted to 0.017 in accordance with the Bonferroni method. An a-priori power of 0.95 was utilised as per the recommended minimum power for planned frequentist analyses, as well as a Cohen’s f effect size of 0.2. Using these estimates, a total sample size of 82 participants was required (41 per group). Thus, for our study to achieve the minimum statistical power using these estimates and to manage for potential participant dropout, we aim to recruit 60 participants (ideally aiming for six groups of 10 participants) for the Body Project treatment group, and a matched 60 participants for the treatment-as-usual control group. This calculation is additionally supported by previous ED trial protocols (Barakat et al., 2021), who obtained similar estimates.

Materials

Body Appreciation Scale (BAS-2)

The BAS-2 (Tylka & Wood-Barcalow, 2015) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire, and is considered a measure of positive body image, examining individuals’ acceptance of, and favourable opinions towards and respect for their body (e.g., ‘I feel love for my body’). Participants are asked to rate whether the item is true of them on a scale of 1 (Never) to 5 (Always), where higher scores indicate higher body appreciation. It had demonstrated good psychometric properties cross-culturally (Razmus et al., 2020).

Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS-21)

The DASS-21 is a 21-item self-report questionnaire that examines three related negative emotional states; depression (e.g., ‘I felt that life was meaningless’), anxiety (e.g., ‘I felt I was close to panic’) and stress (e.g., ‘I found it hard to wind down’; (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995). Participants are asked to rate items according to how much each statement applied to them over the past week on a scale of 0 (Did not apply to me at all) to 3 (Applied to me very much or most of the time), where higher scores indicate higher depression, anxiety and stress. It has demonstrated good psychometric properties across cultures (Zanon et al., 2020).

Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Short (EDE-QS)

The EDE-QS is a brief, 12-item version of the more commonly used 28-item EDEQ (Gideon et al., 2016), that assesses ED symptomatology and severity in the seven days prior to assessment (e.g., ‘…Have you had a strong desire to lose weight?’). Ten items are rated on a 4-point scale (0 days [0] to 6-7 days [3]), and two items on a 4-point scale (Not at all [0] to Markedly [3]), where a higher global score reflects greater frequency and severity of symptoms. The short form was utilised to reduce participant burden. The EDE-QS has been seen to be psychometrically and conceptually sound (Gideon et al., 2016).

Ideal Body Stereotype Scale Revised (IBSS-R)

The IBSS-R is a 6-item scale that was originally designed to measure internalization of societally relevant stereotypical female body ideals (Stice & Bearman, 2001). Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree), where a higher overall score indicates greater endorsement of ideal-body stereotypes. It has demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability (Stice & Bearman, 2001; Stice & Whitenton, 2002). For the purposes of this study, the scale and its items were adjusted to reflect more contemporary, relevant and gender inclusive ideal-body stereotypes (e.g., ‘People who are “in shape” [fit and strong] are more attractive’).

Inside Out Screener

The Inside Out Screener is a 6-item novel screening tool utilised for early detection for high risk and early stage eating disorders, developed for both self-referral and use in clinical settings (Bryant et al., 2021). One item (‘How is your relationship with food?) is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (Worry and stress free) to 5 (Full of worry and stress), and the remaining five items (e.g., ‘Does your weight, body or shape make you feel bad about yourself?’) rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (Never) to 5 (All the time). A higher overall score indicates a higher degree of risk. It has shown excellent preliminary evidence for its psychometric properties (Bryant et al., 2021).

Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)

The K10 is a 10-item scale utilised for measuring general psychological distress (Kessler et al., 2002). Items (e.g., ‘In the past 4 weeks, about how often did you feel tired out for no good reason?’) are rated on a scale 5-point scale from 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time), where a higher score indicates higher distress. It has demonstrated good clinical utility, reliability and validity (Batterham et al., 2017).

Perceived Sociocultural Pressure Scale (PSPS)

The PSPS is a 10-item scale used for assessing the perceived pressure to be thin individuals have experienced from individuals from friends, family, and the media (Stice & Bearman, 2001). Items (e.g., ‘I’ve felt a strong message from the media to have a thin body’) are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (None) to 5 (A lot), with higher scores indicating higher perceived sociocultural pressure. It has demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability (Stice & Bearman, 2001; Stice & Whitenton, 2002).

Procedure

Participants will be recruited via flyers distributed throughout the trial setting (headspace Camperdown). These will invite individuals to participate in the four week, four-session Body Project program (1.5 hours per session), or to participate by completing questionnaires at the required time points if they participate in the Treatment-as-usual control group. Interested participants will be presented with a participant information statement and consent form to provide informed consent to participate in the study. As part of enrolment, consenting participants will self-allocate to a treatment condition. At this time, participants will receive a unique enrolment number which will be utilised on all study materials and questionnaires. Participants under the age of 18 years of age will also require written parental consent to be provided to finalise enrolment. After informed consent has been provided, participants will complete the T1 [pre-treatment] questionnaire. Questionnaire data will be collected via online self-report using Qualtrics Survey Software. This test battery includes collecting demographic information and all outcome measures outlined in the materials section. Demographic information collected includes age, gender identity, ethnicity, and about current (if any) mental health diagnosis(es). Participants are also asked they have experienced an eating disorder either currently or in the past but have not spoken to a health professional about it in order to obtain a diagnosis.

Intervention will commence after enrolment and allocation procedures have been finalised. Detailed information about the intervention and control conditions have been outlined in the subsequent intervention section. Participants will be closely monitored and assessed for safety and adverse events throughout the entire study period. After the fourth visit to headspace Camperdown to close intervention period, participants will complete the T2 (post-treatment) questionnaire (identical to T1 but without demographic information). One month after the T2 questionnaire has been completed, all participants will be asked to complete the T3 (one-month follow-up) questionnaire. After the close of the study period and data collection is complete, data analysis will be carried out by the chief and co-investigators. Table 1 displays the schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessment in accordance with SPIRIT guidelines.

Intervention

Body Project Treatment

The Body Project treatment program is a cognitive dissonance-based body acceptance intervention (Stice et al., 2012). It is a manualised intervention that consists of four group sessions and was originally designed to help adolescent girls and young women resist sociocultural pressures to conform to the thin beauty-ideal and reduce their pursuit of thinness through written, verbal and behavioural exercises. For our treatment groups, the program will be comprised of four group-based 1.5 hour sessions, running over four consecutive weeks. It contains a variety of key principles and tasks summarised in Table 2. For the purposes of utilising this treatment in an inclusive group of gender diverse individuals, some of the content of sessions were adapted to include and reflect other relevant body ideals (e.g., thin ideal, curvy ideal, fit ideal, muscular ideal). A clinical psychology trainee will lead group-sessions based on the treatment manual.

Treatment-as-usual Control

Participants in the control group will continue to attend headspace Camperdown sessions with their usual clinician/s over the four consecutive week period.

Data Analysis Strategy

Statistical analyses will be carried out using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics (version 26.0) predictive analytics software. Preliminary and descriptive analyses will be conducted to examine general sample characteristics and other variable information. This includes analyses such as examining distribution of data to assess for violations of normality assumptions for all variables, floor and ceiling effects, examining the internal consistency of measures using McDonald’s Omega (Ω), and the relationships between variables using Kendall’s Tau correlations.

To investigate the treatment outcomes and test research hypotheses, F-tests (two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]) will be conducted to investigate differences in repeated measures within groups (between T1, T2, and T3), and between group differences (between groups effects at T2 [post-treatment] and T3 [one-month follow-up]), and finally to examine the interaction between conditions (time and treatment). Additionally, baseline differences between groups for outcome measures will be examined pre-treatment (T1), and may be used as a covariate. These differences will be examined for all outcome measures (measures of body image, ED symptomatology and general psychological distress). An alpha of 0.05 for testing statistical significance may be adjusted in accordance with the Bonferroni method to allow for multiple comparisons.

Several additional analyses will be considered if they contribute to a more nuanced understanding of study outcomes and assist in the overall interpretation of findings. This includes examining the impact of demographic variables on outcomes using t-tests and chi-square tests, and subsequently utilising these variables as covariates or moderators. Due to the use of ‘forced response’ items in the online test battery, we do not anticipate any missed data.

Ethical Considerations, Data and Risk Management

Informed consent will be obtained by providing participants with a Participant Information Statement and obtaining written informed consent. Parents with children under the age of 18 will also receive a Participant Information Statement and will provide informed consent. Under the TGA CTN Scheme, all data from intervention studies conducted will be kept indefinitely. However, all information will be treated confidentially. All data will be de-identified by the researchers, and only the approved researchers will have access to the de-identified data. All recruitment, data collection and intervention will be supervised by senior clinical psychologists. If participants wish to withdraw from the study once it has started, they can do so at any time without having to give a reason, by contacting the chief-investigator. Data will be stored on a secured server and managed by the approved study investigators.

In the case of an unexpected medical emergency or workplace accident/injury, the WHS policy of headspace Camperdown and UTS will be followed regarding the reporting of incidents. A distress protocol has been created in order support any distressed participants, both during and after the intervention. As the study and intervention are occurring within the participants treatment centre (headspace Camperdown), their treating clinicians and senior clinical staff will be on site to assist with distress. Any instances of negative or adverse outcomes will also be included in trial reports.

With an early age of onset and high comorbidity with anxiety and mood disorders, young people experiencing mental health distress are especially at risk of developing an ED (Burton et al., 2022). Body image concerns, prodromal disordered eating, and clinical eating disorders (EDs) have a significant impact on the physical and psychological wellbeing of individuals as well as significant societal costs (Hudson et al., 2007; Kessler et al., 2007; Mustelin et al., 2017). Easily accessible, affordable, and effective early intervention and prevention efforts are critical to changing the trajectory of these serious and often fatal conditions. There is a need for effective ED prevention programs suitable for individuals of all gender identities that can be widely disseminated to those vulnerable to developing an eating disorder.

This paper has outlined the protocol for a unique trial of the Body Project dissonance-based eating disorder (ED) prevention program in an Australian youth mental health setting. The aim of this project is to investigate the benefits and feasibility of offering a brief evidence-based ED prevention program within an existing early intervention service (headspace centre). It is hoped that this program will demonstrate efficacy as an early intervention strategy which can be readily implemented in settings like headspace centres and other services and settings where young people access mental health support.

Recent research has found that young Australians presenting at a headspace centre for general mental health support are reporting high rates of body image concerns and disordered eating symptoms (Burton et al., 2022). As Australia’s National Youth Mental Health Foundation with over 150 youth-friendly mental health services across Australia, headspace centres are uniquely placed to offer an accessible early intervention for EDs to those most vulnerable to developing an ED. Therefore, an increased understanding of the feasibility and outcomes of the Body Project as an ED early intervention program in this type of service could inform and influence future stepped care service delivery models to include preventative intervention or early treatment as part of standard practice. This will benefit future populations of vulnerable young people (such as those suffering from subclinical or prodromal EDs) who, without access to an early intervention such as the Body Project, would go on to develop an eating disorder.

Author’s Contributions

AB obtained funding for the trial and is the lead investigator and trial coordinator. AH is the research project manager, SB is the psychologist responsible for implementation of treatment sessions at the trial site, and BH is the trial site coordinator. AB conceived and designed the study. Material preparation was performed by AB and AH, and data collection coordinated by SB and BH. AH prepared the first draft of the trial protocol which included assisting with refining the study design and data analysis plan in collaboration with AB. AH prepared the first draft of this manuscript, subsequent versions were refined in collaboration with AB, SB and BH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Gadigal and the Wangal peoples of the Eora nation, upon who’s ancestral lands this research was conducted. We pay our utmost respect to Elders past and present. The authors acknowledge the staff and young people of headspace Camperdown (the trial site) for their willingness to be involved with this study. The authors acknowledge the University of Technology Sydney Faculty of Health for funding this trial.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. There are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report or benefits that have arisen from this research.

Funding

The study is supported by funding from a University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Faculty of Health “ADRSF Research Engagement Grant”. This funding was obtained and is being managed by Amy Burton.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC: HREC #X23-8405). All participants were provided with a participant information statement and provided their consent to participate in the study. All participants read a Participant Information Statement allowing them to make an informed choice as to whether they wanted to participate in the research or not. They were informed that they could also cease participation at any stage with no penalty to them or to their relationship with headspace or UTS. The ethics of the consent procedure was approved as above.

Allen, K. L., Mountford, V. A., Elwyn, R., Flynn, M., Fursland, A., Obeid, N., Partida, G., Richards, K., Schmidt, U., Serpell, L., Silverstein, S., & Wade, T. (2023). A framework for conceptualising early intervention for eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review: The Journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 31(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2959
AlShebali, M., Becker, C., Kellett, S., AlHadi, A., & Waller, G. (2021). Adapting the body project to a non-western culture: A dissonance-based eating disorders prevention program for Saudi women. Eating and Weight Disorders: EWD, 26(8), 2503–2512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01104-9
Barakat, S., Touyz, S., Maloney, D., Russell, J., Hay, P., Cunich, M., Lymer, S., Kim, M., Madden, S., Miskovic-Wheatley, J., & Maguire, S. (2021). Supported online cognitive behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Eating Disorders, 9, 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00482-w
Batterham, P. J., Sunderland, M., Slade, T., Calear, A. L., & Carragher, N. (2018). Assessing distress in the community: Psychometric properties and crosswalk comparison of eight measures of psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 48(8), 1316–1324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717002835
Becker, C. B., & Stice, E. (2017). From efficacy to effectiveness to broad implementation: Evolution of the Body Project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(8), 767–782. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000204
Bryant, E., Miskovic-Wheatley, J., Touyz, S. W., Crosby, R. D., Koreshe, E., & Maguire, S. (2021). Identification of high risk and early stage eating disorders: First validation of a digital screening tool. Journal of Eating Disorders, 9(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00464-y
Burton, A. L., Hamilton, B., Iorfino, F., La Monica, H. M., Scott, E. M., & Hickie, I. B. (2022). Examining the prevalence of disordered eating in a cohort of young Australians presenting for mental health care at a headspace centre: Results from a cross-sectional clinical survey study. BMJ open, 12(8), e061734. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061734
Chan, A. W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Altman, D. G., Laupacis, A., Gøtzsche, P. C., Krleža-Jerić, K., Hróbjartsson, A., Mann, H., Dickersin, K., Berlin, J. A., Doré, C. J., Parulekar, W. R., Summerskill, W. S., Groves, T., Schulz, K. F., Sox, H. C., Rockhold, F. W., Rennie, D., & Moher, D. (2013). SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
Coffino, J. A., Udo, T., & Grilo, C. M. (2019). Rates of help-seeking in US adults with lifetime DSM-5 eating disorders: Prevalence across diagnoses and differences by sex and ethnicity/race. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 94(8), 1415–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.030
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
Galmiche, M., Déchelotte, P., Lambert, G., & Tavolacci, M. P. (2019). Prevalence of eating disorders over the 2000–2018 period: A systematic literature review. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 109(5), 1402-1413. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy342
Gideon, N., Hawkes, N., Mond, J., Saunders, R., Tchanturia, K., & Serpell, L. (2016). Development and psychometric validation of the EDE-QS, a 12 item short form of the eating disorder examination questionnaire (EDE-Q). PloS one, 11(5), e0152744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152744
Grilo, C. M., Crosby, R. D., Wilson, G. T., & Masheb, R. M. (2012). 12-month follow-up of fluoxetine and cognitive behavioral therapy for binge eating disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 1108–1113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030061
headspace. (2022). headspace Year in Review 2021-2022. Available at: https://headspace.org.au/assets/Headspace-Year-in-Review-2022_RGB.pdf [Accessed 2 April 2023]
headspace. (2023). Who we are. Available at: https://headspace.org.au/our-organisation/who-we-are/ [Accessed 2 April 2023]
headspace National. (2021). headspace Camperdown centre activity overview: Report financial year 2020-21 (1/07/2020 – 30/06/21). Melbourne: headspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation.
Hudson, J. I., Hiripi, E., Pope, H. G., Jr, & Kessler, R. C. (2007). The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Biological Psychiatry, 61(3), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040
Hudson, T. A., Amaral, A. C. S., Stice, E., Gau, J., & Ferreira, M. E. C. (2021). Dissonance-based eating disorder prevention among Brazilian young women: A randomized efficacy trial of the Body Project. Body Image, 38, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.008
Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. L., Walters, E. E., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291702006074
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P. A., Chiu, W. T., Deitz, A. C., Hudson, J. I., Shahly, V., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M. C., Benjet, C., Bruffaerts, R., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., Maria Haro, J., Kovess-Masfety, V., O'Neill, S., Posada-Villa, J., Sasu, C., Scott, K., Viana, M. C., & Xavier, M. (2013). The prevalence and correlates of binge eating disorder in the world health organization world mental health surveys. Biological Psychiatry, 73(9), 904–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.020
Kazdin A. E. (2015). Treatment as usual and routine care in research and clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.006
Kilpela, L. S., Blomquist, K., Verzijl, C., Wilfred, S., Beyl, R., & Becker, C. B. (2016). The body project 4 all: A pilot randomized controlled trial of a mixed-gender dissonance-based body image program. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49(6), 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22562
Linardon, J., Messer, M., Rodgers, R. F., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2022). A systematic scoping review of research on COVID-19 impacts on eating disorders: A critical appraisal of the evidence and recommendations for the field. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 55(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23640
Lock, J., Le Grange, D., Agras, W. S., Moye, A., Bryson, S. W., & Jo, B. (2010). Randomized clinical trial comparing family-based treatment with adolescent-focused individual therapy for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 1025–1032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.128
Looi, J. C. L., Allison, S., Bastiampillai, T., and Kisely, S. R. (2021). Headspace, an Australian Youth Mental Health Network: Lessons for Canadian Mental Healthcare. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent. 30(2), 116–122.
Lovibond, S.H. & Lovibond, P.F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. (2^nd. Ed.) Sydney: Psychology Foundation. ISBN 7334-1423-0.
Luo, Y. J., Jackson, T., Stice, E., & Chen, H. (2021). Effectiveness of an Internet Dissonance-Based Eating Disorder Prevention Intervention Among Body-Dissatisfied Young Chinese Women. Behavior therapy, 52(1), 221–233.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2020.04.007
McGorry, P. D., Goldstone, S. D., Parker, A. G., Rickwood, D. J., and Hickie, I. B. (2014). Cultures for mental health care of young people: an Australian blueprint for reform. The Lancet Psychiatry. 1(7), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)000820
McGorry, P. D., Tanti, C., Stokes, R., Hickie, I. B., Carnell, K., Littlefield, L. K., and Moran, J. (2007). headspace: Australia's National Youth Mental Health Foundation—where young minds come first. Medical Journal of Australia. 187(S7), S68–S70.
Mitchison, D., Touyz, S., González-Chica, D. A., Stocks, N., & Hay, P. (2017). How abnormal is binge eating? 18-Year time trends in population prevalence and burden. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 136(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12735
Mustelin, L., Bulik, C. M., Kaprio, J., & Keski-Rahkonen, A. (2017). Prevalence and correlates of binge eating disorder related features in the community. Appetite, 109, 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.032
Quick, V., Berg, K. C., Bucchianeri, M. M., & Byrd-Bredbenner, C. (2014). Identification of eating disorder pathology in college students: a comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. Advances in Eating Disorders: Theory, Research and Practice, 2(2), 112-124.
Razmus, M., Razmus, W., Tylka, T. L., Jović, M., Jović, M., & Namatame, H. (2020). Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the body appreciation scale-2 across five countries. Body Image, 34, 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.07.003
Rickwood, D., Paraskakis, M., Quin, D., Hobbs, N., Ryall, V., Trethowan, J., and McGorry, P. (2019). Australia's innovation in youth mental health care: The headspace centre model. Early intervention in psychiatry. 13(1), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12740
Rohde, P., Stice, E., & Marti, C. N. (2015). Development and predictive effects of eating disorder risk factors during adolescence: Implications for prevention efforts. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22270
Sideli, L., Lo Coco, G., Bonfanti, R. C., Borsarini, B., Fortunato, L., Sechi, C., & Micali, N. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on eating disorders and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Eating Disorders Review: The Journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 29(6), 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2861
Smith, A. R., Velkoff, E. A., Ribeiro, J. D., & Franklin, J. (2019). Are eating disorders and related symptoms risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors? A meta‐analysis. Suicide and Life‐Threatening Behavior, 49(1), 221-239.
Smink, F. R., Van Hoeken, D., & Hoek, H. W. (2012). Epidemiology of eating disorders: incidence, prevalence and mortality rates. Current psychiatry reports, 14(4), 406-414.
Stice, E., Rohde, P., & Shaw, H. (2012). The Body Project: A Dissonance-Based Eating Disorder Prevention Intervention (2 edn). Oxford Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199859245.001.0001
Stice, E., & Bearman, S. K. (2001). Body-image and eating disturbances prospectively predict increases in depressive symptoms in adolescent girls: A growth curve analysis. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.37.5.597
Stice, E., Bohon, C., Shaw, H., & Desjardins, C. D. (2023). Efficacy of virtual delivery of a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program and evaluation of a donation model to support sustained implementation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 91(3), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000796
Stice, E., Marti, C. N., Shaw, H., & Rohde, P. (2019). Meta-analytic review of dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs: Intervention, participant, and facilitator features that predict larger effects. Clinical Psychology Review, 70, 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.04.004
Stice, E., Onipede, Z. A., Shaw, H., Rohde, P., & Gau, J. M. (2021). Effectiveness of the Body Project eating disorder prevention program for different racial and ethnic groups and an evaluation of the potential benefits of ethnic matching. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 89(12), 1007–1019. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000697
Stice, E., Rohde, P., Shaw, H., & Gau, J. M. (2020). Clinician-led, peer-led, and internet-delivered dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs: Effectiveness of these delivery modalities through 4-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88(5), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000493
Stice, E., & Whitenton, K. (2002). Risk factors for body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls: A longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.38.5.669
Swanson, S. A., Crow, S. J., Le Grange, D., Swendsen, J., & Merikangas, K. R. (2011). Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in adolescents. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 714–723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.22
Tylka, T. L., & Wood-Barcalow, N. L. (2015). The body appreciation scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation. Body Image, 12, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.09.006
Udo, T., & Grilo, C. M. (2018). Prevalence and correlates of DSM-5-defined eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Biological Psychiatry, 84(5), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.03.014
Zanon, C., Brenner, R. E., Baptista, M. N., Vogel, D. L., Rubin, M., Al-Darmaki, F. R., Gonçalves, M., Heath, P. J., Liao, H. Y., Mackenzie, C. S., Topkaya, N., Wade, N. G., & Zlati, A. (2020). Examining the dimensionality, reliability, and invariance of the depression, anxiety, and stress scale-21 (DASS-21) across eight countries. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119887449

Table 1

Schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessment in accordance with SPIRIT guidelines

Timepoint		Study Period
		Enrolment	Post-allocation/Intervention				Close-out
		Visit 0	Visit 1	Visit 2	Visit 3	Visit 4
		T1 [Pre]				T2 [Post]	T3 [one-month follow-up]
Enrolment	Eligibility	✔
	Allocation	✔
	Informed consent	✔
Interventions	Body Project treatment group		✔	✔	✔	✔
Interventions	Treatment-as-usual control group		✔	✔	✔	✔
Assessments	Demographics	✔
	Adverse Event & Serious Adverse Event Assessment	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔	✔
	Body Appreciation Scale (BAS-2)	✔				✔	✔
	Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS-21)	✔				✔	✔
	Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Short (EDE-QS)	✔				✔	✔
	Ideal Body Stereotype Scale Revised (IBSS-R)	✔				✔	✔
	Inside Out Screener	✔				✔	✔
	Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)	✔				✔	✔
	Perceived Sociocultural Pressure Scale (PSPS)	✔				✔	✔

Table 2

Overview of Body Project group session content

Session	Focus	Key Principles and Tasks
Session 1	Introduction & Psychoeducation	Introduction and welcome Psychoeducation about definitions of body ideals Discussion of origins of body ideals (e.g., thin ideal, curvy ideal, fit ideal, muscular ideal) Participants write letter to younger selves discussing costs Self-affirmation task recording positive aspects of the self
Session 2	Cognitive Challenging	Discuss reflections from two tasks from Session 1 Opposing attitudes role play to try to dissuade the facilitator from pursuing body ideals Identify examples of experiences of pressure to conform to body ideals Verbally challenge pressures and identify strategies to resist this
Session 3	Motivation & Behavioural Experiments	Review exercises from Session 2 Challenge statements in support of body ideals made by peers through role play Discuss motivations for participating in the program Create behavioural experiments to challenge body ideal concerns Discuss body activism ideas
Session 4	Review & Summary	Review outcomes of behavioural experiments Discuss experiences with body activism Review subtle ways body ideals are perpetuated Write second letter to younger self to support and self-affirm

Note. The content of the group sessions was adapted from the Body Project manual, to include the key focus, principles and tasks, but to include psychoeducation, challenging, and behavioural experiments targeting varied relevant body ideals (Stice, E., Rohde, P., & Shaw, H. [2012]. The Body Project: A Dissonance-Based Eating Disorder Prevention Intervention [2 edn]. Oxford Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199859245.001.0001).

No competing interests reported.

Getting into a good headspace: A study protocol of an efficacy trial for an eating disorder prevention program in an Australian youth mental health service

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Current Study

Method

Discussion

Declarations

References

Tables

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1