1. Tunçalp, Ӧ. et al. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience—going beyond survival. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 124, 860–862 (2017).
2. Lawn, J. E. et al. Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet Lond. Engl. 384, 189–205 (2014).
3. Rani, M., Bonu, S. & Harvey, S. Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India. Int. J. Qual. Health Care J. Int. Soc. Qual. Health Care 20, 62–71 (2008).
4. Walani, S. R. Global burden of preterm birth. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 150, 31–33 (2020).
5. Oza, S., Cousens, S. N. & Lawn, J. E. Estimation of daily risk of neonatal death, including the day of birth, in 186 countries in 2013: a vital-registration and modelling-based study. Lancet Glob. Health 2, e635-644 (2014).
6. Howson, C. P., Kinney, M. V., McDougall, L., Lawn, J. E., & the Born Too Soon Preterm Birth Action Group. Born Too Soon: Preterm birth matters. Reprod. Health 10, S1 (2013).
7. Kim, E. T., Singh, K., Moran, A., Armbruster, D. & Kozuki, N. Obstetric ultrasound use in low and middle-income countries: a narrative review. Reprod. Health 15, 129 (2018).
8. ACOG. Committee Opinion No 700: Methods for Estimating the Due Date. Obstet. Gynecol. 129, e150–e154 (2017).
9. Miller, L. et al. Working with what you have: How the East Africa Preterm Birth Initiative used gestational age data from facility maternity registers. PLOS ONE 15, e0237656 (2020).
10. Karl, S. et al. Preterm or not–an evaluation of estimates of gestational age in a cohort of women from rural Papua New Guinea. PloS One 10, e0124286 (2015).
11. WHO. WHO recommendations on interventions to improve preterm birth outcomes. (World Health Organization, 2015).
12. Kullinger, M., Granfors, M., Kieler, H. & Skalkidou, A. Discrepancy between pregnancy dating methods affects obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a population-based register cohort study. Sci. Rep. 8, 6936 (2018).
13. WHO. WHO compendium of innovative health technologies for low-resource settings, 2016- 2017. (2018).
14. Nelson, G. A. & Holschuh, C. Evaluation of Telehealth Use in Prenatal Care for Patient and Provider Satisfaction: A Step Toward Reducing Barriers to Care. J. Nurse Pract. 17, 481–484 (2021).
15. Meskó, B., Drobni, Z., Bényei, É., Gergely, B. & Győrffy, Z. Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. mHealth 3, 38 (2017).
16. Thompson, M. The geographies of digital health – Digital therapeutic landscapes and mobilities. Health Place 70, 102610 (2021).
17. Miller, D. D. & Brown, E. W. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Practice: The Question to the Answer? Am. J. Med. 131, 129–133 (2018).
18. WHO. Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. (World Health Organization, 2020).
19. Reis, Z. S. N., Vitral, G. L. N., de Souza, I. M. F., Rego, M. A. S. & Guimaraes, R. N. Newborn skin reflection: Proof of concept for a new approach for predicting gestational age at birth. A cross-sectional study. PloS One 12, e0184734 (2017).
20. Reis, Z. S. N. et al. Prematurity detection evaluating interaction between the skin of the newborn and light: protocol for the preemie-test multicentre clinical trial in Brazilian hospitals to validate a new medical device. BMJ Open 9, e027442 (2019).
21. Wyckoff, M. H. et al. Neonatal life support: 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation. 142, n. 16_suppl_1, p. S185-S221, (2020).
22. Scott, K. et al. “I can guess the month … but beyond that, I can’t tell” an exploratory qualitative study of health care provider perspectives on gestational age estimation in Rajasthan, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 529 (2020).
23. Wylie, B. J. et al. Gestational age assessment in malaria pregnancy cohorts: a prospective ultrasound demonstration project in Malawi. Malar. J. 12, 183 (2013).
24. Weiss, S. M. & Indurkhya, N. Rule-based machine learning methods for functional prediction. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 3, 383–403 (1995).
25. Reis, Z. et al. Premature or Small for Gestational Age Discrimination: International Multicenter Trial Protocol for Classification of the Low-Birth-Weight Newborn Through the Optical Properties of the Skin. JMIR Res. Protoc. 9, e16477 (2020).
26. Ananth, C. V. & Brandt, J. S. Fetal growth and gestational age prediction by machine learning. Lancet Digit. Health 2, e336–e337 (2020).
27. Fung, R. et al. Achieving accurate estimates of fetal gestational age and personalised predictions of fetal growth based on data from an international prospective cohort study: a population-based machine learning study. Lancet Digit. Health 2, e368–e375 (2020).
28. Torres, M. T., Valstar, M. F., Henry, C., Ward, C. & Sharkey, D. Small sample deep learning for newborn gestational age estimation. in 79–86 (IEEE, 2017).
29. Rittenhouse, K. J. et al. Improving preterm newborn identification in low-resource settings with machine learning. PloS One 14, e0198919 (2019).
30. Soubeiga, D., Gauvin, L., Hatem, M. A. & Johri, M. Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness (BPCR) interventions to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14, 129 (2014).
31. Silva, P. C., Guimarães, R. N., Souza, R. G. & Reis, Z. S. N. A quantitative cross-sectional analysis of the melanin index in the skin of preterm newborns and its association with gestational age at birth. Skin Res. Technol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Bioeng. Skin ISBS Int. Soc. Digit. Imaging Skin ISDIS Int. Soc. Skin Imaging ISSI 26, 356–361 (2020).
32. Emeruwa, U. N., Krenitsky, N. M., & Sheen, J. J. Advances in Management for Preterm Fetuses at Risk of Delivery. Clinics in Perinatology, 47, 685-703 (2020).
33. Condon, J. et al. Expression of type 2 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and corticosteroid hormone receptors in early human fetal life. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 4490–4497 (1998).
34. August, D. & Kandasamy, Y. The effects of antenatal glucocorticoid exposure on fetal and neonatal skin maturation. J. Perinat. Med. 45, (2017).
35. Lee, A. C. et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Neonatal Assessment for Gestational Age Determination: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 140, e20171423 (2017).
36. Leal, M. do C. et al. Saúde reprodutiva, materna, neonatal e infantil nos 30 anos do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva 23, 1915–1928 (2018).
37. Bhutani, V. K., Gourley, G. R., Adler, S., Kreamer, B., Dalin, C., & Johnson, L. H. Noninvasive measurement of total serum bilirubin in a multiracial predischarge newborn population to assess the risk of severe hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatrics, 106, e17-e17 (2020).
38. Vitral, G. L. N. et al. Skin thickness as a potential marker of gestational age at birth despite different fetal growth profiles: A feasibility study. PLOS ONE 13, e0196542 (2018).
39. de Souza, I. M. F., Vitral, G. L. N., Caliari, M. V. & Reis, Z. S. N. Association between the chronology of gestation and the morphometrical skin characteristics at childbirth: a development of predictive model. BMJ Health Care Inform. 28, e100476 (2021).
40. UNICEF. IGME: Levels and Trends in Child Mortality. UNICEF DATA https://data.unicef.org/resources/levels-and-trends-in-child-mortality/ (2020).
41. Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G. & Moons, K. G. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. BMC Med. 13, 1 (2015).
42. Venema, E. et al. Large-scale validation of the prediction model risk of bias assessment Tool (PROBAST) using a short form: high risk of bias models show poorer discrimination. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 138, 32–39 (2021).
43. BRASIL. Resolução - RDC No 10, de 03 de Março de 2015. (2015).
44. Emeruwa, Ukachi N.; Krenitsky, Nicole M.; Sheen, Jean-Ju. Advances in Management for Preterm Fetuses at Risk of Delivery. Clinics in Perinatology, v. 47, n. 4, p. 685-703, 2020. born and light: protocol for the preemie-test multicentre clinical trial in Brazilian hospitals to validate a new medical device. BMJ Open 9, e027442 (2019).
45. Reis, Z., Vitral, G. L. N., Guimarães, R. N., Aguiar, R. A. P. L. de & Romanelli, R. M. C. The Preemie-Test for the assessment of the newborn skin maturity. (2019) doi:10.17504/protocols.io.7ynhpve.
46. Reis, Z., Gaspar, J. de S., Elias, S. O. & Aguiar, R. A. L. P. D. Algorithm for gestational age assessment at birth. (2020) doi:10.17504/protocols.io.bawbifan.
47. Zilma, S. N. R. & Rodney, N. G. Device and method for determining gestational age. (2018). patent/US20200178847A1/en.
48. Meijer, R. J. & Goeman, J. J. Efficient approximate k-fold and leave-one-out cross-validation for ridge regression. Biom. J. 55, 141–155 (2013).
49. Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. in the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference 794 (2016). doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785.
50. Altman, D. G. & Bland, J. M. Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. Stat. 32, 307–317 (1983).
51. Popović, Z. B.; Thomas, J. D. Assessing observer variability: a user’s guide. Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy. 7, 317-324, (2017).
52. Kohavi, R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Ijcai. Montreal, Canada. 14, 1137-1145 (1995).
53. Friedman, J. H. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational statistics & data analysis. 38, 367-378 (2002).