Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
29 November 2023 In Vitro Phagocytosis of Different Dinoflagellate Species by Coral Cells
Kaz Kawamura, Eiichi Shoguchi, Koki Nishitsuji, Satoko Sekida, Haruhi Narisoko, Hongwei Zhao, Yang Shu, Pengcheng Fu, Hiroshi Yamashita, Shigeki Fujiwara, Noriyuki Satoh
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis is a unique biological phenomenon, in which animal cells engulf single-celled photosynthetic algae and maintain them in their cytoplasm mutualistically. Studies are needed to reveal the complex mechanisms involved in symbiotic processes, but it is difficult to answer these questions using intact corals. To tackle these issues, our previous studies established an in vitro system of symbiosis between cells of the scleractinian coral Acropora tenuis and the dinoflagellate Breviolum minutum, and showed that corals direct phagocytosis, while algae are likely engulfed by coral cells passively. Several genera of the family Symbiodiniaceae can establish symbioses with corals, but the symbiotic ratio differs depending on the dinoflagellate clades involved. To understand possible causes of these differences, this study examined whether cultured coral cells show phagocytotic activity with various dinoflagellate strains similar to those shown by intact A. tenuis. We found that (a) A. tenuis larvae incorporate Symbiodinium and Breviolum, but not Cladocopium, and very few Effrenium, (b) cultured coral cells engulfed all four species but the ratio of engulfment was significantly higher with Symbiodinium and Breviolum than Cladocopium and Effrenium, (c) cultured coral cells also phagocytosed inorganic latex beads differently than they do dinoflagellates. It is likely that cultured coral cells preferentially phagocytose Symbiodinium and Breviolum, suggesting that specific molecular mechanisms involved in initiation of symbiosis should be investigated in the future.

INTRODUCTION

Coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis is unique, in that animal cells engulf algal cells and maintain them in the cytoplasm, an extraordinary mutualism between taxonomically distant organisms (Baker, 2003; Davy et al., 2012; Weis, 2019). Corals are multicellular animals with two germ layers, ectoderm and endoderm, and gastrodermis cells of the endoderm harbor dinoflagellate symbionts in their cytoplasm. Dinoflagellates of the family Symbiodiniaceae (LaJeunesse et al., 2018) are single-celled yellow-brown algae. These algae exhibit two major states in life: thecate, motile cells with flagella and globular, immobile coccoid cells that proliferate mitotically (LaJeunesse et al., 2012). Symbiotic algae are approximately 10 µm in diameter. Thus, in this mutualism, single algal cells are situated in the cytoplasm of animal cells approximately 20–30 µm in diameter. Corals are thought to provide shelter for their algal symbionts, which supply most of their photosynthetic products to the host corals (Yellowlees et al., 2008). The symbiosis is estimated to have become obligatory more than 200 million years ago (Stanley and Fautin, 2001; Shinzato et al., 2011).

Taking advantage of supplements from symbiotic algae, scleractinian (stony, reef-building) corals produce massive, rocky reefs by depositing calcium carbonate skeletons. Coral reefs harbor an estimated one-third of all described marine species though coral reefs occupy only 0.2–0.3% of the ocean surface (Reaka-Kudla, 2001; Wilkinson, 2008). Reefs support the most biodiverse ecosystems in the oceans, which also support human life in tropical and subtropical countries by virtue of fisheries, tourism, and culture (Reaka-Kudla, 2001; Wilkinson, 2008; Spaldomga et al., 2017). Coral reefs, however, are in crisis due to environmental changes, including increased seawater temperatures, acidification, and pollution, mainly caused by human activities. These stresses cause collapse of coral-dinoflagellate symbioses, resulting in white, dead reefs, an event known as coral bleaching, which leads to loss of coral reefs and all the species they support (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007; Hughes et al., 2017; Sully et al., 2019). Since conservation of coral reefs is one of the most urgent environmental crises facing humanity, cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis are important research subjects not only in terms of basic zoology, but also in regard to sustainability of our planet.

Coral-zoothanthella symbioses can be established through several processes, each of which involves complicated mechanisms. Four fundamental, interrelated processes are (1) mutual partner recognition, (2) onset of symbiosis, (3) maintenance and dynamic homeostasis, including modulation of coral host inert immunity, and (4) dysbiosis, which leads to bleaching (Davy et al., 2012; Weis, 2018). Many studies have attempted to explore cellular and molecular mechanisms of coral-dinoflagellate endosymbiosis (Loh et al., 2001; Wakefield and Kempf, 2001; Baker, 2003; Dove, 2004; Hirose et al., 2008; Biquand et al., 2012; Davy et al., 2012; Yamashita et al., 2013, 2014, 2018; Bockel and Rinkevich, 2019; Yuyama et al., 2018; Weis, 2019; Yoshioka et al., 2020, 2021; Rosset et al., 2021). Recently, our knowledge of these mechanisms has been advanced by studies using the sea anemone Exaiptasia pallida (Weis, 2019), the soft coral Xenia sp. (Hu et al., 2020), and the stony coral Stylophora pistillata (Levy et al., 2021) at the single-cell level (Sebe-Pedros et al., 2017). However, many questions remain regarding molecular mechanisms of symbiosis, especially recognition mechanisms involved in the initial contact of animal and algal cells, which enable subsequent dinoflagellate endocytosis and maintenance of endosymbiosis (Davy et al., 2012).

To tackle questions of symbiosis, many studies have attempted to produce in vitro culture lines of stony coral cells, by which mechanisms of coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis might be investigated. However, so far, most attempts have only reached the primary culture state, but have not achieved a stable, cryo-preservable system (Rinkevich, 2011; Domart-Coulon and Ostrander, 2016; Nowotny et al., 2021). However, we developed stable in vitro coral cell lines originating from planula larvae of the scleractinian coral Acropora tenuis (Kawamura et al., 2021a). Most lines are polyclonal and comprise different types of cells, including gastrodermis cells, digestive cells, secretory cells, etc. The IVB5-line is mostly composed of dark, flattened, amorphous cells, which have properties of endoderm, and which engulf algal cells, actively shuffling cell membranes, filopodia, and lamellipodia. Endocytosis was completed within 5 min after coral inoculation with dinoflagellates (Kawamura et al., 2021b), confirming the occurrence of the fast phase of coral-zoothanthella symbiosis in vitro. However, it remains to be determined whether cultured cells retain symbiotic properties with different algal strains, as natural larval cells have. Therefore, the present study examined in vitro incorporation of different algal species by cultured coral cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cultured IVB5 cell-line of Acropora tenuis

Details of production of stable in vitro cell-culture lines originating from planula larvae of the coral Acropora tenuis are described in Kawamura et al. (2021a). IVB5 is one of 20 cryo-preservable lines and has been cultured in basic seawater medium consisting of natural seawater, one-fifth volume of H2O, 10 mM HEPES (final pH 6.8), and the antibiotics penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL), and amphotericin B (0.25 µg/mL). Immediately before experiments, the basic medium was mixed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 15% fetal bovine serum at a ratio of 9:1. The IVB5-line is polyclonal, but major components are dark, flattened, amorphous cells (FACs), 20–40 µm in length (Fig. 1A). FACs are considered interchangeable with spherical, brilliant cells (Fig. 1B). When dark amorphous cells were resuspended in a 24-well multiplate filled with growth medium, they became flat and extended lamellipodia and filopodia with moderate locomotor activity. These flattened amorphous cells likely have properties of gastroderm cells (Kawamura et al., unpublished) and they exhibit in vitro symbiosis with algal cells (Kawamura et al., 2021b).

Symbiodiniaceae strains, culture, and cell size measurements

Five culturable strains of four species of the family Symbiodiniaceae (Coffroth and Santos, 2005; Yamashita and Koike, 2013; Jeong et al., 2014; LaJeunesse, 2017; LaJeunesse et al., 2018) were used in this study: Symbiodinium microadriaticum (culture ID, AJIS2-C2), S. microadriaticum (culture ID, CCMP828), Breviolum minutum (Mf1.05b), Cladocopium sp. (Y103), and Effrenium voratum (GY-H50-E) (Fig. 2; and see   Supplementary Table S1 (zs230045_TableS1.pdf)). All strains were pre-cultured at 20°C with standard IMK medium (Sanko Jyunyaku, Tokyo) using an incubator (SANYO MIR-554) under 12 h:12 h dark and light conditions using a fluorescent lamp producing 20 µmol/m2/s (Kawamura et al., 2021b).

Identities of strains were reconfirmed by sequencing ITS2 parts of their genomes according to the method of Stat et al. (2009) (see   Supplementary Figure S1 (zs230045_FigS1.pdf)). The primer sequences used were itsD forward: GTGAATTGCAGAACTCCGTG and its2rev2 reverse: CCTCCGCTTACTTATATGCTT. Amplified DNAs were sequenced with a SeqStudio Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The sequences obtained were compared to previously determined sequences to confirm identity. Draft genomes of the strains AJIS2-C2, Mf1.05b, and Y103 were available (Shoguchi et al., 2013, 2018; Yoshioka et al., 2021) (see   Supplementary Table S1 (zs230045_TableS1.pdf)). CCMP828 and GY-H50-E, for which draft genomes are not available, were characterized by partial sequencing of 28S rDNAs on a SeqStudio Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). A database for BLASTN: GeoSymbio_ITS2_LocalDatabase (4).fasta ( https://sites.google.com/site/geosymbio/downloads) (Franklin et al., 2012) was also used for comparison. Details of the strains are as follows.

Symbiodinium microadriaticum strain AJIS2-C2 (ITS2 type A1] (Fig. 2): This strain was originally isolated from the coral Acropora sp. at Ishigaki Island, Okinawa, Japan (Yamashita and Koike, 2013). Sequences showed that this strain is ITS2 type A1 (see   Supplementary Figure S1A (zs230045_FigS1.pdf)). It was maintained in the laboratory of Dr. Hiroshi Yamashita at the Fisheries Technology Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, and then transferred to the Marine Genomics Unit at Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST) (Yoshioka et al., 2021).

Fig. 1.

Configuration of the coral cell line, IVB5. (A) Lower magnification of flattened amorphous cells (FACs). Bar, 100 µm. (B) FACs (black arrowheads) and spherical brilliant cells (white arrowhead) are considered functionally interchangeable. Bar, 50 µm. (C) Coral cells 3 days after algal inoculation. Broken circles show “fatty cells” engulfing algae. Black arrowheads show FACs. Red arrowhead shows an alga. Bar, 50 µm. (D) Higher magnification of “fatty cells” (broken circle). Black arrowheads show FACs. Bar, 50 µm. (E) AtSnail immunocytochemistry of FACs 2 hours after algal inoculation. Bars, 20 µm. (E1) Dark field image. White arrowheads show nuclei with Snail-expression (green). Alga emits red autofluorescence. (E2) Fluorescent image merged with bright field image.

fi_zs230045_001.jpg

Symbiodinium microadriaticum strain CCMP828 (ITS2 type A1) (Fig. 2): This strain was originally isolated from the jellyfish Cassiopeia xamachana and was obtained from the National Center for Marine Algae and Microbiota (NCMA), Boothbay Harbor, Maine ( https://ncma.bigelow.org/CCMP828). Sequences showed that this strain is ITS2 type A1 (see   Supplementary Figure S1B (zs230045_FigS1.pdf)).

Breviolum minutum [ITS2 type B1) (Fig. 2): B. minutum (LaJeunesse et al., 2018), previously named Symbiodinium minutum (LaJeunesse et al., 2012), was originally harbored by the Caribbean coral Orbicella faveolata (previously Montastraea faveolata), maintained in the laboratory of Dr. Mary Alice Coffroth, at State University at New York, Buffalo, United States and then in the MGU at OIST and Sekida's laboratory of Kochi University. The culture ID of this strain is Mf1.05b (McIlroy and Coffroth, 2017), and it is currently provided through National Institute of Environmental Science, Tsukuba, Japan under  https://mcc.nies.go.jp/strainList.do?strainId=3806 upon request. For sequences for ITS2 type B1, see   Supplementary Figure S1C (zs230045_FigS1.pdf).

Cladocopium sp. (ITS2 type C92) (Fig. 2): Cladocopium sp. (LaJeunesse et al., 2018) was originally derived from the cardiid clam Fragum sp. in Okinawa, Japan, and was isolated by Prof. Terufumi Yamasu at the University of the Ryukyus. The culture ID of this strain is Y103. It has been maintained in the laboratory of Prof. Michio Hidaka at the University of the Ryukyus, and then transferred to laboratories at OIST and Kochi University. This strain is currently provided through the National Institute of Environmental Science, Tsukuba, Japan under  https://mcc.nies.go.jp/strainList.do?strainId=4075 upon request. For sequences of ITS2 type C92, see   Supplementary Figure S1D (zs230045_FigS1.pdf).

Effrenium voratum (ITS2 type E1) (Fig. 2): E. voratum (LaJeunesse et al., 2018) was originally derived from the East China Sea and maintained as a monoclonal line in the laboratory of Dr. Hongwei Zhao at the College of Ecology and Environment & State Key Laboratory of Marine Resource Utilization in South China Sea of Hainan University and then transferred to OIST and Kochi University. The culture ID of this strain is GY-H50-E. For sequences of ITS2 type E1, see   Supplementary Figure S1E (zs230045_FigS1.pdf).

Measurement of cell size

Symbiodiniaceae strains in culture exhibit three types of morphology: mastigote (motile, with flagella), coccoid (spherical, no flagella), and doublet (dividing, no flagella) (Jeong et al., 2014). Cell size was determined with images of the coccoid stage (Fig. 2). Cells were photographed under differential interference contrast (DIC) imaging using a Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 microscope equipped with an AxioCam digital camera (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Ten individuals were measured manually using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (version 13.0), and mean cell sizes were calculated.

In vivo experiments with incorporation of dinoflagellates by coral larvae

Five strains of Symbiodiniaceae for infection tests were cultured in the MGU at OIST (Shoguchi et al., 2018). Symbiodinium microadriaticum AJIS2-C2 has been maintained in Daigo's IMK medium (Sanko Jyunyaku, Tokyo), plus three antibiotics, ampicillin (100 µg/mL), kanamycin (50 µg/mL), and streptomycin (50 µg/mL). The culture medium of the other four Symbiodiniaceae strains included artificial seawater containing 1x Guillard's (F/2) marine-water enrichment solution (Sigma-Aldrich) with three antibiotics. Pre-cultures for infection experiments were maintained for more than 1 week without antibiotics.

Fig. 2.

Five strains of four species of the family Symbiodiniaceae used in this study. Morphology of immobile coccoid cells is shown above, and average cell sizes (length and width) are shown with bars representing standard errors. Symbiodinium microadriaticum AJIS2-C2, S. microadriaticum CCMP828, Breviolum minutum Mf1.05b, Cladocopium sp. Y103, and Effrenium voratum GY-H50-E. See   Supplementary Table S1 (zs230045_TableS1.pdf) for further information of dinoflagellate strains.

fi_zs230045_002.jpg

Co-cultures involving Acropora larvae and Symbiodiniaceae were started at larval ages of 8.5 and 12.5 days. Acropora larvae were kindly provided in early June of 2019 by Mr. Shuichi Mekaru at Onna Fisheries Co., Onna, Okinawa. ∼80 larvae were cultured with 40 mL of filtered seawater in a petri dish. Each Symbiodiniaceae strain was added to the dishes at ∼600 cells/mL final density. Control petri dishes without cultured Symbiodiniaceae cells were prepared to confirm the absence of contamination. Co-culture dishes were put into an incubator CLE-305 (TOMY, Japan) set at 25°C and ∼20 µmol/m2/s (12 h light:12 h dark cycle) (Cumbo et al., 2013). After infection for 3 to 12 days, alga-infected larvae were detected by observation of 10 embryos under a Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 microscope (Zeiss, Germany). Observed larvae were trapped between a glass slide and a coverslip and were prevented from swimming. Counts of algal cells within larval bodies were performed by mildly crushing larvae with coverslips. The percentage of Symbiodiniaceae-infected larvae was calculated as described in Yamashita et al. (2018).

Observation of in vitro symbiosis

A 200–250-µL drop of culture medium containing dinoflagellates or latex beads was added to each well of a 24-well multiplate, which contained approximately 1 mL of medium for culturing cells of the IVB5 line. A 24-well multiplate that contained cultured coral cells and algae was put in a translucent, moist container and exposed to natural lighting at 20–22°C throughout culture and observation. Immediately after addition, interactions between the coral cells and dinoflagellates were observed using an inverted microscope (Olympus CKX41) equipped with a color digital camera (WRAYMER SR300) (Kawamura et al., 2021b). Photos obtained by consecutive observation with time-lapse video (2–3-s interval) was converted to a time-lapse video using iPhoto. Pictures and videos were also taken with an ordinary microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i) equipped with a differential interference contrast (DIC) apparatus

We also examined whether coral cells retained the capacity for inoculation with dinoflagellates after they were cultured for several days since the first phagocytosis. In order to distinguish dinoflagellates used for the first and second inoculations, dinoflagellates of the second inoculation were labelled with DiI. The labelling was carried out by immersing dinoflagellates in a solution that contained 0.02% DiI in sterile seawater (Setareh Biotech) for 10 min.

Non-ionic latex beads

This study also examined whether cultured coral cells engulf inorganic materials such as latex beads. Microspheres called latex beads or latex particles were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Catalog ID, N37464). They are spherical particles, 10 µm in diameter, in the colloidal size range and are formed from an amorphous polymer, such as polystyrene.

Immunocytochemistry

Approximately 5 × 106 FAC cell suspension was fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature. After quenching with 200 mM glycine in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 5 minutes, the cell suspension was incubated for 30 minutes in the blocking solution containing 2.5% skim milk, 0.25% blocking reagent (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), 0.5% nonidet p-40, and 0.2% Triton X-100. Rabbit anti-AtSnail antibody (Kawamura et al., 2021a) was diluted 1000-fold with 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS (PBST). It was incubated with the cell suspension overnight at 4°C. Goat anti-rabbit IgG labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Vector Laboratory, Burlingame, CA, USA) was diluted 200-fold with PBST. Samples were stained with the secondary antibody for 0.5 h at room temperature. They were observed under a confocal microscope (ECLIPSE C1si system; Nikon, Japan).

RESULTS

Coral cell symbiosis with different Symbiodiniaceae strains

Coral cells of dark, flattened morphology actively extended and retracted pseudopodia and showed elevated locomotor activity soon after algae were added to culture dishes (Kawamura et al., 2021b). Coral cells endocytosed symbiotic algae within 30 min, after which, algae were surrounded by host cytoplasmic membrane (Sekida et al., unpublished). Cultured cells that engulfed algal cells changed their morphology from a dark flattened form to a spherical ‘fatty’ form (Fig. 1C, D). Cells that engulfed algae as well as the not-engulfed algae showed positive signals of AtSnail antibody of A. tenuis in the nucleus, indicating that the cultured cells that engulfed algae originated from the coral (Fig. 1E1, E2). Bacteria-like microorganisms are often observed in vacuoles of coral cell cytoplasm (Sekida et al., unpublished), suggesting that coral cells endocytose micro-organic materials. Our previous study showed that approximately 45% of IVB5 cells incorporated B. minutum within 24 h after inoculation (Kawamura et al., 2021b). To determine whether coral cells engulf dinoflagellates of other genera or stains of Symbiodiniaceae, in vitro endocytosis was examined using four additional strains, Symbiodinium microadriaticum AJIS2-C2 and CCMP828, Cladocopium sp. Y103, and Effrenium voratum GY-H50-E (Fig. 2, and see   Supplementary Table S1 (zs230045_TableS1.pdf)). In addition, as a control, we examined phagocytosis of these strains by intact planula larvae.

(a) Engulfment in vivo: Yamashita et al. (2014) reported that planula larvae of A. tenuis incorporated clade A (Symbiodinium) most effectively (60–100% of larvae), clade D (Durusdinium) less effectively (20–100%), and clade B (Breviolum) least effectively (10–40%), but larvae did not incorporate clade C (Cladocopium). We examined incorporation rates of different Symbiodiniaceae species at two larval stages, 8.5 and 12.5 days after fertilization, and two observation periods, 3–6 and 10–12 days after addition of dinoflagellates (Fig. 3). Under our experimental conditions, A. tenuis planula larvae incorporated Symbiodinium AJIS2-C2 and CCMP828 and Breviolum Mf1.05b. Approximately 70%, 50%, and 30% of larvae incorporated Symbiodinium AJIS2-C2 and CCMP828, and Breviolum, respectively (Fig. 3). In contrast, A. tenuis planula larvae did not engulf Cladocopium sp. Y103 (Fig. 3). Larvae at 3–6 days were not infected with Effrenium GY-H50-E, but approximately 10% of 12.5-day larvae engulfed Effrenium (Fig. 3). In general, 12.5-day larvae exhibited higher ratios of incorporation than 8.5-day larvae (Fig. 3). Larvae incorporated more algae at longer periods of infection (10–12 days after infection) than at shorter periods (3–6 days) (Fig. 3). These results were comparable to those of Yamashita et al. (2014).

Fig. 3.

Engulfment ratios when Acropora tenuis planula larvae were mixed with dinoflagellates in vivo. From left to right: Symbiodinium microadriaticum AJIS2-C2, S. microadriaticum CCMP828, Breviolum minutum Mf1.05b, Cladocopium sp. Y103, and Effrenium voratum GYH50-E. Dinoflagellates were added to larvae 8.5 and 12.5 days after fertilization. Ratios of larvae that engulfed dinoflagellates were scored at 3–6 days (green bars) and 10–12 days (red bars) after mixing the two organisms.

fi_zs230045_003.jpg

Fig. 4.

Scatterplots showing the infection rate of cultured IVB5-line cells that incorporated five species of dinoflagellates in vivo. From left to right: Symbiodinium microadriaticum AJIS2-C2, S. microadriaticum CCMP828, Breviolum minutum Mf1.05b, Cladocopium sp. Y103, and Effrenium voratum GY-H50-E. (A, B, C) One day, 2 days, and 3 days after mixture of the two organisms. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviations of more than 10 measurements. P-values were calculated with a two-tailed Student's t-test.

fi_zs230045_004.jpg

(b) Engulfment in vitro: Cultured IVB5-line cells incorporated all four clades of dinoflagellates, but the infection ratio differed significantly between Symbiodinium/Breviolum and Cladocopium/Effrenium (Fig. 4). Approximately 41%, 55%, and 40% of cultured cells endocytosed Symbiodinium AJIS2-C2 (Fig. 4) and CCMP828 (Figs. 4; 5A1, A2) and Breviolum (Figs. 4; 5B1, B2), respectively, within 1 day of mixture. CCMP828 always showed the highest rate of uptake among the five strains (Fig. 4). In contrast, the rates of Cladocopium and Effrenium incorporation were quite low; only 6% of cultured cells engulfed Cladocopium (Figs. 4; 5C1, C2) and Effrenium (Figs. 4; 5D1, D2).

In addition, a group constituted of Symbiodinium/Breviolum and another group of Cladocopium/Effrenium showed different alga-host cell interactions after incorporation. Symbiodinium and Breviolum provoked an immediate response of cultured cells, in which cultured cells engulfed these species as soon as 5 min after inoculation. One day later, algal uptake plateaued (Fig. 5A1, B1), and then gradually decreased (Figs. 4; 5A2, B2). For example, approximately 40% of coral cells engulfed Breviolum within 1 day and this symbiotic state continued for at least 1 week (Figs. 4, 5B). The symbiotic state, however, did not extend beyond 10 days, and most coral cells with Breviolum disappeared within 20 days. Similarly, Symbiodinium AJIS2-C2 disappeared from host cells after 4 weeks and CCMP828 after 5 weeks (Figs. 4, 5A2). Host coral cells gradually recovered the dark flattened morphology (Fig. 5A1). This is likely caused by host cell exocytosis or digestion of algal cells since fragments of dinoflagellates were found in the coral cell cytoplasm (Fig. 5A1, B2).

Fig. 5.

Differential affinity between algal species and coral cells. (A) Symbiodinium microadriaticum CCMP828. (B) Breviolum minutum Mf1.05b. (C) Cladocopium sp. Y103. (D) Effrenium voratum GY-H50-E. White arrowheads show coral cells engulfing algae. Red arrowheads show fragmented algae in a coral cell body. (A1–D1) One day after inoculation. Nomarski differential interference contrast microscopy. Bars, 20 µm. (A2, B2) Three days after inoculation. Inverted phase contrast microscopy (IPC). Bars, 50 µm. (C2, D2) 48 days after inoculation, IPC. Bars, 50 µm.

fi_zs230045_005.jpg

On the other hand, in the case of Cladocopium and Effrenium, incorporation occurred at a very low rate until the third day of infection (Fig. 4; Fig. 5C1, D1). Then, host cells with Cladocopium and Effrenium slightly increased in number until 2 weeks, and up to 50 % by 3 weeks of inoculation (data not shown). Algae were maintained by cultured cells at such an incorporation ratio for more than 7 weeks after inoculation (Fig. 5C2, D2). Host cells retained a spherical form (Fig. 5C2, D2).

(c) Capacity for algal engulfment of coral cells that once lost symbiotic dinoflagellates: As mentioned above, infection was maintained for 4 weeks for Symbiodinium and 2 weeks for Breviolum, and likely dissolved thereafter. We examined the capacity of cultured cells for phagocytosis after disappearance of algae from the first inoculation. Namely, additional algae were supplied to dark flattened cells 31 days after the primary inoculation of Symbiodinium CCPM828 (Fig. 6A2) and 51 days after the primary inoculation of Breviolum (Fig. 6B1). One day later, infection was re-established by host cells (Fig. 6A2, B2). Thus, phagocytosis by coral cells can occur if algae are available to host cells at least 1 month after the first inoculation.

We further examined whether in vitro cultured cells having algae in the cytoplasm continue to incorporate additional algae if they are available. Fresh algae were labeled with DiI (Fig. 6C1) and administered to cultured cells 5 days after the first administration of algae (Fig. 6C1). In a few hours, unlabeled and labeled algae were found in single cultured cells (Fig. 6C1). Three days after the secondary inoculation, most cultured cells still had DiI signals, and some cells had remnant DiI signals without algae (Fig. 6C2). These signals would have come from incorporated algae, suggesting algal digestion by coral cells or exocytosis of incorporated algae by coral cells.

In vitro endocytosis of coral cell with latex beads

Finally, we examined whether coral cells respond in vitro to inorganic materials such as latex beads and engulf them in the same way as they do symbiotic dinoflagellates. Since dinoflagellates range from 7 to 14 µm (Fig. 2), we selected latex beads of 10 µm and compared responses of coral cells toward beads with responses toward live dinoflagellates. Latex beads did not cause elevated locomotor activity of coral cells as seen in inoculation with Symbiodinium and Breviolum. In controls, 1 day after application, many cultured cells had engulfed Symbiodinium and Breviolum (Figs. 7A, 8A). On the other hand, latex beads were attached to surfaces of coral cells and in several cases, they were found in cell bodies (Fig. 8B). Approximately 10% of cells engulfed beads within 1 day (Fig. 7A). The number of beads associated with single coral cells increased by 2 days of bead application (Figs. 7B, 8C); however, unlike algal uptake, the number of coral cells with incorporated beads did not increase significantly thereafter (Figs. 7C, 8D). In addition, coral cells that endocytosed beads remained dark and flattened and did not become spherical (Fig. 8D). It is highly likely that coral cells are able to endocytose inorganic beads in a different manner from endocytosis of symbiotic dinoflagellates.

Fig. 6.

Effect of additional algae applied to coral cells that lost dinoflagellates after 2 weeks in a symbiotic state. (A) S. microadriaticum CCMP828. (B) B. minutum Mf1.05b. (A1) 31 days after the primary inoculation of algae. Bar, 50 µm. (A2) One day after the secondary inoculation. Broken circles show coral cells engulfing algae. Bar, 20 µm. (B1) 51 days after the primary inoculation of algae. Bar, 50 µm. (B2) One day after the secondary inoculation. Bar, 50 µm. (C) Secondary engulfment of S. microadriaticum CCMP82 marked with DiI (yellow arrowhead). White arrowheads show dinoflagellates engulfed after the primary inoculation. Blue arrowheads show algae not incorporated. Bars, 20 µm. (C1) A few hours after inoculation. (C2) Three days after inoculation showing coral cells that secondarily engulfed algae. White broken circle shows a coral cell that exhibits remnant DiI fluorescent signals without algae.

fi_zs230045_006.jpg

Fig. 7.

Scatterplots showing the incorporation rate of latex beads in cultured IVB5 cells. As controls, Symbiodinium microadriaticum AJIS2-C2, S. microadriaticum CCMP828, Cladocopium sp. Y103, and Effrenium voratum GY-H50-E were used. (A, B, C) One day, 2 days, and 3 days after mixture of the two organisms. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviations of more than 10 measurements. P-values were calculated with a two-tailed Student's t-test.

fi_zs230045_007.jpg

Fig. 8.

In vitro coral cell phagocytosis of latex beads. (A) Control, 1 day after mixing IVB5 coral cells with algae. Bar, 20 µm. (B) Latex beads mixed with coral cells, 1 day after mixing. Approximately 10% of cells had endocytosed beads. Bar, 50 µm. (Inset) Enlargement of a cell that engulfed two beads. Bar, 20 µm. (C) Two days after coral cell-bead mixing. Broken circles show coral cells engulfing several beads. Bar, 50 µm. (D) Three days after coral cell-bead mixing. Most cells were dark and flattened, having pseudopodia for motility. This contrasts with endocytosis of dinoflagellates, in which coral hosts became spherical (see Fig. 1C, D). Bar, 50 µm.

fi_zs230045_008.jpg

DISCUSSION

Members of the family Symbiodiniaceae (Dinoflagellate) have been categorized into several clades or genera based on their morphological and genetic features and recently LaJeunesse et al. (2018) re-classified them into nine clades, A–I, using new data. However, Yorifuji et al. (2021) reported a new clade of Symbiodiniaceae, suggesting that the family is composed of 10 or more clades. Of these, Symbiodinium (Clade A), Breviolum (Clade B), Cladocopium (Clade C), and Durusdinium (Clade D), are major symbionts of scleractinian corals (LaJeunesse et al., 2018). Although the symbiotic specificity or preference between coral species and dinoflagellate species is complex, A. tenuis planula larvae preferentially incorporate Symbiodinium, while larvae phagocytose Breviolum and Durusdinium, but not Cladocopium (Yamashita et al., 2014, 2018). Under our experimental conditions, A. tenuis larvae preferentially incorporated Symbiodinium and Breviolum, but not Cladocopium (Fig. 3), and these results are comparable to those of previous studies (Yamashita et al., 2014). On the other hand, the symbiotic preference of A. tenuis with different clades of Symbiodiniaceae changes after metamorphosis to mature adults, since A. tenuis adults preferentially host Cladocopium (Shinzato et al., 2018; Satoh et al., 2021) and Durusdinium (Yuyama et al., 2018). Although this issue was beyond the scope of this study, it is an interesting research subject for future studies.

LaJeunesse et al. (2018) found that Effrenium (Clade E) consists of one species, the exclusively free-living (non-symbiotic) E. voratum. Under our experimental conditions, 10% of larvae 10–12 days post fertilization phagocytosed E. voratum. After the mixture experiment, we checked the ITS2 sequence of this dinoflagellate and confirmed that it was E. voratum. However, it remains unknown whether this incorporation is followed by symbiosis, or is simple engulfment, followed by algal exocytosis.

Symbiotic preferences between corals and dinoflagellates have been discussed in relation to the size of dinoflagellates (Biquand et al., 2017). In A. tenuis – Symbiodiniaceae symbiosis, Biquand et al. (2017) compared symbiont infectivity among various Symbiodinium strains with a size range of 7.3 µm (small), 9.4 µm (medium), and 10.5 (large), and found that larger Symbiodinium are less likely to establish symbiotic relationships with host A. tenuis, suggesting that cell size might affect symbiosis rate. Cell size may not always be important in establishment of symbiosis, at least when compared among different species of Symbiodiniaceae. Dinoflagellates used in this experiment were approximately 9–10 µm for S. microadriaticum, 7 µm for B. minutum, 11 µm for Cladocopium sp., and 14 µm for E. voratum (Fig. 2). The incorporation rate was higher with S. microadriaticum (9–10 µm) than B. minutum (7 µm) (Fig. 2). Therefore, it is likely that partner recognition of corals and dinoflagellates is the primary factor enabling symbiosis, and that algal cell size may serve as a secondary factor among species of the same genus.

The main objective of this study was to examine what responses cultured cells of A. tenuis planula larvae show when mixed with different species of Symbiodiniaceae and different strains of Symbiodinium, although we could not examine Durusdinium (D), since stains of this clade were not available in the year of our in vitro experiment. Do clustered cells exhibit symbiont preferences in vitro similar to those of planula larvae in vivo? Results of this study suggest that three incorporation states or properties of coral cells depend on target subjects.

Differences were observed in endocytosis of dinoflagellates and latex beads by coral cells in culture. Incorporation of dinoflagellates by IVB5 cells is followed by morphological changes of host cells. Their shapes changed from a dark flattened form with locomotive activity to a spherical fatty form with less motility (Fig. 1). This change was not seen with latex beads (Fig. 8). This suggests that coral cells exhibit phagocytotic activity to various objects in the correct size range. This might be an intrinsic physiological property of coral cells. Moreover, coral cells recognize dinoflagellates as symbiosis targets, which does not occur with latex beads. This property requires biological communication or recognition between these taxonomically divergent organisms. We think that this finding might apply not only to cultured cells in vitro but also in vivo. Therefore, these results should be confirmed in vivo in the future.

The third property of coral cells in relation to symbiosis is deduced from differences in coral cell responses to Symbiodinium/Breviolum vs. Cladocopium/Effrenium. When Symbiodinium/Breviolum were added to culture medium, coral cells responded quickly and engulfed them in as little as 5 min after mixture. In contrast, the initial response of cultured cells against Cladocopium/Effrenium was quite slow. In addition, the infection rate with Symbiodinium/ Breviolum was significantly higher than that with Cladocopium/Effrenium (Fig. 4). Behavior of coral cells with engulfed dinoflagellates also differed between the two groups. That is, the interaction of corals cells with engulfed algal cells was active with Symbiodinium/Breviolum, but not with Cladocopium/Effrenium. These differences may be caused by coral cell selection preferences against different species of dinoflagellates as targets of phagocytosis and/or symbiosis. In other words, additional mechanisms are required for larval cells to interact with Symbiodinium/ Breviolum, which are not seen with Cladocopium/Effrenium.

However, these observations raise a question about recognition of Symbiodinium and Breviolum. Are shared mechanisms or molecules used for the two species, or different and specific mechanisms or molecules used for each of these two species? Coral–dinoflagellate symbiosis involves at least four interrelated processes: partner recognition, onset of symbiosis, maintenance and dynamic homeostasis, and dysbiosis. Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in each process should be investigated (reviewed by Davy et al., 2012; Weis, 2019). Our question is associated with the first of the four. Identification of cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in these processes is challenging when intact symbionts are used as experimental systems (Wood-Charlson et al., 2006; Kuniya et al., 2015). As discussed above, this study identified three properties of coral cells in the first process of symbiosis: intrinsic phagocytotic activity in general, recognition of Symbiodiniaceae as phagocytotic targets, and preferential phagocytosis of specific dinoflagellates for symbiosis. Therefore, the IVB5-line serves as an in vitro system for studying cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in coral cell symbiosis with photosynthetic dinoflagellates.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Mr. Shunichi Mekaru for proving us Acropora tenuis larvae and Kanako Hisata for help in preparation of manuscript. Dr. Steven Aird is acknowledged for his help in editing of the manuscript. This work was funded by an OIST collaboration with Kochi University and in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 22H03794 to KN, ES, KK, SF and NS.

© 2023 Zoological Society of Japan

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors have no competing interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

KK and NS conceived and designed study. KK, SS, SF, and NS carried out in vitro symbiosis observations. ES, HN, HZ, YS, PF, HY, and SS cultured zooxanthellae. ES, KN and HN performed in vivo incorporation of coral larvae. KK and NS prepared the manuscript and all authors commented on it.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Sequences for ITS2 and 28S rRNA of the E. voratum GYH50-E are available at DDBJ/GenBank/EMBL under accession numbers LC639190 and LC639191, respectively.

REFERENCES

1.

Baker AC (2003) Flexibility and specificity in coral-algal symbiosis: diversity, ecology, and biogeography of Symbiodinium. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34: 661–689 Google Scholar

2.

Biquand E, Okubo N, Aihara Y, et al. (2017) Acceptable symbiont cell size differs among cnidarian species and may limit symbiont diversity. ISME J 11: 1702–1712 Google Scholar

3.

Bockel T, Rinkevich B (2019) Rapid recruitment of symbiotic algae into developing scleractinian coral tissues. J Marine Sci Eng 7: 306 Google Scholar

4.

Coffroth MA, Santos SR (2005) Genetic diversity of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium. Protist 156: 19–34 Google Scholar

5.

Cumbo VR, Baird AH, van Oppen MJH (2013) The promiscuous larvae: flexibility in the establishment of symbiosis in corals. Coral Reefs 32: 111–20 Google Scholar

6.

Davy SK, Allemand D, Weis VM (2012) Cell biology of cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76: 229–361 Google Scholar

7.

Domart-Coulon I, Ostrander GK (2016) Coral cell and tissue methods. In“Diseases of Coral” Ed by CM Woodley et al., Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken NJ, pp 489–505 Google Scholar

8.

Dove SG (2004) Scleractinian corals with photoprotective host pigments are hypersensitive to thermal bleaching. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 272: 99–116 Google Scholar

9.

Franklin EC, Stat M, Pochon X, Putnam HM, Gates RD (2012) Geo-Symbio: a hybrid, cloud-based web application of global geospatial bioinformatics and ecoinformatics for Symbiodinium-host symbioses. Mol Ecol Resour 12: 369–373 Google Scholar

10.

Hirose M, Yamamoto H, Nonaka M (2008) Metamorphosis and acquisition of symbiotic algae in planula larvae and primary polyps of Acropora spp. Coral Reefs 27: 247–254 Google Scholar

11.

Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, et al. (2007) Coral reefs under rapid climate changes and ocean acidification. Science 318: 1737–1742 Google Scholar

12.

Hu M, Zheng X, Fan C-H, Zheng Y (2020) Lineage dynamics of the endosymbiotic cell type in the soft coral Xenia. Nature 582: 534–538 Google Scholar

13.

Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Alvarez-Noriega M, Alvarez-Romero JG, Anderson KD, et al. (2017) Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature 543: 373–377 Google Scholar

14.

Jeong HJ, Lee SY, Kang NS, Yoo YD, Lim AS, Lee MJ, et al. (2014) Genetics and morphology characterize the dinoflagellate Symbiodinium voratum, n. sp., (Dinophyceae) as the sole representative of Symbiodinium Clade E. J Eukaryot Microbiol 61: 75–94 Google Scholar

15.

Kawamura K, Nishitsuji K, Shoguchi E, Fujiwara S, Satoh N (2021a) Establishing sustainable cell lines of a coral, Acropora tenuis. Marine Biotech 23: 373–388 Google Scholar

16.

Kawamura K, Sekida S, Nishitsuji K, Shoguchi E, Hisata K, Fujiwara S, Satoh N (2021b) In vitro symbiosis of reef-building coral cells with photosynthetic dinoflagellates. Front Mar Sci 8: 706308 Google Scholar

17.

Kuniya N, Jimbo M, Tanimoto F, Yamashita H, Koike K, Harii S, et al. (2015) Possible involvement of tachylectin-2-like lectin from Acropora tenuis in the process of Symbiodinium acquisition. Fish Sci 81: 473–483 Google Scholar

18.

LaJeunesse TC (2017) Validation and description of Symbiodinium microadriaticum,thetypespeciesofSymbiodinium(Dinophyta). J Phycol 53: 1109–1114 Google Scholar

19.

LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Reimer JD (2012) A genetics-based description of Symbiodinium minutum sp. nov. and S. psygmophilum sp. nov. (Dinophyceae), two dinoflagellates symbiotic with cnidaria. J Phycol 48: 1380–1391 Google Scholar

20.

LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Gabrielson PW, Jeong HJ, Reimer JD, Voolstra CR, et al. (2018) Systematic revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr Biol 28: 2570–2580 Google Scholar

21.

Levy S, Elek A, Grau-Bove X, et al. (2021) A stony coral cell atlas illuminates the molecular and cellular basis of coral symbiosis, calcification, and immunity. Cell 184: 2973–2987 Google Scholar

22.

Loh WKW, Loi T, Carter D, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2001) Genetic variability of the symbiotic dinoflagellates from the wide-ranging coral species Seriatopora hystrix and Acropora longicyathus in the Indo-West Pacific. Marine Ecol Prog Series 222: 97–107 Google Scholar

23.

McIlroy SE, Coffroth MA (2017) Coral ontogeny affects early symbiont acquisition in laboratory-reared recruits. Coral Reefs 36: 927–932 Google Scholar

24.

Nowotny JD, Connelly MT, Traylor-Knowes N (2021) Novel methods to establish whole-body primary cell cultures for the cnidarians Nematostella vectensis and Pocillopora damicornis. Sci Rep 11: 4086 Google Scholar

25.

Reaka-Kudla ML (2001) Coral reefs: Biodiversity and conservation. In: “Contemporary Approaches to the Study of Biodiversity” Ed by H Hernandez et al., Instituto de Biodiversity, Santo Domingo de Heredia, pp 221–243 Google Scholar

26.

Rinkevich B (2011) Cell cultures from marine invertebrates: insights for capturing endless stemness. Marine Biotech 13: 345–354 Google Scholar

27.

Rosset SL, Oakley CA, Ferrier-Pages C, Suggett DJ, Weis VM, Davy SK (2021) The Molecular Language of the Cnidarian-Dinoflagellate Symbiosis. Trends Microbiol 29: 320–333 Google Scholar

28.

Satoh N, Kinjo K, Shintaku K, Kezuka D, Ishimori H, Yokokura A, et al. (2021) Color morphs of the coral, Acropora tenuis, show different responses to environmental stress and different expression profiles of fluorescent-protein genes. G3: Genes Genomes Genet 11: jkab018 Google Scholar

29.

Sebe-Pedros A, Saudemont B, Chomsky E, Plessier F, Mailhe M-P, Renno J, et al. (2017) Cnidarian cell types diversity and regulation revealed by whole-organism single-cell RNA-seq. Cell 173: 1520–1534 Google Scholar

30.

Shinzato C, Shoguchi E, Kawashima T, Hamada M, Hisata K, Tanaka M, et al. (2011) Using the Acropora digitifera genome to understand coral responses to environmental change. Nature 476: 320–323 Google Scholar

31.

Shinzato C, Zayasu Y, Kanda M, Kawamitsu M, Satoh N, Yamashita H, et al. (2018) Using seawater to document coral-zoothanthella diversity: a new approach to coral reef monitoring using environmental DNA. Front Marine Sci 5: 28 Google Scholar

32.

Shoguchi E, Shinzato C, Kawashima T, Gyoja F, Mungpakdee S, Koyanagi R, et al. (2013) Draft assembly of the Symbiodinium minutum nuclear genome reveals dinoflagellate gene structure. Curr Biol 23: 1399–1408 Google Scholar

33.

Shoguchi E, Beedessee G, Tada I, Hisata K, Kawashima T, Takeuchi T, et al. (2018) Two divergent Symbiodinium genomes reveal conservation of a gene cluster for sunscreen biosynthesis and recently lost genes. BMC Genomics 19: 458 Google Scholar

34.

Spalding MD, Burke L, Wood SA, Ashpole J, Hutchinson J, zu Ermgassen PSE (2017) Mapping the global value and distribution of coral reef tourism. Marine Policy 82: 104–113 Google Scholar

35.

Stanley GD Jr , Fautin DG (2001) Paleontology and evolution. The origins of modern corals. Science 291: 1913–1914 Google Scholar

36.

Stat M, Pochon X, Cowie ROM, Gates RD (2009) Specificity in communities of Symbiodinium in corals from Johnston Atoll. Mar Ecol Prog Ser Inter-Research Science Center 386: 83–96 Google Scholar

37.

Sully S, Burkepile DE, Donovan MK, Hodgson G, van Woesik R (2019) A global analysis of coral bleaching over the past two decades. Nat Commun 10: 1264 Google Scholar

38.

Wakefield TS, Kempf SC (2001) Development of host- and symbiont-specific monoclonal antibodies and confirmation of the origin of the symbiosome membrane in a cnidarian–dinoflagellate symbiosis. Biol Bull 200: 127–143 Google Scholar

39.

Weis YM (2019) Cell biology of coral symbiosis: Foundational study can inform solution to the coral reef crisis. Integr Comp Biol 59: 845–855 Google Scholar

40.

Wilkinson C (2008) Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2008. Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network and Reef and Rainforest Research Centre, Townsville, Australia Google Scholar

41.

Wood-Charlson EM, Hollingsworth LL, Krupp DA, Weis VM (2006) Lectin/glycan interactions play a role in recognition in a coral/ dinoflagellate symbiosis. Cell Microbiol 8: 1985–1993 Google Scholar

42.

Yamashita H, Koike K (2013) Genetic identity of free-living Symbiodinium obtained over a broad latitudinal range in the Japanese coast: Phylogeny of free-living Symbiodinium. Phycological Res 61: 68–80 Google Scholar

43.

Yamashita H, Suzuki G, Hayashibara T, Koike K (2013) Acropora recruits harbor ‘rare’ Symbiodinium in the environmental pool. Coral Reefs 32: 355–366 Google Scholar

44.

Yamashita H, Suzuki G, Kai S, Hayashibara T, Koike K (2014) Establishment of coral–algal symbiosis requires attraction and selection. PLOS ONE 9: e97003 Google Scholar

45.

Yamashita H, Suzuki G, Shinzato C, Jimbo M, Koike K (2018) Symbiosis process between Acropora larvae and Symbiodinium differs even among closely related Symbiodinium types. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 592: 119–128 Google Scholar

46.

Yellowlees D, Rees T, Leggat W (2008) Metabolic interactions between algal symbionts and invertebrate hosts. Plant Cell Environ 31: 679–694 Google Scholar

47.

Yorifuji M, Yamashita H, Suzuki G, Kawasaki T, Tsukamoto T, Okada W, et al. (2021) Unique environmental Symbiodiniaceae diversity at an isolated island in the northwestern Pacific. Mol Phylog Evol 161: 107158 Google Scholar

48.

Yoshioka Y, Yamashita H, Suzuki G, Zayasu Y, Tada I, Kanda M, et al. (2021) Whole-genome transcriptome analyses of native symbionts reveal host coral genomic novelties for establishing coral–algae symbioses. Genome Biol Evol 13 Google Scholar

49.

Yoshioka Y, Yamashita H, Suzuki G, Shinzato C (2022) Larval transcriptomic responses of a stony coral, Acropora tenuis, during initial contact with the native symbiont, Symbiodinium microadriaticum. Sci Rep 12: 2854 Google Scholar

50.

Yuyama I, Ishikawa M, Nozawa M, Yoshida MA, Ikeo K (2018) Transcriptomic changes with increasing algal symbiont reveal the detailed process underlying establishment of coral-algal symbiosis. Sci Rep 8: 16802 Google Scholar
Kaz Kawamura, Eiichi Shoguchi, Koki Nishitsuji, Satoko Sekida, Haruhi Narisoko, Hongwei Zhao, Yang Shu, Pengcheng Fu, Hiroshi Yamashita, Shigeki Fujiwara, and Noriyuki Satoh "In Vitro Phagocytosis of Different Dinoflagellate Species by Coral Cells," Zoological Science 40(6), 444-454, (29 November 2023). https://doi.org/10.2108/zs230045
Received: 29 May 2023; Accepted: 14 September 2023; Published: 29 November 2023
KEYWORDS
Coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis
different clades of Symbiodiniaceae
in vitro system
latex beads
phagocytosis
Back to Top