Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 12, 2019
Accepted
December 29, 2019
Published
December 30, 2019
Download
PDF EC (Bahasa Indonesia) (Bahasa Indonesia) (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 4766 Download : 1795

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Maternal mortality rate (MMR) in Indonesia is still high, 359 per 100,000 born alive. One of the government's efforts to reduce MMR is by providing antenatal care (ANC) service, and holding pregnancy classes (KIH). KIH is a program to increase maternal knowledge and support the making pregnancy safer (MPS) program policy, which is an Obstetric service approach, that every pregnant woman must be assisted by health workers.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between ANC and KIH to the place and birth attendants.
Methods: A cross-sectional study, national health indicator survey (SIRKESNAS) 2016, calculation of samples based on the 2010 population census (SP) data. Primary sampling unit (PSU) is a sub-district selected as probability proportional to size (PPS), households that have children aged 0-59 months (Eligible households), samples were selected by simple random sampling of eligible households, as many as 7,313 mothers. The collected variables were ANC, KIH, and the place and birth attendant. Data were analyzed by logistic regression test
Results: Logistic regression test results showed that the ANC was positively related to the place of delivery (OR 4,054; p <0.000) and birth attendants (OR 2.659; p <0.000). There was a relationship between KIH and the place of delivery (OR 1,327; p <0.001), and birth attendants (OR 1,718; p <0,000).
Conclusion: Mothers who performed at least 4 ANCs, and attended pregnancy classes, were more likely to choose to deliver in health care facilities and deliver with health workers.

Keywords

Antenatal Care pregnancy classes birth attendant ANC Kelas Ibu Hamil

Article Details

How to Cite
Ashar, H., Latifah, L., Kusrini, I., & Tjandrarini, D. H. (2019). Relationship between antenatal care and pregnancy classes with selection of place and birth attendant in Indonesia. JKKI : Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan Indonesia, 10(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.20885/JKKI.Vol10.Iss3.art10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Depkes. Pedoman Pelayanan Antenatal. Cetakan 1. Jakarta; 2007.
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik, Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencanan Nasional, Departemen Kesehatan. Survei demografi dan kesehatan Indonesia 2012. Sdki. 2012;16.
  3. Stalker P. Millenium development goals. Jakarta; 2008.
  4. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Situasi Kesehatan Ibu. Pusat data dan informasi Kementrian Kesehatan RI. Jakarta; 2014. p: 8.
  5. Mubasyiroh R, Tejayanti T, Senewe F. Hubungan kematangan reproduksi dan usia saat melahirkan dengan kejadian bayi berat lahir rendah (BBLR) di Indonesia tahun 2010. Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi. 2016;7(2):109–18.
  6. Direktorat Bina Pelayanan Medik Dasar Departemen Kesehatan RI. Pedoman pelayanan Antenatal. Jakarta. 2007;p: 1-98.
  7. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Laporan Survei Indikator Kesehatan Nasional (Sirkesnas) 2016. 2016;(17).
  8. Konsultasi R, Program N, Dan K. Rencana strategis kementerian kesehatan 2015-2019. 2015.
  9. Departemen Kesehatan RI. Pedoman pelaksanaan kelas ibu hamil. Jakarta; 2009. pp:1-47.
  10. Kusbandiyah J. Analisis implementasi program kelas ibu hamil oleh bidan puskesmas di kota Malang. Universitas Diponegoro. 2013.
  11. Nurdiyan A, Yulizawati, Sinta L El, Fitrayeni, Iryani D. Analisis sistem pelaksanaan kelas ibu hamil di puskesmas Malalak dan Biaro kabupaten Agam. Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas. 2015;4(1):1–9.
  12. Wijayanti T, Setiyaningsih A, Kebidanan A, Utomo E. Efektivitas kelas ibu hamil terhadap deteksi dini tanda bahaya kehamilan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Internasional, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang. 2014. p: 1–5.
  13. Widiantari NKN. Hubungan karakteristik ibu dan dukungan sosial suami dengan partisipasi ibu mengikuti kelas ibu hamil di kota Denpasar. Public Health and Preventive Medicine Archive. 2016;4(1): 54-9.
  14. Ngowi AF, Kamazima SR, Kibusi S, Gesase A, Bali T. Women’s determinant factors for preferred place of delivery in Dodoma region Tanzania: A cross sectional study. Reproductive Health. 2017;14(1):1–8.
  15. Yanti HP. Evaluasi program kelas ibu hamil di puskesmas wilayah kabupaten Batang Tahun 2012. Thesis. Universitas Diponegoro. 2013.
  16. BalitbangKes. Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2013. Jakarta; 2013.
  17. Suwanti SR, Chandradewi A. Hubungan frekuensi antenatal care (ANC) dengan pemilihan penolong persalinan diwilayah kerja puskesmas Moyo Hulu kabupaten Sumbawa Tahun 2013. Jurnal Kesehatan prima. 2014;8(1):1232–8.
  18. Besral B. Pengaruh pemeriksaan kehamilan terhadap pemilihan penolong persalinan. Kesmas National Public Healt Journal. 2006;1(2):88.
  19. Juana S, Nurdiati DS, Triratnawati A. Kepatuhan antenatal care dan pemilihan penolong persalinan di Natuna. Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat. 2016;32:467–72.
  20. Jekti RP, Mutiatikum D. Correlation between antenatal care compliance and birth attendant selection with selection of birth attendant. Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi. 2011;1:84–91.
  21. Arruabarrena I, Paúl J de. Early intervention programs for children and families: Theoretical and empirical bases supporting their social and economic efficiency. Psychosocial Intervention. 2012;21(2):117–27.
  22. Adamu PI, Adamu MO, Okagbue HI. Data in support of high rate of pregnancy related deaths in Maiduguri, Borno State, Northeast Nigeria. Data in Brief. 2018;18:409–14.
  23. Kassar SB, Melo AMC, Coutinho SB, Lima MC, Lira PIC. Determinants of neonatal death with emphasis on health care during pregnancy, childbirth and reproductive history. Jornal de Pediatria (Versão em Português). 2013;89(3):269–77.
  24. Pratiwi NL, Basuki H, Humaniora P, Kesehatan K. Prevalensi rasio pelayanan kesehatan maternal dan ketersediaan fasilitas kesehatan di era JKN/KIS di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia. 2016;5(2):42–52.
  25. Puspita YA. Perbedaan persepsi kontrol diri ibu hamil terhadap intensi ibu untuk memberikan asi eksklusif pada kelas ibu hamil plus di puskesmas Muara Teweh kabupaten Barito Utara. Jurnal Edu Health. 2015;5(2):123–30.
  26. Eliana A, Fridayanti W. Perbedaan rerata pengetahuan ibu hamil sebelum dan sesudah mengikuti kelas ibu hamil di puskesmas Wangon II kabupaten Banyumas tahun 2012. Jurnal Bidan Prada. 2012;3(2):54–62.
  27. Puty I, Wibowo A. Pengaruh keikutsertaan senam hamil terhadap kecemasan primigravida trimester ketiga dalam menghadapi persalinan. Jurnal Biometrika dan Kependudukan. 2012;1:26–32.
  28. Murni NNA, Suhartono, Suherni T. Pengaruh latihan relaksasi guided imagery and music (gim) pada kelas ibu terhadap derajat kecemasan ibu hamil menghadapi persalinan pertama: studi di puskesmas Meninting kabupaten Lombok Barat. Jurnal Kesehatan Prima. 2014;8:1197–206.
  29. Fuada N, Setyawati B. Pelaksanaan kelas ibu hamil di Indonesia. Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi . 2015;6(2):67–75.
  30. Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Buku saku pelayanan kesehatan ibu di fasilitas kesehatan dasar dan rujukan. Edisi pert. Jakarta; 2013. p: 368.
  31. BaLitbangKes. Riset Fasilitas Kesehatan 2011. Jakarta; 2011.
  32. Aluko-Arowolo SO, Ayobami OO. Residence location and ante-natal healthcare utilisation in selected public and private Orthodox hospitals in Ijebu, South-Western Nigeria. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;185:307–13.
  33. Djasri H. 10 langkah pendampingan AMP di tingkat kabupaten situasi daerah di 3 kabupaten NTT (Sumba Timur, Manggarai Barat dan Timor Tengah Selatan) Disusun oleh?: Tim Manajemen dan Tim Klinis. Yogyakarta; 2015.
  34. Sibiya MN, Cele RJ, Ngxongo TSP. Assessment of the use of the new maternity case record in improving the quality of antenatal care in eThekwini District, KwaZulu-Natal. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. 2015;2:53–8.
  35. Scarf VL, Rossiter C, Vedam S, Dahlen HG, Ellwood D, Forster D, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery. 2018;62:240–55.