University lecturers’ preparedness to use technology in teacher training of mathematics during COVID-19: The case of Ethiopia
Abstract
The study aimed to investigate Ethiopian university lecturers’ readiness to use technology for teaching mathematics at the tertiary level during the COVID-19 pandemic when they were compelled to adapt to distant education. Using Google Forms, online questionnaires were distributed to 41 lecturers in three Ethiopian universities, of whom eighteen participated. Before the research, the questionnaire was piloted with eight lecturer participants to categorise questions and validate the instrument using the Rasch measurement model. The questionnaire was locally developed based on guidelines from the literature. It purposed to investigate university lecturers’ individual preparedness for technological instruction in terms of their knowledge, beliefs and current, and historical exposure to this mode of instruction. As a counterbalance, some circumstantial factors influencing their readiness were investigated too. Lecturers’ optimistic beliefs about using educational technologies have been found to contrast with some disabling circumstantial factors. This study revealed that the lecturers were generally able and interested in integrating technology into the teaching process but that barriers, primarily at the institutional level, hindered them from doing so. In addition to the technologies suggested in the questionnaire, participants enriched the research findings by adding more possible technologies that lecturers may use for educational purposes. The data was analysed using WINSTEPS (Student Version of WINSTEPS 4.7.0.0) and SPSS version 20. The results showed the reliability of using the instrument was 0.77 based on Cronbach’s alpha. The PT-measure correlation value determined the construct validity (PMC), ranging from 0.23 to 0.71 except item PUT15’s infit and outfit MNSQ between 0.1 to 1.86 and ZSTD range -1.05 to 1.61, which was acceptable. The fit statistics showed that the person separation index, 1.97, was considered good and that the item separation index, 0.63 was within an acceptable range. Person and item reliability were at 0.8 and 0.28, respectively. The result indicated that the new instrument with five items after eliminating unfit items (such as items FAT19, PTT10, KDT1, PTT8 and PTT 12) was reliable and valid to measure the use of technology in the teaching and learning process of the university lecturers.
References
Adnan, M. and K. Anwar. 2020. “Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students’ Perspectives.” Online Submission 2(1): 45‒51.
Aghajani, M. and M. Adloo. 2018. “The Effect of Online Cooperative Learning on Students’ Writing Skills and Attitudes through Telegram Application.” International Journal of Instruction 11(3): 433‒448.
Albion, P. R. and P. A. Ertmer. 2002. “Beyond the foundations: The role of vision and belief in teachers’ preparation for integration of technology.” TechTrends 46(5): 34‒38.
Avgerinou, M. and S. Moros. 2020. “The 5-Phase Process as a Balancing Act during Times of Disruption: Transitioning to Virtual Teaching at an International JK-5 School.” In Teaching, technology, a teacher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stories from the field. Waynesfield, NC, USA.
Basilaia, G. and D. Kvavadze. 2020. “Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia.” Pedagogical Research 5(4).
Beglar, D. 2010. “A Rasch-based validation of the Vocabulary Size Test.” Language Testing 27(1): 101‒118.
Bond, T. and C. M. Fox. 2015. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Routledge.
Bond, T. G. and C. M. Fox. 2001. “Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human.” Sciences 6: 7. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Crawford, J., K. Butler-Henderson, J. Rudolph, B. Malkawi, M. Glowatz, R. Burton, and S. Lam. 2020. “COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses.” Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching 3(1): 1‒20.
Durak, H. and M. Saritepeci. 2017. “Investigating the effect of technology use in education on classroom management within the scope of the FATİH project.” Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 46(2): 441‒457.
Freihofner, U., C. Campbell, and S. Smala. 2018. “Digital Tool Use and Self-Regulated Strategies in a Bilingual Online Learning Environment.” In Digital Technologies: Sustainable Innovations for Improving Teaching and Learning, 131‒146. Springer, Cham.
Galbraith, P. and C. Haines. 1998. “Disentangling the nexus: Attitudes to mathematics and technology in a computer learning environment.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 36(3): 275‒290.
Goos, M. 2005. “A sociocultural analysis of the development of pre-service and beginning teachers’ pedagogical identities as users of technology.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 8(1): 35‒59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-0457-0.
Huang, R., J. M. Spector, and J. Yang. 2019. Educational Technology a Primer for the 21st century. Springer.
Iqbal, M. Z., H. I. Alradhi, A. A. Alhumaidi, K. H. Alshaikh, A. M. AlObaid, M. T. Alhashim, and M. H. AlSheikh. 2020. “Telegram as a Tool to Supplement Online Medical Education During COVID-19 Crisis.” Acta Informatica Medica 28(2): 94.
Jain, T. 2020. “The Revolution of Education.” In Emerging Trends in Business and Management: Issues and Challenges (Volume 2), ed. R. Venkatesan, 67–71. Tamil Nadu, India: Tiruvannamalai ‒ 606603. www.shanmugacollege.edu.in.
Kagan, D. M. 1992. “Implication of research on teacher belief.” Educational Psychologist 27(1): 65‒90.
Kaur, S. 2020. “The coronavirus pandemic in Malaysia: A commentary.” Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 12(5): 482.
Leder, G. C., E. Pehkonen, and G. Törner. 2002. “Setting the scene.” In A Hidden, Variable Mathematics Education? ed. G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, and G. Torner, 1–10.
Likert, R. 1932. “A technique for the measurement of attitudes.” Archives of Psychology 22(140): 55. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1933-01885-001. (Accessed 16 February 2022).
Linacre, J. M. 2005. “A user’s guide to Winsteps/Ministeps Rasch-Model programs.” https://www.winsteps.com/winman/copyright.htm. (Accessed 16 February 2022).
Linacre, J. M. 2002. “Optimising rating scale category effectiveness.” Journal of Applied Measurement 3(1): 85‒106.
Mailizar, A. M. and S. Bruce. 2020. “Secondary-school-mathematics-teachers-views-on-e-learning-implementation-barriers-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-the-case-of-indonesia.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16. em1860.10.29333/ejmste/8240.
Mashhadi Heidar, D. and M. Kaviani. 2016. “The social impact of Telegram as a social network on teaching English vocabulary among Iranian intermediate EFL learners.” Sociological Studies of Youth (23): 65‒76.
Michael, K. 2015. “Integrating Content, Pedagogy and Technology for Enhancing Quality of Education.” Paper presented at the 5th Annual International Conference on Quality Education, Mekele University.
Mutalib, M. I. A. 2020. “Teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Campus Notes 18 May. [Blog] https://www.bernama.com/en/thoughts/news.php?id=1842593.
Pace, C., S. K. Pettit, and K. S. Barker. 2020. “Best practices in middle level quaranteaching: Strategies, tips and resources amidst COVID-19.” Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Association for Middle Level Education 31(1): 2.
Pappas, C. 2014. “The science and the benefits of gamification in eLearning.” https://elearningindustry.com/science-benefits-gamification eLearning.
Perry, B., N. Y. Wong, and P. Howard. 2006. “Comparing primary and secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, mathematics learning and mathematics teaching in Hong Kong and Australia.” In Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Traditions ‒ A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West, 435‒448. Springer, Boston, MA.
Petko, D. 2012. “Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations.” Computers and Education 58(4): 1351‒1359.
Phellas, C. N., A. Bloch, and C. Seale. 2011. “Structured methods: Interviews, questionnaires, and observation.” Researching Society and Culture 3: 181‒205.
Piotrowski, M. 2010. “What is an e-learning platform?” In Learning management system technologies and software solutions for online teaching: Tools and applications, 20‒36. IGI Global.
Sadaf, A. and B. L. Johnson. 2017. “Teachers’ beliefs about integrating digital literacy into classroom practice: An investigation based on the theory of planned behavior.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 33(4): 129‒137.
Teferra, T., A. Asgedom, J. Oumer, T. W/hanna, A. Dalelo, and B. Assefa. 2018. Ethiopian Educational Development Roadmap (2018‒30) (Issue July). http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/sites/planipolis/files/ressources/ethiopia_education_development_roadmap_2018-2030.pdf.
Thompson, A. G. 1992. “Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research.” In Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning, ed. D. Grouws, 127–146. New York: Macmillan.
Toquero, C. M. 2020. “Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Philippine Context.” Pedagogical Research 5(4): 1-5em0063. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947.
Wiranegara, D. A. and S. Hairi. 2020. “Conducting English learning activities by implementing Telegram group class during COVID-19 pandemic.” Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes 3(2): 104‒114.
Wright, B. D. and J. M. Linacre. 1994. “The Rasch model as a foundation for the Lexile Framework.” Unpublished manuscript.
Yushau, B. 2006. “Computer attitude, use, experience, software familiarity and perceived pedagogical usefulness: The case of mathematics professors.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2(3): 1‒17.
Copyright (c) 2021 FRANCE machaba, Tola Bedada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
