Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
Neste artigo, investigamos algumas das relações entre discurso especializado e conhecimento, por meio do estudo discursivo de um livro-texto de genética. Depois da crítica a abordagens convencionais em epistemologia e psicologia em relação ao conhecimento, argumentamos que em primeiro lugar precisamos de uma tipologia detalhada de vários tipos de conhecimento. O conhecimento científico em tal quadro teórico é definido como um conhecimento compartilhado, geral, abstrato e “certificado” de um grupo (profissional). Uma análise da estrutura discursiva de um livro-texto de genética sugere que o conhecimento científico é organizado por meio de esquemas específicos, que englobam categorias como Estrutura, Quantidade, Forma, Composição e Função, entre outras categorias, especialmente para a descrição das “coisas”. Em seguida, assume-se que o conhecimento científico encontra-se necessariamente baseado no conhecimento cotidiano, não especializado de toda a comunidade epistêmica de uma nação ou cultura. O artigo discute muitas propriedades e problemas sobre a natureza da relação entre conhecimento e discurso e conclui que nós ainda sabemos muito pouco sobre tal relação.Referências
ACKERMAN, D.; ANTON, T. & McCOURT, R. (Eds.). (1995). The new science journalists. New York: Ballantine Books.
APPLE, M.W. & Christian-Smith, L. K. (Eds.). (1991). The politics of the textbook. London: Routledge.
ARONOWITZ, S. (1988). Science as power: discourse and ideology in modern society. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
BARNES, B. (Ed.). (1982). Science in context: readings in the sociology of science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
BECKER, S. & SELMAN, B. (1986). An overview of knowledge: acquisition methods for expert systems. Toronto: Computer Systems Research Institute, University of Toronto.
BOOSE, J.H. (Ed.). (1988). Knowledge acquisition for knowledge-based systems. London San Diego: Academic Press.
BOOSE, J.H. (Ed.). (1990). The foundations of knowledge acquisition. London San Diego: Academic Press.
BRITTON, B.K. & GRAESSER, A. C. (Eds.). (1996). Models of understanding text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
BRITTON, B.K.; WOODWARD, A. & BINKLEY, M.R. (Eds.). (1993). Learning from textbooks: theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
CALSAMIGLIA, H. & VAN DIJK, T.A. (2004). Popularization discourse and knowledge about the genome. Discourse Studies, in press.
CHARNIAK, E. (1972). Toward a model of children’s story comprehension. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
CHASE, A. (1975). The legacy of Malthus: the social costs of the new scientific racism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
CLARK, H.H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
DURANTI, A. (Ed.). (1992). Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge (England) New York: Cambridge University Press.
DUSZAK, A. (Ed.). (1997). Culture and styles of academic discourse. Berlin, Germany New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
FAYARD, P. (1993). Sciences aux quotidiens: l’information scientifique et technique dans les quotidiens nationaux européens. Nice: Z´éditions.
FOUCAULT, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
FUCHS, C. (1982). La paraphrase. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
FUCHS, C. (1993). Paraphrase et énonciation. (Paraphrase and utterance). Paris: Ophrys.
GRECO, J. & SOSA, E. (Eds.). (1999). The Blackwell guide to epistemology. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
GREGORY, J. & MILLER, S. (1998). Science in public: communication, culture and credibility. New York: Plenum.
GRIZE, J.B. (1981). Discours et connaissances. (Discourse and Knowledge). Communication and Cognition, 14(4), 343-357.
GUNNARSSON, B.L.; LINELL, P. & NORDBERG, B. (Eds.). (1997). The construction of professional discourse. London New York: Longman.
HYLAND, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
JOHNSON-LAIRD, P.N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridgeshire New York: Cambridge University Press.
KELLER, E.F. (1995) Refiguring life: metaphors of twentieth century biology. New York: Columbia University Press.
KINTSCH, W. (1998). Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KUIPERS, T.A.F. & MACKOR, A. R. (Eds.). (1995). Cognitive patterns in science and common sense. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.
LATOUR, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
LATOUR, B. & WOOLGAR, S. (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
LEMKE, J.L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Corp.
MARTIN, J.R. & VEEL, R. (1998). Reading science: critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. New York: Routledge.
MYERS, G. (1990). Writing biology: texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
POJMAN, L.P. (1999). The theory of knowledge: classical and contemporary readings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
PURKHARDT, S. C. (1993). Transforming social representations: a social psychology of common sense and science. London: Routledge.
ROTHBART, D. (1997). Explaining the growth of scientific knowledge: metaphors, models, and meanings. Lewiston, N.Y.: E. Mellen Press.
SCANLON, E. (1999). Communicating science: contexts and channels. London New York: Routledge.
SCHANK, R.C. & ABELSON, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, N.J. New York: L. Erlbaum Associates distributed by the Halsted Press Division of John Wiley and Sons.
SHORE, B. (1996). Culture in mind: cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
VAN DIJK, T.A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage Publications.
VAN DIJK, T.A. (1998). Ideology: a multidisciplinary approach. London, England UK: Sage Publications.
VAN DIJK, T.A. (1999). Context models in discourse processing. In: van Oostendorp, Herre, & Goldman, Susan R. (Eds.). The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 123-148.
VAN DIJK, T.A. (2003). The discourse-knowledge interface. In Ruth Wodak and Gilbert Weiss (Eds.) Multidisciplinary CDA. London: Palgrave.
VAN DIJK, T.A. (2004). Discourse, knowledge and ideology. In: M. Pütz, J. Neff & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Language and ideology. Berlin: Mouton (in press).
VAN DIJK, T.A. & KINTSCH, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
VAN OOSTENDORP, H. & GOLDMAN, S. R. (Eds.). (1999). The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
VAN OOSTENDORP, H. & ZWAAN, R. A. (Eds.). (1994). Naturalistic text comprehension. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
VENTOLA, E. & MAURANEN, A. (Eds.). (1996). Academic writing: intercultural and textual issues. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
WIELINGA, B. (Ed.). (1990). Current trends in knowledge acquisition. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
WILKES, A.L. (1997). Knowledge in minds: individual and collective processes in cognition. Hove: Psychology Press.
O periódico Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
