Smoking Cessation Level of Contemplation in the Pediatric Emergency Department
Michelle K Arzubi Hughes*, Melinda Mahabee-Gittens E, Denise Dowd M and Joan Giovanni
Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of The Kings Daughter, USA
Submission: December 17, 2017; Published: July 26, 2018
*Corresponding author: Michelle K Arzubi Hughes, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of The Kings Daughter, USA.
How to cite this article: Michelle K A H, Melinda M G E, Denise D M, Joan G. Smoking Cessation Level of Contemplation in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Acad J Ped Neonatol. 2018; 7(1): 555761. DOI: 10.19080/AJPN.2018.07.555761
Keywords: Smoking; Pediatric; Cessation level; Tobacco; Health risk; Correlated
Background
Smoking tobacco is a significant health risk not only to the person smoking, but to those individuals that are exposed to the second-hand smoke as well. Although the number of smokers in the United States is declining, the effects of tobacco are still abundant and seen alarmingly in children. In the United States, there is an estimated 46 million people or 20.6% of all adults (aged 18 years and older) who smoke cigarettes. Cigarette smoking is more common among men (23.1%) than women (18.3%). These statistics split into age ranges are as follows: 21.4% of adults aged 18-24 years, 23.7% of adults aged 25-44 years, 22.6% of adults aged 45-64 years and 9.3% of adults aged 65 years and older. Most importantly, 43% of children < 12 years old live with at least one smoker [1].
The risks of second and third hand smoke on children’s health are vast. Published studies have correlated the effects of second and third hand smoke to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), respiratory tract infections, asthma, otitis media, behavior problems and sleeping disorders [2]. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure is the leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality and has been responsible for $4.6 billion in direct medical costs to the treatment of children [3].
It is important to understand the level of contemplation and motivation of smokers to assist physicians in implementing a smoking cessation program and intervention for the particular individual.
The Emergency Department (ED) has been noted to be an ideal location for intervention. Several surveys show that the ED is a point of access to reach large number of smokers [4]. One study concluded that approximately 50% of smokers reported moderate interest in an ED - based intervention and were willing to stay an extra 15minutes to obtain further education [5].
Possible Study Implications: This study will illustrate the relationship between parent’s level of contemplation to quit smoking with their knowledge of smoking and the effects of second hand smoke on their children. By understanding this relationship, adequate interventions such as education and smoking cessation information can be developed for these parents in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Interventions based on the stages of change model have been shown to enhance motivation and predict cessation [6].
Study Aims
For smoking parents/primary caregivers of children presenting the ED/UC
I. To determine level of contemplation/motivation of parents/primary caregivers to quit smoking.
II. The “stages of change” model will be used for assessing a patient’s willingness to quit using tobacco. This model entails changing behavior through a process of five motivational stages:
a. Precontemplation (not planning to quit within the next six months)
b. Contemplation (considering quitting within the next six months)
c. Preparation (planning to quit within the next 30 days)
d. Action (successfully quitting for less than six months), and
e. Maintenance (successfully quitting for at least six months).
III. To determine level of understanding of the relationship of smoking to their child’s illness, and childhood smokingrelated illnesses in general.
IV. This will be based on their knowledge of effects of second hand smoke and their child’s chief complaint.
V. To measure the association between #1 and #2.
VI. To determine the inter-relationship between the importance of smoking cessation and #3.
Methods
Definitions
I. Level of contemplation: will be determined by questions #16-#18 (see attached document) in a binary method. Precontemplation: #16 Yes (1), #17 No (0), #18 No (0); Contemplation: #16 Yes (1), #17 Yes (1), #18 No (0); Preparation: #16 Yes (1), #17 Yes (1), #18 Yes (1).
II. Level of knowledge of the effects of second hand smoke: will be based on question #24. The answers will be dichotomized. The answers that are correct will be given 1 point; those that are incorrect will be given 0 points. The points will then be summed, to a maximum score of 9 points. This score will then be compared in a chart form to the three different levels of contemplation.
III. Correlation of child’s illness: The child’s diagnosis will be obtained and recorded prior to the discharge order given by the attending.
IV. Definition of importance of smoking cessation: will be based on question #15.
Study Type
Cross sectional anonymous adult survey of 200 parents will be administered by a research assistant, a small group of subinvestigators or Dr. Michelle Arzubi. A waiver for informed consent will be requested and, in its place, a handout explaining the study will be given to the parents prior to the onset of the study.
Study site
Emergency Department and Urgent Care of Children’s Mercy Hospital (CMH) Main Campus, Urgent Care of CMH South and North.
Inclusion criteria
I. Parents / primary caregivers of children presenting to the Children’s Mercy Emergency Department, Children’s Mercy Northland Urgent Care, or Children’s Mercy South Urgent Care with non-critical complaints.
II. Live in the same household with child.
III. English or Spanish speaking.
IV. Smokers.
V. An adult, who has smoked at least 100 cigarettes in his or her lifetime, is currently smoking either inside or outside of the house and may or may not smoke every day.
Exclusion criteria
I. Parents/primary caregivers of critically ill children
II. Parents/primary caregivers of children presenting for sexual or physical abuse.
III. Parents who do not live in the household with the child.
IV. Non-Smokers
V. Speak a language other than English or Spanish.
Data Collection
Patient recruitment
Based on a piloted survey performed with questions generated from a compilation of previous studies done by Dr. Melinda Mahabee -Gittens, the following method was determined to be most effective:
I. The data will be collected by research assistants or Dr. Michelle Arzubi. The researchers will receive training regarding the study, the manner in which to approach the parents, to ask questions in a non-judgmental manner, and to collect the data.
II. The researchers will approach the parents of the patients once the patients have been triaged, roomed, and seen by either the resident physician, or attending. The researchers will ask the physicians whether or not it is appropriate to see the particular patient’s parents / caregivers.
III. Once the researcher is in the room, the conversation will be similar to the following
IV. “Good morning/ afternoon/ evening, Mr. /Mrs. /Ms. Smith. My name is Dr. Michelle Arzubi. I was wondering whether you would be interested in participating in a research study.” If yes → “This is a study based on smoking. Therefore, my next question is: do you smoke?” If they answer no →“Thank you very much for your time, but at this time, we are only enrolling people who smoke” If yes → “Thank you. You will now be asked approximately 30 questions, which should take no more than 10 minutes of your time. These questions are not meant to judge you or make you feel bad in any way. If at any point in time you feel uncomfortable, please let me know, and we will stop the questions. I have many family members and friends that smoke and understand that smoking is a hard habit to break, both because it’s used as a stress-reliever and it is also addicting. I am handing you a sheet that explains a bit more about this study and why we are conducting it at this time.”
V. The questions will be handed to the parents in 8½” x 5½” cards to follow along, while the researcher asks them the questions, and enters the answers on a portable computer. Handing out cards and asking the parents the questions directly, made the parents more comfortable, and clarifies any questions the parents may have.
Statistical consideration
With the assistance of Ashley Sherman, MA, Children’s Mercy statistician, it was determined that with a sample size of 200, there would be a high level of precision for estimating the correlation coefficient. If the correlation is as high as 0.70, the 95% confidence interval for estimating the correlation will range from 0.62 to 0.76. If the correlation is as high as 0.80, the 95% confidence interval for estimating the correlation is calculated to range from 0.74- 0.85 (Figure 1-4).
Outcome measures
I. Level of contemplation/motivation will be defined as: precontemplation → no intention of quitting; contemplation (intend to quit within the next 6 months; preparation → interested in quitting in the next 30 days and recent attempt.
II. Level of parental understanding of the relationship between their smoking and child’s illness will be defined as agreeing or strongly agreeing with the effects of smoking on their child’s health.
III. These results will be divided based on the child’s diagnoses. One group will be diagnoses associated with second hand smoke exposure, and the second group will be diagnoses not related to second hand smoke exposure.
IV. Diagnoses associated with second hand smoke exposure are: Upper respiratory tract infections, Bronchiolitis, Pneumonia, Asthma, Ear infection, difficulty sleeping, or behavior problems.
Results
A total of 220 parents were asked to participate in the survey, and 200 completed the survey. The 20 parents that did not complete the survey had a variety of reasons for not doing so. The answers varied from lack of desire to participate, to not having enough time. The demographics of the 200 patients are shown in (Table 1-9).
References
- Cigarette Smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation- United States (2008) Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 58 (44): 1227-1232.
- From the American Academy of Pediatrics: Policy Statement-Tobacco use: a pediatric disease (2009) Pediatrics 124(5): 1474-1487.
- Secondhand Smoke Tearing Families Apart: the Health and Economic Burden of Smoking on Children. Washington, DC: American Legacy Foundation, USA.
- Winickoff JP, Hillis VJ, Palfrey JS, Perrin JM, Rigotti NA (2003) A Smoking Cessation Intervention for Parents of Children who are Hospitalized for respiratory illness: The Stop Tobacco Outreach Program. Pediatrics 111(1): 140-145.
- Boudreaux ED, Baumann BM, Friedman K, Ziedonis DM (1998) Smoking Stage of Change and Interest in an Emergency Departmentbased Intervention. Academic Emergency Medicine 12(3): 211-218.
- Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ, Sutton SR (1998) Stage theories of health behavior: conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychology 17(3): 290-299.
- Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO (1991) The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 86(9): 1119-1127.