|
Abstract
2005, Vol. 76, No. 10, Pages 1623-1628
(doi:10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1623)
Evaluation of Long-Term Implant Success Devorah Schwartz-Arad,* Ran Herzberg, and Liran Levin *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. †Department of Periodontology, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University. ‡Department of Oral Rehabilitation, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University. Correspondence: Dr. Devorah Schwartz-Arad, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Fax: 972-3-6409250; e-mail: dubi@schwartz-arad.co.il. Implant success criteria, regarding marginal bone loss and other parameters, were first suggested in 1986 and today are still frequently referred to as the gold standard for implant success. However, according to the recent abundance of data on marginal bone loss and a better understanding of bone and soft tissue behavior around the implant neck and body, these criteria are inaccurate for the wide variety of implant systems. The purpose of this article is to review some of the relevant literature regarding marginal bone loss and to propose guidelines for a novel approach to evaluate the long-term success of implants regarding marginal bone loss. Four hypothetical patterns of implant marginal bone loss after the first year are suggested: a low-rate marginal bone loss over the years (Albrektsson's pattern); low-rate marginal bone loss in the first few years followed by a rapid loss of bone support; high-rate marginal bone loss in the first few years followed by almost no bone loss; and continuous high-rate marginal bone loss leading to a complete loss of bone support. KEYWORDS: Bone loss, criteria, implant, neck, survival Cited by
Kerstin
Fischer
,
Torsten
Stenberg
,
Måns
Hedin
,
Lars
Sennerby
. (2008) Five-year results from a randomized, controlled trial on early and delayed loading of implants supporting full-arch prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19:5, 433-441 Online publication date: 1-Jun-2008. CrossRef
M.
Barış Güncü
,
Yavuz
Aslan
,
Celal
Tümer
,
Güliz N.
Güncü
,
Serdar
Uysal
. (2008) In-patient comparison of immediate and conventional loaded implants in mandibular molar sites within 12 months. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19:4, 335-341 Online publication date: 1-May-2008. CrossRef Tolga F. Tözüm, Ilser Turkyilmaz, Nermin Yamalik, Erdem Karabulut, Kenan Eratalay. (2007) Analysis of the Potential Association of Implant Stability, Laboratory, and Image-Based Measures Used to Assess Osteotomy Sites: Early Versus Delayed Loading. Journal of Periodontology 78:9, 1675-1682 Online publication date: 1-Sep-2007. Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (176 KB)
| PDF Plus (258 KB) Irit Kupershmidt, Liran Levin, Devorah Schwartz-Arad. (2007) Inter-Implant Bone Height Changes in Anterior Maxillary Immediate and Non-Immediate Adjacent Dental Implants. Journal of Periodontology 78:6, 991-996 Online publication date: 1-Jun-2007. Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (8249 KB)
| PDF Plus (258 KB) Marc Quirynen, Marcelo Abarca, Nele Van Assche, Myron Nevins, Daniel van Steenberghe. (2007) Impact of supportive periodontal therapy and implant surface roughness on implant outcome in patients with a history of periodontitis. Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 34:9, 805 CrossRef
|
|
|