Research Article

in

Care Coordination From a Strengths Perspective: A Practice-Based Evidence Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practice

Have access already?

Get access to this article:

Or get access to the particular issue:

Or get access to the entire journal:

Advertisement

Abstract

Background and Purpose: It is critical to accurately represent strengths interventions to improve data and enable intervention effectiveness research from a strengths perspective. However, it is challenging to understand strengths interventions from the multiple perspectives of computerized knowledge representation, evidence-based practice guidelines, and practice-based evidence narratives. Intervention phrases abstracted from nurse care coordinator practice narratives described strengths interventions with community-dwelling elders. This project aims were to (a) compare nurse care coordinator use of evidence-based interventions as described in the two guidelines (what to do and how to do it), (b) analyze nurse care coordinator intervention tailoring (individualized care), and (c) evaluate the usefulness of the Omaha System for comparison of narrative phrases to evidence-based guidelines. Methods: Phrases from expert nurse care coordinators were mapped to the Omaha System for comparison with the guidelines interventions and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Venn diagrams were used to visually depict intervention overlap between the guidelines and the phrases. Results: Empirical evaluation of 66 intervention phrases mapped to 14 problems using 3 category terms and 19 target terms showed alignment between guidelines and the phrases, with the most overlap across two guidelines and the phrases in categories, and the most diversity in care descriptions. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the value in having both standardized guidelines and expert clinicians who see the whole person and can synthesize and apply guidelines in tailored ways. There is potential to create a feedback loop between practice-based evidence and evidence-based practice by expanding this approach to use of practice-generated Omaha System data as practice-based evidence. Further research is needed to refine and advance the use of these methods with additional practices and guidelines.

Article usage
Article Usage
Period Abstract Full PDF Total
Apr 2024 15 0 0 15
Mar 2024 58 0 0 58
Feb 2024 47 0 0 47
Jan 2024 52 0 0 52
Dec 2023 35 1 1 37
Nov 2023 32 0 0 32
Oct 2023 25 1 1 27
Sep 2023 24 1 0 25
Aug 2023 23 1 0 24
Jul 2023 27 1 1 29
Jun 2023 29 0 1 30
May 2023 78 0 0 78
Apr 2023 35 0 0 35
Mar 2023 55 0 0 55
Feb 2023 31 1 0 32
Jan 2023 67 1 0 68
Dec 2022 47 0 0 47
Nov 2022 40 0 0 40
Oct 2022 53 0 0 53
Sep 2022 50 0 0 50
Aug 2022 49 3 2 54
Jul 2022 47 0 0 47
Jun 2022 38 0 0 38
May 2022 42 1 2 45
Apr 2022 62 0 0 62
Mar 2022 54 2 2 58
Feb 2022 75 0 1 76
Jan 2022 37 1 0 38
Dec 2021 36 4 1 41
Nov 2021 57 3 1 61
Oct 2021 50 0 0 50
Sep 2021 57 4 1 62
Aug 2021 38 1 3 42
Jul 2021 40 4 3 47
Jun 2021 37 3 2 42
May 2021 59 1 0 60
Apr 2021 110 3 1 114
Mar 2021 98 0 0 98
Feb 2021 89 1 1 91
Jan 2021 57 0 0 57
Dec 2020 66 0 0 66
Nov 2020 42 2 2 46
Oct 2020 50 0 0 50
Sep 2020 37 1 1 39
Aug 2020 37 1 0 38
Jul 2020 31 2 1 34
Jun 2020 55 1 1 57
May 2020 27 2 1 30
Apr 2020 23 2 0 25
Mar 2020 47 2 2 51
Feb 2020 54 0 0 54
Jan 2020 53 1 0 54
Dec 2019 113 0 0 113
Nov 2019 73 1 0 74
Oct 2019 29 2 1 32
Sep 2019 22 0 0 22
Aug 2019 14 2 2 18
Jul 2019 23 0 2 25
Jun 2019 37 0 1 38
May 2019 31 0 0 31
Apr 2019 31 0 0 31
Mar 2019 65 1 2 68
Feb 2019 43 2 2 47
Jan 2019 49 0 1 50
Dec 2018 28 1 1 30
Nov 2018 40 6 5 51
Oct 2018 28 1 0 29
Sep 2018 22 0 1 23
Aug 2018 11 0 0 11
Jul 2018 0 0 1 1
May 2018 0 2 1 3