초록

Recently, Yoshida et al. (2014) propose a movement-plus-ellipsis analysis of the Why-Stripping construction with base-generation of why in the clause initial position. While agreeing with the idea of base-generated why in this construction, this paper argues that Yoshida et al. have a number of limitations, especially with respect to the clausal ellipsis requirement and the analysis of Stripping constructions with other adverbials. In this paper, a non-movement, non-ellipsis based analysis of the construction will be proposed on the basis of Ginzburg & Sag’s (2000) approach to fragment clauses. By incorporating Minimal Recursion Semantics representations, this paper also provides an account of question interpretations, focus-sensitive readings, and scope relations in why and other adverbial Stripping constructions.

키워드

Stripping, Bare-Argument Ellipsis, fragments, Why-Stripping, Not-Stripping, why, how-come, constraint-based approach

참고문헌(23)open

  1. [단행본] Bromberger, S. / 1992 / On What We Know We Don’t Know: Explanation, Theory, Linguistics, and How Questions Shape Them / The University of Chicago Press

  2. [단행본] Casielles, E. / 2006 / The Syntax of Nonsententials: Multidisciplinary Perspectives / John Benjamins Publishing Company : 117 ~ 145

  3. [단행본] Chomsky, N. / 1995 / The Minimalist Program / MIT Press

  4. [단행본] Collins, C. / 1991 / More Papers on Wh-Movement: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15 / MIT Press : 31 ~ 45

  5. [학술지] Copestake, A. / 2006 / Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction / Research on Language and Computation 3 : 281 ~ 332

  6. [단행본] Culicover, P. W. / 2005 / Simpler Syntax / Oxford University Press

  7. [학술대회] Döring, S. / 2012 / The Focus Sensitivity of Sentence Adverbs / Proceedings of ConSOLE 19 : 201 ~ 214

  8. [단행본] Fiengo, R. / 1994 / Indices and Identity / MIT Press

  9. [단행본] Ginzburg, J. / Interrogative Investigation: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives / CSLI Publications

  10. [학술지] Hankamer, J. / 1976 / Deep and Surface Anaphora / Linguistic Inquiry 7 : 391 ~ 426

  11. [학술지] Ko, H. / 2005 / Syntax of Why-in-situ: Merge into [Spec, CP] in the Overt Syntax / Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23 : 867 ~ 916

  12. [단행본] Merchant, J. / 2001 / The Syntax of Silence / Oxford University Press

  13. [학술지] Merchant, J. / 2004 / Fragments and Ellipsis / Linguistics and Philosophy 27 : 661 ~ 738

  14. [학술대회] Nakao, C. / 2012 / On the Syntax of Why-Stripping / Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics : 270 ~ 280

  15. [학술지] Ochi, M. / 2004 / How Come and Other Adjunct Wh-Phrases: A Cross-linguistic Perspective / Language and Linguistics 5 : 29 ~ 57

  16. [단행본] Pesetsky, D. / 1997 / Is the Best Good Enough / MIT Press : 337 ~ 383

  17. [단행본] Rizzi, L. / 2001 / Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Rizzi / Elsevier : 287 ~ 296

  18. [학술대회] Ross, J. R. / 1969 / Guess Who? / Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society : 252 ~ 286

  19. [학술지] Shlonsky, U. / 2011 / Where’s ‘Why’? / Linguistic Inquiry 42 (4) : 651 ~ 659

  20. [학술지] Stepanov, A. / 2008 / Cartography and Licensing of Wh-Adjuncts: A Cross-linguistic Perspective / Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26 : 589 ~ 638

  21. [학술대회] Weir, A. / 2014 / Why-Stripping Targets Voice Phrase / Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 1 : 235 ~ 248

  22. [학술지] 유은정 / 2013 / A Base-generated Fragment Approach to Sluicing Constructions / 언어학 21 (4) : 27 ~ 56

  23. [학술지] Yoshida, M. / 2014 / The Syntax of Why-Stripping / Natural Language and Linguistic Theory