Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 44 issue 1 (january 2021) : 74-80

Effect of Planting Methods on Growth and Yield of Groundnut Cultivars

B.U. Olayinka1, A.S. Abdulbaki2,3,*, R.T. Mohammed1, Hameed Alsamadany3, R.B. Murtadha1, Yahya Alzahrani3, Ayinla Abdulaziz4, K.A. Abdulkareem1, E.O. Etejere1
1Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
2Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Federal University Dutsinma, Katsina state, Nigeria.
3Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
4Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Alhikmah University, Ilorin, Nigeria.
  • Submitted30-12-2019|

  • Accepted20-04-2020|

  • First Online 22-08-2020|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-546

Cite article:- Olayinka B.U., Abdulbaki A.S., Mohammed R.T., Alsamadany Hameed, Murtadha R.B., Alzahrani Yahya, Abdulaziz Ayinla, Abdulkareem K.A., Etejere E.O. (2020). Effect of Planting Methods on Growth and Yield of Groundnut Cultivars . Legume Research. 44(1): 74-80. doi: 10.18805/LR-546.
Background: The low yield in groundnut which can be partly attributed to poor land preparation methods necessitated the need for alternative strategy of land preparation that will promote higher productivity in groundnut farming. 

Methods: A field experiment was carried out in two separate locations between May and August in 2016 to assess the effect of planting methods on growth and yield of groundnut cultivars.

Result: The results revealed that groundnut crop sown on modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting recorded significantly higher plant height, number of leaves, 50% flowering, yield attributes and yield when compared to other methods of  planting  All the groundnut cultivars responded positively to all planting methods except those grown on flat surface without beds. However, modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting proved to be the best method.  
Groundnut is an important oil, food and feed crop of the world (Variath and Janila, 2017). Although majorly valued as a protein oil source, it can also serve as a good for vitamins B and E elements like calcium and phosphorus. The yield in groundnut is largely dependent on the flowering period and viability of the pegs (Lucas et al., 2011). This is because if the pegs fail to contact and enter the soil they usually wither. Failure of some pegs to reach the soil surface in due time is because they are too distant from the surface or the time is not enough for their growth (Lucas et al., 2011).  Literature also has it that about 30% of the pods that do not reach the full maturity stage are lost at the end of the cycle (Santos et al., 2000).  
        
The productivity and quality of groundnut depends on the environmental conditions and the improved agronomic practices especially the planting methods which plays a significant role in achieving higher productivity of groundnut crop. Ajeigbe et al., (2014) revealed that planting on ridges recorded higher yield compared to flat surface. However, the conical shape of the ridges delay peg penetration by increase the distance between the pegs and the surface of soil (Olayinka et al., 2015). Recent studies have reported that raised beds land preparation method outperformed the conventional ridges planting techniques in wheat, maize and groundnut (Ortega et al., 2008; Olayinka et al., 2015).
        
The high demand for groundnut and groundnut products throughout the world coupled with the defects offered by conventional planting method as earlier mentioned in the foregoing discourse necessitated the need to study alternative planting method that will improve its growing environment and favour higher yield.    
This study was carried out in two different locations at the Botanical Garden of University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria between May and August in 2016. The experimental soil was sandy loamy in texture with low organic matter (0.77%) and slightly acidic pH (6.30) in in nature. The available nitrogen was moderately low (0.15%). The soil was low in available calcium, magnesium, sodium potassium and Cation Exchange Capacity with respective values of 4.13 cmol kg-1 0.42 cmol kg-1, 0.12 cmol kg-1, 0.11 cmol kg-1 and 2.82 cmol kg-1.
        
The seeds of the four cultivars used were obtained from Institute of Agricultural Research (IAR), Zaria, Nigeria. Samnuts 21 and 23 mature between 115-120 days (medium maturing). Samnut 22 matures between 90-100 days (early-maturing) and Samnut 24 mature between 80-90 days (early-maturing) [Plate 1(a-d)].
 

Plate 1: The pods and seeds of four groundnut cultivars.


 
Field layout followed 4×4×3 factorial design consisting of four cultivars, four planting methods and three replicates.  Gross plot size measured 13 m x 9 m containing 36 subplots each measuring 3 m by 2 m separated by 0.5 m. The four planting methods assessed were flat surface without bed, raised beds, conventional ridges and furrow with ridges planting and modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting [Plate 2 (a-d)].
 

Plate 2: Planting methods layout and dimension


        
The field was cleared manually to remove grasses and stumps using cutlass. It was ploughed and harrowed with hoe and demarcated into thirty-six subplots. Prior to sowing, seeds were treated with seedrex (33% permethrin + 15% carbonderzine + 12 chlorothalonil) at the rate of 4 kg of seed per 10 g of the chemical to prevent soil borne diseases. Seeds were sown per hole at a depth of 0.03 m, plant to plant spacing was 0.2 m. Plots were manually weeded to maintain normal crop growth at interval of two weeks.  Harvesting was done by carefully uprooting the plants from the soil.  The harvested plants were washed in running water and the cleaned pods were detached and air-dried to 12% moisture for 6-7 days.
        
Vegetative parameters evaluated at 12 week after planting (WAP) were plant height, number of leaves and leaf area. Above-ground dry weight was also determined by oven-dried at 80°C until a constant weight was achieved. Reproductive characters determined were time taken to achieve 50% flowering, number of pegs per plant, number of pods and seeds per plant, pod and seed weight per plant, 100-seed weight, pod length and pod and seed yields in kilogram per hectare and harvest index were also evaluated.

Data recorded for the two locations were pooled together on account of  zero interaction between location by cultivars by planting methods using Univariate Analysis of variance  under general model of Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software version 17. Duncan Multiple Range Test (Duncan, 1955) was used to separate the means.
Growth attributes
 
The plant height and number of leaves were influenced by cultivar and land preparation dynamics. In all the cultivars, modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting recorded significantly taller stem compared to all other planting methods except in Samnut 23 (Fig 1). The results of number of leaves followed similar trend as recorded for plant height (Fig 1) Groundnut raised under modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting recorded the highest leaf area and above-ground dry weight among all the planting methods (Fig 2).  The flat surface without beds showed the lowest value of all the growth attributes (Fig 1 and 2). The increased growth attributes by this treatment could be attributed to a more conducive soil conditions like proper aeration and availability of moisture both in the furrow and the soil surface. Also the soil surface as well the furrow where the seeds were planted in  the narrow are friable and well loose which offered additional advantages over those of raised beds and ridges. Higher crop productivity had been attributed to factors such proper aeration and availability of moisture (Joshi, 2017). Further still, modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting provided further less mechanical compaction that permitted root to grow profusely in the furrow where the planting was done compared to flat surface and other planting methods. The results agreed with findings of Sripunitha et al., (2011) and Olayinka et al., (2015). These growth attributes varied significantly among the cultivars and were highest in Samnut 21 and lowest in Samnut 24. The observed variability could be attributed to differential genetic constitution (Hernandez et al., 2008).
 

Fig 1: Plant height and number of leaves of four cultivars of groundnut (Samnuts 21, 22, 23 and 24) as affected by land preparation dynamics.


 

Fig 2: Leaf area and above-ground dry weight of four cultivars of groundnut (Samnuts 21, 22, 23 and 24) as affected by land preparation dynamics.


 
50% flowering and number of pegs per plant
 
The time taken to attain 50% flowering as affected by planting methods was not significant. However, modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting, raised beds and conventional ridges and furrow with ridges planting attained their 50% flowering 2-4 days (Fig 3). Groundnut grown on modified ridges and furrow with narrow planting recorded significantly highest peg number as compared to other planting methods (Fig 3). The early flowering in modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting may be due to better crop growing environment provided by these treatments. Subrahmaniyan et al., (2002) reported earlier flowering where soil conditions were altered by the agronomic practices in groundnut. The lower peg number in flat surface without raised beds compared to other planting methods could be hinged on factors that were attributed for growth attributes (Chassot and Richner, 2002). 
 

Fig 3: Number of days to 50% flowering and number of pegs per plant of four cultivars of groundnut (Samnuts 21, 22, 23 and 24) as affected by land preparation dynamics.


 
Yield attributes, yield and harvest index
 
Number of matured pods per plant, pod weight per plant, number of seed per plant, seed weight per plant were significantly influenced by planting methods (Table 1). Modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting recorded highest number of pods per plant which was closely followed by those of raised beds, conventional ridges and furrow with ridges planting except in Samnut 22 (Table 1). Lowest number of pods per plant was recorded from flat surface without raised beds. The results of other yield components such as seed weight per plant and number of seed per plant, 100-seed weight, pod length and pod circumference recorded similar result as recorded for number of pods per plant (Table 1 and 2).
 

Table 1: Influence of different land preparation dynamics on number of pods per plant, pod weight per plant, number of seeds per plant and seed weight per plant.


 

Table 2: Influence of different land preparation dynamics on 100 seed weight, pod length and pod circumference.


        
Groundnut yields were only significantly influenced by cultivars and planting methods. Samnuts 23 and 24 recorded higher mean yield, in groundnut raised under modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting as compared to other planting methods (Table 3). Significantly lowest pod and seed yields per hectare were recorded for all the cultivars grown on flat surface without raised beds. Result recorded for harvest was similar to those recorded for yield except that the effect of planting methods was not significant (Table 3). The enhanced yield attributes, yield and harvest index by ridges and furrow with narrow furrow most importantly in Samnut 23 and 24 could be due to greater  photosynthetic capacity and partition of assimilates into various parts of the plant. This to large extent was enhanced by the factors such as leaf area development, rate of flower formation, peg production and soil conditions created by this planting method. The results agreed with the view of Bhoi et al., (2010) who reported that yield or productivity of any field crop is governed by net photosynthetic efficiency as well as microclimate and edaphic factors of the area in which the crop is grown.
 

Table 3: Influence of different land preparation dynamics on pod and seed yields and harvest index.


        
Another possible explanation for enhanced yield in modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting was that this treatment offered more opportunity for peg proximity to the soil surface. For instance, it was observed that pegs produced at the upper parts of the branches had a shorter distance to travel and therefore end up in forming pods as a result of uniform distance that was maintained between the pegs and the soil surface as the branches extend outward from the main stem. According to Santos et al., (2005) the most efficient plants at transforming pegs into viable fruits have most pegs in the first 15 cm of plant height, which is the maximum size reached by pegs under field conditions. Mathukia et al., (2014) had also reported that alternate furrow and beds increased growth and yield of groundnut over flat surface. The low yield in the conventional ridges could be attributed to the conical shape of the ridges which prevented the pegs from enjoying close proximity to the soil surface (Olayinka et al., 2015). This could be the reason why African farmers often practice earthing-up the branches with soil to decrease the distance between the pegs and soil surface (Nigam et al., 2006). This practice resulted in more damaged and infected pods.
The great economic importance of groundnut throughout the world enhances its high demand. The low yield of the crop that be partly ascribed to poor planting method entail alternative planting method if the high demand for  groundnut and groundnut products will be met. Experiment results revealed that all the cultivars responded positively to planting methods with the exception of those grown on flat surface without raised beds. However, modified ridges and furrow with narrow furrow planting was found to be more effective most importantly because of its positive influence on the growth and yield of the cultivars studied.

  1. Ajeigbe, H.A., Waliyar, F., Echekwu, C.A., Ayuba, K., Motagi, B.N., Eniayeju, D., Inuwa, A. (2014). Farmer’s guide to groundnut production in Nigeria. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, India. pp. 36.

  2. Bhoi, S.K., Lakpale, R., Jangre, A., Mishra, S. (2010). Studies on the effect of weed control methods on growth and yield attributes of hybrid. Cotton. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 1(4): 434-437.

  3. Chassot, A., Richner, W. (2002). Root characteristics and phosphorus uptake of maizeseedlings in a bilayered soil. Agronomy Journal. 94: 118-127.

  4. Duncan, B.D. (1955). Multiple Range and F-test Biometrics. 42.

  5. Hernandez, R.J., Carlos, R.F.J., Salgado, H., Lamadrid, F.H., Valverde, G.V., Rodriguez, M.H., Martinez, B.J. (2008). Immunity related genes in dipterans share common enrichment of AT-rich motifs in their 5' regulatory regions that are potentially involved in nucleosome formation. BMC Genomics. 9: 326.

  6. Joshi, R. (2017). Physical constraints of fine textured heavy soils and their management-A review. Agricultural Reviews. 38(3): 216-222.

  7. Lucas, N.L., Roseane, C.S., Péricles A.M.F (2011). Correlation and path analysis of peanuts traits associated with pegs. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology. 11(1): 88-93.

  8. Mathukia, R.K., Panara, D.M., Patel, K.C., Mathukia, R.R. (2014). Response of Kharif groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) to land layouts, mulches and nutritional management. Innoriginal International Journal of Sciences. 1(1): 3-4.

  9. Nigam, S.N., Aruna, R., Giri, DY., Rao, G.V.R., Reddy A.G.S. (2006). Obtaining sustainable higher groundnut yield: principles and Practices of Cultivation. Information Bulletin No. 71. International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics. pp. 18. 

  10. Olayinka, B.U., Yusuf, B.T., Etejere, E.O. (2015). Growth, yield and proximate composition of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as influenced by land preparation method. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 7(2): 227-231.

  11. Ortega, A.L., Mir, E.V., Rangel, E.E. (2008). Nitrogen management and wheat genotype performance in a planting system on narrow raised bed. Cereal Res Commun. 36: 343-352.

  12. Santos, R.C., Custodio, R.J.M., Santos, V.F. (2000). Efficiency reproduction in peanut genotypes and phenotypic correlation between characters connected to the góforo. Science and Agrotechnology. 24: 617-622.

  13. Santos, R.C., Godoy, J.I., Favero, A.P. (2005). Improvement of peanut. In: Santos, R.C. (Ed.). The agribusiness of the peanut in Brazil. Embrapa Information Technology, Brasília, p. 123-192.

  14. Santos, R.C., Rego, G.M., Santos, C.A., Peixoto, A.S., Melo Filho, P.A., Moraes, T.M.G., Suassuna, A.T.F. (2006). Recommendations techniques for growing groundnuts in small properties of the Brazilian northeast. Embrapa Cotton, Campina Grande, 7pp.

  15. Sripunitha, A., Sivasubramaniam, K., Manikandan, S., Selvarani, K. and Shyla, K. K. (2011). Sub Surface Drip Irrigation Studies on Seed and Field Quality of Groundnut cv. VRI 2. Legume Research-An International Journal. 34(4): 311-313.

  16. Subrahmaniyan, K., Kalaiselven, P. and Arulmozhi, N. (2002). Effect of polyethylene film mulch on flowering and pod yield of groundnut. Legume Research-An International Journal. 25(3):225-226.

  17. Variath, M.T. and Janila, P. (2017). Economic and academic importance of peanut. In The peanut genome (pp. 7-26). Springer, Cham. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)