Human rights infringement against contemporary legal practice in several criminal cases

Authors

  • Katarzyna Rydz-Sybilak Uniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Prawa i Administracji, Katedra Postępowania Karnego i Kryminalistyki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.77.02

Keywords:

human rights, protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, prohibition to use tortures and inhuman treatment, pre-trial detention, incriminating evidence, right to defense, complain to the European Court of Human Rights

Abstract

Issues connected with protection against tortures or other forms of inhuman or degrading treatment are regulated in the European law not only in The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, but also in The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which was adopted by The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on June 26, 1987 and later ratified by all 47 countries of The Council of Europe. It is a key element in amending the control system. It has been agreed that the system based on individual and international pleas should be supported by preventive measures. Various situations in which the state has serious obligations so as to protect art. 3 of the Convention, take place following criminal proceedings by organs entitled to act according to legislation. It ought to be mentioned that despite our country’s ratification of the above mentioned legal acts, while conducting pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases, the violation of basic human rights and inhumane treatment of the suspects or the accused happen the most often. The state is responsible for securing proper conditions that would grant respect for one’s dignity and the procedures and methods of obtaining incriminating evidence are not to cause suffering whose scale and intensity would surpass needs of personal security of the accused or suspects during the proceedings in criminal trials, with respect to the legal procedures regulating the arrest and the use of preventative measures in form of a detention order.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nowicki, Marek A. 2013. Wokół Konwencji Europejskiej. Komentarz do Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka. Komentarz. LEX.
Google Scholar

The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms drafted in Rome on November 4, 1950. Dz. U. 1993, No 90, p. 587.
Google Scholar

Protocol No 1 and No 4. Dz. U. 1995, No 36, p. 175/1 – binding act.
Google Scholar

Protocol No 2. Dz. U. 1995, No 36, p. 176 – archival act.
Google Scholar

An Action Against Turkey. No. 40145/98 – sentence from 2005.
Google Scholar

Complaint v. Spain. No. 51192/99 – decision of 2001.
Google Scholar

Chember Against Russia of July 3, 2008. Chamber (Section I), application No. 7188/03, § 50.
Google Scholar

Iłowiecki Against Poland of October 4, 2001. P. 14, § 62 and 63, www.coe.org.pl
Google Scholar

Klamecki Against Poland of April 3, 2003. P. 21, § 122 and p. 27, § 144.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2016-12-30

How to Cite

Rydz-Sybilak, K. (2016). Human rights infringement against contemporary legal practice in several criminal cases. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 77, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.77.02

Issue

Section

Articles