본문 바로가기
KCI 등재

『西浦漫筆』上2의 ‘泰伯至德章’에 관한 고찰- 주자 해석의 비판적 수용 및 ‘양보[讓]’의 관점을 중심으로 -

A review on perspective of interpretation of ‘Taibozhidezhang(泰伯至德章)’ in the Subsection 2. to Volume 1. of 『Seopomanpil(西浦漫筆)』- Issues in critical interpretation of “rang讓,concessions” -

동북아 문화연구
약어 : -
2024 vol.1, no.78, pp.43 - 66
DOI : 10.17949/jneac.1.78.202403.004
발행기관 : 동북아시아문화학회
연구분야 : 학제간연구
Copyright © 동북아시아문화학회
인용한 논문 수 :   -  
4 회 열람

This paper examines Seopo's critical view with the academic attitude that Seopo tried to interpret scriptures and historical figures in a similar way to the perspective of Soron scholars, as a paper that examines the narrative method of Seopo‘s interpretation of the original ‘Taibozhidezhang(泰伯至德章)’of 『The Analects』. As a result of the review, Seopo maintained a position to criticize Juja's interpretation of the scriptures in a way that was faithful to the original intention of Taebaekjideokjang, yet subjectively added to it. Seopo criticizes original text of Taebaekjideokjang in a structure that it consecutively covers the entire text from the beginning to the end, narrates the essay in a simplified manner while well-aware of controversies of interpretation in ‘Taibozhidezhang’, expresses Zhuzi’s interpretation in 『The Analects』 in a complexed and multi-layered text structure by exhibiting independent perspective. In summary, Seopo questions the phrase “Sanyitianxiarang(三以天下讓)” through a sentence structure of ‘Dissenting opinion(或曰)’-‘Opinion(曰)’. offering a paradoxical perspective in interpretation of “rang(讓)” that ‘Rang(conceding) of Tianxia(天下)’ may interpret to ‘Guo(國:Nation)’s Rang(conceding)’ which all leads to the conclusion confirming Seopo’s polysemy way of interpretation. In conclusion, Seopo can be evaluated as showing the “huokan(活看)”'s perspective beyond the dogmatic idea of absolutely accepting phrases in Taebaekjideokjang while challenging the authority over the interpretation of the existing scriptures. This proves that Confucius' evaluation of Taebaek Jidok is not simply that Confucius praised “Taibo(泰伯)” as a “unsurpassed excellence(至德)” but a complex issue related to Seopo's ideological tendency to succeed to the throne in the 17th century.

『西浦漫筆』, 金萬重, 『論語』, ‘泰伯至德章’, ‘양보[讓]’, 朱子, 『論語集註』, 朝鮮 後期
『Seopomanpil』, Kim Manjoong, 『The Analects』, ‘Taibozhidezhang’, ‘rang’, Zhuzi, 『Lunyujizhu』, unsurpassed excellence

* 2023년 이후 발행 논문의 참고문헌은 현재 구축 중입니다.