Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Non-Indigenous and Indigenous food-related interactions: How does the transmission of a normativity perpetuate colonialism?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Type 2 diabetes has been considered an epidemic among Indigenous Peoples in Canada. They also suffer more from obesity than non-Indigenous people in the country, a condition that is considered an epidemic worldwide. Various public health and social services professionals are working in Indigenous communities across the country to raise awareness about certain lifestyle habits. The main objective of this article is to analyze the food normativity transmitted to an Indigenous population and to examine its reception. More specifically, the aim is to understand the opportunities of transmission (content and format) and the relational dynamics that these encounters between mostly non-Indigenous professionals and Indigenous Peoples imply.

Method

The analysis is based on an ethnographic fieldwork in the Anicinabe community of Lac Simon (Abitibi, Quebec). Conducted with a relational approach, interviews and participant observation were carried out.

Results

It appears that the Anicinabek have a great knowledge of the “good” eating habits as defined by a biomedical food normativity. A reflexive analysis of my presence in the community as a non-Indigenous anthropologist and an analysis of the Anicinabek’s responses to food recommendations lead me to argue that a form of food colonialism, inscribed in welfare (assistance) colonialism, persists while food surveillance seems to be integrated by the Anicinabek. This food normativity is the bearer of a biomedical conception of food and the colonial history of the country colours its transmission to Indigenous Peoples.

Conclusion

Greater autonomy, namely Indigenous food sovereignty, seems necessary to deconstruct this food assistance structure.

Résumé

Objectifs

Depuis plusieurs années déjà, le diabète de type 2 est considéré au stade épidémique chez les Premières Nations au Canada. Ils souffrent aussi davantage d’obésité que les non-Autochtones au pays, une condition qualifiée d’épidémie à l’échelle mondiale. Divers représentants de la santé publique et des services sociaux travaillent dans les communautés autochtones du pays notamment pour les sensibiliser à certaines habitudes de vie. L’objectif principal de cet article est d’analyser la normativité alimentaire transmise à une population autochtone et à en examiner la réception. Plus précisément, il s’agit d’examiner les occasions de transmission (contenu et format) et de comprendre les dynamiques relationnelles que ces occasions de rencontre entre professionnels non-autochtones et Autochtones impliquent.

Méthode

La présente analyse s’appuie sur des données récoltées dans le cadre d’une enquête ethnographique d’un an au sein de la communauté anicinabe de Lac Simon (Abitibi, Québec). Menées avec une approche relationnelle, des entrevues avec des membres de la communauté ainsi que de l’observation participante ont été réalisées permettant ainsi un accès aux quotidiens des Anicinabek autant au sein de la réserve que lors de séjours sur le territoire.

Résultats

À Lac Simon, comme dans d’autres communautés autochtones, les sources de sensibilisation sont nombreuses et accessibles depuis des années : formations, ateliers, activités communautaires et rencontres individualisées sur demande. D’ailleurs, une connaissance des « bonnes habitudes » alimentaires par les Anicinabek est notable. Une analyse réflexive de ma présence au sein de la communauté en tant qu’anthropologue non-autochtone et une analyse des réponses des Anicinabek face aux conseils alimentaires m’amène à soutenir qu’une forme de colonialisme alimentaire, inscrit dans un colonialisme d’assistance, persiste alors qu’une surveillance alimentaire apparait comme intégrée par les Anicinabek. Cette normativité alimentaire est porteuse d’une conception biomédicale de l’alimentation et l’historique colonial du pays teinte sa transmission au sein des populations autochtones.

Conclusion

Une plus grande autonomie, voire une souveraineté alimentaire autochtone, semble nécessaire pour déconstruire cet encadrement alimentaire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. The addition of the “k” signifies the plural and addition of the “kwe” signifies the feminine (Anicinabekwe).

  2. Follow-up was done with local authorities during and after the fieldwork. Follow-up was also done during the analysis and writing process of the thesis from which this article is drawn. For a detailed presentation of the research context and paradigmatic considerations that guided the thesis, see Hamel-Charest (2022).

  3. In the context of the research (Quebec, Abitibi), the term non-Indigenous mostly refers to “white” people and the term “Blancs” (whites) is often used by both Indigenous (here Anicinabek) and non-Indigenous people.

  4. These norms refer to an ideal in the sense that many non-Indigenous individuals also do not strictly adhere to them.

  5. Tcikojikwe is the feminine version of Tcikojik, a term by which the Lac Simon Anicinabek refer to Canadians, generally white people.

  6. In Lac Simon, most of them are non-Indigenous, but it should be noted that some nurses are Anicinabek and that several Anicinabek work in various sectors such as front-line services or with families. The picture is much the same in local schools, where the majority of teachers are non-Indigenous while Anicinabek often act as teaching assistants.

  7. In a study conducted with Indigenous Peoples residing in and around Terrace, British Columbia, Luppens and Power (2018) also note that they have good knowledge of the nutritional qualities of foods.

  8. The author used the term “white”; therefore, I use it when referring to his work.

  9. See Tanner (1983) for a more complete picture of these distinctions.

References

  • Baril, G., & Paquette, M.-C. (2012). Les normes sociales et l’alimentation. Rapport, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batal, M., Chan, H. M., Ing, A., Fediuk, K., Berti, P., Sadik, T., & Johnson-Down, L. (2021). Nutrient adequacy and nutrient sources of adults among ninety-two First Nations communities across Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 112(Supp 1), S29–S40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bédard, H. (1988). Les Montagnais et la réserve de Betsiamites, 1850–1900 (No. 7). Institut québécois de recherche sur la culture. Distribution, Diffusion Prologue.

  • Bordeleau, S., Asselin, H., Mazerolle, M. J., & Imbeau, L. (2016). “Is it still safe to eat traditional food?” Addressing traditional food safety concerns in aboriginal communities. Science of the Total Environment, 565, 529–538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Habitus, code et codification. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 64, 40–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. (2020). “Food will be what brings the people together”: Constructing counter-narrative from the perspective of indigenous foodways. In P. Settee & S. Shukla (Eds.), Indigenous food systems: Concepts, cases, and conversations (pp. 83–100). Canadian Scholars.

  • Dumont, V. (1999). Lexique anicinabe. Conseil de la nation Anishnabe, Secteur Éducation et Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, A. (2004). Regard(s) « sur » et « par » l’alimentation pour renverser et comprendre comment sont renversés les rapports de générations : l’exemple de la socialisation alimentaire inversée. Enfances Familles Générations, 20, 79–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, C. (2015). Nourrir la machine humaine. Nutrition et alimentation au Québec, 1860-1945. McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2005). Biopouvoir ou biolégitimité? Splendeurs et misères de la santé publique. In M.-C. Granjon (Ed.), Penser avec Michel Foucault (pp. 161–182). Éditions Karthala.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischler, C. (1979). Gastro-nomie et gastro-anomie. Sagesse du corps et crise bioculturelle de l’alimentation moderne. Communications, 31, 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischler, C. (1990). L’Homnivore. Odile Jacob.

  • Foucault, M. (2012 [1975]). Surveiller et punir. Gallimard.

  • Garabuau-Moussaoui, I. (2002). Introduction. Une anthropologie par l’alimentation. In I. Garabuau-Moussaoui, E. Palomares, & D. Desjeux (Eds.), Alimentations contemporaines (pp. 55–80). L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, L. (2011). Entre plaisir et contrôle : l’équilibre comme fondement de la normativité et de l’action dans l’alimentation contemporaine. Ethnologies, 33(2), 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel-Charest, L. (2022). Mos wiyas sasigwan acitc sasipatakan : La contemporanéité alimentaire des Anicinabek de Lac Simon et leurs stratégies d’adaptation face au colonialisme alimentaire. Thèse de doctorat. Département d’anthropologie, Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leport, J. (2017). Dynamiques du changement des modèles alimentaires : le cas du poisson à Dakar. Thèse de doctorat. Université Toulouse – Jean Jaurès.

  • Luppens, L., & Power, E. (2018). “Indigenous isn’t just about what was before, it’s what’s happening now”: Perspectives of indigenous peoples of the foods in their contemporary diets. Canadian Food Studies /la Revue Canadienne des Études Sur L’alimentation, 5(2), 142–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massé, R. (2002). La flexibilité des critères dans la justification éthique des interventions : du principisme spécifié à un modèle centré sur les valeurs phares. In C. Hervé, B. M. Knoppers, P. A. Molinari, & G. Moutel (Eds.), Éthique médicale, bioéthique et normativité (pp. 105–102). Université René-Descartes.

  • Mosby, I. (2013). Administering colonial science: Nutrition research and human biomedical experimentation in Indigenous communities and residential school, 1942–1952. Histoire Sociale/Social History, 46(91), 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R. (Ed.). (1977). The white arctic. Anthropological essays on tutelage and ethnicity. Memorial University of Newfoundland, University of Toronto Press.

  • Poulain, J.-P. (2008 [2002]). Manger aujourd’hui. Attitudes, normes et pratiques. Privat.

  • Poulain, J.-P. (2002). Sociologie de l’alimentation. Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (2005). Alcool en milieu autochtone et marqueurs identitaires meurtriers. Drogues, Santé et Sociétés, 4(1), 85–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, A. (1983). Introduction: Canadian Indians and the politics of dependency. In A. Tanner (Ed.), The politics of Indianness: Case studies of native ethnopolitics in Canada (pp. 1–35). Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony. Fernwood: Indigenous research methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. K., Reading, J., Elias, B., & O’Neil, J. D. (2000). Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canada’s First Nations: Status of an epidemic in progress. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 163(5), 561–566.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Kitci Migwetc to the Anicinabe community of Lac Simon, to its Band Council who supported this research, and to those Anicinabekwek and Anicinabek who welcomed me in their families and shared their culture and experiences.

Funding

The research was financially supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council through the Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarships Program—Doctoral Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The sole author is responsible for all aspects of this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence Hamel-Charest.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

University of Montreal, Arts and Sciences Research Ethics Board, certificate no. CERAS-2016–17-255-D.

Consent to participate

The local band council approved the research. Individual consent was obtained from participants for interviews.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamel-Charest, L. Non-Indigenous and Indigenous food-related interactions: How does the transmission of a normativity perpetuate colonialism?. Can J Public Health 115, 80–88 (2024). https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-023-00834-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-023-00834-w

Keywords

Mot-clés

Navigation