Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2011, 57(2):64-70 | DOI: 10.17221/82/2010-AGRICECON

Information and communication infrastructure development and agro-food trade

Štefan BOJNEC1, Imre FERTŐ2
1 Faculty of Management, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
2 Corvinus University of Budapest and Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary

The purpose of this paper is to provide an adapted gravity trade model to measure the influence of communication infrastructure development on agro-food trade. The adapted gravity trade model presents associations of bilateral agro-food trade between OECD countries with traditional gravity equation variables and particularly with variables of the information and communication infrastructure development. Using the adapted gravity trade model we find a positive association between the information and communication infrastructure development and bilateral agro-food trade flows between OECD countries. This association is significantly stronger for agricultural than for food products. The improved information and communication infrastructure development improves information and reduces trade transaction costs.

Keywords: communication infrastructure, agro-food trade, adapted gravity model, OECD countries

Published: February 28, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BOJNEC Š, FERTŐ I. Information and communication infrastructure development and agro-food trade. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2011;57(2):64-70. doi: 10.17221/82/2010-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson J.E., Marcouiller D. (2002): Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84: 342-352. Go to original source...
  2. Anderson J., van Vincoop E. (2004): Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 42: 691-751. Go to original source...
  3. Bašek V., Kraus J. (2009): Czech foreign agricultural trade after joining the European Union. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 55: 583-595. Go to original source...
  4. Bojnec Š., Fertő I. (2010): Internet and international food industry trade. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110: 744-761. Go to original source...
  5. Cheng I-H., Wall H.J. (2005): Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 87: 49-63. Go to original source...
  6. Egger P. (2002): An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials. The World Economy, 25: 297-312. Go to original source...
  7. FAO (2005): The State of Food and Agriculture 2005. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  8. Feenstra R. (2004): Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Princeton University Press, Oxford.
  9. Fink C., Matto A., Lleana N. (2002): Assessing the Impact of Communication Costs on International Trade. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2929, Washington, DC. Go to original source...
  10. Frankel J., Rose A. (2002): An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117: 437-466. Go to original source...
  11. Francois J., Manchin M. (2007): Institutions, Infrastructure, and Trade. Development Studies Working Papers No. 224, Centro Studi Luca D'Agliano, Milano. Go to original source...
  12. Freund C.L., Weinhold D. (2004): The effect of the Internet on international trade. Journal of International Economics. 62: 171-189. Go to original source...
  13. de Groot H.L.F., Linders G-J.M, Rietveld P., Subramanian U. (2004): The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos, 57: 103-124. Go to original source...
  14. Heckman J. (1979): Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47: 153-161. Go to original source...
  15. Horská E. (2004): Modern marketing in the business practice - the source of competitive advantage in the global market. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 50: 572-576. Go to original source...
  16. Horská E, Krasnodębski A. (2009): The selected theoretical and practical viewpoints to managing cultural diversity in the international business. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 55: 368-374. Go to original source...
  17. Jeníček V., Krepl V. (2009): The role of foreign trade and its effects. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 55: 211- 220. Go to original source...
  18. Linders G-J.M., de Groot H.L.F. (2006): Estimation of the Gravity Equation in the Presence of Zero Flows. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2006-072/3, Amsterdam. Go to original source...
  19. Matyas L. (1997): Proper econometric specification of the gravity model. The World Economy, 20: 363-368. Go to original source...
  20. Olper A., Raimondi V. (2009): Patterns and determinants of international trade costs in the food industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60: 273-297 Go to original source...
  21. Rauch J.E. (2001): Business and social networks in international trade. Journal of Economic Literature, 39: 1177-1203. Go to original source...
  22. Rose A.K. (2004): Do we really know that the WTO increases trade? American Economic Review, 94: 98-114. Go to original source...
  23. Svatoš M., Smutka L. (2009): Influence of the EU enlargement on the agrarian foreign trade development in member states. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 55: 233-249. Go to original source...
  24. Tang L. (2006): Communication costs and trade of differentiated goods. Review of International Economics, 14: 54-68. Go to original source...
  25. Vaněk J., Jarolímek J., Šimek P. (2008): Development of communication infrastructure in rural areas of the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54: 129-134. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.