Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2021, 67(7):266-276 | DOI: 10.17221/56/2021-AGRICECON

Inferring customer heterogeneity for rural tourism: A latent class approach based on a best-worst choice modellingOriginal Paper

Wookhyun An ORCID...*, Silverio Alarcón
Department of Agricultural Economics, Statistics and Business Management, School of Agricultural, Food and Biosystems Engineering, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain

This research aims to analyse customers' preference heterogeneity for rural tourism in Spain and explore their preferences' personal and socio-demographic factors. To achieve this purpose, latent class analysis with the best-worst choice modelling has been applied through conducting a survey on 452 customers in Madrid and Barcelona. The results show that there are five classes in the Spanish rural tourism market: 'all-around seeker', 'leisure activist', 'culture explorer', 'comfort-driven user', and 'basic value pursuer'. The contribution of this investigation is that it is the first study that applied the latent class analysis with best-worst choice modelling to explore customers' preference heterogeneity for rural tourism.

Keywords: customers' preference; heterogeneous choices; tourism experiences

Published: July 14, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
An W, Alarcón S. Inferring customer heterogeneity for rural tourism: A latent class approach based on a best-worst choice modelling. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2021;67(7):266-276. doi: 10.17221/56/2021-AGRICECON.
Download citation

References

  1. Aizaki H., Nakatani T., Sato K. (2014): Stated Preference Methods Using R. New York, USA, CRC Press: 1-233. Go to original source...
  2. An W., Alarcón S. (2020): Exploring rural tourism experiences through subjective perceptions: A visual Q approach. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 18: 1-16. Go to original source...
  3. An W., Alarcón S. (2021): From netnography to segmentation for the description of the rural tourism market based on tourist experiences in Spain. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19: 1-13. Go to original source...
  4. Albaladejo-Pina I.P., Díaz-Delfa M.T. (2005). Rural tourism demand by type of accommodation. Tourism Management, 26: 951-959. Go to original source...
  5. Albaladejo-Pina I.P., Díaz-Delfa M.T. (2009): Tourist preferences for rural house stays: Evidence from discrete choice modelling in Spain. Tourism Management, 30: 805-811. Go to original source...
  6. Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L. (2002): Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23: 421-446. Go to original source...
  7. Bujosa A., Riera A., Hicks R.L. (2010): Combining discrete and continuous representations of preference heterogeneity: A latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47: 477-493. Go to original source...
  8. Campón-Cerro A.M., Hernández-Mogollón J.M., Alves H. (2017): Sustainable improvement of competitiveness in rural tourism destinations: The quest for tourist loyalty in Spain. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6: 252-266. Go to original source...
  9. Chaminuka P., Groeneveld R.A., Selomane A.O., van Ierland E.C. (2012): Tourist preferences for ecotourism in rural communities adjacent to Kruger National Park: A choice experiment approach. Tourism Management, 33: 168-176. Go to original source...
  10. Eusébio C., Carneiro M.J., Kastenholz E., Figueiredo E., Soares da Silva D. (2017): Who is consuming the countryside? An activity-based segmentation analysis of the domestic rural tourism market in Portugal. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31: 197-210. Go to original source...
  11. Fernández-Hernández C., León C.J., Aranã J.E., Díaz-Pére F. (2016): Market segmentation, activities and environmental behaviour in rural tourism. Tourism Economics, 22: 1033-1054. Go to original source...
  12. Frochot I. (2005): A benefit segmentation of tourists in rural areas: A Scottish perspective. Tourism Management, 26: 335-346. Go to original source...
  13. Garrod B., Wornell R., Youell R. (2006): Re-conceptualising rural resources as countryside capital: The case of rural tourism. Journal of Rural Studies, 22: 117-128. Go to original source...
  14. Hearne R.R., Salinas Z.M. (2002): The use of choice experiments in the analysis of tourist preferences for ecotourism development in Costa Rica. Journal of Environmental Management, 65: 153-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Hearne R.R., Santos C.A. (2005): Tourists' and locals' preferences toward ecotourism development in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7: 303-318. Go to original source...
  16. Hynes S., Hanley N., Scarpa R. (2008): Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90: 1011-1027. Go to original source...
  17. Kemperman A. (2021): A review of research into discrete choice experiments in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on Discrete Choice Experiments in Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 87: 103-137. Go to original source...
  18. Kim D., Park B.-J.R. (2017): The moderating role of context in the effects of choice attributes on hotel choice: A discrete choice experiment. Tourism Management, 63: 439-451. Go to original source...
  19. Kim H.N. (2018): The economic valuation of change in the quality of rural tourism resources: Choice experiment approaches. Sustainability, 10: 1-17. Go to original source...
  20. Lane B., Kastenholz E. (2015): Rural tourism: The evolution of practice and research approaches - Towards a new generation concept? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23: 1133-1156. Go to original source...
  21. Louviere J.J., Street D., Burgess L., Wasi N., Islam T., Marley A.A.J. (2008): Modelling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information. Journal of Choice Modelling, 1: 128-164. Go to original source...
  22. Marley A.A.J., Louviere J.J. (2005): Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best-worst choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49: 464-480. Go to original source...
  23. Martins-Almeida A.M., Correia A., Pimpão A. (2014): Segmentation by benefits sought: The case of rural tourism in Madeira. Current Issues in Tourism, 17: 813-831. Go to original source...
  24. Molera L., Albaladejo-Pina I.P. (2007): Profiling segments of tourists in rural areas of South-Eastern Spain. Tourism Management, 28: 757-767. Go to original source...
  25. Notaro S., Grilli G., Paletto A. (2019): The role of emotions on tourists' willingness to pay for the Alpine landscape: A latent class approach. Landscape Research, 44: 743-756. Go to original source...
  26. Park D.B., Yoon Y.S. (2009): Segmentation by motivation in rural tourism: A Korean case study. Tourism Management, 30: 99-108. Go to original source...
  27. Polo Peña A.I., Frías Jamilena D.M., Rodríguez Molina M.Á., Rey Pino J.M. (2014): Online marketing strategy and market segmentation in the Spanish rural accommodation sector. Journal of Travel Research, 55: 362-379. Go to original source...
  28. Rid W., Ezeuduji I.O., Pröbstl-Haider U. (2014): Segmentation by motivation for rural tourism activities in the Gambia. Tourism Management, 40: 102-116. Go to original source...
  29. Ruiz-Real J.L., Uribe-Toril J., de Pablo Valenciano J., Gázquez-Abad J.C. (2020): Rural tourism and development: Evolution in scientific literature and trends. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research: 1-25. Go to original source...
  30. Sarrias M. (2016): Discrete choice models with random parameters in R: The Rchoice package. Journal of Statistical Software, 74: 1-31. Go to original source...
  31. Scarpa R., Notaro S., Louviere J., Raffaelli R. (2011): Exploring scale effects of best/worst rank ordered choice data to estimate benefits of tourism in alpine grazing commons. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93: 809-824. Go to original source...
  32. Shoji Y., Tsuge T. (2015): Heterogeneous preferences for winter nature-based tours in sub-frigid climate zones: A latent class approach. Tourism Economics, 21: 387-407. Go to original source...
  33. Vermunt J., Magidson J. (2016): Upgrade Manual for Latent GOLD 5.1. Belmont, MA, USA, Statistical Innovations Inc.: 1-17.
  34. Wu L., Zhang J., Fujiwara A. (2011): Representing tourists' heterogeneous choices of destination and travel party with an integrated latent class and nested logit model. Tourism Management, 32: 1407-1413. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.