Soil & Water Res., 2017, 12(4):220-228 | DOI: 10.17221/50/2016-SWR

Simulation study of anisotropic flow resistance of farmland vegetationOriginal Paper

Shengtang ZHANG, Yin LIU, Jingzhou ZHANG, Yuanchen LIU
Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, P.R. China

Farmland vegetation is commonly cultivated with uniform planting spacing and heights. The effect of these features on resistance to hydraulic erosion is unclear. Hydraulic model experiments with the angle between the crop rows and the water flow direction set at 15°, 30°, 45° or 90° were conducted to analyze variation in the law of water flow resistance under partial or complete submergence of the crop. Cultivation can impact the flow resistance on slopes and this effect was greater when the crop was partially submerged. When planting spacing, slope, and water depth were constant, the change of the water flow Darcy-Weisbach resistance coefficient f with crop row-water flow angle was f15° > f30° > f45° > f90°. This suggests that flow resistance of farmland vegetation is anisotropic. The water flow resistance coefficient of crops that were partly submerged increased with water depth, but decreased with water depth when the crop was completely submerged. At the critical change from partial submergence to complete submergence, the water flow resistance coefficient was the highest when water depth was equal to crop height. These results may be useful for optimizing farmland planting and soil and water conservation.

Keywords: hydraulic erosion; resistance coefficient; simulation experiment; vegetation resistance

Published: December 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ZHANG S, LIU Y, ZHANG J, LIU Y. Simulation study of anisotropic flow resistance of farmland vegetation. Soil & Water Res.. 2017;12(4):220-228. doi: 10.17221/50/2016-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Aberle J., Järvelä J. (2013): Flow resistance of emergent rigid and flexible floodplain vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 51: 33-45. Go to original source...
  2. Abrahams A.D., Parsons A.J., Wainwright J. (1994): Resistance to overland flow on semiarid grassland and shrubland hillslopes, Walnut Gulch, Southern Arizona. Journal of Hydrology, 156: 431-446. Go to original source...
  3. Busari A.O., Li C.W. (2016): Bulk drag of a regular array of emergent blade-type vegetation stems under gradually varied flow. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 12: 59-69. Go to original source...
  4. Di Cristo C., Iervolino M., Vacca A. (2012): Green's function of the linearized saint-venant equations in laminar and turbulent flows. Acta Geophysica, 60: 173-190. at tested angles were (greatest to least) f15° > f30° > Fathi-Moghadam M., Kashefipour M., Ebrahimi N., f45° > f90°. This relationship is valuable for optimizing Go to original source...
  5. Emamgholizadeh S. (2011): Physical and numerical the use of farmland planting to minimize surface modeling of submerged vegetation roughness in rivers runoff and reduce soil erosion. (2) Farmland with different planting directions can have significantly and flood plains. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16: 858-864. Go to original source...
  6. Hyväluoma J., Lilja H., Turtola E. (2013): An anisotropic flow-routing algorithm for digital elevation models. Computers & Geosciences, 60: 81-87. Go to original source...
  7. Ishikawa Y., Mizuhara K., Ashida S. (2000): Effect of density of trees on drag exerted on trees in river channels. Journal of Forestry Research, 5: 271-279. Go to original source...
  8. Jarvela J. (2002): Flow resistance of flexible and still vegetation: A flume study with natural plants. Journal of Hydrology, 269: 44-54. Go to original source...
  9. Kadlec R.H. (1990): Overland flow in wetlands: vegetation resistance. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 116: 691-706. Go to original source...
  10. Kateb H.E., Zhang H.F., Zhang P.C., Mosandl R. (2013): Soil erosion and surface runoff on different vegetation covers and slope gradients: A field experiment in Southern Shaanxi Province, China. Catena, 105: 1-10. Go to original source...
  11. Kim J., Ivanov V.Y., Katopodes N.D. (2012): Hydraulic resistance to overland flow on surfaces with partially submerged vegetation. Water Resources Research, 48: 10540-10558. Go to original source...
  12. Konečná J., Podhrázská J., Kučera J. (2014): Erosion processes and sediment transport during extreme rainfall-runoff events in an experimental catchment. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 23: 1195-1200.
  13. Konings A.G., Katul G.G., Thompson S.E. (2012): A phenomenological model for the flow resistance over submerged vegetation. Water Resources Research, 48: 02522-02530. Go to original source...
  14. Kubrak E., Kubrak J., Rowinski P. M. (2008): Vertical velocity distributions through and above submerged, flexible vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Research Science, 53: 905-920. Go to original source...
  15. Li G., Wang X., Zhao X., Huang E., Liu X., Cao S. (2013): Flexible and rigid vegetation in overland flow resistance. Transactions of the ASABE, 56: 919-926. Go to original source...
  16. Luhar M., Rominger J., Nepf H. (2008): Interaction between flow, transport and vegetation spatial structure. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 8: 423-439. Go to original source...
  17. Mathieu A., Joannon A. (2003): How farmers view their job in Pays de Caux, France Consequences for grassland in water erosion. Environmental Science and Policy, 6: 29-36. Go to original source...
  18. Nehal L., Yan Z.M., Xia J.H. (2005): Study of the flow through non-submerged vegetation. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 17: 498-502.
  19. Nepf H., Ghisalberti M., White B., Murphy E. (2007): Retention time and dispersion associated with submerged aquatic canopies. Water Resources Research, 43: 1-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Noarayanan L., Murali K., Sundar V. (2012): Manning's 'n' co-efficient for flexible emergent vegetation in tandem configuration. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 6: 51-62. Go to original source...
  21. Park J.H., Meusburger K., Jang I.Y., Kang H., Alewell C. (2014): Erosion-induced changes in soil biogeochemical and microbiological properties in Swiss Alpine grasslands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 69: 382-392. Go to original source...
  22. Roche N., Daiän J.F., Lawrence D.S.L. (2007): Hydraulic modeling of runoff over a rough surface under partial inundation. Water Resources Research, 43: 8410-8420. Go to original source...
  23. Sepaskhah A.R., Shaabani M. K. (2007): Infiltration and hydraulic behaviour of an anguiform furrow in heavy texture soils of Iran. Biosystems Engineering, 98: 248-256. Go to original source...
  24. Stone B.M., Shen H.T. (2002): Hydraulic resistance of flow in channels with cylindrical roughness. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128: 500-506. Go to original source...
  25. Takken I., Govers G. (2001): Effects of tillage on runoff and erosion patterns. Soil & Tillage Research, 61: 55-60. Go to original source...
  26. Tang H.W., Tian Z.J., Yan J., Yuan S.Y. (2014): Determining drag coefficients and their application in modelling of turbulent flow with submerged vegetation. Advances in Water Resources, 69: 134-145. Go to original source...
  27. Västilä K., Järvelä J., Aberle J. (2013): Characteristic reference areas for estimating flow resistance of natural foliated vegetation. Journal of Hydrology, 492: 49-60. Go to original source...
  28. Velasco D., Bateman A., Redondo J.M., Demedina V. (2003): An open channel flow experimental and theoretical study of resistance and turbulent characterization over flexible vegetated linings. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 70: 69-88. Go to original source...
  29. Verschoren V., Meire D., Schoelynck J., Buis K., Bal K.D., Troch P., Meire P., Temmerman S. (2016): Resistance and reconfiguration of natural flexible submerged vegetation in hydrodynamic river modelling. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 16: 245-265. Go to original source...
  30. Ye C., Liu X.N., Wang X.K. (2015): Effects of roughness elements distribution on overland flow resistance. Journal of Mountain Science, 12: 1145-1156. Go to original source...
  31. Zhang S.T., Liu Y., Li M.M., Liang B. (2016): Distributed hydrological models for addressing effects of spatial variability of roughness on overland flow. Water Science and Engineering, 9: 249-255 Go to original source...
  32. Zhang X., Yu G.Q., Li Z.B., Li P. (2014): Experimental study on slope runoff, erosion and sediment under different vegetation types. Water Resources Management, 28: 2415-2433. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.