Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2007, 52(3):77-82 | DOI: 10.17221/2235-CJAS

Effects of goat social rank on kid gender

C. Tölü1, T. Savaº1, A. Pala1, H. Thomsen2
1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey
2 Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, Denmark

Mechanisms of gender ratio in progeny are complex and the fine details are still largely unknown, even in mammals. Though the 50% ratio of males and females is expected, various factors have been shown to be effective in diverting the ratio from the expected. In this study, dominance index, effects of sire, age of dam, birth type and year of birth on the gender ratio of Turkish Saanen goat kids were investigated in a full model. The analysis indicated that dominance index (DI) of the dam had a significant influence on the gender ratio of kids (P = 0.036). Certain sires tended to father female descendants repeatedly and the dams with high dominance index gave birth to male kids. Effects of sire on kid gender approached significance (P = 0.094). Age of dam, year and birth type were insignificant.

Keywords: goat; gender ratio; sire effect; age; birth typ

Published: March 31, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tölü C, Savaº T, Pala A, Thomsen H. Effects of goat social rank on kid gender. Czech J. Anim. Sci.. 2007;52(3):77-82. doi: 10.17221/2235-CJAS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Agresti A. (1992): A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Stat. Sci., 7, 131-177. Go to original source...
    2. Alvarez L., Martin G.B., Galindo F., Zarco L.A. (2003): Social dominance of female goats affects their response to the male effect. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 84, 119- 126. Go to original source...
    3. Andersson M. (1994): Sexual Selection. Monographs in behaviour and ecology. Princeton University Press.
    4. Andersson M., Schaar J., Wiktorsson H. (1984): Effects of drinking water flow rates and social rank on performance and drinking behaviour of tied-up dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci., 11, 599-610. Go to original source...
    5. Bansod R.S., Jagtap D.Z. (1992): Gender ratio of crossbred calves field and organised farm. Indian Vet. J., 69, 655- 656.
    6. Barroso F.G., Alados C.L., Boza J. (2000): Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: effect on food habits and production. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 69, 35-53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Belsare V.P., Singh V.P., Chourasia S.K., Singh N.P. (1993): Factors affecting secondary gender ratio in Friesian × Sahiwal crossbreds. Indian J. Anim. Reprod., 14, 124.
    8. Boesch C. (1997): Evidence for dominant wild female chimpanzees more in sons. Anim. Behav., 54, 811- 815. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Cameron E.Z., Linklater W.L., Stafford K.J., Veltman C. J. (1999): Birth gender ratios relate to mare condition at conception in Kaimanawa horses. Behav. Ecol., 10, 472-475. Go to original source...
    10. Çelik K., Serbest S., Vurur S., Pala A., Dağlioğlu K. (2003): Experiments to investigate the factors that affect the rate of gender constitution. Pak. J. Nutr., 2, 238-241. Go to original source...
    11. Chandler J.E., Steınholt-Chenevert H.C., Adkınson R.W., Moser E.B. (1998): Sex ratio variation between ejaculates within sire evaluated by polymerase chain reaction, calving, and farrowing records. J. Dairy Sci., 81, 1855-1867. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Clutton-Brock T.H., Iason G.R. (1986): Gender ratio variation in mammals. Q. Rev. Biol., 61, 339-374. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Clutton-Brock T.H., Albon S.D., Guinness F.E. (1984): Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer. Nature, 308, 358-360. Go to original source...
    14. Clutton-Brock T.H., Albon S.D., Guinness F.E. (1986): Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth gender ratio in Red deer. Nature, 308, 460-471. Go to original source...
    15. Cote S.D. (2000): Dominance hierarchies in female goats: stability, aggressiveness and determinants of rank. Behaviour, 137, 1541-1566. Go to original source...
    16. Cote S.D., Festa-Bianchet M. (2001a): Reproductive success in female goats: the influence of age and social rank. Behaviour, 62, 173-181. Go to original source...
    17. Cote S.D., Festa-Bianchet M. (2001b): Offspring sex ratio in relation to maternal age and social rank in mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 49, 260-265. Go to original source...
    18. Demirci E., Gür S. (1993): Effect of age, breeding year and gender of foetus on pregnancy length in Brown Swiss cows. Med. Sci. Mag., 7, 124-129.
    19. Gomendio M., Clutton-Brock T.H., Albon S.D., Guinness F.E., Simpson M.J. (1990): Mammalian gender ratios and variation in costs of rearing sons and daughters. Nature, 343, 261-263. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Górecki M.T. (2003): Sex ratio in litters of domestic pigs. Biol. Lett., 40, 111-118.
    21. Górecki M.T., Koscinski K. (2003): Offspring sex ratio in domestic goat (Capra hircus). Arch. Tierz., 46, 277- 284. Go to original source...
    22. Graves H.B., Hable C.P., Jenkins T.H. (1985): Effects of morphology and dominance on female spatial behaviour. Behav. Proc., 11, 189-197. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Gray E., Katanbaf M.N. (1985): Gender ratio and distribution of genders in swine. J. Hered., 76, 36-38. Go to original source...
    24. Grech V., Vassallo-Agius P., Savona-Ventura C. (2003): Secular trends in gender ratios at birth in North America and Europe over the second half of the 20th century. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 57, 612-615. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Harman S.M., Danner R.L., Roth G.S. (1978): Testosterone secretion in the rat in response to chorionic gonadotrophin: alterations with age. Endocrinology, 102, 540-544. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Hewison A.J.M., Andersen R., Gaillard J.M., Linnell J. D.C., Delorme D. (1999): Contradictory findings in studies of sex ratio variation in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 45, 339-348. Go to original source...
    27. Hohenboken W.D., Seifert G.W., Aspden W.J. (1987): Genetic and environmental influences on offspring gender ratio and neonatal survival in Bos Induces × Bos Taurus cattle. J. Anim. Brit. Genet., 104, 309-316. Go to original source...
    28. Jacobsen R., Moller H., Mouritsen A. (1999): Natural variation in the human gender ratio. Hum. Reprod., 14, 3120-3125. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Karaa g aç F., Özcan M., Savaş T. (2003): Verlauf von aggressivem Picken and einigen Verhaltensmerkmalen in rangordnungsinstabilen Käfiggruppen bei Legehennen. Arch. Tierz., 46, 391-396. Go to original source...
    30. Kojola I. (1997): Social status and physical condition of mother and sex ratio of offspring in cervids. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 51, 267-274. Go to original source...
    31. Kruuk L.E.B., Clutton-Brock T.H., Albon S.D., Pemberton J.M., Guinness F.E. (1999a): Population density affects gender ratio variation in Red deer. Nature, 399, 459- 461. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. Kruuk L.E.B., Clutton-Brock T.H., Rose K.E., Guinness F.E. (1999b): Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in Red deer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, 266, 1655-1661. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Kumar A., Lavania G.S., Lathwal S.S. (1992): Gender ratio in crossbred cattle. Indian J. Anim. Res., 26, 25-28.
    34. Lamprecht J. (1986): Structure and causation of the dominance hierarchy in a flock of bar-headed geese (Anserindicus). Behaviour, 96, 28-48. Go to original source...
    35. Lindström J., Coulson T., Kruuk L., Forchhammer M.C., Coltman D.W., Clutton-Brock T. (2002): Sex ratio variation in Soay sheep. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 53, 2530. Go to original source...
    36. Mosley C.J. (1999): Influence of social dominance on habitat selection by free-ranging ungulates. In: Launchbaugh K., Sanders K., Mosley J. (eds.): Proc. Grazing Behaviour of Livestock and Wildlife. Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Stn. Bull #70, Univ. ID. 23-24 March, 109-118.
    37. Orgeur P., Mimouni P., Sinoret J.P. (1990): The influence of rearing conditions on the social relationships of young male goats (Capra hircus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 27, 105-113. Go to original source...
    38. Parazzini F., Carlo L.V., Levi F., Fransceschi S. (1998): Trends in male: female ratio among newborn infants in 29 countries from five continents. Hum. Reprod., 13, 1394-1396. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    39. Phillips C.J.C., Rind M.I. (2002): The Effects of social dominance on the production and behavior of grazing dairy cows offered forage supplements. J. Dairy Sci., 85, 51-59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    40. Pusey A., Williams J., Goodali J. (1997): The influence of dominance rank on the reproductive success of female chimpanzees. Science, 277, 828-831. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    41. SAS (1999): SAS OnlineDoc ®, Version 8, Cary, NC., USA.
    42. Sethi R.K., Rao M.K. (1981): Variation in gender ratio in dairy cattle. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 34, 454-456.
    43. Singh A., Kirmani M.A., Choudhary R.P. (1991): Factors affecting gender ratio in crossbred cattle. Indian Vet. J., 68, 282-285.
    44. Tölü C., Savaº T. (2003): Factors affecting rank-order development in goats. In: 2nd Joint Meeting of Departments of Animal Science of the Balkan Countries Associated with the 32 nd Annual Session of Scientific Communications of the Bucharest Faculty of Animal Science, 15-17 October, Romania.
    45. Tölü C., Savaº T. (2007): A brief report on intra-species aggressive biting in a goat herd. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 102, 124-129. Go to original source...
    46. Tomar S.S., Tripathi V.N. (1988): Inheritance of gender ration in murrah buffaloes. Indian Vet. J., 65, 687- 692.
    47. Trivers R.L., Willard D.E. (1973): Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179, 90-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    48. Weladji R.B., Holand R., Yoccoz N.G., Lenvik D. (2003): Maternal age offspring sex ratio variation in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Ann. Zool. Fenn., 40, 357-363.
    49. West S.A., Herre E.A., Sheldon B.C. (2000): The benefits of allocating gender. Science, 290, 288-290. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content