본문 바로가기
KCI 등재

‘노동’인가? ‘로동’인가? - 두음법칙 문제를 통해 본 남북 통합 시대의 새로운 어문규범의 방향에 대하여 -

The direction of the new norm of language in the era of the integration of South and North Korea - Focusing on the initial law -

한말연구
약어 : KLR
2020 no.58, pp.35 - 66
DOI : 10.16876/klrc.2020..58.35
발행기관 : 한말연구학회
연구분야 : 한국어와문학
Copyright © 한말연구학회
3 회 열람

This article examines what orthography should be like in the era of inter-Korean language integration, focusing on the initial law. For this purpose, first of all, I analyzed Kim Soo-kyung's 1947 paper published in the 『Rodong Newspaper』 , which not only triggered a change in orthography related to the initial law but also provided a theoretical basis for such change in North Korea. This will show what logic and grounds prompted them to first modify this part of the <Unification of Korean Orthography>(1933). In Chapter 3, I looked into why Joseoneo-hagheo (Korean Language Society) made such a rule through discussions on the orthography of the time. Finally, in chapter 4, I suggested in a experimetal form how to integrate the difference in orthography represented by the initial law in the era of inter-Korean integration. Being mindful that the morphism underlying <Unification of Korean Orthography>(1933) presupposed a homogeneous monolingual society, I looked for the direction of norms to be pursued amid the coexistence of disparate groups that differ in system and culture.

두음법칙, 표기법, 남북 언어통합, 김수경, <한글마춤법통일안>, 형태주의
the Initial Law, orthography, inter-Korean language integration, Kim Soo-kyung, <Unification of Korean Orthography>(1933), morphism