Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2009 Association between Ants and a Leafhopper (Cicadellidae: Idiocerinae) in the Central Brazilian Cerrado
Jonas Maravalhas, Helena C. Morais
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Associations between ants and Hemiptera are common in the families Membracidae, Coccoidea and Aphidoidea, but there are only a few cases of ants using honeydew of Cicadellidae species. We surveyed plants of Roupala montana Aubl. (Proteaceae) in the cerrado area (savanna like vegetation) in the Federal District (Brazil) during the rainy season of 2006 and 2007. In this period the plants produce new leaves, which are consumed by the nymphs of a probable new species of Rotundicerus (Cicadellidae: Idiocerinae). The nymph groups are of variable size, with a mean of 20 individuals. We found 83% of them being tended by ants. A total of 21 ant species was documented, with predominance of Camponotus spp. and Cephalotes spp. There is a clear species turnover of ants on the nymph groups and attendance is not continuous in most of the cases, suggesting an opportunistic association between ants and Rotundicerus sp.

Translation by the authors.

Foliage-foraging ants use a wide range of plant resources (Rico-Gray et al. 1998) and hemipteran honeydew is the most commonly used food resource (Davidson et al. 2003). Ants play a major role in arboreal ecosystems, being highly biodiverse, resource-dominant and the primary arthropod predator (Hölldobler & Wilson 1990; Floren et al. 2002; Styrsky & Eubanks 2007).

Ant-hemipteran associations are mostly found within treehoppers (Auchenorrhyncha: Membracidae), coccids and aphids (Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea and Aphidoidea) (Hölldobler & Wilson 1990; Delabie 2001). Associations with leafhoppers (Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae) are not very common (Delabie 2001), and can occur indirectly, without contact between ants and the leafhoppers (Steiner et al. 2004), or directly, with changes in the leafhopper's behavior and honeydew release after ant request (Larsen et al. 1992; Moya-Raygoza & Nault 2000).

The Idiocerinae subfamily is one of the less studied among the Cicadellidae with 20 described genera, many of which are monotypic. The genus Rotundicerus Maldonado-Capriles has three described species (Lozada-Robles 2004) and R. minutus Dietrich has been found associated with ants (Dietrich & McKamey 1990).

In the cerrado vegetation of Central Brazil, Rotundicerus sp., probably a new species (G. Mejdalani, personal communication), uses Roupala montana Aubl. (Proteaceae) as host plants (Seyffarth 1996). Here we present information about this leafhopper's biology as well as the associated ant species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Area

The field work took place at the Fazenda Água Limpa (15°30′8-47°25′), an experimental and protected farm owned by the University of Brasilia, in the Federal District, Brazil. The altitude at the area varies between 1048 and 1160 m, with an annual average rainfall of 1416.8 mm (Coefficient of Variation = 19.9%; series from 1980 to 2004; RECOR Meteorological Station,  www.recor.org.br) and mean annual temperature of 22.3°C. The region is characterized by a very definite dry season, with the months between May to Sep receiving less than 7% of annual rainfall. The farm's natural vegetation has different phyto physiognomies (Oliveira Filho & Ratter 2002) with the predominance of cerrado sensu sticto, where the studies were done. Detailed information about the farm's vegetation can be found in Ratter (1980), Eiten (1984), and Felfili et al. (2000).

Host Plant

Roupala montana is an evergreen shrub, reaching up to 3 m high, and very common at the study area (Franco 1998). There is foliar asynchrony between plants of the same population, so there is flush and loss of leaves throughout the year, with a peak of leaf production in the transition between dry and rainy season (Sep and Oct) (Lenza & Klink 2006). Roupala montana also occurs in the borders of gallery forests at the Fazenda Água Limpa (Felfili & Abreu 1999).

Sampling

Weekly observations were conducted approximately between 9–11 am from Sep to Oct 2006 and Apr to Oct 2007, with the examination of R. montana individuals for the presence of Rotundicerus sp. and tending ants.

The presence of nymphs and the number of individuals per group was recorded. The presence of tending ants was recorded and the specimens were collected with an entomological aspirator and kept in plastic vials containing 70% alcohol.

In Nov 2006 and 2007 a 24-h monitoring was done on 7 chosen nymph groups of Rotundicerus sp., in order to record the ant species turnover. We selected 1 group per plant and the groups contained from 5 to 20 individuals.

Fig. 1.

Percentage of Roupala montana (Proteaceae) individuals, examined monthly in 2007, with the presence of new leaves and of Rotundicerus sp. (Cicadellidae, Idiocerinae) nymphs in a cerrado area of the Federal District, Brazil.

f01_563.eps

Adults and nymphs of Rotundicerus sp. were sent to Dr. Gabriel Mejdalani (Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro) for identification. The ants collected were identified by Dr. Jaques H. C. Delabie (Laboratório de Mirmecologia UESC/CEPLAC, Bahia).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Between Sep and Oct 2006, at the weekly samples of the beginning of the rainy season, 56 individuals of R. montana were examined of which 28.6% were infested by Rotundicerus sp., with a total of 116 groups of nymphs. Between Apr and Oct 2007, 360 plants were examined and 11% of them had groups of nymphs.

Although Rotundicerus sp. nymphs occur mainly in groups, some individuals were found alone. In 2006 a mean of 2.65 groups per plant was found (sd = 2.35; min = 1, max = 9) and each group had a mean of 19.4 nymphs (sd = 18.47; min = 1, max = 80). The groups are formed by nymphs of different instars and eventually some imagos. In some cases we observed the presence of an adult female together with the young nymphs, however no egg laying or egg masses were found. It is possible, as described for R. minutus (Dietrich & McKamey 1990), that eggs may be inserted almost completely into the stem or the leaf vein of the host plant, but we did not observe this.

TABLE 1.

FREQUENCY OF ANT SPECIES ASSOCIATED WITH GROUPS OF ROTUNDICERUS SP. NYMPHS COLLECTED IN 2006 AND 2007 DURING WEEKLY SAMPLING TRIPS IN A CERRADO AREA OF THE FEDERAL DISTRICT, BRAZIL.

t01_563.gif

Fig. 2.

A Camponotus crassus worker foraging honeydew from Rotundicerus sp. nymph (Cicadellidae, Idiocerinae) in a cerrado area of the Federal District, Brazil.

f02_563.eps

The occurrence of Rotundicerus sp. was concentrated in Oct when the host plants have the peak of leaf production (Fig. 1). Along with the monitoring made between Apr and Oct 2007, we observed a few groups of nymphs in other months, always on R. montana individuals that had young leaves. In the borders of a gallery forest groups of nymphs were observed between Sep 2007 and May 2008, always on young leaves. The observed exceptions were recorded in Jun in a nearby cerrado area, and in Apr and May in the border of a gallery forest where nymphs were feeding on inflorescences of R. montana. These observations suggest that Rotundicerus sp. have a defined reproductive season between Aug and Nov, together with the production of new leaves by the host plant, but can reproduce opportunistically whenever there is available food for the offspring.

Adults of Rotundicerus sp. were not found on R. montana during the rest of the year in the study site, suggesting that after the development of the nymphs on R. montana's young leaves the adults exploit another unknown host plant species.

Of a total of 66 plants examined in 2006 and 2007 with groups of the leafhopper, 83% had tending ants. We found 15 ant species associated with Rotundicerus sp. in the diurnal observations of 2006 and 2007 (Table 1). Camponotus crassus was the most frequent ant species found with the nymph (Fig. 2). A group of nymphs could be attended by more than one ant species at the same time, and this was observed twice, with Cephalotes liepini attending a Crematogaster victima dominated group, but without any agonistic interaction.

During the 24-h monitoring samples made in 2006 we recorded 9 ant species (Table 2 A). Only 1 group had ants in all the 12 periods. The other 6 groups had from 4 to 7 periods without ant presence. Another group had attendance of C. crassus on 6 consecutive periods, during the day. A similar result was obtained in 2007 (Table 2 B). With the exception of the groups attended by Azteca instabilis and Pheidole capillata, all the others had at least 4 periods of ant absence. Azteca instabilis species monopolizes the resource and exploit it continuously.

There is a clear ant species turnover during a day, so a single nymph group can be attended by 2 or more ant species in a 24-h period (Table 2). Camponotus atriceps, Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) sp. and Crematogaster evallans were the most frequent during the night and Camponotus crassus, Camponotus arboreus, Cephalotes pusillus, and Cephalotes depressus the most frequent during the day.

Altogether, we found 21 ant species associated with groups of nymphs of Rotundicerus sp., and the species composition, with predominance of Camponotus spp. and Cephalotes spp., is similar to that found in Membracidae and extrafloral nectaries ant associations in the cerrado (e.g., Oliveira et al. 1995; DelClaro & Oliveira 1999; Moreira & DelClaro 2005).

TABLE 2.

OCCURRENCE OF ANT SPECIES ASSOCIATED WITH SEVEN GROUPS OF ROTUNDICERUS SP. IN A 24-H OBSERVATION, IN NOV 2006 (A) AND 2007 (B) IN A CERRADO AREA OF THE FEDERAL DISTRICT, BRAZIL. PERIODS 18:30 TO 04:30 IN (A) AND 19:00 TO 05:00 IN (B) ARE NIGHT PERIODS. DURING PERIOD 01:00 AND 05:00 IN (B) NO COLLECTIONS WERE MADE DUE TO HEAVY RAIN.

t02a_563.gif

continued

t02b_563.gif

The Idiocerinae are phloem feeders and the nymphs of Rotundicerus sp. are gregarious and non-jumping. These characteristics help the association with ants (Delabie 2001), and it seems to be a characteristic of the genus (Dietrich & McKamey 1990).

Ant attendance to the nymphs most of the time is not continuous, and there is a temporal variation of the ant species associated to Rotundicerus sp. groups. This suggests that the ants explore Rotundicerus sp. nymph's honeydew opportunistically, contrasting with other ant-hemipteran associations. This characteristic makes this association interesting to compare costs and benefits to the involved species.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Thanks to Dr. Jacques Delabie for identification of ant species and to Dr. Gabriel Mejdalani for identification of the leafhopper; to Pedro A. S. Cirotto for information about nymphs on a forest edge; to the Postgraduate Ecology Program and technician Mardônio Timo (Department of Ecology) for support in field transportation; to the Universidade de Brasilia for infrastructure in the campus and in the Fazenda Agua Limpa, to PIC-UnBCNPq for the scientific initiation scholarship granted to J. Maravalhas; and to FINATEC for financial support.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

D. W. Davidson , S. C. Cook, R. R. Snelling , and T. H. Chua 2003 Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300: 969–972. Google Scholar

2.

J. H. C. Delabie 2001. Trophobiosis between Formicidae and Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): an overview. Neotropical Entomol. 30: 501–516. Google Scholar

3.

K. Del-Claro , and P. S. Oliveira 1999. Ant-Homoptera interactions in a Neotropical Savanna: the honeydew-producing treehopper, Guayaquila xiphias (Membracidae), and its associated ant fauna on Didymopanax vinosum (Araliaceae). Biotropica 31: 135–144. Google Scholar

4.

C. H. Dietrich , and S. H. McAmey 1990. Three new idiocerine leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) from Guyana with notes on ant-mutualism and subsociality. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 92:214–223. Google Scholar

5.

G. Eiten 1984. Vegetation of Brasilia. Phytocoenologia 12: 271–291. Google Scholar

6.

J. M. F. Felfili , and M. M. Abreu 1999. Regeneração natural de Roupala montana Aubl., Piptocarpha macropoda Back, e Persea fusca Mez. em quatro condições ambientais na mata de galeria do Gama-DF. Cerne 5: 125–132. Google Scholar

7.

J. M. Felfili , A. V. Rezende , M. C. Silva Jr. , and M. A. Silva 2000. Changes in the floristic composition of cerrado sensu stricto in Brazil over a nine-year period. J. Tropical Ecol. 16: 579–590. Google Scholar

8.

A. Floren , A. Biun , and K. E. Linsenmais 2002. Arboreal ants as key predators in tropical lowlands rainforest trees. Oecologia 131: 137–144. Google Scholar

9.

A. C. Franco 1998. Seasonal patterns of gas exchange, water relations and growth of Roupala montana, an evergreen savanna species. Plant Ecol. 136: 69–76. Google Scholar

10.

B. HÖlldobler , and E. O. Wilson 1990. The Ants. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. 732 pp. Google Scholar

11.

K. J. Larsen , S. E. Heady , and L. R. Nault 1992. Influence of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on honeydew excretion and escape behaviors in a myrmecophile, Dalbulus quinquenotatus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), and its congeners. J. Insect Behavior 5: 109–122. Google Scholar

12.

E. Lenza , and C. A. Klink 2006. Comportamento fenológico de espécies lenhosas em um cerrado sentido restrito de Brasília, DF. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 29: 627–638. Google Scholar

13.

P. Lozada-Robles 2004. Los Idiocerinae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) en la Región Neotropical. Resumos do III Encuentro Científico Internacional de Invierno (Peru), p. 14. Google Scholar

14.

V. S. S. Moreira , and K. Del-Claro 2005. The outcomes of an ant-treehopper association on Solanum lycocarpum St. Hill: increased membracid fecundity and reduced damage by chewing herbivores. Neotropical Entomol. 34: 881–887. Google Scholar

15.

G. Moya-Raygoza , and L. R. Nault 2000. Obligatory mutualism between Dalbulus quinquenotatus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and attendant ants. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 93: 929–940. Google Scholar

16.

A. T. Oliveira-Filho , and J. A. Ratter 2002. Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the Cerrado Biome, pp. 91–120. In P. S. Oliveira and R. J. Marquis [eds.], The Cerrados of Brazil. Columbia University Press, New York. 398 pp. Google Scholar

17.

P. S. Oliveira , C. Klitzke , and E. Vieira 1995. The ant fauna associated with the extrafloral nectaries of Ouratea hexasperma (Ochinaceae) in an area of cerrado vegetation in central Brazil. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 131: 77–82. Google Scholar

18.

J. A. Ratter 1980. Notes on the Vegetation of Fazenda Água Limpa (Brasília, DF, Brazil). Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh. 111 pp. Google Scholar

19.

V. Rico-Gray , J. G. Garcia-Franco , M. Palacios-Rios , C. Diaz-Castelazo, V. Parra-Tabla , and J. A. Navarro 1998. Geographical and seasonal variation in the richness of ant-plant interactions in Mexico. Biotropica 30:190–200. Google Scholar

20.

J. A. S. Seyffarth 1996. Interações entre homópteros, formigas e Roupala montana Aubl. Resumos do III Congresso de Ecologia do Brasíl (Brasília, DF), p. 339. Google Scholar

21.

F. M. Steiner , B. C. Schlick-Steiner, W. Holzinger , C. Komposch, S. Pazoutova , M. Sanetra , and E. Christian 2004. A novel relationship between ants and a leafhopper (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). European J. Entomol. 101: 689–692. Google Scholar

22.

J. D. Styrsky , and M. D. Eubanks 2007. Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proc. Royal Society B, London 274: 151–164. Google Scholar
Jonas Maravalhas and Helena C. Morais "Association between Ants and a Leafhopper (Cicadellidae: Idiocerinae) in the Central Brazilian Cerrado," Florida Entomologist 92(4), 563-568, (1 December 2009). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.092.0405
Published: 1 December 2009
KEYWORDS
Formicidae
Hemiptera
honeydew
Rotundicerus
Roupala
sap-sucking
Back to Top