Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-17T06:16:56.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collaboration and Concepts of Authorship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Lisa Ede  and
Andrea A. Lunsford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Cogito, ergo sum.

—Rene Descartes

I yam what I am.

—Ralph Ellison

Who am we?

—Sherry Turkle1

What does it mean to be an author? this question has been interrogated from just about every imaginable angle, as the status of the author has been problematized, deconstructed, and challenged to such an extent that discussions of the author problem now seem decidedly old-hat. Scholars now understand—in theory, at least—that the notion of author (like that of the founding or sovereign subject on which it depends) is a peculiarly modern construct, one that can be traced back through multiple and overdetermined pathways to the development of modern capitalism and of intellectual property, to Western rationalism, and to patriarchy. Foucault's assertion that “[t]he coming into being of the notion of ‘author’ constitutes the privileged moment of individualization in the history of ideas, knowledge, literature, philosophy, and the sciences” no longer surprises (141). The author, like the autonomous individual of Descartes's cogito, is, we understand with Raymond Williams, “a characteristic form of bourgeois thought” (192), one that Ralph Ellison parodies, for instance, when his protagonist, in a fleeting moment of self- and cultural integration, proclaims “I yam what I am” (260). The relentless intertextuality of Web culture, the rapid proliferation of multiple selves online, and the development of what Sherry Turkle has called “distributed selves” of postmodernity would seem to have moved us well beyond autonomous individualism (Life 14).

Information

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 116 , Issue 2 , March 2001 , pp. 354 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Acker, Kathy. “Dead Doll Prophecy.” The Subversive Imagination: Artists, Society, and Social Responsibility. Ed. Becker, Carol. New York: Routledge, 1994. 20–34.Google Scholar
Acker, Kathy. Don Quixote, Which Was a Dream. New York: Grove, 1984.Google Scholar
Acker, Kathy. I Dreamt I Became a Nymphomaniac!: Imagining. San Francisco: Empty Elevator Shaft Poetry, 1974.Google Scholar
Acker, Kathy. Pussy, King of the Pirates. New York: Grove, 1996.Google Scholar
Addison, Joanne. “Data Analysis and Subject Representation in Empowering Composition Research.” Written Communication 14 (1997): 106–28.10.1177/0741088397014001003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Pamela J. “Style as Politics: A Feminist Approach to the Teaching of Writing.” College English 47 (1985): 360–71.10.2307/376958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands / La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute, 1987.Google Scholar
Arac, Jonathan. “Shop Window or Laboratory: Collection. Collaboration, and the Humanities.” The Politics of Research. Ed. Kaplan, E. Ann and Levine, George. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1997. 116–26.Google Scholar
Barlow, John Perry. “The Next Economy of Ideas: Will Copyright Survive the Napster Bomb?” Wired Oct. 2000: 240–52.Google Scholar
Bartholomae, David. “Inventing the University.” When a Writer Can't Write: Studies in Writer's Block and Other Composing Process Problems. Ed. Rose, Mike. New York: Guilford, 1985. 134–65.Google Scholar
Bartholomae, David. “Writing with Teachers.” Villanueva 479–88.Google Scholar
Bartholomae, David, and Elbow, Peter. “Interchanges.” Villanueva 501–10.Google Scholar
Barton, Ellen. “More Methodological Matters: Against Negative Argumentation.” College Composition and Communication 51 (2000): 399–416.10.2307/358742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Derrick. Race, Racism, and American Law. 4th ed. New York: Aspen, 2000.Google Scholar
Berlin, James. Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges. 1900-1985. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi I. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Bishop, Wendy, ed. Elements of Alternate Style: Essays on Writing and Revision. Portsmouth: Boynton, 1997.Google Scholar
Bizzell, Patricia. Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1992.10.2307/j.ctt7zwb7kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleich, David, ed. Collaboration and Change in the Academy. Spec. issue of JAC 14.1 (1994): 1–316.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Ed. Jack Goody. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Bové, Paul. In the Wake of Theory. Hanover: UP of New England, 1992.Google Scholar
Boyle, James. Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Bridwell-Bowles, Lillian. “Discourse and Diversity: Experimental Writing within the Academy.” College Composition and Communication 43 (1992): 349–68.10.2307/358227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodkcy, Linda. Academic Writing as Social Practice. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Brodkcy, Linda. Writing Permitted in Designated Areas Only. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1996.Google Scholar
Brooke, Robert, Mirtz, Ruth, and Evans, Rick. Small Groups in Writing Workshops: Invitations to a Writer's Life. Urbana: NCTE. 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruffee, Kenneth. “Collaborative Learning and the ‘Conversation of Mankind.‘” College English 46 (1984): 635–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buranen, Lise, and Roy, Alice M., eds. Perspectives on Plagiarism and Intellectual Property in a Postmodern World. Albany: State U of New York P, 1999.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, and Scott, Joan W., eds. Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Caesar, Terry. Conspiring with Forms: Life in Academic Texts. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1992.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Christian, Barbara. “The Race for Theory.” Feminist Studies 14 (1988): 67–79.10.2307/3177999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clanchy, Michael T. From Memory to Written Record: England, 1066-1307. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. Rhetorical Spaces: Essays on Gendered Locations. New York: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Collective, Combahee River. “A Black Feminist Statement.” This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. Ed. Moraga, Cherríe and Anzaldúa, Gloria. New York: Kitchen Table, 1981. 210–18.Google Scholar
Community Literacy Center. English Dept., Carnegie Mellon U. 7 Sept. 2000 <http://English.cmu.edu/clc/>..>Google Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary J. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law. Durham: Duke UP, 1998.10.1215/9780822382492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Creative Collaboration: Alternatives to the Adversarial Academy.” Presidential Forum. MLA Convention. Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, Washington. 27 Dec. 2000.Google Scholar
Cross, Geoffrey. Collaboration and Conflict: A Conceptual Exploration of Group Writing and Positive Emphasis. Cresskill: Hampton, 1994.Google Scholar
Crowley, Sharon. Composition in the University: Historical and Polemical Essays. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, Helen. Co-authoring in the Classroom: Creating an Environment for Effective Collaboration. Urbana: NCTE, 1997.Google Scholar
David, Damrosch. We Scholars: Changing the Culture of the University. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1995.Google Scholar
Davidson, Cathy. “What If Scholars in the Humanities Worked Together, in a Lab?” Chronicle of Higher Education 28 May 1999: B4-5.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences. Online Literature Library. 9 Sept. 2000 <http://www.literature.org/authors/descartes-rene/reason-discourse/chapter-04.html>..>Google Scholar
Dyson, Esther. “Intellectual Value.” Wired July 1995: 136+.Google Scholar
Ede, Lisa, and Lunsford, Andrea A. Singular Texts / Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Elbow, Peter. “Being a Writer vs. Being an Academic.” Villanueva 489–500.Google Scholar
Ellison, Ralph. The Invisible Man. New York: Vintage, 1972.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West. Berkeley: U of California P, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, Linda. The Construction of Negotiated Meaning: A Social Cognitive Theory of Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Flynn, Elizabeth. “Composing as a Woman.” College Composition and Communication 39 (1988): 423–35.10.2307/357697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, Janis, ed. New Visions of Collaborative Writing. Portsmouth: Boynton, 1992.Google Scholar
Foss, Sonja, and Griffin, Cindy. “Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric.” Communication Monographs 62 (1995): 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Poststructuralist Criticism. Ed. Harari, Josué V. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1979. 141–60.Google Scholar
Frey, Olivia. “Beyond Literary Darwinism: Women's Voices and Critical Discourse.” College English 52 (1990): 507–26.10.2307/377539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuss, Diana. Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature, and Difference. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane, Hirsch, Marianne, and Miller, Nancy K. “Criticizing Feminist Criticism.” Hirsch and Keller 349–69.Google Scholar
Gates, Henry Louis. The Signifying Monkey. New York: Oxford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. “Common Sense as a Cultural System.” Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic, 1983. 73–93.Google Scholar
Gere, Anne. Intimate Practices: Literary and Cultural Work in U.S. Women's Clubs, 1880-1920. Chicago: U of Illinois P, 1997.Google Scholar
Gere, Anne. Writing Groups: History, Theory, and Implications. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald. “Two Cheers for the Argument Culture.” Hedgehog Review 2 (2000): 53–71.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. The Labyrinths of Literacy: Reflections on Literacy Past and Present. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1995.10.2307/j.ctvthhc29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinier, Lani. The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. New York: Free, 1994.Google Scholar
Harkin, Patricia, and Schilb, John, eds. Contending with Words: Composition and Rhetoric in a Postmodern Age. New York: MLA, 1991.Google Scholar
Harris, Joseph. “Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss: Class Consciousness in Composition.” College Composition and Communication 52 (2000): 43–68.10.2307/358543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Joan E., and Messer-Davidow, Ellen, eds. (En)Gendering Knowledge: Feminists in Academe. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1991.Google Scholar
Heath, Shirley Brice, dir. ArtShow: Youth and Community Development. Alweis Productions, 2000.Google Scholar
Heilemann, John. “David Boies: The Wired Interview.” Wired Oct. 2000: 254–59.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Marianne, and Keller, Evelyn Fox, eds. Conflicts in Feminism. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. Boston: South End, 1989.Google Scholar
Howard, Rebecca. Standing in the Shadows of Giants: Plagiarists, Authors, Collaborators. Norwood: Ablex, 1999.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. “Presidential Address 2000.” PMLA 116.3 (2001): forthcoming.Google Scholar
IText Working Group. “A Project to Define Future Directions for Research on the Relationship between Information Technology and Writing.” Unpublished paper, 2000.Google Scholar
Jaszi, Peter. “On the Author Effect: Contemporary Copyright and Collective Creativity.” Woodmansee and Jaszi 29–56.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Carey, and Rose, Ellen Cronan. “Strange Bedfellows: Feminist Collaboration.” Signs 18 (1993): 547–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kecht, Maria-Regina, ed. Pedagogy Is Politics: Literary Theory and Critical Teaching. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1992.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Gesa, and Mortensen, Peter, eds. Ethics and Representation in Qualitative Studies of Literacy. Urbana: NCTE, 1996.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Gesa, and Ritchie, Joy. “Beyond the Personal: Theorizing a Politics of Location in Composition Research.” College Composition and Communication 46 (1995): 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, Holly. “Preface to On Collaborations I.” Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature 13.2 (1994): 231–33.Google Scholar
Laird, Holly. Women Coauthors. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2000.Google Scholar
Lay, Mary M., and Karis, William M., eds. Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigations in 'Theory and Practice. Austin: Baywood, 1991.Google Scholar
LeFevre, Karen Burke. Invention as a Social Act. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1987.Google Scholar
LeFevre, Karen Burke. “The Tell-Tale ‘Heart’: Determining ‘Fair Use’ of Unpublished Texts.” Law and Contemporary Problems 55.2 (1992): 153–83.Google Scholar
London, Bette. Writing Double: Women's Literary Partnerships. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Loomba, Ania. “Overworlding the ‘Third World.‘” Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory. Ed. Williams, Patrick and Chrisman, Laura. New York: Columbia UP, 1994. 305–23.Google Scholar
Lucas, Christopher J. Crisis in the Academy: Rethinking Higher Education in America. New York: St. Martin's, 1996.Google Scholar
Lugones, María “Playfulness, ‘World’ Traveling, and Loving Perception.” Hypatia 2.2 (1987): 3–19.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01062.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunsford, Andrea Abernathy. “Rhetoric, Feminism, and the Politics of Ownership.” College English 61 (1999): 529–44.10.2307/378972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Charles. “The Heavenly Jukebox.” Atlantic Sept. 2000: 39–59.Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey. Textual Intercourse: Collaboration, Authorship, and Sexualities in Renaissance Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997.Google Scholar
McKay, Nellie. Statement. 1997 MLA Elections Candidate Information Booklet. New York: MLA, 1997. 5.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Françoise. Hot Property: The Stakes and Claims of Literary Originality. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1994.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy K. Getting Personal: Feminist Occasions and Other Autobiographical Acts. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard E. “The Nervous System.” College English 58 (1996): 265–86.10.2307/378712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Susan. Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP. 1991.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. “On Race and Voice: Challenges for Liberal Education in the 1990s.” Between Borders: Pedagogy and the Politics of Cultural Studies. Ed. Giroux, Henry A. and McLaren, Peter. New York: Routledge, 1994. 145–66.Google Scholar
Orlando Project: An Integrated History of Women's Writing in the British Isles. English Dept., U of Alberta. 5 Sept. 2000 <http://www.ualberta.ca/ORLANDO/orlando.htm>..' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Orlando+Project:+An+Integrated+History+of+Women's+Writing+in+the+British+Isles.+English+Dept.,+U+of+Alberta.+5+Sept.+2000+.>Google Scholar
Pareles, Jon. “Envisaging the Industry as the Loser on Napster.” New York Times on the Web 14 Feb. 2001: 2 pp. 3 Mar. 2001 <http://www.nylimes.com/2001/02/14/tethnology/14NOTE.html>..>Google Scholar
Peck, Elizabeth G., and Mink, JoAnna Stephens, eds. Common Ground: Feminist Collaboration in the Academy. Albany: State U of New York P, 1998.Google Scholar
“Peer Review.” Chronicle of Higher Education 8 Sept. 2000: A12.Google Scholar
Porter, James E. “Liberal Individualism and Internet Policy: A Communitarian Critique.” Passions. Pedagogies, and Twenty-First Century Technologies. Ed. Hawisher, Gail and Selfe, Cynthia. Logan: Utah State UP, 1999. 231–48.Google Scholar
Porter, James E. Rhetorical Ethics and Internelworked Writing. Greenwich: Ablex, 1998.Google Scholar
Readings, Bill. The University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Reagan, Sally Barr, Fox, Thomas, and Bleich, David, eds. Writing With: New Directions in Collaborative Teaching, Learning, and Research. Albany: State U of New York P, 1994.Google Scholar
Reither, James A., and Vipond, Douglas. “Writing as Collaboration.” College English 51 (1989): 855–67.10.2307/378091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roen, Duane H., and Mittan, Robert K. “Collaborative Scholarship in Composition: Some Issues.” Methods and Methodology in Composition Research. Ed. Kirsch, Gesa and Sullivan, Patricia A. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1992. 287–313.Google Scholar
Rose, Mark. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993.Google Scholar
Royster, Jacqueline Jones. Traces of a Stream: Literary and Social Change among African American Women. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royster, Jacqueline Jones. “When the First Voice You Hear Is Not Your Own.” College Composition and Communication 47 (1996): 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Jan Zlotnick, ed. Women/Writing/Teaching. Albany: State U of New York P, 1998.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. “‘Experience.‘” Butler and Scott 22–40.Google Scholar
Selfe, Cynthia L. Technology and Literacy in the Twenty-First Century: The Importance of Paying Attention. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Simpson, David. The Academic Postmodern and the Rule of Literature: A Report on Half-Knowledge. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995.Google Scholar
“Smith, Anna Deveare.” Current Biography Yearbook 1994. Ed. Graham, Judith. New York: Wilson, 1994.Google Scholar
Smith, Paul. Discerning the Subject. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1988.Google Scholar
Sosnoski, James J. Modern Skeletons in Postmodern Closets: A Cultural Studies Alternative. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1995.Google Scholar
Spear, Karen. Sharing Writing: Peer Response Groups in English Classes. Portsmouth: Boynton, 1988.Google Scholar
Spigelman, Candace. Across Property Lines: Textual Ownership in Writing Groups. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Stanford Bulletin 2000-01. Stanford: Stanford U, 2000.Google Scholar
Starkey, David, ed. Teaching Writing Creatively. Portsmouth: Boynton, 1998.Google Scholar
Susan, Stewart. Crimes of Writing: Problems in the Containment of Representation. New York: Oxford UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Patricia. “Revising the Myth of the Independent Scholar.” Reagan, Fox, and Bleich 11–30.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Patricia A., and Qualley, Donna J. Pedagogy in the Age of Politics: Writing and Reading (in) the Academy. Urbana: NCTE, 1994.Google Scholar
Tompkins, Jane. “Me and My Shadow.” New Literary History 19 (1987): 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimbur, John. “Agency and the Death of the Author: A Partial Defense of Modernism.” JAC 20 (2000): 283–98.Google Scholar
Trimbur, John. “Collaborative Learning and Teaching Writing.” Perspectives on Research and Scholarship in Composition. Ed. McClelland, Ben W. and Donovan, Timothy R. New York: MLA, 1985. 87–109.Google Scholar
Trimbur, John, and Braun, Lundy. “Lab Life and the Determination of Authorship.” Forman 19–36.Google Scholar
Trinh T., Minh-ha Woman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon, 1995.Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. “Who Am We?” Wired Jan. 1996: 148+.Google Scholar
Villanucva, Victor, ed. Cross-Talk in Comp Theory. Urbana: NCTE, 1997.Google Scholar
Walker, Cheryl. “Feminist Literary Criticism and the Author.” Critical Inquiry 16 (1990): 551–71.10.1086/448546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Evan. Work Time: English Departments and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Welch, Kathleen. Electric Rhetoric: Classical Rhetoric, Oralism, and a New Literacy. Cambridge: MIT P, 1999.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Winter, Jay. “Doing Public History: Producing The Great War for PBS and BBC.” Presidential Forum. MLA Convention. San Francisco Hilton Hotel. San Francisco. 27 Dec. 1998.Google Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha. “The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the ‘Author.‘” Eighteenth Century Studies 17 (1984): 425–48.10.2307/2738129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha, and Jaszi, Peter, eds. The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. Durham: Duke UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Yancey, Kathleen Blake, and Spooner, Michael. “A Single Good Mind: Collaboration, Cooperation, and the Writing Self.” College Composition and Communication 49 (1998): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zawacki, Tery Myers. “Recomposing as a Woman—An Essay in Different Voices.” College Composition and Communication 43 (1992): 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar